Files
claude-cookbooks/tool_evaluation/tool_evaluation.ipynb
2025-09-10 23:43:39 +00:00

1244 lines
53 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

{
"cells": [
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"# Tool Evaluation\n",
"\n",
"Multiple agents independently run a single evaluation task from an evaluation file."
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": 1,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"import json\n",
"import re\n",
"import time\n",
"import traceback\n",
"import xml.etree.ElementTree as ET\n",
"from pathlib import Path\n",
"from typing import Any, Dict, List, Tuple\n",
"\n",
"from anthropic import Anthropic"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"## Prompts"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": 2,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"# Embedded evaluator prompt\n",
"EVALUATION_PROMPT = \"\"\"You are an AI assistant with access to tools.\n",
"\n",
"When given a task, you should:\n",
"1. Use the available tools to complete the task\n",
"2. Provide a reasoning of your approach wrapped in <reasoning> tags\n",
"3. Provide feedback on the tools wrapped in <feedback> tags\n",
"4. Provide your final response wrapped in <response> tags, last\n",
"\n",
"Important:\n",
"- Your response should be concise and directly address what was asked\n",
"- Always wrap your final response in <response> tags\n",
"- If you cannot solve the task return <response>NOT_FOUND</response>\n",
"- For numeric responses, provide just the number\n",
"- For IDs, provide just the ID\n",
"- For names or text, provide the exact text requested\n",
"- Your response should go last\n",
"\n",
"Reasoning Requirements:\n",
"- In your <reasoning> tags, explain:\n",
" - The steps you took to complete the task\n",
" - Which tools you used, in what order, and why\n",
" - The inputs you provided to each tool\n",
" - The outputs you received from each tool\n",
" - Your reasoning for how you arrived at the response\n",
"\n",
"Feedback Requirements:\n",
"- In your <feedback> tags, provide constructive feedback on the tools:\n",
" - Comment on tool names: Are they clear and descriptive?\n",
" - Comment on input parameters: Are they well-documented? Are required vs optional parameters clear?\n",
" - Comment on descriptions: Do they accurately describe what the tool does?\n",
" - Comment on any errors encountered during tool usage: Did the tool fail to execute? Did the tool return too many tokens?\n",
" - Identify specific areas for improvement and explain WHY they would help\n",
" - Be specific and actionable in your suggestions\"\"\""
]
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"## Agent Loop"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": 3,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"client = Anthropic()\n",
"model = \"claude-sonnet-4-20250514\"\n",
"\n",
"\n",
"def agent_loop(\n",
" prompt: str, tools: List[Dict[str, Any]] = None\n",
") -> Tuple[str, Dict[str, Any]]:\n",
" \"\"\"Simplified agent class for tool evaluation\"\"\"\n",
" messages = [{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": prompt}]\n",
"\n",
" response = client.messages.create(\n",
" model=model,\n",
" max_tokens=4096,\n",
" system=EVALUATION_PROMPT,\n",
" messages=messages,\n",
" tools=tools,\n",
" )\n",
"\n",
" messages.append({\"role\": \"assistant\", \"content\": response.content})\n",
"\n",
" # Track tool calls with timing\n",
" tool_metrics = {} # {tool_name: {\"count\": N, \"durations\": [X1, X2, ...]}}\n",
"\n",
" def _prepare_tool_result(tool_use_id, tool_result):\n",
" return {\n",
" \"role\": \"user\",\n",
" \"content\": [\n",
" {\n",
" \"type\": \"tool_result\",\n",
" \"tool_use_id\": tool_use_id,\n",
" \"content\": tool_result,\n",
" }\n",
" ],\n",
" }\n",
"\n",
" while response.stop_reason == \"tool_use\":\n",
" tool_use = next(block for block in response.content if block.type == \"tool_use\")\n",
" tool_name = tool_use.name\n",
"\n",
" tool_start_ts = time.time()\n",
" try:\n",
" tool_response = eval(\n",
" f\"{tool_name}(**tool_use.input)\"\n",
" ) # Call the tool function with its input\n",
" except Exception as e:\n",
" tool_response = f\"Error executing tool {tool_name}: {str(e)}\\n\"\n",
" tool_response += traceback.format_exc()\n",
" tool_duration = time.time() - tool_start_ts\n",
"\n",
" # Update tool metrics\n",
" if tool_name not in tool_metrics:\n",
" tool_metrics[tool_name] = {\"count\": 0, \"durations\": []}\n",
" tool_metrics[tool_name][\"count\"] += 1\n",
" tool_metrics[tool_name][\"durations\"].append(tool_duration)\n",
"\n",
" # Prepare tool result and append to messages\n",
" messages.append(_prepare_tool_result(tool_use.id, tool_response))\n",
" response = client.messages.create(\n",
" model=model,\n",
" max_tokens=4096,\n",
" system=EVALUATION_PROMPT,\n",
" messages=messages,\n",
" tools=tools,\n",
" )\n",
" messages.append({\"role\": \"assistant\", \"content\": response.content})\n",
"\n",
" response = next(\n",
" (block.text for block in response.content if hasattr(block, \"text\")),\n",
" None,\n",
" )\n",
" return response, tool_metrics"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"## Helper Functions"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": 4,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"def parse_evaluation_file(file_path: Path) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:\n",
" \"\"\"Parse XML evaluation file and return list of evaluation tasks.\"\"\"\n",
" try:\n",
" tree = ET.parse(file_path)\n",
" root = tree.getroot()\n",
" evaluations = []\n",
"\n",
" # Check for task elements\n",
" tasks = root.findall(\".//task\")\n",
" for task in tasks:\n",
" prompt_elem = task.find(\"prompt\")\n",
" response_elem = task.find(\"response\")\n",
"\n",
" if prompt_elem is not None and response_elem is not None:\n",
" eval_dict = {\n",
" \"prompt\": (prompt_elem.text or \"\").strip(),\n",
