Merge pull request #19 from robertjakob/feature/open-source-prep

PDF generation functionality

Agent1_Peer_Review/Plan_PDFgeneration.md

@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+PDF creation implementation
+
+We got the following JSON inputs which we now want to turn in a comprehensive and professionally looking pdf report (please make sure to comprehend their content before continuing)
+
+input 1:
+/Users/robertjakob/rigorous-6/Agent1_Peer_Review/results/executive_summary.json
+
+Includes manuscript Title, Executive Summary, Combined Scores
+
+input 2
+- /Users/robertjakob/rigorous-6/Agent1_Peer_Review/results/quality_control_results.json
+
+Includes detailed AI peer review feedback
+
+
+What the PDF report could as folowed and include the following information
+
+
+Page 1 - Cover Page
+- Company Name: The Rigorous Company (maybe in header?)
+- Title: Rigorous AI Peer Review Report 
+- Subtitle: For the manuscript titled... (can be extracted from input 1)
+- Date and time of Review (when this report was created)
+- Overall Scores from executive_summary.json:
+  - Section Score: 3.3/5
+  - Rigor Score: 3.1/5
+  - Writing Score: 3.3/5
+  - Final Score: 3.2/5
+- Thank you note and request for feedback:
+
+Thank you for using the Rigorous AI Peer Reviewer!
+We're dedicated to providing actionable, high-quality feedback that accelerates your revision process and boosts your chances of publication. To help us improve the system, please consider completing our short feedback survey. Your input directly contributes to making this tool more useful, accurate, and impactful for the research community. All responses are confidential and sincerely appreciated.
+
+Feedback Link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1EhQvw-HdGRqfL01jZaayoaiTWLSydZTI4V0lJSvNpds/edit
+
+- Important Note: "Like real peer reviews, this AI-generated feedback may occasionally include hallucinations, overconfident statements, vague suggestions, or simply a flase statement. Still, we hope you find it insightful and helpful in improving your manuscript for publication."
+
+- A graphical illustration of the high level scores (can be extracted from input 1). We could use a star system Score: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ (4/5)
+
+
+Page 2 - Executive Summary (1 page)
+- The three-paragraph executive summary from executive_summary.json
+- 3 Radar charts showing scores of subcategories (Section Scores: S1-S10, Rigorous Scores: R1-R7, Writing Scores: W1-W7, which can be extracted from input 2). Ideally these can be fitted next to each other.
+
+- Detailed Section Analyses organized as follows:
+
+Section-Specific Assessment (S1–S10):
+- S1 – Title and Keywords
+- S2 – Abstract
+- S3 – Introduction
+- S4 – Literature Review
+- S5 – Methodology
+- S6 – Results
+- S7 – Discussion
+- S8 – Conclusion
+- S9 – References
+- S10 – Supplementary Materials
+
+Rigorous Assessment (R1–R7):
+- R1 – Originality and Contribution
+- R2 – Impact and Significance
+- R3 – Ethics and Compliance
+- R4 – Data and Code Availability
+- R5 – Statistical Rigor
+- R6 – Technical Accuracy
+- R7 – Consistency
+
+Writing Assessment (W1–W7):
+- W1 – Language and Style
+- W2 – Narrative and Structure
+- W3 – Clarity and Conciseness
+- W4 – Terminology Consistency
+- W5 – Inclusive Language
+- W6 – Citation Formatting
+- W7 – Target Audience Alignment
+
+For each section, include:
+- Score
+- Summary
+- Specific suggestions with:
+  - Original text
+  - Improved version
+  - Explanation
+- Consider displaying inputs as tables
+
+More suggestions:
+
+- try to use fittings icons/emoji
+  - Critical issues (⚠️)
+  - Suggestions (💡)
+  - Improvements (✅)
+- Use professional design elements to make reading easier and give the report a more professional look:
+  - Consistent color coding for different score ranges:
+    - High scores: Green (#4CAF50)
+    - Medium scores: Yellow (#FFC107)
+    - Low scores: Red (#F44336)
+  - Clear hierarchy of information
+  - Tables for structured data
+  - Page numbers and headers/footers
+
+Implementation Details:
+
+1. PDF Generation:
+   - Use reportlab library for PDF creation
+   - Page size: Letter (8.5" x 11")
+   - Margins: 1 inch on all sides
+   - Font: Arial or similar sans-serif font
+   - Base font size: 11pt
+   - Headers: 14pt bold
+   - Subheaders: 12pt bold
+
+2. Layout Specifications:
+   - Cover Page:
+     - Company logo in header (/Users/robertjakob/rigorous-6/Agent1_Peer_Review/logo.svg)
+     - Website in header: https://www.rigorous.company/
+     - Star rating system: 5 stars max, half-star increments
+     - Footer: Page number, date
+   
+   - Executive Summary Page:
+     - Radar charts: 3 charts side by side, each 2.5" wide
+     - Each chart should have clear labels and a 0-5 scale
+     - Executive summary text: 11pt, justified alignment
+   
+   - Detailed Analysis Pages:
+     - Each section starts on a new page
+     - Section header: 14pt bold
+     - Score display: Large, color-coded number
+     - Tables: 10pt font, alternating row colors
+     - Icons: 12pt size, consistent spacing
+
+3. Error Handling:
+   - Gracefully handle missing sections in JSON
+   - Provide default values for missing scores
+   - Skip empty sections without breaking layout
+   - Log any data inconsistencies
+
+4. Output:
+   - Filename format: "Rigorous_Review_[manuscript_title]_[date].pdf"
+   - Include metadata (title, author, creation date)
+   - Enable PDF search functionality
+   - Ensure PDF is accessible (proper tagging)

Agent1_Peer_Review/context/context.json

@@ -1,16 +1,14 @@
 {
-  "outlet": "NPJ Digital Medicine",
-  "focus": "statistical analyses",
   "target_publication_outlets": {
     "label": "Target Publication Outlets (optional but recommended)",
     "description": "This helps us tailor the review to your target venue's requirements.",
     "placeholder": "e.g., Nature Medicine, Science, or specific conferences like NeurIPS 2024",
-    "user_input": ""
+    "user_input": "Computers in Human Behavior"
   },
   "review_focus_areas": {
     "label": "Review Focus Areas (optional but recommended)",
     "description": "Specify any particular aspects you'd like the AI peer reviewers to focus on.",
     "placeholder": "e.g., statistical analysis, methodology, experimental design, motivation, or specific aspects you want reviewers to focus on",
-    "user_input": ""
+    "user_input": "methods"
   }
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/logo.svg

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+<svg width="300" height="100" viewBox="0 0 300 100" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" fill="none">
+  <!-- Blue circle -->
+  <circle cx="50" cy="50" r="30" stroke="#4A7CFF" stroke-width="6"></circle>
+
+  <!-- Rounded blue checkmark -->
+  <path d="M38 50l7 7 13-13" stroke="#4A7CFF" stroke-width="6" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"></path>
+
+  <!-- "rigorous." text -->
+  <text x="95" y="64" font-family="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" font-size="40" fill="#0F0F1A" font-weight="bold">
+    rigorous.
+  </text>
+</svg>

Agent1_Peer_Review/pdf_generator.py

@@ -0,0 +1,441 @@
+import json
+from datetime import datetime
+from reportlab.lib import colors
+from reportlab.lib.pagesizes import letter
+from reportlab.lib.styles import getSampleStyleSheet, ParagraphStyle
+from reportlab.lib.units import inch
+from reportlab.platypus import SimpleDocTemplate, Paragraph, Spacer, Table, TableStyle, Image, PageBreak, KeepTogether
+from reportlab.graphics.shapes import Drawing
+from reportlab.graphics.charts.legends import Legend
+from reportlab.graphics.charts.textlabels import Label
+from reportlab.pdfbase import pdfmetrics
+from reportlab.pdfbase.ttfonts import TTFont
+from reportlab.lib.enums import TA_CENTER, TA_LEFT, TA_RIGHT, TA_JUSTIFY
+import os
+
+class PDFReportGenerator:
+    def __init__(self, executive_summary_path, quality_control_path, output_path):
+        """Initialize the PDF generator with input and output paths."""
+        self.executive_summary = self.load_json(executive_summary_path)
+        self.quality_control = self.load_json(quality_control_path)
+        self.output_path = output_path
+        self.styles = getSampleStyleSheet()
+        self.setup_styles()
+        
+    def load_json(self, file_path):
+        """Load and return JSON data from file."""
+        with open(file_path, 'r') as f:
+            return json.load(f)
+    
+    def setup_styles(self):
+        """Setup custom styles for the PDF."""
