# Context Creation Accuracy Improvements ## Problem Addressed Issue #48 reported that `/context:create` generates inaccurate information, including hallucinated APIs, patterns, and structures that don't exist in the actual codebase. ## Solution Implemented Enhanced both `/context:create` and `/context:update` commands with comprehensive accuracy safeguards and self-verification mechanisms. ## Key Improvements ### 1. Pre-Analysis Verification Phase Added mandatory verification step before any context creation: ```markdown ### 2.5. Verification and Accuracy Phase **CRITICAL: Before writing any context files, you MUST:** 1. **Evidence-Based Analysis Only** - Only document patterns you can directly observe in the codebase - Never assume or infer functionality that isn't explicitly present - If uncertain about a pattern, use cautious language: "appears to", "likely", "potentially" 2. **Self-Verification Questions** - Before writing about any architectural pattern: "Can I point to specific files that demonstrate this?" - Before documenting any API or interface: "Have I actually seen this implemented in the code?" - Before describing any workflow: "Is this based on actual code or am I inferring?" ``` ### 2. Mandatory Accuracy Validation Added post-creation accuracy checks for every context file: ```markdown ### 4.5. Accuracy Validation **MANDATORY: After writing each context file, perform this self-check:** 1. **Evidence Verification** - Can I point to specific files/directories that support each claim? - Have I avoided making up APIs, patterns, or structures that don't exist? - Are all technical details based on actual code inspection? 2. **Assumption Flagging** - Have I clearly marked any assumptions with warning flags? - Did I use appropriate confidence levels and qualifying language? - Are uncertain statements properly disclaimed? ``` ### 3. Required Disclaimers and Warnings Enhanced user awareness with explicit accuracy warnings: ```markdown ⚠️ IMPORTANT ACCURACY NOTICE: - Context analysis is AI-generated and may contain inaccuracies - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before using for development - Look for ⚠️ assumption flags and verify uncertain claims - Cross-reference technical details with actual codebase ``` ### 4. Conservative Update Approach For context updates, implemented evidence-based modification standards: ```markdown 1. **Conservative Update Approach** - Only update information you can directly verify in the codebase - Preserve existing accurate information rather than making uncertain changes - When evidence is unclear, add cautionary notes rather than definitive statements ``` ## Specific Accuracy Mechanisms ### Self-Verification Questions - "Can I point to specific files that demonstrate this?" - "Have I actually seen this implemented in the code?" - "Is this based on actual code or am I inferring?" ### Uncertainty Flags - `⚠️ Assumption - requires verification` - `⚠️ This is an assumption and should be verified` - `⚠️ Verify - [specific item to check]` ### Qualifying Language - "appears to", "likely", "potentially" - "Based on analysis of [specific files]" - "High confidence", "Medium confidence", "Low confidence - verify" ### Evidence Requirements - File/directory references for all technical claims - Specific code locations supporting patterns - Cross-references to actual implementation ## Expected Results These improvements should significantly reduce context creation inaccuracies by: 1. **Forcing evidence-based analysis** instead of inference 2. **Adding multiple verification checkpoints** throughout the process 3. **Requiring explicit uncertainty flagging** for assumptions 4. **Providing clear user warnings** about manual review requirements 5. **Establishing conservative update practices** for ongoing maintenance ## Testing Recommendation Users should test the enhanced context creation on complex codebases and compare accuracy with previous versions. The new system should produce more conservative, evidence-based context with appropriate uncertainty flags.