" \"response\": (response_elem.text or \"\").strip(),\n",
" }\n",
" evaluations.append(eval_dict)\n",
"\n",
" return evaluations\n",
" except Exception as e:\n",
" print(f\"Error parsing evaluation file {file_path}: {e}\")\n",
" return []"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": 5,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"def evaluate_single_task(\n",
" task: Dict[str, Any], tools: List[Dict[str, Any]], task_index: int\n",
") -> Dict[str, Any]:\n",
" \"\"\"Evaluate a single task with the given tools.\"\"\"\n",
" start_time = time.time()\n",
"\n",
" # Run the task\n",
" print(f\"Task {task_index + 1}: Running task with prompt: {task['prompt']}\")\n",
" response, tool_metrics = agent_loop(task[\"prompt\"], tools)\n",
"\n",
" # Extract all tagged content\n",
" def _extract_xml_content(text, tag):\n",
" pattern = rf\"<{tag}>(.*?)</{tag}>\"\n",
" matches = re.findall(pattern, text, re.DOTALL)\n",
" return matches[-1].strip() if matches else None\n",
"\n",
" response, reasoning, feedback = (\n",
" _extract_xml_content(response, tag)\n",
" for tag in [\"response\", \"reasoning\", \"feedback\"]\n",
" )\n",
" duration_seconds = time.time() - start_time\n",
"\n",
" return {\n",
" \"prompt\": task[\"prompt\"],\n",
" \"expected\": task[\"response\"],\n",
" \"actual\": response,\n",
" \"score\": int(response == task[\"response\"]),\n",
" \"total_duration\": duration_seconds,\n",
" \"tool_calls\": tool_metrics,\n",
" \"num_tool_calls\": sum(\n",
" len(metrics[\"durations\"]) for metrics in tool_metrics.values()\n",
" ),\n",
" \"reasoning\": reasoning,\n",
" \"feedback\": feedback,\n",
" }"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"## Main Evaluation Function"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": 6,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"# Report Templates\n",
"REPORT_HEADER = \"\"\"\n",
"# Evaluation Report\n",
"\n",
"## Summary\n",
"\n",
"- **Accuracy**: {correct}/{total} ({accuracy:.1f}%)\n",
"- **Average Task Duration**: {average_duration_s:.2f}s\n",
"- **Average Tool Calls per Task**: {average_tool_calls:.2f}\n",
"- **Total Tool Calls**: {total_tool_calls}\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\"\"\"\n",
"\n",
"TASK_TEMPLATE = \"\"\"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: {prompt}\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `{expected_response}`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `{actual_response}`\n",
"**Correct**: {correct_indicator}\n",
"**Duration**: {total_duration:.2f}s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {tool_calls}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"{reasoning}\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"{feedback}\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\"\"\"\n",
"\n",
"\n",
"def run_evaluation(eval_path: str, tools: List[Dict[str, Any]]) -> str:\n",
" \"\"\"\n",
" Run evaluation with provided tools using a simple loop.\n",
"\n",
" Args:\n",
" eval_path: Path to XML evaluation file\n",
" tools: List of tool definitions to use for evaluation\n",
"\n",
" \"\"\"\n",
" print(\"🚀 Starting Evaluation\")\n",
"\n",
" eval_file = Path(eval_path)\n",
"\n",
" # Parse evaluation tasks\n",
" tasks = parse_evaluation_file(eval_file)\n",
"\n",
" print(f\"📋 Loaded {len(tasks)} evaluation tasks\")\n",
"\n",
" # Simple loop to run all tasks\n",
" results = []\n",
" for i, task in enumerate(tasks):\n",
" print(f\"Processing task {i + 1}/{len(tasks)}\")\n",
" results.append(evaluate_single_task(task, tools, i))\n",
"\n",
" # Calculate summary statistics\n",
" correct = sum(r[\"score\"] for r in results)\n",
" accuracy = (correct / len(results)) * 100\n",
" average_duration_s = sum(r[\"total_duration\"] for r in results) / len(results)\n",
" average_tool_calls = sum(r[\"num_tool_calls\"] for r in results) / len(results)\n",
" total_tool_calls = sum(r[\"num_tool_calls\"] for r in results)\n",
"\n",
" report = REPORT_HEADER.format(\n",
" correct=correct,\n",
" total=len(results),\n",
" accuracy=accuracy,\n",
" average_duration_s=average_duration_s,\n",
" average_tool_calls=average_tool_calls,\n",
" total_tool_calls=total_tool_calls,\n",
" )\n",
"\n",
" report += \"\".join(\n",
" [\n",
" TASK_TEMPLATE.format(\n",
" prompt=task[\"prompt\"],\n",
" expected_response=task[\"response\"],\n",
" actual_response=result[\"actual\"],\n",
" correct_indicator=\"✅\" if result[\"score\"] else \"❌\",\n",
" total_duration=result[\"total_duration\"],\n",
" tool_calls=json.dumps(result[\"tool_calls\"], indent=2),\n",
" reasoning=result[\"reasoning\"] or \"N/A\",\n",
" feedback=result[\"feedback\"] or \"N/A\",\n",
" )\n",
" for task, result in zip(tasks, results)\n",
" ]\n",
" )\n",
" # Join all sections into final report\n",
" return report"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"## Calculator Tool"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": 7,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"def calculator(expression: str) -> str:\n",
" \"\"\"A basic calculator that performs arithmetic operations.\"\"\"\n",
" try:\n",
" result = eval(expression, {\"__builtins__\": {}}, {})\n",
" return str(result)\n",
" except Exception as e:\n",
" return f\"Error: {str(e)}\"\n",
"\n",
"\n",
"# Define the tool schema for the calculator\n",
"calculator_tool = {\n",
" \"name\": \"calculator\",\n",
" \"description\": \"A calculator.\", # An unhelpful tool description. \n",
" \"input_schema\": {\n",
" \"type\": \"object\",\n",
" \"properties\": {\n",
" \"expression\": {\n",
" \"type\": \"string\",\n",
" \"description\": \"A mathematical expression.\", # An unhelpful schema description.\n",
" }\n",
" },\n",
" \"required\": [\"expression\"],\n",
" },\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"# Set the tools list\n",
"tools = [calculator_tool]"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"## Run Evaluation"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": 8,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [
{
"name": "stdout",
"output_type": "stream",
"text": [
"✅ Using calculator tool\n",
"🚀 Starting Evaluation\n",
"📋 Loaded 20 evaluation tasks\n",
"Processing task 1/20\n",
"Task 1: Running task with prompt: How many days are between March 15, 2024 and September 22, 2025? Include both start and end dates in your count.\n",
"Processing task 2/20\n",
"Task 2: Running task with prompt: If a meeting starts at 11:45 AM and lasts for 2 hours and 37 minutes, what time does it end? Express in 24-hour format as HH:MM.\n",
"Processing task 3/20\n",
"Task 3: Running task with prompt: What is 2^100 mod 7? Give the exact integer result.\n",
"Processing task 4/20\n",
"Task 4: Running task with prompt: What day of the week will it be 1000 days from Monday?\n",
"Processing task 5/20\n",
"Task 5: Running task with prompt: Calculate 15! (15 factorial). Give the exact integer result.\n",
"Processing task 6/20\n",
"Task 6: Running task with prompt: How many different ways can you choose 5 items from a set of 12 items? (Calculate C(12,5))\n",
"Processing task 7/20\n",
"Task 7: Running task with prompt: Calculate sin(π/6) + cos(π/3) + tan(π/4). Give the exact value.\n",
"Processing task 8/20\n",
"Task 8: Running task with prompt: Solve for x: 2^x = 128. Give the exact integer value.\n",
"Processing task 9/20\n",
"Task 9: Running task with prompt: Calculate ln(e^3) + log₁₀(1000) - log₂(8). Give the exact value.\n",
"Processing task 10/20\n",
"Task 10: Running task with prompt: Calculate the determinant of the 2x2 matrix [[3, 7], [2, 5]].\n",
"Processing task 11/20\n",
"Task 11: Running task with prompt: What is the greatest common divisor (GCD) of 1071 and 462?\n",
"Processing task 12/20\n",
"Task 12: Running task with prompt: Is 97 a prime number? Answer 'true' or 'false'.\n",
"Processing task 13/20\n",
"Task 13: Running task with prompt: Calculate 42 XOR 15 (bitwise exclusive OR).\n",
"Processing task 14/20\n",
"Task 14: Running task with prompt: Calculate floor(7.8) × ceiling(2.1) + round(4.5).\n",
"Processing task 15/20\n",
"Task 15: Running task with prompt: Calculate the magnitude of the complex number 3 + 4i.\n",
"Processing task 16/20\n",
"Task 16: Running task with prompt: Convert the hexadecimal number FF to decimal.\n",
"Processing task 17/20\n",
"Task 17: Running task with prompt: Calculate the median of this dataset: [3, 7, 2, 9, 1, 5, 8].\n",
"Processing task 18/20\n",
"Task 18: Running task with prompt: Calculate the 10th Fibonacci number (where F(1)=1, F(2)=1).\n",
"Processing task 19/20\n",
"Task 19: Running task with prompt: What is 25% of 40% of 80% of 500?\n",
"Processing task 20/20\n",
"Task 20: Running task with prompt: Convert 72 degrees Fahrenheit to Celsius. Round to 1 decimal place.\n",
"\n",
"# Evaluation Report\n",
"\n",
"## Summary\n",
"\n",
"- **Accuracy**: 18/20 (90.0%)\n",
"- **Average Task Duration**: 12.82s\n",
"- **Average Tool Calls per Task**: 2.80\n",
"- **Total Tool Calls**: 56\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: How many days are between March 15, 2024 and September 22, 2025? Include both start and end dates in your count.\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `557`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `557`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 24.50s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 7,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 9.775161743164062e-05,\n",
" 8.893013000488281e-05,\n",
" 0.0001647472381591797,\n",
" 8.082389831542969e-05,\n",
" 8.058547973632812e-05,\n",
" 8.58306884765625e-05,\n",
" 7.414817810058594e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool worked well for this task. Here's my assessment:\n",
"\n",
"Tool name: \"calculator\" is clear and accurately describes the function.\n",
"\n",
"Input parameters: The \"expression\" parameter is well-documented and straightforward. It's clear that it expects a mathematical expression as a string, and the required parameter is clearly marked.\n",
"\n",
"Description: The description \"A calculator\" is accurate but quite brief. It could be more descriptive, such as \"A calculator that evaluates mathematical expressions\" to be more informative.\n",
"\n",
"Performance: The tool executed all calculations correctly without errors and returned appropriate numeric results. No token limit issues were encountered.\n",
"\n",
"Areas for improvement:\n",
"- The description could be more detailed to specify what types of mathematical operations are supported\n",
"- It would be helpful to know if there are any limitations on expression complexity or supported functions\n",
"- Examples of valid expressions in the description would make it more user-friendly\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: If a meeting starts at 11:45 AM and lasts for 2 hours and 37 minutes, what time does it end? Express in 24-hour format as HH:MM.\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `14:22`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `14:22`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 15.42s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 3,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 7.867813110351562e-05,\n",
" 7.557868957519531e-05,\n",
" 7.05718994140625e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool worked well for this time calculation problem. Here's my assessment:\n",
"\n",
"**Tool Name**: \"calculator\" - Clear and descriptive name that accurately reflects its function.\n",
"\n",
"**Input Parameters**: \n",
"- The \"expression\" parameter is well-documented as \"A mathematical expression\"\n",
"- It's properly marked as required\n",
"- The tool accepts standard mathematical expressions which is intuitive\n",
"\n",
"**Description**: The description \"A calculator\" is accurate but quite brief. It could be enhanced by mentioning it can handle basic arithmetic operations and mathematical expressions.\n",