+        # Define colors
+        self.colors = {
+            'high_score': colors.HexColor('#4CAF50'),    # Green
+            'medium_score': colors.HexColor('#FFC107'),  # Yellow
+            'low_score': colors.HexColor('#F44336'),     # Red
+            'header_bg': colors.HexColor('#2196F3'),     # Blue
+            'header_text': colors.white,
+            'footer_text': colors.grey,
+            'table_header': colors.HexColor('#E3F2FD'),  # Light Blue
+            'table_alt': colors.HexColor('#F5F5F5')      # Light Grey
+        }
+        
+        # Modify existing styles
+        self.styles['Heading1'].fontSize = 14
+        self.styles['Heading1'].spaceAfter = 12
+        self.styles['Heading1'].alignment = TA_LEFT
+        self.styles['Heading1'].textColor = colors.black
+        
+        self.styles['Heading2'].fontSize = 12
+        self.styles['Heading2'].spaceAfter = 10
+        self.styles['Heading2'].alignment = TA_LEFT
+        self.styles['Heading2'].textColor = colors.black
+        
+        self.styles['Normal'].fontSize = 11
+        self.styles['Normal'].spaceAfter = 12
+        self.styles['Normal'].alignment = TA_LEFT
+        self.styles['Normal'].textColor = colors.black
+        
+        # Add new styles
+        self.styles.add(ParagraphStyle(
+            name='CoverTitle',
+            parent=self.styles['Heading1'],
+            fontSize=24,
+            spaceAfter=30,
+            alignment=TA_CENTER
+        ))
+        
+        self.styles.add(ParagraphStyle(
+            name='CoverSubtitle',
+            parent=self.styles['Heading2'],
+            fontSize=18,
+            spaceAfter=20,
+            alignment=TA_CENTER
+        ))
+        
+        self.styles.add(ParagraphStyle(
+            name='Header',
+            parent=self.styles['Normal'],
+            fontSize=10,
+            alignment=TA_CENTER,
+            textColor=self.colors['header_text']
+        ))
+        
+        self.styles.add(ParagraphStyle(
+            name='Footer',
+            parent=self.styles['Normal'],
+            fontSize=9,
+            alignment=TA_CENTER,
+            textColor=self.colors['footer_text']
+        ))
+        
+        # Section header style
+        self.styles.add(ParagraphStyle(
+            name='SectionHeader',
+            fontSize=16,
+            leading=20,
+            spaceAfter=16,
+            spaceBefore=12,
+            alignment=TA_LEFT,
+            fontName='Helvetica-Bold',
+            textColor=colors.black
+        ))
+        
+        # Subheader style
+        self.styles.add(ParagraphStyle(
+            name='SubHeader',
+            fontSize=13,
+            leading=16,
+            spaceAfter=8,
+            spaceBefore=8,
+            alignment=TA_LEFT,
+            fontName='Helvetica-Bold',
+            textColor=colors.black
+        ))
+        
+        # Justified body text
+        self.styles.add(ParagraphStyle(
+            name='Justified',
+            parent=self.styles['Normal'],
+            fontSize=11,
+            leading=15,
+            alignment=TA_JUSTIFY,
+            spaceAfter=10
+        ))
+        
+        # Table cell style
+        self.styles.add(ParagraphStyle(
+            name='TableCell',
+            fontSize=10,
+            leading=13,
+            alignment=TA_LEFT,
+            spaceAfter=2
+        ))
+        
+        self.styles.add(ParagraphStyle(
+            name='SuggestionTableCell',
+            fontSize=9,
+            leading=11,
+            alignment=TA_LEFT,
+            spaceAfter=1,
+            fontName='Helvetica',
+        ))
+    
+    def get_score_color(self, score):
+        """Return color based on score."""
+        if score >= 4:
+            return self.colors['high_score']
+        elif score >= 2.5:
+            return self.colors['medium_score']
+        return self.colors['low_score']
+    
+    def create_header(self, canvas, doc):
+        """Draw logo centered at the top of every page, just below the top margin."""
+        canvas.saveState()
+        logo_path = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), 'logo.png')
+        if os.path.exists(logo_path):
+            page_width, page_height = doc.pagesize
+            logo_width = 1.2 * inch
+            logo_height = 0.35 * inch
+            # Center logo horizontally
+            x = (page_width - logo_width) / 2
+            y = page_height - doc.topMargin + 10  # 10 points below the top edge
+            canvas.drawImage(logo_path, x, y, width=logo_width, height=logo_height, mask='auto')
+        canvas.restoreState()
+    
+    def create_footer(self, canvas, doc):
+        """Create footer with page number and date."""
+        canvas.saveState()
+        
+        # Add page number and date
+        canvas.setFillColor(self.colors['footer_text'])
+        canvas.setFont('Helvetica', 8)
+        
+        # Page number
+        page_text = f"Page {doc.page}"
+        canvas.drawCentredString(doc.width/2 + doc.leftMargin, doc.bottomMargin/2, page_text)
+        
+        # Date
+        date_text = datetime.now().strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M")
+        canvas.drawRightString(doc.width + doc.leftMargin, doc.bottomMargin/2, date_text)
+        
+        canvas.restoreState()
+    
+    def create_cover_page(self):
+        """Create the cover page content."""
+        elements = []
+        
+        # Add title
+        elements.append(Paragraph("AI Peer Review Report", self.styles['CoverTitle']))
+        elements.append(Spacer(1, 0.25*inch))
+        
+        # Add subtitle with manuscript title
+        elements.append(Paragraph(
+            "For the manuscript",
+            ParagraphStyle(
+                name='ManuscriptLabel',
+                parent=self.styles['Normal'],
+                fontSize=12,
+                alignment=TA_CENTER,
+                spaceAfter=4,
+                textColor=colors.black,
+                fontName='Helvetica'
+            )
+        ))
+        elements.append(Paragraph(
+            self.executive_summary['manuscript_title'],
+            ParagraphStyle(
+                name='ManuscriptTitle',
+                parent=self.styles['Heading1'],
+                fontSize=18,
+                alignment=TA_CENTER,
+                spaceAfter=24,
+                textColor=colors.black,
+                fontName='Helvetica-Bold'
+            )
+        ))
+        elements.append(Spacer(1, 0.4*inch))
+        
+        # Add scores with star ratings
+        scores = self.executive_summary['scores']
+        score_data = [
+            ['Category', 'Score', 'Rating'],
+            ['Section Assessment', f"{scores['section_score']:.1f}/5", '⭐' * int(round(scores['section_score']))],
+            ['Rigor Assessment', f"{scores['rigor_score']:.1f}/5", '⭐' * int(round(scores['rigor_score']))],
+            ['Writing Assessment', f"{scores['writing_score']:.1f}/5", '⭐' * int(round(scores['writing_score']))],
+            ['Final Score', f"{scores['final_score']:.1f}/5", '⭐' * int(round(scores['final_score']))]
+        ]
+        
+        # Create table with scores
+        score_table = Table(score_data, colWidths=[2*inch, 1.2*inch, 1.2*inch])
+        score_table.setStyle(TableStyle([
+            ('BACKGROUND', (0, 0), (-1, 0), self.colors['header_bg']),
+            ('TEXTCOLOR', (0, 0), (-1, 0), colors.white),
+            ('ALIGN', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 'CENTER'),
+            ('FONTNAME', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 'Helvetica-Bold'),
+            ('FONTSIZE', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 11),
+            ('TOPPADDING', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 8),
+            ('BOTTOMPADDING', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 8),
+            ('LINEBELOW', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 1.2, self.colors['header_bg']),
+            ('BACKGROUND', (0, 1), (-1, -1), self.colors['table_alt']),
+            ('ROWBACKGROUNDS', (0, 1), (-1, -1), [self.colors['table_alt'], colors.white]),
+            ('TEXTCOLOR', (0, 1), (-1, -1), colors.black),
+            ('ALIGN', (0, 1), (-1, -1), 'LEFT'),
+            ('FONTNAME', (0, 1), (-1, -1), 'Helvetica'),
+            ('FONTSIZE', (0, 1), (-1, -1), 11),
+            ('LEFTPADDING', (0, 0), (-1, -1), 10),
+            ('RIGHTPADDING', (0, 0), (-1, -1), 10),
+            ('TOPPADDING', (0, 1), (-1, -1), 2),
+            ('BOTTOMPADDING', (0, 1), (-1, -1), 2),
+            ('FONTNAME', (0, -1), (-1, -1), 'Helvetica-Bold'),
+            ('GRID', (0, 0), (-1, -1), 0.7, colors.HexColor('#B0BEC5')),
+            ('BOX', (0, 0), (-1, -1), 1.2, self.colors['header_bg']),
+            ('VALIGN', (0, 0), (-1, -1), 'TOP'),
+        ]))
+        elements.append(score_table)
+        elements.append(Spacer(1, 0.3*inch))
+        
+        # Add thank you note
+        thank_you = """
+        Thank you for using the Rigorous AI Peer Reviewer!<br/><br/>
+        We're dedicated to providing actionable, high-quality feedback that accelerates your revision process and boosts your chances of publication. To help us improve the system, please consider completing our short feedback survey. Your input directly contributes to making this tool more useful, accurate, and impactful for the research community. All responses are confidential and sincerely appreciated.<br/><br/>
+        <b>Feedback Link:</b> <a href='https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1EhQvw-HdGRqfL01jZaayoaiTWLSydZTI4V0lJSvNpds/edit'><font color='#1976D2'><u>Feedback Form</u></font></a><br/><br/>
+        <b>Important Note:</b> Like real peer reviews, this AI-generated feedback may occasionally include hallucinations, overconfident statements, vague suggestions, or simply a false statement. Still, we hope you find it insightful and helpful in improving your manuscript for publication.
+        """
+        elements.append(Paragraph(thank_you, self.styles['Justified']))
+        elements.append(Spacer(1, 0.5*inch))
+        
+        return elements
+    
+    def create_executive_summary_page(self):
+        """Create the executive summary page content."""
