We still need to delete app and check how may rows affected in apps table.
But we don't really care about other tables and rows affected there: routes, calls, logs
We need to delete app out of loop to check for invalid numbers of rows affected:
- zero rows means nothing happend
Despite apps table, zero rows affected if valid case for routes, calls and logs
I'd be pretty surprised if these were happening but meh, a computer running at
capacity can make the runtime scheduler do all kinds of weird shit, so this
locks down the behavior around slot launching.
I didn't load test much as there are cries of 'wolf' running amok, and it's
late, so this could be off a little -- but I think it's about this easy. cold
is the only one launching slots for itself, so it should always receive its
own slot (provided within time bounds). for hot we just need a way to tell the
ram token allocator that we aren't there anymore, so that somebody can close
the token (important).
If the bug still persists then it seems likely that there is another bug
around timing I'm not aware of (possible, but unlikely) or the more likely
case that it's actually taking up to the timeout to launch a container / find
a ram slot / find a free container. Otherwise, it's not related to the agent
and the http server timeouts may need fiddling with (read / write timeout),
if ruby client is failing to connect though I'm guessing that it's just that
nobody is reading the body (i.e. no function runs) and the error handling
isn't very well done, as we are replying with 504 if we hit a timeout (but if
nobody is listening, they won't get it).
calls, apps, and routes listing were previously returning the entire data set,
which just won't scale. this adds pagination with cursoring forward to each of
these endpoints (see the [docs](docs/definitions.md)).
the patch is really mostly tests, shouldn't be that bad to pick through.
some blarble about implementation is in order:
calls are sorted by ids but allow searching within certain `created_at` ranges
(finally). this is because sorting by `created_at` isn't feasible when
combined with paging, as `created_at` is not guaranteed to be unique -- id's
are (eliding theoreticals). i.e. on a page boundary, if there are 200 calls
with the same `created_at`, providing a `cursor` of that `created_at` will
skip over the remaining N calls with that `created_at`. also using id will be
better on the index anyway (well, less of them). yay having sortable ids! I
can't discern any issues doing this, as even if 200 calls have the same
created_at, they will have different ids, and the sort should allow paginating
them just fine. ids are also url safe, so the id works as the cursor value
just fine.
apps and routes are sorted by alphabetical order. as they aren't guaranteed to
be url safe, we are base64'ing them in the front end to a url safe format and
then returning them, and then base64 decoding them when we get them. this does
mean that they can be relatively large if the path/app is long, but if we
don't want to add ids then they were going to be pretty big anyway. a bonus
that this kind of obscures them. if somebody has better idea on formatting, by
all means.
notably, we are not using the sql paging facilities, and we are baking our own
based on cursors, which ends up being much more efficient for querying longer
lists of resources. this also should be easy to implement in other non-sql dbs
and the cursoring formats we can change on the fly since we are just exposing
them as opaque strings. the front end deals with the base64 / formatting, etc
and the back end is taking raw values (strfmt.DateTime or the id for calls).
the cursor that is being passed to/by the user is simply the last resource on the
previous page, so in theory we don't even need to return it, but it does make
it a little easier to use, also, cursor being blank on the last page depends
on page full-ness, so sometimes users will get a cursor when there are no
results on next page (1/N chance, and it's not really end of world -- actually
searching for the next thing would make things more complex). there are ample
tests for this behavior.
I've turned off all query parameters allowing `LIKE` queries on certain listing
endpoints, as we should not expose sql behavior through our API in the event
that we end up not using a sql db down the road. I think we should only allow
prefix matching, which sql can support as well as other types of databases
relatively cheaply, but this is not hooked up here as it didn't 'just work'
when I was fiddling with it (can add later, they're unnecessary and weren't
wired in before in front end).
* remove route listing across apps (unused)
* fix panic when doing `/app//`. this is prob possible for other types of
endpoints, out of scope here. added a guard in front of all endpoints for this
* adds `from_time` and `to_time` query parameters to calls, so you can e.g.
list the last hour of tasks. these are not required and default to
oldest/newest.
* hooked back up the datastore tests to the sql db, only run with sqlite atm,
but these are useful, added a lot to them too.
* added a bunch of tests to the front end, so pretty sure this all works now.
* added to swagger, we'll need to re-gen. also wrote some words about
pagination workings, I'm not sure how best to link to these, feedback welcome.
* not sure how we want to manage indexes, but we may need to add some (looking
at created_at, mostly)
* `?route` changed to `?path` in routes listing, to keep consistency with
everything else
* don't 404 when searching for calls where the route doesn't exist, just
return an empty list (it's a query param ffs)
closes#141