"\n",
"**Tool Performance**: \n",
"- The tool executed all calculations correctly without errors\n",
"- It handled multi-step arithmetic expressions well\n",
"- Results were returned promptly with appropriate precision\n",
"- No token limit issues encountered\n",
"\n",
"**Areas for Improvement**:\n",
"- The description could be more detailed, such as \"A calculator that evaluates mathematical expressions including basic arithmetic operations (+, -, *, /), parentheses, and decimal numbers\"\n",
"- It would be helpful to know what mathematical functions are supported beyond basic arithmetic\n",
"- Information about precision limits or maximum expression complexity would be useful\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: What is 2^100 mod 7? Give the exact integer result.\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `2`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `2`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 6.92s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 1,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 7.939338684082031e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool worked well for this modular arithmetic problem. The tool name \"calculator\" is clear and descriptive. The input parameter \"expression\" is well-documented and allows for complex mathematical expressions including modular arithmetic operations. The description accurately describes the tool's purpose. The tool successfully handled the large exponentiation and modulo operation in a single expression, which is very convenient. No errors were encountered and the result was returned promptly.\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: What day of the week will it be 1000 days from Monday?\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `Wednesday`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `Sunday`\n",
"**Correct**: ❌\n",
"**Duration**: 10.90s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 1,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 6.914138793945312e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"The calculator shows that 1000 mod 7 = 6. This means that 1000 days from Monday will be 6 days after Monday in the weekly cycle.\n",
"\n",
"Starting from Monday and counting 6 days forward:\n",
"- Monday + 1 day = Tuesday\n",
"- Monday + 2 days = Wednesday \n",
"- Monday + 3 days = Thursday\n",
"- Monday + 4 days = Friday\n",
"- Monday + 5 days = Saturday\n",
"- Monday + 6 days = Sunday\n",
"\n",
"So 1000 days from Monday will be a Sunday.\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool worked well for this task. Here's my feedback:\n",
"\n",
"Tool name: \"calculator\" - Clear and descriptive name that accurately represents the function.\n",
"\n",
"Input parameters: The \"expression\" parameter is well-documented and appropriately named. It's clear that it expects a mathematical expression as a string. The requirement that it's a required parameter is also clear.\n",
"\n",
"Description: The description \"A calculator\" is very brief but functional. It could be slightly more descriptive, such as \"A calculator that evaluates mathematical expressions\" to be more informative about its capabilities.\n",
"\n",
"Performance: The tool executed successfully and returned the correct result for the modulo operation (1000 % 7 = 6). No errors were encountered.\n",
"\n",
"Areas for improvement: The description could be expanded to mention what types of mathematical operations are supported (arithmetic, modulo, etc.) to help users understand the tool's full capabilities.\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: Calculate 15! (15 factorial). Give the exact integer result.\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `1307674368000`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `1307674368000`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 10.77s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 2,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 7.414817810058594e-05,\n",
" 8.106231689453125e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool has some strengths and weaknesses:\n",
"\n",
"Strengths:\n",
"- The tool name \"calculator\" is clear and descriptive\n",
"- The parameter name \"expression\" is well-named and intuitive\n",
"- The description \"A mathematical expression\" is concise\n",
"- The parameter documentation clearly indicates it's a required string\n",
"\n",
"Weaknesses:\n",
"- The tool doesn't support factorial notation (!), which is a common mathematical operator\n",
"- The error message \"invalid syntax\" is not very helpful - it doesn't specify what syntax is supported or what went wrong\n",
"- The description could be more detailed about what mathematical operations and functions are supported\n",
"- There's no indication of the computational limits or precision of the calculator\n",
"\n",
"Suggestions for improvement:\n",
"- Add support for factorial notation (!) as it's a fundamental mathematical operation\n",
"- Provide more detailed error messages that explain what syntax is supported\n",
"- Expand the description to list supported operations (e.g., \"+, -, *, /, ^, !, sqrt(), etc.\")\n",
"- Include information about numerical precision and limits in the description\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: How many different ways can you choose 5 items from a set of 12 items? (Calculate C(12,5))\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `792`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `792`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 11.31s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 2,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 7.367134094238281e-05,\n",
" 8.177757263183594e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool has some limitations that could be improved:\n",