+        elements = []
+        
+        # Add executive summary
+        elements.append(Paragraph("Executive Summary", self.styles['SectionHeader']))
+        elements.append(Spacer(1, 0.1*inch))
+        elements.append(Paragraph(self.executive_summary['executive_summary'], self.styles['Justified']))
+        elements.append(Spacer(1, 0.3*inch))
+        
+        # Merge Section, Rigor, and Writing Scores into one grouped table with vertical spans
+        merged_table_data = [["Category", "Sub-Category", "Score"]]
+        spans = []
+        row_idx = 1
+        for cat_label, scores in [
+            ("Section Assessment", self.quality_control['section_results']),
+            ("Rigor Assessment", self.quality_control['rigor_results']),
+            ("Writing Assessment", self.quality_control['writing_results'])
+        ]:
+            group_start = row_idx
+            for i, (key, data) in enumerate(scores.items()):
+                score = data['score']
+                color = self.get_score_color(score)
+                # Prepend code (key) to sub-category name
+                subcat = f"{key} - {data['section_name']}"
+                merged_table_data.append([
+                    Paragraph(cat_label if i == 0 else "", self.styles['TableCell']),
+                    Paragraph(subcat, self.styles['TableCell']),
+                    Paragraph(f"<font color='{color}'> {int(round(score))}/5 </font>", self.styles['TableCell'])
+                ])
+                row_idx += 1
+            # Add span for this group if more than one row
+            if row_idx - group_start > 1:
+                spans.append(('SPAN', (0, group_start), (0, row_idx - 1)))
+        merged_table = Table(merged_table_data, colWidths=[1.7*inch, 3.1*inch, 1.1*inch], repeatRows=1)
+        table_style = [
+            ('BACKGROUND', (0, 0), (-1, 0), self.colors['header_bg']),
+            ('TEXTCOLOR', (0, 0), (-1, 0), colors.white),
+            ('ALIGN', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 'CENTER'),
+            ('FONTNAME', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 'Helvetica-Bold'),
+            ('FONTSIZE', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 12),
+            ('TOPPADDING', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 10),
+            ('BOTTOMPADDING', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 10),
+            ('LINEBELOW', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 1.2, self.colors['header_bg']),
+            ('BACKGROUND', (0, 1), (0, -1), colors.HexColor('#E3F2FD')),
+            ('BACKGROUND', (1, 1), (-1, -1), self.colors['table_alt']),
+            ('ROWBACKGROUNDS', (1, 1), (-1, -1), [self.colors['table_alt'], colors.white]),
+            ('TEXTCOLOR', (0, 1), (-1, -1), colors.black),
+            ('ALIGN', (0, 1), (-1, -1), 'LEFT'),
+            ('FONTNAME', (0, 1), (-1, -1), 'Helvetica'),
+            ('FONTSIZE', (0, 1), (-1, -1), 11),
+            ('LEFTPADDING', (0, 0), (-1, -1), 10),
+            ('RIGHTPADDING', (0, 0), (-1, -1), 10),
+            ('TOPPADDING', (0, 1), (-1, -1), 2),
+            ('BOTTOMPADDING', (0, 1), (-1, -1), 2),
+            ('GRID', (0, 0), (-1, -1), 0.7, colors.HexColor('#B0BEC5')),
+            ('BOX', (0, 0), (-1, -1), 1.2, self.colors['header_bg']),
+            ('VALIGN', (0, 0), (-1, -1), 'TOP'),
+        ]
+        table_style.extend(spans)
+        merged_table.setStyle(TableStyle(table_style))
+        elements.append(merged_table)
+        elements.append(Spacer(1, 0.2*inch))
+        
+        return elements
+    
+    def create_detailed_analysis_pages(self):
+        """Create the detailed analysis pages content."""
+        elements = []
+        
+        # Process section, rigor, and writing results
+        for group in [
+            self.quality_control['section_results'],
+            self.quality_control['rigor_results'],
+            self.quality_control['writing_results']
+        ]:
+            for section_id, section_data in group.items():
+                elements.append(PageBreak())
+                # Add code prefix to section header
+                section_title = f"{section_id} - {section_data['section_name']}"
+                elements.append(Paragraph(section_title, self.styles['SectionHeader']))
+                score = section_data['score']
+                score_color = self.get_score_color(score)
+                elements.append(Paragraph(f"<b>Score:</b> <font color='{score_color}'>{int(round(score))}/5</font>", self.styles['SubHeader']))
+                # Add summary
+                elements.append(Paragraph(section_data['summary'], self.styles['Justified']))
+                elements.append(Spacer(1, 0.2*inch))
+                # Add suggestions
+                if 'suggestions' in section_data and section_data['suggestions']:
+                    # Create table for suggestions
+                    table_data = [['Remarks', 'Original', 'Improved', 'Explanation']]
+                    for suggestion in section_data['suggestions']:
+                        # Use small font for body cells
+                        table_data.append([
+                            Paragraph(suggestion.get('remarks', ''), self.styles['SuggestionTableCell']),
+                            Paragraph(suggestion['original_text'], self.styles['SuggestionTableCell']),
+                            Paragraph(suggestion['improved_version'], self.styles['SuggestionTableCell']),
+                            Paragraph(suggestion['explanation'], self.styles['SuggestionTableCell'])
+                        ])
+                    # Create and style table
+                    table = Table(table_data, colWidths=[1.8*inch, 1.8*inch, 1.8*inch, 1.8*inch], repeatRows=1)
+                    table.setStyle(TableStyle([
+                        ('BACKGROUND', (0, 0), (-1, 0), self.colors['header_bg']),
+                        ('TEXTCOLOR', (0, 0), (-1, 0), colors.white),
+                        ('ALIGN', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 'CENTER'),
+                        ('FONTNAME', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 'Helvetica-Bold'),
+                        ('FONTSIZE', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 11),
+                        ('BOTTOMPADDING', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 6),
+                        ('LINEBELOW', (0, 0), (-1, 0), 1.2, self.colors['header_bg']),
+                        ('BACKGROUND', (0, 1), (-1, -1), self.colors['table_alt']),
+                        ('ROWBACKGROUNDS', (0, 1), (-1, -1), [self.colors['table_alt'], colors.white]),
+                        ('TEXTCOLOR', (0, 1), (-1, -1), colors.black),
+                        ('ALIGN', (0, 1), (-1, -1), 'LEFT'),
+                        ('FONTNAME', (0, 1), (-1, -1), 'Helvetica'),
+                        ('FONTSIZE', (0, 1), (-1, -1), 9),
+                        ('LEFTPADDING', (0, 0), (-1, -1), 6),
+                        ('RIGHTPADDING', (0, 0), (-1, -1), 6),
+                        ('TOPPADDING', (0, 0), (-1, -1), 4),
+                        ('BOTTOMPADDING', (0, 1), (-1, -1), 4),
+                        ('GRID', (0, 0), (-1, -1), 0.7, colors.HexColor('#B0BEC5')),
+                        ('BOX', (0, 0), (-1, -1), 1.2, self.colors['header_bg']),
+                        ('VALIGN', (0, 0), (-1, -1), 'TOP'),
+                    ]))
+                    elements.append(table)
+        
+        return elements
+    
+    def generate_pdf(self):
+        """Generate the complete PDF report."""
+        doc = SimpleDocTemplate(
+            self.output_path,
+            pagesize=letter,
+            rightMargin=72,
+            leftMargin=72,
+            topMargin=72,
+            bottomMargin=72
+        )
+        
+        # Build the document
+        elements = []
+        
+        # Add cover page
+        elements.extend(self.create_cover_page())
+        elements.append(PageBreak())
+        
+        # Add executive summary page
+        elements.extend(self.create_executive_summary_page())
+        elements.append(PageBreak())
+        
+        # Add detailed analysis pages
+        elements.extend(self.create_detailed_analysis_pages())
+        
+        # Build the PDF with headers and footers
+        doc.build(elements, 
+                 onFirstPage=lambda c, d: (self.create_header(c, d), self.create_footer(c, d)),
+                 onLaterPages=lambda c, d: (self.create_header(c, d), self.create_footer(c, d)))
+
+def main():
+    # Define paths
+    base_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
+    executive_summary_path = os.path.join(base_dir, 'results', 'executive_summary.json')
+    quality_control_path = os.path.join(base_dir, 'results', 'quality_control_results.json')
+    output_path = os.path.join(base_dir, 'results', 'review_report.pdf')
+    
+    # Create and generate PDF
+    generator = PDFReportGenerator(executive_summary_path, quality_control_path, output_path)
+    generator.generate_pdf()
+    print(f"PDF report generated successfully at: {output_path}")
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    main() 

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/R1_results.json

@@ -1,154 +1,135 @@
 {
-  "originality_contribution_score": 4,
+  "originality_contribution_score": 3,
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
       "category": "novelty",
-      "location": "Abstract, Paragraph 1",
-      "issue": "While the study claims to extend prior research by applying predictive models over longer durations and in different contexts, it does not sufficiently clarify how its approach fundamentally differs from existing models, especially in the methodological innovation or in the specific features used.",
+      "location": "Abstract & Introduction",
+      "issue": "The review claims to be the first comprehensive synthesis of mobile app churn prediction, but it largely consolidates existing methods from related domains without introducing new theoretical frameworks or innovative methodologies specific to mobile apps.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This limits the perceived novelty of the approach, potentially reducing the contribution's distinctiveness within the field."
+      "impact": "This limits the perceived novelty of the research approach, potentially reducing its contribution to advancing new concepts or models in churn prediction."
     },
     {
       "category": "contribution",
-      "location": "Introduction, Paragraph 4",
-      "issue": "The paper states that it addresses a research gap by evaluating nonadherence prediction models across different conditions and regulatory environments, but it lacks a clear articulation of how these contributions advance theoretical understanding or practical implementation beyond existing models.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This affects the clarity of the paper's unique contribution, making it less compelling for readers seeking innovative insights."
+      "location": "Introduction & Discussion",
+      "issue": "While the review summarizes existing algorithms and features, it offers limited critical analysis of why certain models outperform others in mobile contexts or how these insights can lead to novel predictive frameworks.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "This diminishes the contribution to the field by not providing actionable, theory-driven insights or innovative contributions that could guide future research."
     },
     {
       "category": "verification",
-      "location": "Discussion, Paragraph 4.1",
-      "issue": "The authors claim that their models are generalizable and applicable across various contexts, but there is limited discussion on validation strategies such as prospective testing or external validation to substantiate these claims.",
+      "location": "Abstract & Results",
+      "issue": "The claims about the effectiveness of behavioral features and the performance of ML algorithms are not sufficiently verified through meta-analytical techniques or statistical testing, given the heterogeneity of the included studies.",
       "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This weakens the validity of the claimed generalizability and limits confidence in the models' robustness."
+      "impact": "This affects the validity of the claimed generalizations and limits confidence in the stated conclusions about feature importance and algorithm performance."
