mirror of
https://github.com/yamadashy/repomix.git
synced 2025-06-11 00:25:54 +03:00
docs(claude): Add dialogue type summaries to commit message format
User requested clarification on commit message dialogue format: - User wanted dialogue type/nature to be summarized upfront - User preferred descriptive headers like 'User requested feature enhancement' - Assistant added dialogue type summaries before bullet points - Examples now show 'feature enhancement for CI automation' and 'performance optimization discussion' - Makes the nature of user-AI collaboration immediately clear 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
10
CLAUDE.md
10
CLAUDE.md
@@ -121,13 +121,13 @@ npm run test
|
||||
- Follow [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/) with scope: `type(scope): Description`
|
||||
- Write detailed commit messages focusing on the "why" rather than the "what"
|
||||
- **Include user dialogue context**: Reference the specific conversation or request that led to the change in the commit body
|
||||
- Format: Use title for technical change, body with clear dialogue section marker
|
||||
- Start dialogue section with header like "Generated from the following user dialogue:" or "Based on user conversation:"
|
||||
- Format: Use title for technical change, body with clear dialogue section marker and summary
|
||||
- Start with dialogue type summary, then provide bullet points of the conversation flow
|
||||
- Examples:
|
||||
```
|
||||
feat(cli): Add new --no-progress flag
|
||||
|
||||
Generated from the following user dialogue:
|
||||
User requested a feature enhancement for CI automation:
|
||||
- User requested disabling progress output for CI environments
|
||||
- Progress output creates noise in build logs
|
||||
- Assistant implemented --no-progress flag for automation compatibility
|
||||
@@ -137,9 +137,9 @@ npm run test
|
||||
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||||
```
|
||||
```
|
||||
perf(metrics): Optimize token counting for top files
|
||||
perf(metrics): Optimize token counting performance optimization discussion:
|
||||
|
||||
Based on user conversation:
|
||||
User questioned current token counting approach and suggested improvements:
|
||||
- User asked: "Is token counting only used for top files display?"
|
||||
- Assistant explained multiple use cases including total output size
|
||||
- User suggested: "Since chars and tokens correlate, pre-filter by chars first"
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user