"\n",
"1. **Error handling**: The tool failed when I used factorial notation (12!) without providing a clear error message about what syntax is supported. A more descriptive error message would help users understand what mathematical expressions are valid.\n",
"\n",
"2. **Mathematical notation support**: The tool doesn't seem to support factorial notation (!), which is commonly used in combinatorics problems. Adding support for factorial operations would make the tool more versatile for mathematical calculations.\n",
"\n",
"3. **Function name**: \"calculator\" is clear and descriptive.\n",
"\n",
"4. **Parameter documentation**: The \"expression\" parameter is well-named and the description \"A mathematical expression\" is adequate, though it could be more specific about what syntax/operations are supported.\n",
"\n",
"5. **Alternative approach success**: The tool worked well when I broke down the combination formula into basic arithmetic operations, showing it can handle complex expressions when written in supported syntax.\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: Calculate sin(π/6) + cos(π/3) + tan(π/4). Give the exact value.\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `2`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `2`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 13.78s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 3,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 9.298324584960938e-05,\n",
" 8.034706115722656e-05,\n",
" 7.82012939453125e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool has some limitations that could be improved:\n",
"\n",
"1. **Tool name**: The name \"calculator\" is clear and descriptive.\n",
"\n",
"2. **Input parameters**: The \"expression\" parameter is well-named, but the documentation could be more specific about what mathematical functions and syntax are supported. It's unclear whether trigonometric functions like sin, cos, tan are available or what import syntax is allowed.\n",
"\n",
"3. **Description**: The description \"A mathematical expression\" is too vague. It should specify:\n",
" - What mathematical functions are supported (basic arithmetic, trigonometric, logarithmic, etc.)\n",
" - What syntax is expected (Python-like, standard mathematical notation, etc.)\n",
" - Whether imports are allowed or if functions need to be prefixed\n",
"\n",
"4. **Error handling**: The tool returned syntax errors when I tried to use trigonometric functions or import statements, but didn't provide guidance on correct syntax. Better error messages would help users understand the limitations.\n",
"\n",
"5. **Specific improvements needed**:\n",
" - Add built-in support for common mathematical functions (sin, cos, tan, log, sqrt, etc.)\n",
" - Clarify the supported syntax in the parameter description\n",
" - Provide examples of valid expressions\n",
" - If imports aren't supported, the tool should have pre-imported common math functions\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: Solve for x: 2^x = 128. Give the exact integer value.\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `7`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `7`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 14.76s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 4,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 9.036064147949219e-05,\n",
" 7.700920104980469e-05,\n",
" 7.200241088867188e-05,\n",
" 7.581710815429688e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool has some inconsistencies in how it handles exponentiation:\n",
"- The caret symbol (^) didn't work properly for exponentiation (2^7 returned 5 instead of 128)\n",
"- The pow() function is not defined\n",
"- The ** operator works correctly for exponentiation\n",
"\n",
"Tool name: \"calculator\" is clear and descriptive.\n",
"\n",
"Input parameters: The \"expression\" parameter is well-documented as \"A mathematical expression\" and it's clear that it's required.\n",
"\n",
"Description: The description \"A calculator\" is accurate but quite brief. It could be more helpful to specify what mathematical operations and syntax are supported.\n",
"\n",
"Areas for improvement:\n",
"1. The tool should consistently support standard mathematical notation like ^ for exponentiation\n",
"2. The description should specify which operators and functions are supported (e.g., +, -, *, /, **, etc.)\n",
"3. Error handling could be improved - when ^ didn't work as expected, it would be helpful to get an error message rather than an incorrect result\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: Calculate ln(e^3) + log₁₀(1000) - log₂(8). Give the exact value.\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `3`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `3`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 16.96s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 4,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 9.465217590332031e-05,\n",
" 9.083747863769531e-05,\n",
" 8.106231689453125e-05,\n",
" 7.939338684082031e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool has some limitations that became apparent during this task:\n",
"\n",
"**Tool Name**: The name \"calculator\" is clear and descriptive.\n",
"\n",
"**Input Parameters**: The \"expression\" parameter is well-documented as \"A mathematical expression\" and is clearly marked as required.\n",
"\n",
"**Functionality Issues**:\n",
"1. **Limited function support**: The calculator doesn't recognize common mathematical functions like ln, log, log10, or log2, which are standard in most mathematical contexts.\n",
"2. **No import capability**: The calculator cannot handle import statements like \"import math\" which would give access to logarithmic functions.\n",
"3. **Basic arithmetic only**: The tool appears to only support basic arithmetic operations (+, -, *, /, **) rather than advanced mathematical functions.\n",