     },
     {
       "category": "comparison",
-      "location": "Literature Review, Paragraph 4",
-      "issue": "The review mentions prior studies predicting churn at specific points but does not sufficiently compare the current models' performance metrics with those of existing state-of-the-art models, especially in similar health intervention contexts.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This hampers the ability to position the current work within the existing literature and assess its relative contribution."
+      "location": "Introduction & Discussion",
+      "issue": "The review mentions that no prior synthesis exists for mobile app churn prediction but does not thoroughly compare its findings with the detailed results from telecommunication or other related sectors, missing an opportunity to contextualize the novelty.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This reduces the clarity of how this review advances or differs from existing literature, weakening its comparative contribution."
     },
     {
       "category": "advancement",
-      "location": "Results & Discussion",
-      "issue": "While the models demonstrate high accuracy and AUC, the paper does not sufficiently discuss how these predictive capabilities translate into actual health outcomes or intervention improvements, thus limiting the demonstration of knowledge advancement.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This reduces the practical significance and impact of the research findings."
+      "location": "Discussion & Conclusion",
+      "issue": "The paper emphasizes potential for personalized, adaptive systems but lacks concrete proposals, prototypes, or empirical evidence demonstrating how these models can directly lead to system innovations or improved user retention.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This limits the perceived advancement of knowledge, making the contribution more descriptive than transformative."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "We developed machine learning models for the prediction of nonadherence in two mHealth interventions, one for nonspecific and degenerative back pain over a program duration of 90 days (Vivira, n = 8,372), and another for hypertension self-management over 186 days (Manoa, n = 6,674).",
-      "improved_version": "We introduced a novel ensemble-based machine learning framework that integrates temporal behavioral features with intervention-specific metrics, applied to two distinct mHealth interventions\u2014Vivira (90 days) and Manoa (186 days)\u2014demonstrating its adaptability across diverse health conditions and regulatory environments.",
-      "explanation": "This emphasizes methodological innovation and highlights the framework's flexibility, enhancing perceived novelty.",
-      "location": "Abstract, Paragraph 1",
+      "original_text": "This systematic literature review investigates applied machine learning (ML) algorithms and features for predicting churn in mobile apps by synthesizing methodologies and outcomes of 50 selected studies.",
+      "improved_version": "This review introduces a novel framework for categorizing ML algorithms and features tailored specifically to mobile app contexts, aiming to identify gaps and propose new hybrid models for improved churn prediction.",
+      "explanation": "Adding a focus on developing or proposing new frameworks enhances the originality and contribution, moving beyond mere synthesis.",
+      "location": "Abstract",
       "category": "novelty",
       "focus": "novelty"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Our models identified an average of 94% of nonadherent users between Weeks 2 and 13 in Vivira (mean AUC = 0.95).",
-      "improved_version": "Our models achieved state-of-the-art predictive performance, accurately identifying over 94% of nonadherent users with an average AUC of 0.95, surpassing existing benchmarks in digital health adherence prediction.",
-      "explanation": "Adding comparative language and performance context clarifies the contribution relative to existing literature.",
-      "location": "Abstract, Paragraph 1",
+      "original_text": "The findings demonstrate a wide variety of applied ML algorithms - from logistic regression to custom deep neural networks - to predict users' churn probabilities and survival times in mobile apps.",
+      "improved_version": "The review critically analyzes the performance trade-offs between simple and complex ML models, proposing a new hybrid approach that combines interpretability with high accuracy for mobile app churn prediction.",
+      "explanation": "Introducing a new hybrid model concept increases contribution and advances the field by offering practical solutions.",
+      "location": "Abstract",
       "category": "contribution",
       "focus": "contribution"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The rich data collected by mHealth interventions raise the question of whether \u2013 and to what extent \u2013 nonadherence can be predicted using these data.",
-      "improved_version": "This study pioneers the systematic evaluation of behavioral app engagement data for long-term nonadherence prediction, establishing a new methodological standard in digital health research.",
-      "explanation": "This explicitly states the innovative aspect and sets a new standard, reinforcing contribution claims.",
-      "location": "Introduction, Paragraph 4",
-      "category": "novelty",
-      "focus": "novelty"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Our findings show that nonadherence to mHealth interventions can be accurately predicted over extended program durations.",
-      "improved_version": "Our findings demonstrate that behavioral engagement data can reliably forecast nonadherence over multi-month periods, providing a scalable approach for proactive intervention in digital health.",
-      "explanation": "Highlights scalability and practical utility, advancing the field's understanding of long-term prediction.",
-      "location": "Discussion, Paragraph 4.1",
-      "category": "advancement",
-      "focus": "advancement"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "We applied random forest algorithms for all predictions.",
-      "improved_version": "We employed an innovative hybrid modeling approach combining random forests with recurrent neural networks, capturing both static and temporal behavioral patterns to enhance prediction accuracy.",
-      "explanation": "Introducing a novel hybrid approach emphasizes methodological innovation, boosting the originality score.",
-      "location": "Methodology, Paragraph 2.2",
-      "category": "novelty",
-      "focus": "novelty"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Our models demonstrated strong performance across all prediction windows.",
-      "improved_version": "Our models not only demonstrated high performance but also provided interpretable feature importance insights, facilitating targeted intervention strategies and advancing practical application in clinical settings.",
-      "explanation": "Adds interpretability and practical relevance, enhancing contribution and advancement.",
-      "location": "Results, Paragraph 3.2",
-      "category": "contribution",
-      "focus": "contribution"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The models predicted nonadherence weekly from Weeks 2 to 13 based on users\u2019 daily app activity variables.",
-      "improved_version": "The models leverage real-time behavioral features to predict nonadherence weekly, enabling timely, personalized intervention opportunities and setting a new standard for dynamic adherence management.",
-      "explanation": "Highlights real-time application and potential for intervention, emphasizing practical impact.",
-      "location": "Methodology, Paragraph 2.2",
-      "category": "advancement",
-      "focus": "advancement"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "While the study claims to extend prior research by applying predictive models over longer durations and in different contexts, it does not sufficiently clarify how its approach fundamentally differs from existing models.",
-      "improved_version": "This study advances existing models by integrating intervention-specific behavioral metrics with temporal engagement data, enabling long-term, scalable predictions across diverse health conditions and regulatory environments.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the methodological novelty and broad applicability, strengthening the contribution argument.",
-      "location": "Discussion, Paragraph 4.1",
-      "category": "novelty",
-      "focus": "novelty"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The paper states that it addresses a research gap by evaluating nonadherence prediction models across different conditions and regulatory environments, but it lacks a clear articulation of how these contributions advance theoretical understanding or practical implementation beyond existing models.",
-      "improved_version": "By validating predictive models across two distinct health conditions and regulatory contexts, this work provides empirical evidence for the generalizability and practical utility of behavioral engagement-based adherence prediction, thereby bridging a critical gap between research and real-world application.",
-      "explanation": "Explicitly links empirical validation to practical and theoretical advancement, clarifying contribution.",
-      "location": "Introduction, Paragraph 4",
-      "category": "contribution",
-      "focus": "contribution"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The authors claim that their models are generalizable and applicable across various contexts, but there is limited discussion on validation strategies such as prospective testing or external validation.",
-      "improved_version": "Future work should include prospective validation studies and external datasets to rigorously test the models' robustness and real-world applicability, thereby strengthening the evidence base for widespread implementation.",
-      "explanation": "Provides a clear pathway for validation, addressing a key gap and enhancing credibility.",
-      "location": "Discussion, Paragraph 4.4",
+      "original_text": "The review underscores the importance of behavioral features related to users\u2019 activity and progress within apps.",
+      "improved_version": "The review identifies behavioral features as most predictive but also develops a new feature importance ranking methodology tailored for mobile app data, providing more robust insights.",
+      "explanation": "Developing a new methodology for feature importance enhances originality and practical utility.",
+      "location": "Results",
       "category": "verification",
       "focus": "verification"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The review mentions prior studies predicting churn at specific points but does not sufficiently compare the current models' performance metrics with those of existing state-of-the-art models.",
-      "improved_version": "A comprehensive comparison with existing state-of-the-art churn and nonadherence prediction models reveals that our approach achieves comparable or superior performance metrics, particularly in long-term and multi-condition contexts, underscoring its potential for broad application.",
-      "explanation": "Positions the work within the literature, emphasizing its competitive edge and contribution.",
-      "location": "Literature review, Paragraph 4",
-      "category": "comparison",
-      "focus": "comparison"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "While the models demonstrate high accuracy and AUC, the paper does not sufficiently discuss how these predictive capabilities translate into actual health outcomes or intervention improvements.",
-      "improved_version": "Integrating these predictive models into clinical workflows and evaluating their impact on health outcomes and adherence-related behaviors will be a crucial next step to demonstrate tangible benefits and advance the field's practical knowledge.",
-      "explanation": "Connects predictive performance to health impact, emphasizing knowledge advancement.",
-      "location": "Discussion, Paragraph 4.1",
+      "original_text": "The review also explores additional factors and methods in influencing churn prediction outcomes highlighted in relevant studies.",
+      "improved_version": "The review introduces a novel multi-factor analysis integrating contextual, behavioral, and social features to better understand their combined impact on churn prediction accuracy.",
+      "explanation": "This approach offers a more comprehensive, innovative perspective on feature interactions, advancing knowledge.",
+      "location": "Results",
       "category": "advancement",
       "focus": "advancement"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The study claims to extend prior research but does not specify how the models perform relative to existing benchmarks.",
-      "improved_version": "By benchmarking our models against established adherence and churn prediction algorithms in similar health domains, we demonstrate significant improvements in predictive accuracy and temporal robustness, thereby contributing novel insights to digital health analytics.",
-      "explanation": "Provides comparative performance context, strengthening claims of contribution.",
-      "location": "Abstract, Paragraph 1",
+      "original_text": "The review highlights the necessity for consistent methodologies and reporting standards to enhance future research.",
+      "improved_version": "The review proposes a standardized reporting framework for mobile app churn prediction studies, including detailed feature descriptions, performance metrics, and dataset characteristics, to facilitate comparability and meta-analysis.",
+      "explanation": "Providing a concrete, innovative reporting standard directly advances research quality and comparability.",
+      "location": "Discussion",
+      "category": "advancement",
+      "focus": "advancement"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Most studies evaluated and compared an average of 3.6 different ML algorithms for churn prediction.",
+      "improved_version": "This review introduces a comprehensive benchmarking protocol for evaluating ML algorithms in mobile app churn prediction, encouraging future studies to adopt standardized evaluation procedures.",
+      "explanation": "Establishing a benchmarking protocol enhances methodological contribution and comparability.",
+      "location": "Results",
+      "category": "novelty",
+      "focus": "novelty"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size.",
+      "improved_version": "The review develops a new dataset characterization schema that standardizes reporting of dataset size, class imbalance, and data collection periods, facilitating cross-study comparison.",
+      "explanation": "A new schema improves verification and comparability, contributing to methodological rigor.",
+      "location": "Results",
+      "category": "verification",
+      "focus": "verification"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review underscores the importance of behavioral features like app logins and progress metrics.",
+      "improved_version": "The review proposes a novel feature engineering pipeline that automatically extracts and ranks behavioral features from raw app interaction logs, enhancing model interpretability and performance.",
+      "explanation": "Automated feature engineering pipeline adds innovation and practical utility.",
+      "location": "Results",
       "category": "contribution",
       "focus": "contribution"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Few studies have evaluated churn prevention strategies in controlled settings.",
+      "improved_version": "The review advocates for designing and conducting controlled experimental trials integrating churn prediction and prevention strategies, and proposes a standardized experimental framework for such evaluations.",
+      "explanation": "A new experimental framework advances the field by guiding future empirical validation.",
+      "location": "Discussion",
+      "category": "advancement",
+      "focus": "advancement"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The paper emphasizes the potential of behavioral features for universal applicability across app domains.",
+      "improved_version": "The review develops a cross-domain transferable feature set and tests its predictive power in multiple app contexts, demonstrating its generalizability and practical relevance.",
+      "explanation": "Empirical validation of transferability enhances contribution and knowledge advancement.",
+      "location": "Discussion",
+      "category": "advancement",
+      "focus": "advancement"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review notes heterogeneity in datasets, definitions, and metrics, limiting meta-analytical synthesis.",
+      "improved_version": "The review proposes a harmonized data collection and reporting protocol to reduce heterogeneity, enabling future meta-analyses and cumulative knowledge building.",
+      "explanation": "This standardization effort directly advances research methodology and verification."
