alihan/claude-cookbooks
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anthropics/claude-cookbooks.git synced 2025-10-06 01:00:28 +03:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
f26aa5891c6b31676cc88dcb8b8329c4b281395b
claude-cookbooks/.claude/commands/link-review.md
Jiri De Jonghe f26aa5891c Add Claude Code SDK tutorials and examples (#195) 
* Add Claude Code SDK tutorials and examples

This PR adds comprehensive tutorials and examples for the Claude Code SDK, including:
- Research agent implementation with web search capabilities
- Chief of Staff agent with multi-agent coordination
- Observability agent with Docker configuration
- Supporting utilities and documentation

The examples demonstrate key SDK features:
- Multi-turn conversations with ClaudeSDKClient
- Custom output styles and slash commands
- Hooks for automated actions and governance
- Script execution via Bash tool
- Multi-agent orchestration patterns

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: rodrigo olivares <rodrigoolivares@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Notov <zh@anthropic.com>
2025-09-12 15:04:34 -07:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

allowed-tools, description
allowed-tools description
Bash(gh pr comment:*),Bash(gh pr diff:*),Bash(gh pr view:*) Review links in changed files for quality and security issues

Review the links in the changed files and check for potential issues:

Link Quality Checks

  1. Broken Links: Identify any links that might be broken or malformed
  2. Outdated Links: Check for links to deprecated resources or old documentation
  3. Security: Ensure no links to suspicious or potentially harmful sites
  4. Best Practices:
    • Links should use HTTPS where possible
    • Internal links should use relative paths
    • External links should be to stable, reputable sources

Specific Checks for Anthropic Content

  • Links to Claude documentation should point to the latest versions
  • API documentation links should be current
  • Model documentation should reference current models, not deprecated ones
  • GitHub links should use the correct repository paths

Report Format

Provide a clear summary with:

  • ✅ Valid and well-formed links
  • ⚠️ Links that might need attention (e.g., HTTP instead of HTTPS)
  • ❌ Broken or problematic links that must be fixed

If all links look good, provide a brief confirmation.

IMPORTANT: Post your review as a comment on the pull request using the command: gh pr comment $PR_NUMBER --body "your review content"