"\n",
"**Suggestions for Improvement**:\n",
"1. **Expand function library**: Add support for common mathematical functions including ln(), log(), log10(), log2(), sin(), cos(), tan(), sqrt(), etc.\n",
"2. **Update description**: The description should specify what types of mathematical expressions are supported (e.g., \"A mathematical expression supporting basic arithmetic and common mathematical functions\").\n",
"3. **Provide examples**: Include examples in the description showing supported syntax and functions.\n",
"4. **Error handling**: Better error messages that suggest alternatives when unsupported functions are used.\n",
"\n",
"These improvements would make the calculator much more useful for mathematical problems involving logarithms, trigonometry, and other advanced functions.\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: Calculate the determinant of the 2x2 matrix [[3, 7], [2, 5]].\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `1`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `1`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 8.95s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 1,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 7.367134094238281e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool worked well for this task. Here's my assessment:\n",
"\n",
"**Tool Name**: \"calculator\" - Clear and descriptive, immediately conveys what the tool does.\n",
"\n",
"**Input Parameters**: \n",
"- The \"expression\" parameter is well-documented with a clear description \"A mathematical expression\"\n",
"- The parameter is properly marked as required, which is appropriate\n",
"- The parameter accepts string input, which works well for mathematical expressions\n",
"\n",
"**Description**: The description \"A calculator\" is accurate but quite brief. It could be more detailed about what types of expressions it supports.\n",
"\n",
"**Performance**: The tool executed successfully and returned the correct result (1) for the mathematical expression \"3*5 - 7*2\".\n",
"\n",
"**Areas for Improvement**:\n",
"- The tool description could be more comprehensive, specifying supported operations, syntax, or limitations\n",
"- It would be helpful to know if the calculator supports complex mathematical functions, parentheses, etc.\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: What is the greatest common divisor (GCD) of 1071 and 462?\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `21`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `21`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 18.60s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 4,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 8.058547973632812e-05,\n",
" 7.43865966796875e-05,\n",
" 7.62939453125e-05,\n",
" 7.390975952148438e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"I used the Euclidean algorithm to find the GCD of 1071 and 462:\n",
"\n",
"1. First, I tried using a gcd() function directly, but it wasn't available in the calculator\n",
"2. I then implemented the Euclidean algorithm manually:\n",
" - Step 1: 1071 % 462 = 147 (remainder when 1071 is divided by 462)\n",
" - Step 2: 462 % 147 = 21 (remainder when 462 is divided by 147) \n",
" - Step 3: 147 % 21 = 0 (remainder when 147 is divided by 21)\n",
" \n",
"Since the remainder is 0, the algorithm stops and the GCD is the last non-zero remainder, which is 21.\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool worked well for performing modular arithmetic operations needed for the Euclidean algorithm. However, there are some areas for improvement:\n",
"\n",
"Tool name: \"calculator\" is clear and descriptive.\n",
"\n",
"Input parameters: The \"expression\" parameter is well-documented as \"A mathematical expression\" and it's clear that it's required. However, it would be helpful to know what mathematical functions and operations are supported (e.g., does it support gcd(), sin(), cos(), etc.).\n",
"\n",
"Descriptions: The description accurately describes what the tool does, though it could be more specific about supported operations.\n",
"\n",
"Errors encountered: The gcd() function was not defined, which required me to implement the Euclidean algorithm manually using modular arithmetic. It would be beneficial if common mathematical functions like gcd(), lcm(), factorial(), etc. were built into the calculator.\n",
"\n",
"Specific improvements:\n",
"1. Include a list of supported mathematical functions in the parameter description\n",
"2. Add common mathematical functions like gcd(), lcm(), abs(), etc.\n",
"3. Consider providing examples of valid expressions in the parameter description\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: Is 97 a prime number? Answer 'true' or 'false'.\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `true`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `true`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 17.98s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 7,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 7.748603820800781e-05,\n",
" 7.200241088867188e-05,\n",
" 7.367134094238281e-05,\n",
" 7.62939453125e-05,\n",
" 8.58306884765625e-05,\n",
" 7.843971252441406e-05,\n",
" 7.653236389160156e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool worked well for this task. The tool name \"calculator\" is clear and descriptive. The input parameter \"expression\" is well-documented and makes it clear that mathematical expressions should be provided as strings. The tool handled basic modulo operations and exponentiation correctly.\n",
"\n",
"One minor issue encountered was that \"sqrt\" wasn't recognized as a function, but using \"**0.5\" for square root worked as an alternative. It would be helpful if the tool documentation mentioned which mathematical functions are available (like sqrt, sin, cos, etc.) or if common mathematical functions were supported by default.\n",