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "novelty_assessment": "This research introduces a comprehensive framework for long-term nonadherence prediction using behavioral engagement data, applicable across different health conditions and regulatory environments. While the use of machine learning for churn prediction is established, applying it systematically to diverse mHealth interventions with a focus on both adherence and churn over extended durations represents a notable advancement. The integration of intervention-specific features and temporal modeling adds further novelty, although explicit methodological innovations could be more clearly articulated.",
-    "contribution_analysis": "The study significantly contributes by demonstrating that behavioral app engagement features can reliably predict nonadherence over extended periods, enabling timely interventions. It bridges a gap in the literature by validating models across different health conditions and regulatory contexts, thus enhancing generalizability. The detailed analysis of feature importance and potential for in-app targeted strategies offers practical insights for intervention design, advancing both scientific understanding and clinical applicability.",
-    "verification_status": "While the models show high predictive accuracy, the paper lacks prospective validation or external dataset testing, which are essential to confirm real-world effectiveness. The claims of generalizability are supported by performance across two datasets, but further validation in diverse, real-world settings is needed to substantiate these claims fully.",
-    "comparative_analysis": "The paper references prior studies predicting churn at specific points but does not directly compare performance metrics with existing benchmarks. Incorporating such comparisons would better position this work within the current literature, highlighting its relative strengths and innovations.",
-    "advancement_evaluation": "The research advances knowledge by extending predictive modeling to longer durations and multiple health conditions, emphasizing the potential for scalable, real-time adherence management. However, the translation of predictive accuracy into health outcomes remains to be demonstrated, and future work should focus on integrating these models into clinical workflows and evaluating their impact on health metrics."
+    "novelty_assessment": "The research consolidates existing ML algorithms and features used in mobile app churn prediction but does not introduce fundamentally new models or theoretical frameworks. Its novelty lies mainly in systematic synthesis rather than innovation in methodology or theory.",
+    "contribution_analysis": "The review\u2019s main contribution is providing a comprehensive overview of current practices, identifying behavioral features as most predictive, and highlighting gaps such as limited experimental validation of churn prevention strategies. It offers practical recommendations but lacks novel models or empirical validation of proposed frameworks.",
+    "verification_status": "The claims about feature importance and algorithm performance are based on descriptive summaries without meta-analytic statistical testing, which limits the strength of verification. The heterogeneity of studies further complicates definitive verification of claims.",
+    "comparative_analysis": "While the review compares its findings with telecommunication and other sectors, it does not deeply analyze how methodologies differ or how insights from other domains could inform innovations in mobile app contexts. This limits the comparative contribution.",
+    "advancement_evaluation": "The review advances understanding by emphasizing behavioral features and proposing standardization efforts, but it stops short of developing new models, prototypes, or empirical validation studies that would demonstrate tangible knowledge or system-level improvements."
   },
-  "summary": "This study offers a substantial contribution to the field of digital health adherence prediction by extending machine learning models to long-term, multi-condition contexts and emphasizing their practical utility. While it demonstrates high predictive performance and potential for targeted interventions, further validation and explicit methodological innovations are necessary to fully realize its impact. Overall, it advances the understanding of behavioral data's role in sustaining engagement and provides a solid foundation for future research and implementation efforts."
+  "summary": "This review provides a thorough synthesis of existing ML-based churn prediction studies in mobile apps, highlighting prevalent algorithms and features, and emphasizing behavioral data's importance. However, it offers limited original methodological innovation or empirical validation, positioning it as a valuable but incremental contribution. To elevate its impact, future work should focus on developing novel models, standardizing evaluation protocols, and empirically testing integrated churn prevention strategies in controlled settings."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/R2_results.json

@@ -3,144 +3,144 @@
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
       "category": "field_influence",
-      "location": "Abstract and Introduction",
-      "issue": "While the study demonstrates high predictive accuracy for nonadherence and churn, it primarily focuses on two specific interventions within the German healthcare context, which may limit generalizability to other settings or populations.",
+      "location": "Abstract",
+      "issue": "While the review highlights the applicability of ML algorithms across domains, it underemphasizes the potential for standardization and cross-domain benchmarking, which could significantly influence the field.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This could restrict the perceived impact of the findings across diverse global mHealth applications, potentially affecting the field's adoption of these models universally."
+      "impact": "This limits the ability to develop universally applicable models and hampers the field's progression toward best practices."
     },
     {
       "category": "implications",
       "location": "Discussion",
-      "issue": "The link between adherence prediction and actual health outcomes remains unestablished, which limits the broader clinical and health policy implications of the research.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Without evidence of improved health outcomes, the practical and policy relevance of the predictive models is somewhat constrained, reducing their potential influence on healthcare decision-making."
+      "issue": "The discussion notes limited evidence on churn prevention strategies but does not sufficiently explore the broader societal or economic implications of deploying such models at scale.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This omission reduces the perceived significance of the findings for policy and industry-wide adoption."
     },
     {
       "category": "future_research",
-      "location": "Limitations and Future Work",
-      "issue": "The models rely on rich, continuous behavioral data, which may not be available in all intervention settings, especially those with sparse or sporadic engagement data.",
+      "location": "Conclusion",
+      "issue": "The review calls for more controlled trials but lacks specific guidance on standardizing datasets, definitions, and metrics to facilitate comparability.",
       "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This limits the applicability of the models in real-world, resource-constrained environments and calls for future research on adapting models to less data-rich contexts."
+      "impact": "This hampers future research efforts by perpetuating heterogeneity and impeding meta-analyses."
     },
     {
       "category": "applications",
-      "location": "Discussion",
-      "issue": "The paper suggests in-app interventions based on predictions but does not empirically test whether such targeted strategies effectively improve adherence or health outcomes.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This leaves a gap between predictive capability and actual intervention efficacy, which is critical for translating research into practice."
+      "location": "Results",
+      "issue": "The practical applications are discussed mainly in the context of model performance, with limited emphasis on integration challenges in real-world systems.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This oversight may lead to overestimating the readiness of models for deployment, affecting industry adoption."
     },
     {
       "category": "policy",
-      "location": "Introduction and Discussion",
-      "issue": "The study emphasizes the potential for predictive models to inform targeted strategies but does not address regulatory or ethical considerations related to user privacy, consent, and data security.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Overlooking these aspects could hinder policy adoption and implementation of such models in healthcare systems."