"\n",
"The tool provided accurate numerical results for all the modulo operations I needed to determine primality.\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: Calculate 42 XOR 15 (bitwise exclusive OR).\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `37`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `37`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 9.16s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 1,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 7.295608520507812e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool worked well for this bitwise operation:\n",
"\n",
"**Strengths:**\n",
"- Tool name \"calculator\" is clear and descriptive\n",
"- The tool correctly interpreted the ^ operator as XOR rather than exponentiation, which is appropriate for bitwise operations\n",
"- The expression parameter is well-documented as \"A mathematical expression\"\n",
"- The tool executed successfully and returned the correct result\n",
"\n",
"**Areas for improvement:**\n",
"- The description could be more specific about supported operations, particularly noting that it supports bitwise operations like XOR (^), AND (&), OR (|), etc.\n",
"- It would be helpful to clarify in the documentation that ^ represents XOR rather than exponentiation in this context\n",
"- The parameter description could include examples of supported expression types or operators\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: Calculate floor(7.8) × ceiling(2.1) + round(4.5).\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `25`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `26`\n",
"**Correct**: ❌\n",
"**Duration**: 16.79s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 4,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 8.940696716308594e-05,\n",
" 9.965896606445312e-05,\n",
" 9.179115295410156e-05,\n",
" 6.818771362304688e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool has several limitations that make it difficult to use for more complex mathematical operations:\n",
"\n",
"**Tool Name**: The name \"calculator\" is clear and descriptive.\n",
"\n",
"**Input Parameters**: The \"expression\" parameter is well-documented as \"A mathematical expression\" and it's clear that it's required. However, the documentation doesn't specify what mathematical functions are supported.\n",
"\n",
"**Functionality Issues**: \n",
"- The tool doesn't support common mathematical functions like floor(), ceil(), round(), or even int()\n",
"- It doesn't have access to the math module\n",
"- The tool appears to only support basic arithmetic operations (+, -, *, /, etc.)\n",
"\n",
"**Specific Areas for Improvement**:\n",
"1. **Function Support**: The tool should support common mathematical functions like floor, ceil, round, abs, min, max, etc. This would make it much more useful for mathematical calculations.\n",
"2. **Documentation**: The parameter description should specify which functions and operations are supported (e.g., \"Supports basic arithmetic (+, -, *, /, **) and common functions (sin, cos, sqrt, etc.)\")\n",
"3. **Error Handling**: Better error messages explaining what functions are available when unsupported functions are used would help users understand the tool's limitations.\n",
"4. **Import Statements**: If the tool uses Python evaluation, it should have common modules like math pre-imported or allow import statements.\n",
"\n",
"These improvements would make the calculator tool much more versatile and user-friendly for a wider range of mathematical calculations.\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: Calculate the magnitude of the complex number 3 + 4i.\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `5`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `5`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 12.84s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 3,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 9.1552734375e-05,\n",
" 8.96453857421875e-05,\n",
" 0.0001010894775390625\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool has some limitations that could be improved:\n",
"\n",
"1. **Tool name**: The name \"calculator\" is clear and descriptive.\n",
"\n",
"2. **Input parameters**: The parameter \"expression\" is well-named and the description \"A mathematical expression\" is accurate, though it could be more specific about supported syntax.\n",
"\n",
"3. **Syntax support issues**: The tool doesn't support common mathematical functions like `sqrt()` and uses Python's `**` operator for exponentiation instead of the more mathematical `^` operator. This creates confusion as `^` is the standard mathematical notation for exponentiation, but the tool interprets it as Python's XOR operator.\n",
"\n",
"4. **Error handling**: The tool provides clear error messages when syntax is incorrect, which is helpful for debugging.\n",
"\n",
"5. **Suggestions for improvement**:\n",
" - Add support for common mathematical functions like `sqrt()`, `sin()`, `cos()`, `log()`, etc.\n",
" - Consider supporting both `^` and `**` for exponentiation to accommodate different user expectations\n",
" - Update the parameter description to specify the supported syntax (e.g., \"A mathematical expression using Python syntax\")\n",
" - Provide examples of valid expressions in the description\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: Convert the hexadecimal number FF to decimal.\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `255`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `255`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 6.72s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 1,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 7.2479248046875e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool worked well for this task. The tool name \"calculator\" is clear and descriptive. The \"expression\" parameter is well-documented and makes it obvious what kind of input is expected. The tool successfully handled the mathematical expression and returned the correct result without any errors. The description accurately describes what the tool does. No improvements are needed for this particular use case.\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: Calculate the median of this dataset: [3, 7, 2, 9, 1, 5, 8].\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `5`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `5`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 11.66s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 3,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 0.00010514259338378906,\n",
" 7.700920104980469e-05,\n",
" 7.224082946777344e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool has some limitations:\n",
"- Tool name \"calculator\" is clear and descriptive\n",
"- The parameter \"expression\" is well-documented as \"A mathematical expression\" \n",
"- However, the tool appears to be limited to basic mathematical operations and doesn't support Python functions like sorted(), which would be helpful for statistical calculations\n",
"- The tool executed successfully for basic arithmetic but failed when trying to use built-in Python functions\n",
"- For improvement, the tool could either:\n",
" 1. Support more Python built-in functions for data analysis tasks\n",
" 2. Have clearer documentation about what types of expressions are supported\n",
" 3. Provide better error messages explaining limitations\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: Calculate the 10th Fibonacci number (where F(1)=1, F(2)=1).\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `55`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `55`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 9.10s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 1,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 7.271766662597656e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool worked well for this verification step. The tool name \"calculator\" is clear and descriptive. The parameter \"expression\" is well-documented and it's clear that it expects a mathematical expression as a string. The description \"A calculator\" is simple but adequate - it could be slightly more descriptive by mentioning it can evaluate mathematical expressions. The tool executed without any issues and returned the correct result. One potential improvement would be to specify in the description what types of mathematical operations are supported (basic arithmetic, advanced functions, etc.), though for this use case the basic functionality was sufficient.\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: What is 25% of 40% of 80% of 500?\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `40`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `40`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 8.01s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 1,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 8.0108642578125e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool worked well for this mathematical computation. The tool name \"calculator\" is clear and descriptive. The parameter \"expression\" is well-named and the description \"A mathematical expression\" is accurate, though it could be more detailed about what types of expressions are supported (arithmetic, functions, etc.). The tool correctly computed the result, though it returned a floating-point precision artifact (40.00000000000001 instead of exactly 40). For percentage calculations like this, it might be helpful if the tool could handle rounding to remove such precision errors automatically, or if the description mentioned this potential issue.\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n",
"### Task\n",
"\n",
"**Prompt**: Convert 72 degrees Fahrenheit to Celsius. Round to 1 decimal place.\n",
"**Ground Truth Response**: `22.2`\n",
"**Actual Response**: `22.2`\n",
"**Correct**: ✅\n",
"**Duration**: 11.30s\n",
"**Tool Calls**: {\n",
" \"calculator\": {\n",
" \"count\": 3,\n",
" \"durations\": [\n",
" 8.20159912109375e-05,\n",
" 9.465217590332031e-05,\n",
" 8.273124694824219e-05\n",
" ]\n",
" }\n",
"}\n",
"\n",
"**Reasoning**\n",
"N/A\n",
"\n",
"**Feedback**\n",
"The calculator tool has some limitations that could be improved:\n",
"1. Tool name: \"calculator\" is clear and descriptive\n",
"2. Input parameters: The \"expression\" parameter is well-documented as \"A mathematical expression\" and it's clear that it's required\n",
"3. Description: \"A calculator\" is quite brief but adequately describes the basic function\n",
"4. Functionality limitations: The calculator doesn't support built-in functions like round(), which limits its usefulness for common mathematical operations that require rounding\n",
"5. Error handling: When I tried to use round(), it returned a clear error message which was helpful\n",
"6. Improvement suggestions: \n",
" - Add support for common mathematical functions like round(), floor(), ceil(), abs(), etc.\n",
" - Expand the description to mention what types of expressions are supported\n",
" - Consider adding examples of valid expressions in the parameter description\n",
"\n",
"---\n",
"\n"
]
}
],
"source": [
"# Run evaluation\n",
"print(f\"✅ Using calculator tool\")\n",
"\n",
"report = run_evaluation(eval_path=\"evaluation.xml\", tools=tools)\n",
"\n",
"print(report)"
]
}
],
"metadata": {
"kernelspec": {
"display_name": "Python 3",
"language": "python",
"name": "python3"
},
"language_info": {
"codemirror_mode": {
"name": "ipython",
"version": 3
},
"file_extension": ".py",
"mimetype": "text/x-python",
"name": "python",
"nbconvert_exporter": "python",
"pygments_lexer": "ipython3",
"version": "3.11.13"
}
},
"nbformat": 4,
"nbformat_minor": 4
}