+      "location": "Limitations and Recommendations",
+      "issue": "The review does not address privacy, ethical, or regulatory considerations related to deploying churn prediction models, especially in health and social domains.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "Ignoring policy implications could hinder responsible deployment and acceptance of these technologies."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "The rich data collected by mHealth interventions raise the question of whether \u2013 and to what extent \u2013 nonadherence can be predicted using these data.",
-      "improved_version": "The study could explicitly state the potential for these predictive models to be integrated into adaptive intervention frameworks, emphasizing how real-time predictions could enable proactive adherence support.",
-      "explanation": "This clarifies the practical utility of the models and enhances their perceived impact on intervention design.",
+      "original_text": "The findings demonstrate a wide variety of applied ML algorithms - from logistic regression to custom deep neural networks - to predict users' churn probabilities and survival times in mobile apps.",
+      "improved_version": "The abstract should explicitly state the potential for standardizing ML methodologies to enable cross-study comparability, thereby accelerating field-wide progress.",
+      "explanation": "Highlighting standardization emphasizes the importance of methodological consistency, which enhances the impact on the field.",
       "location": "Abstract",
-      "category": "impact_statement",
+      "category": "field_influence",
+      "focus": "field_influence"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review underscores the importance of behavioral features related to users\u2019 activity and progress within apps, and discusses the promising but limited results related to the effectiveness of churn prevention strategies informed by prediction models.",
+      "improved_version": "The review should further elaborate on how behavioral features can be standardized and integrated into scalable, real-time systems to maximize practical impact.",
+      "explanation": "This enhances understanding of practical applications and encourages future development of deployable solutions.",
+      "location": "Abstract",
+      "category": "applications",
       "focus": "applications"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Our models identified an average of 94% of nonadherent users between Weeks 2 and 13 in Vivira (mean AUC = 0.95).",
-      "improved_version": "Our models demonstrated high accuracy, identifying over 94% of nonadherent users across extended periods, which underscores their potential to significantly improve adherence monitoring in digital health interventions.",
-      "explanation": "Rephrasing emphasizes the significance of the predictive performance and its potential to influence adherence management.",
-      "location": "Results",
-      "category": "field_influence",
-      "focus": "field_influence"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The study extends prior research showing that methodologies effective in predicting churn during the first week remain applicable over longer durations.",
-      "improved_version": "This research advances the field by demonstrating that predictive methodologies for early churn are robust over longer durations, supporting their integration into sustained engagement strategies.",
-      "explanation": "This highlights the contribution to the field and the potential for long-term application of these models.",
-      "location": "Discussion",
-      "category": "field_influence",
-      "focus": "field_influence"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The models rely on behavioral app engagement data, which may not be available in all settings.",
-      "improved_version": "Future research should explore the adaptation of these models to settings with sparse or intermittent data, possibly incorporating alternative data sources or proxy indicators of engagement.",
-      "explanation": "This broadens the scope of applicability and encourages development of more versatile models.",
-      "location": "Limitations and Future Work",
-      "category": "future_research",
-      "focus": "future_research"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The models could be integrated with targeted in-app interventions, but their effectiveness remains untested.",
-      "improved_version": "Subsequent studies should empirically evaluate whether in-app, prediction-driven interventions effectively enhance adherence and health outcomes, establishing causal links.",
-      "explanation": "This directs future research toward validating the practical impact of the predictive models.",
+      "original_text": "Most studies evaluated and compared multiple different ML algorithms with mixed results, and no particular model emerged as a single best-performing model across a broad range of studies.",
+      "improved_version": "The discussion should include recommendations for developing benchmarking frameworks and shared datasets to identify truly generalizable models across domains.",
+      "explanation": "This promotes research standardization, facilitating clearer insights and advancing the field.",
       "location": "Discussion",
       "category": "future_research",
       "focus": "future_research"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The study does not address regulatory or ethical considerations related to data privacy.",
-      "improved_version": "Incorporating a discussion on ethical, legal, and privacy considerations is essential to facilitate responsible deployment and policy acceptance of predictive models in healthcare.",
-      "explanation": "This enhances the policy relevance and addresses critical barriers to implementation.",
+      "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, and the reporting standards were inconsistent.",
+      "improved_version": "The review should advocate for the adoption of standardized reporting guidelines, including dataset characteristics, to improve reproducibility and comparability.",
+      "explanation": "Standardized reporting enhances the scientific rigor and accelerates cumulative knowledge building.",
+      "location": "Limitations and Recommendations",
+      "category": "future_research",
+      "focus": "future_research"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review highlights the potential of churn prediction models to enable targeted churn prevention strategies but notes limited evidence from controlled trials.",
+      "improved_version": "It should emphasize the need for policy frameworks and ethical guidelines to govern the deployment of predictive models, especially in sensitive domains like health.",
+      "explanation": "Addressing policy and ethics ensures responsible innovation and broader societal acceptance.",
       "location": "Discussion",
       "category": "policy",
       "focus": "policy"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The high retention rates in these interventions may limit the generalizability of findings.",
-      "improved_version": "Future research should test the models in interventions with lower retention rates to assess their robustness and generalizability across diverse engagement contexts.",
-      "explanation": "This encourages validation in more challenging environments, broadening impact.",
-      "location": "Limitations",
-      "category": "field_influence",
-      "focus": "field_influence"
+      "original_text": "The review indicates that behavioral features such as app activity are most predictive, but it does not sufficiently explore how to operationalize these features in real-time systems.",
+      "improved_version": "Include discussion on technical challenges and solutions for integrating behavioral features into scalable, real-time churn prediction systems.",
+      "explanation": "This provides practical guidance for industry practitioners and enhances real-world impact.",
+      "location": "Results",
+      "category": "applications",
+      "focus": "applications"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The link between adherence and health outcomes remains unestablished.",
-      "improved_version": "Further longitudinal studies are needed to establish the causal relationship between adherence prediction and actual health improvements, strengthening the clinical relevance.",
-      "explanation": "This clarifies the pathway from prediction to health impact, enhancing the significance of the research.",
-      "location": "Implications",
-      "category": "implications",
-      "focus": "implications"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The models are most effective when rich, continuous behavioral data are available.",
-      "improved_version": "Developing models that perform reliably with limited or intermittent data will be crucial for broader implementation, especially in resource-constrained settings.",
-      "explanation": "This promotes research into adaptable models, increasing practical utility.",
-      "location": "Limitations and Future Work",
-      "category": "future_research",
-      "focus": "future_research"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The study emphasizes the potential for predictive models to inform targeted strategies but does not empirically test intervention efficacy.",
-      "improved_version": "Implementing and evaluating targeted adherence-promoting strategies based on these predictions in prospective trials will be vital to demonstrate real-world effectiveness.",
-      "explanation": "This guides future work toward translating predictive insights into tangible health benefits.",
+      "original_text": "The review mentions the importance of model complexity but does not sufficiently address explainability and transparency issues.",
+      "improved_version": "Add a detailed discussion on balancing model performance with explainability, especially for health and social applications where interpretability is critical.",
+      "explanation": "This guides future research and deployment toward more responsible AI practices.",
       "location": "Discussion",
       "category": "applications",
       "focus": "applications"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The study's focus on German healthcare interventions may limit applicability elsewhere.",
-      "improved_version": "Future research should validate these models across diverse healthcare systems and cultural contexts to enhance their global relevance.",
-      "explanation": "This broadens the potential impact and adoption of the models worldwide.",
-      "location": "Limitations",
-      "category": "field_influence",
-      "focus": "field_influence"
+      "original_text": "The review notes the emergence of digital health applications but does not deeply analyze the unique challenges in health-related domains.",
+      "improved_version": "Expand on health-specific challenges, including privacy, data security, and regulatory compliance, and how they influence model development and deployment.",
+      "explanation": "This enhances the policy relevance and practical applicability in sensitive domains.",
+      "location": "Introduction",
+      "category": "policy",
+      "focus": "policy"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The models' predictive performance improves over time as more data become available.",
-      "improved_version": "Designing models that can adapt and maintain accuracy with evolving data streams will be essential for sustained long-term application.",
-      "explanation": "This emphasizes the importance of model adaptability for ongoing impact.",
-      "location": "Results",
+      "original_text": "The review emphasizes the importance of behavioral features but does not sufficiently discuss the potential biases and fairness issues in ML models.",
+      "improved_version": "Incorporate a discussion on bias mitigation, fairness, and ethical considerations in churn prediction models to promote responsible AI development.",
+      "explanation": "This aligns the research with societal values and policy standards, increasing its broader impact.",
+      "location": "Discussion",
+      "category": "policy",
+      "focus": "policy"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The conclusion advocates for more research but lacks specific guidance on how to foster interdisciplinary collaboration and data sharing.",
+      "improved_version": "Recommend establishing collaborative platforms and data repositories with standardized formats to facilitate cross-disciplinary research and accelerate innovation.",
+      "explanation": "This promotes a more integrated research ecosystem, enhancing the impact of future studies.",
+      "location": "Conclusion",
       "category": "future_research",
       "focus": "future_research"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review discusses ML algorithms but does not sufficiently address the need for explainable AI in sensitive applications like health.",
+      "improved_version": "Highlight the importance of developing and adopting explainable AI techniques to ensure transparency and trustworthiness in health-related churn prediction models.",
+      "explanation": "This encourages responsible deployment and aligns with policy trends toward ethical AI.",
+      "location": "Discussion",
+      "category": "policy",
+      "focus": "policy"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review mentions the economic impact of user retention but does not explore policy implications for data privacy and user rights.",
+      "improved_version": "Discuss the necessity of regulatory frameworks that protect user data privacy and rights while enabling effective churn prediction systems.",
+      "explanation": "Addressing this ensures responsible innovation and societal trust, amplifying the research\u2019s broader significance.",
+      "location": "Limitations and Recommendations",
+      "category": "policy",
+      "focus": "policy"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "field_influence": "This research significantly advances the field by demonstrating that machine learning models based on behavioral app engagement can accurately predict nonadherence over extended periods. The high predictive accuracy across two distinct interventions suggests that these models could be integrated into digital health platforms worldwide, potentially transforming adherence monitoring and intervention strategies.",
-    "broader_implications": "The findings imply that objective, granular user engagement data can serve as a foundation for proactive adherence support, which could lead to improved health outcomes and reduced healthcare costs. However, the current lack of evidence linking adherence prediction to actual health improvements limits the broader clinical and policy impact. Addressing this gap through longitudinal outcome studies will be crucial for translating these models into policy and practice.",
-    "future_research_impact": "Future work should focus on validating these models in diverse populations and settings, especially where engagement data are sparse. Developing adaptive models that can function with limited data and testing their integration with real-time, targeted interventions will be essential. Additionally, exploring ethical, legal, and privacy considerations will facilitate responsible deployment in healthcare systems.",
-    "practical_applications": "The models' ability to identify users at risk of nonadherence before full disengagement opens avenues for implementing personalized, in-app interventions such as tailored notifications, content adjustments, or motivational prompts. Empirical validation of these strategies' effectiveness in improving adherence and health outcomes is a necessary next step to realize their practical potential.",
-    "policy_implications": "The study underscores the need for policies that support data privacy, user consent, and ethical use of predictive analytics in healthcare. Establishing frameworks for responsible data handling and transparent model deployment will be vital for gaining regulatory approval and public trust, ultimately enabling scalable integration into healthcare delivery."
+    "field_influence": "The review effectively synthesizes current ML approaches for churn prediction across mobile app domains, highlighting their potential to influence user retention strategies and industry practices. However, emphasizing the need for standardized benchmarks and cross-domain validation would further enhance its impact on advancing the field.",
+    "broader_implications": "The findings suggest that behavioral features are universally predictive, which could inform policy and industry standards for data collection and model deployment. Addressing ethical, privacy, and fairness considerations is crucial for responsible scaling and societal acceptance of these models.",
+    "future_research_impact": "The review underscores the necessity for standardized datasets, reporting guidelines, and controlled trials to validate models in real-world settings. Promoting interdisciplinary collaboration and open data sharing will accelerate the development of robust, generalizable, and ethically sound churn prediction systems.",
+    "practical_applications": "While the review highlights promising models and features, translating these into scalable, real-time systems remains a challenge. Future work should focus on operationalizing behavioral features, ensuring model explainability, and integrating models seamlessly into existing app infrastructures.",
+    "policy_implications": "The deployment of churn prediction models, especially in health and social domains, must be guided by policies that address privacy, data security, and ethical use. Developing regulatory frameworks and promoting explainable AI will be essential for responsible adoption and societal trust."
   },
-  "summary": "This study offers a robust demonstration of machine learning models capable of accurately predicting nonadherence in digital health interventions over extended periods, highlighting their potential to enhance adherence support and health outcomes. While the technical performance is impressive, further validation in diverse settings, empirical testing of intervention efficacy, and addressing ethical considerations are essential to maximize its impact. Overall, the research makes a valuable contribution to the field of digital health, with promising implications for future intervention design, policy development, and health system integration."
+  "summary": "This review provides a comprehensive overview of ML-based churn prediction in mobile apps, emphasizing behavioral features and model performance. Its strengths lie in synthesizing diverse methodologies and highlighting practical and research gaps. To maximize its impact, future work should focus on standardization, ethical considerations, and rigorous validation in real-world settings, thereby fostering responsible innovation and broad societal benefits."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/R3_results.json

@@ -1,134 +1,122 @@
 {
-  "ethics_compliance_score": 4,
+  "ethics_compliance_score": 3,
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
       "category": "conflicts",
-      "location": "Author Contributions and Conflicts of Interest section",
-      "issue": "Authors disclose affiliations with institutions and funding sources, but the potential influence of funding entities (e.g., health insurers, investors) on study design or interpretation is not explicitly addressed.",
+      "location": "Author Contributions & Competing Interests section",
+      "issue": "The authors disclose affiliations and funding sources, including industry ties (e.g., CSS, Uniqa, Pathmate Technologies), but do not explicitly discuss potential conflicts of interest or measures taken to mitigate bias.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Unclear influence of funding or affiliations may raise concerns about bias or conflicts of interest affecting research objectivity."
+      "impact": "Lack of explicit conflict of interest management could raise concerns about bias influencing study design, interpretation, or reporting."
     },
     {
       "category": "privacy",
-      "location": "Abstract and Methods sections",
-      "issue": "While datasets are anonymized, the extent of data privacy measures, including data encryption, storage security, and handling procedures, are not detailed.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Insufficient detail on privacy safeguards limits assurance of data protection compliance and participant confidentiality."
+      "location": "Methodology section, Data Collection paragraph",
+      "issue": "The review synthesizes data from multiple studies, many of which involve user data, but there is no explicit mention of how data privacy and anonymization are handled or whether data sharing complies with privacy standards.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "Potential privacy issues if the original data collection involved sensitive user information without clear anonymization or privacy safeguards."
     },
     {
       "category": "consent",
-      "location": "Methods section, 2.2 Dataset description",
-      "issue": "The text states that only users who provided consent under specific regulations were included, but does not specify how informed consent was obtained, documented, or whether participants were informed about data use for research.",
+      "location": "Entire document, especially Data Collection and Data Privacy sections",
+      "issue": "The review does not specify whether the original studies obtained informed consent from users for data collection and analysis, nor does it address how consent procedures were handled in the included studies.",
       "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Lack of explicit description of informed consent procedures raises questions about participant autonomy and ethical compliance."
+      "impact": "Absence of discussion on consent procedures undermines ethical transparency regarding participant rights and data use."
     },
     {
       "category": "integrity",
-      "location": "Discussion and Limitations sections",
-      "issue": "The study relies on retrospective data and does not specify procedures for data validation, quality control, or measures to prevent data fabrication or manipulation.",
+      "location": "Results and Discussion sections",
+      "issue": "The review reports performance metrics and model comparisons but does not address potential biases, overfitting, or validation procedures used in the original studies, which are critical for research integrity.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Potential issues with data integrity could undermine research validity and trustworthiness."
+      "impact": "Limited transparency about model validation and bias control could compromise the trustworthiness of the synthesized findings."
     },
     {
       "category": "guidelines",
-      "location": "Ethics Declaration",
-      "issue": "The study claims exemption from ethics approval due to anonymized data but does not specify adherence to international ethical standards such as the Declaration of Helsinki or ICH-GCP guidelines.",
+      "location": "Overall methodology and reporting sections",
+      "issue": "While the review follows PRISMA guidelines, it notes inconsistent reporting standards across included studies and provides recommendations, but does not specify adherence to ethical guidelines like the Declaration of Helsinki or institutional review board (IRB) approvals in the original studies.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "While likely acceptable, explicit mention of adherence to recognized ethical standards would strengthen compliance transparency."
+      "impact": "Lack of explicit mention of ethical approval in the original studies limits assessment of compliance with established research ethics standards."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "The use of DiGA data is strictly limited. Therefore, only users who provided consent under Article 4, Section 2, 4 of the DiGA regulations (DiGA-Verordnung, DiGAV) were included.",
-      "improved_version": "The study explicitly obtained informed consent from users in accordance with Article 4, Section 2, 4 of the DiGA regulations (DiGA-Verordnung, DiGAV), including detailed procedures on how consent was obtained, documented, and participants were informed about data use for research purposes.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifying the consent process ensures compliance with ethical standards for participant autonomy and transparency.",
-      "location": "Methods section, 2.2 Dataset description",
+      "original_text": "The authors disclose affiliations and funding sources, including industry ties (e.g., CSS, Uniqa, Pathmate Technologies), but do not explicitly discuss potential conflicts of interest or measures taken to mitigate bias.",
+      "improved_version": "The authors should explicitly discuss potential conflicts of interest related to industry affiliations and describe measures taken to mitigate bias, such as independent data validation or transparency in funding influence.",
+      "explanation": "Explicit conflict of interest statements and bias mitigation strategies enhance transparency and uphold research integrity.",
+      "location": "Author Contributions & Competing Interests section",
+      "category": "conflicts",
+      "focus": "conflicts"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review synthesizes data from multiple studies, many of which involve user data, but there is no explicit mention of how data privacy and anonymization are handled or whether data sharing complies with privacy standards.",
+      "improved_version": "The review should specify whether the original studies adhered to data privacy standards, including anonymization and compliance with regulations such as GDPR or HIPAA, and describe how privacy considerations were managed.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifying privacy safeguards ensures ethical handling of user data and aligns with data protection standards.",
+      "location": "Methodology section, Data Collection paragraph",
+      "category": "privacy",
+      "focus": "privacy"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review does not specify whether the original studies obtained informed consent from users for data collection and analysis, nor does it address how consent procedures were handled in the included studies.",
+      "improved_version": "The authors should include an assessment of whether the original studies reported obtaining informed consent from participants and describe the consent procedures followed, ensuring adherence to ethical standards.",
+      "explanation": "Addressing consent procedures confirms respect for participant autonomy and ethical compliance.",
+      "location": "Introduction or Methodology section",
       "category": "consent",
       "focus": "consent"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The use of DiGA data is strictly limited. Therefore, only users who provided consent under Article 4, Section 2, 4 of the DiGA regulations (DiGA-Verordnung, DiGAV) were included.",
-      "improved_version": "The study details the informed consent procedures, including how participants were informed about data collection, purpose, and their rights, ensuring adherence to international guidelines such as the Declaration of Helsinki.",
-      "explanation": "Explicitly describing consent procedures aligns with ethical standards and enhances transparency.",
-      "location": "Abstract",
-      "category": "consent"
+      "original_text": "The review reports performance metrics and model comparisons but does not address potential biases, overfitting, or validation procedures used in the original studies.",
+      "improved_version": "The review should evaluate and discuss the validation methods, bias mitigation strategies, and overfitting controls used in the included studies to ensure research integrity.",
+      "explanation": "Transparency about validation and bias control enhances trustworthiness and scientific rigor.",
+      "location": "Results and Discussion sections",
+      "category": "integrity",
+      "focus": "integrity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The datasets are anonymized, but specific privacy measures are not detailed.",
-      "improved_version": "The datasets were anonymized following established protocols, including data encryption, secure storage, and access controls, with detailed documentation available upon request.",
-      "explanation": "Providing specific privacy measures enhances confidence in data protection and compliance with GDPR or similar regulations.",
-      "location": "Data Collection section",
-      "category": "privacy"
+      "original_text": "While the review follows PRISMA guidelines, it notes inconsistent reporting standards across included studies and does not specify adherence to ethical guidelines like the Declaration of Helsinki or IRB approvals.",
+      "improved_version": "The authors should explicitly state whether the included studies reported obtaining ethical approval from relevant review boards and adhered to established ethical guidelines such as the Declaration of Helsinki.",
+      "explanation": "Explicit mention of ethical approval in primary studies affirms compliance with recognized ethical standards.",
+      "location": "Discussion or limitations section",
+      "category": "guidelines",
+      "focus": "guidelines"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "While datasets are anonymized, the extent of data privacy measures is not detailed.",
-      "improved_version": "The study describes comprehensive data privacy protocols, including encryption during data transfer, secure storage environments, and restricted access, in accordance with GDPR and institutional standards.",
-      "explanation": "Detailing privacy safeguards demonstrates commitment to data protection standards.",
-      "location": "Discussion section",
-      "category": "privacy"
+      "original_text": "The review does not specify whether the original studies obtained informed consent from users for data collection and analysis.",
+      "improved_version": "The review should include an analysis of whether the primary studies reported obtaining informed consent from participants, and discuss the adequacy of consent procedures in protecting participant rights.",
+      "explanation": "Ensuring informed consent aligns with ethical standards and enhances participant protection.",
+      "location": "Methodology or discussion sections",
+      "category": "consent",
+      "focus": "consent"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The study states that it involves analysis of anonymized datasets, but does not specify how informed consent was obtained.",
-      "improved_version": "The study explicitly states that informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection, with clear information provided about data use, confidentiality, and the right to withdraw, in line with ethical guidelines.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifying consent procedures affirms respect for participant autonomy and ethical compliance.",
-      "location": "Introduction",
-      "category": "consent"
+      "original_text": "There is no mention of how data privacy was maintained in the original studies, especially regarding sensitive user information.",
+      "improved_version": "The review should evaluate whether the original studies implemented privacy-preserving measures such as data anonymization, encryption, and compliance with relevant data protection laws.",
+      "explanation": "Explicit focus on privacy measures ensures ethical data handling and compliance with legal standards.",
+      "location": "Data collection paragraph",
+      "category": "privacy",
+      "focus": "privacy"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The study relies on retrospective data and does not specify procedures for data validation or quality control.",
-      "improved_version": "The research team implemented rigorous data validation and quality control procedures, including consistency checks, outlier detection, and validation against source records, to ensure data integrity.",
-      "explanation": "Describing data validation processes supports research integrity and validity.",
-      "location": "Methodology section",
-      "category": "integrity"
+      "original_text": "The authors disclose affiliations and funding but do not explicitly discuss how potential conflicts of interest were managed or mitigated.",
+      "improved_version": "The authors should include a statement on how potential conflicts of interest were identified and managed, such as through independent review or disclosure policies.",
+      "explanation": "Proactive conflict management enhances credibility and ethical transparency.",
+      "location": "Author Contributions & Competing Interests",
+      "category": "conflicts",
+      "focus": "conflicts"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The ethics declaration states exemption from ethics approval but does not specify adherence to international standards.",
-      "improved_version": "The study affirms adherence to international ethical standards, including the Declaration of Helsinki and ICH-GCP guidelines, with documentation of compliance procedures available upon request.",
-      "explanation": "Explicitly referencing recognized standards reinforces ethical rigor.",
-      "location": "Ethics Declaration",
-      "category": "guidelines"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Authors disclose affiliations and funding but do not explicitly address potential influence on study design or interpretation.",
-      "improved_version": "The authors declare that funding sources and affiliations had no influence on study design, data analysis, or interpretation, and any potential conflicts of interest are transparently disclosed.",
-      "explanation": "Explicit conflict of interest statement enhances transparency and trust.",
-      "location": "Conflicts of Interest section",
-      "category": "conflicts"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The datasets are anonymized, but the privacy safeguards are not detailed.",
-      "improved_version": "The datasets used were anonymized following GDPR-compliant procedures, including pseudonymization, secure storage, and restricted access, with detailed protocols documented in supplementary materials.",
-      "explanation": "Providing concrete privacy measures ensures compliance and reassures stakeholders.",
-      "location": "Data collection and discussion sections",
-      "category": "privacy"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The study mentions that only users who provided consent were included but does not specify how consent was obtained.",
-      "improved_version": "The study explicitly describes the informed consent process, including how participants were informed about data collection, purpose, confidentiality, and their rights, ensuring compliance with ethical standards.",
-      "explanation": "Clear consent procedures uphold ethical principles of autonomy and informed participation.",
-      "location": "Introduction",
-      "category": "consent"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The research relies on retrospective data without detailing validation procedures.",
-      "improved_version": "The research team conducted data validation steps, including consistency checks, outlier detection, and cross-verification against source records, to ensure data accuracy and integrity.",
-      "explanation": "Describing validation processes supports research integrity and reproducibility.",
-      "location": "Methodology section",
-      "category": "integrity"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The ethics declaration states exemption but does not specify adherence to international guidelines.",
-      "improved_version": "The study confirms adherence to international ethical standards, including the Declaration of Helsinki and ICH-GCP, with documentation available upon request.",
-      "explanation": "Explicit mention of standards reinforces ethical compliance.",
-      "location": "Ethics declaration"
+      "original_text": "The review highlights the need for standardized reporting but does not specify whether the primary studies adhered to ethical guidelines like the Declaration of Helsinki or obtained IRB approval.",
+      "improved_version": "The review should assess and report whether the included studies explicitly stated adherence to ethical guidelines and obtained IRB or ethics committee approval, ensuring compliance with research standards.",
+      "explanation": "Explicit reporting of ethical approval affirms adherence to established research ethics.",
+      "location": "Discussion",
+      "category": "guidelines",
+      "focus": "guidelines"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "conflicts_assessment": "The authors disclose affiliations with academic and industry partners and funding from insurers and investors, but do not explicitly clarify how potential conflicts of interest were managed or how funding sources may have influenced the study. Transparency in this area is essential to uphold research integrity and prevent bias.",
-    "privacy_compliance": "While datasets are anonymized, the manuscript lacks detailed description of data privacy measures such as encryption, access controls, and data handling protocols. Providing this information would strengthen confidence that data privacy regulations (e.g., GDPR) are being followed and that participant confidentiality is protected.",
-    "consent_procedures": "The study states that only users who provided consent under specific regulations were included, but does not specify how consent was obtained, whether it was informed, documented, or if participants were aware of the research use of their data. Clear documentation of informed consent procedures is critical for ethical compliance.",
-    "research_integrity": "The manuscript does not detail procedures for data validation, quality control, or measures to prevent data manipulation. Implementing and describing such procedures are vital to ensure the accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility of research findings.",
-    "guidelines_adherence": "The ethics declaration mentions exemption from ethics approval but does not specify adherence to international standards such as the Declaration of Helsinki or ICH-GCP. Explicitly stating compliance with these standards would enhance the ethical rigor of the research."
+    "conflicts_assessment": "The manuscript discloses author affiliations and funding sources, including industry ties, but lacks explicit discussion of potential conflicts of interest or bias mitigation strategies. This omission could lead to perceived or actual bias, affecting the credibility of the findings. Clear conflict of interest statements and management procedures are essential for transparency.",
+    "privacy_compliance": "The review synthesizes data from multiple studies involving user data but does not detail how privacy and data protection measures were handled in the original studies. Without explicit mention of anonymization, data security, or compliance with privacy laws like GDPR or HIPAA, there is a risk of privacy violations, which undermines ethical standards in data handling.",
+    "informed_consent_procedures": "There is no discussion on whether the primary studies obtained informed consent from participants for data collection and analysis. This omission raises concerns about respect for participant autonomy and adherence to ethical research practices. Clarifying consent procedures is critical for ethical compliance.",
+    "research_integrity": "The review reports performance metrics and model comparisons but does not evaluate validation procedures, bias mitigation, or overfitting controls used in the original studies. Transparency in these areas is vital to ensure the scientific validity and reproducibility of the findings, thereby upholding research integrity.",
+    "guidelines_adherence": "While PRISMA guidelines are followed for the review process, there is no explicit mention of whether the primary studies adhered to ethical standards such as the Declaration of Helsinki or obtained IRB approval. This gap limits the assessment of the ethical rigor of the included research, which is fundamental for high-quality ethical standards."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the study demonstrates a good level of ethical awareness, particularly in data anonymization and compliance with regional regulations. However, it would benefit from more explicit descriptions of informed consent procedures, data privacy safeguards, and management of potential conflicts of interest. Addressing these areas would elevate the research to an excellent standard, ensuring full transparency and adherence to international ethical guidelines."
+  "summary": "Overall, the systematic review demonstrates a solid methodological approach but exhibits moderate gaps in explicitly addressing key ethical considerations such as conflicts of interest, data privacy, informed consent, and adherence to ethical guidelines in the primary studies. These issues moderately impact the ethical robustness of the research. To enhance research standards, explicit statements and assessments regarding conflicts, privacy safeguards, consent procedures, and ethical approvals should be incorporated. The score of 3 reflects acceptable but improvable compliance, with specific areas needing attention to reach higher ethical standards."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/R4_results.json

@@ -3,125 +3,136 @@
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
       "category": "data_sharing",
-      "location": "Abstract, Paragraph 1",
-      "issue": "No explicit statement or link provided regarding the availability of the datasets used in the study.",
+      "location": "Abstract & Methods section",
+      "issue": "While the review mentions that 16% of studies used publicly available datasets, there is no explicit statement about the availability of datasets used in the reviewed studies or whether datasets are shared openly or upon request.",
       "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This significantly hampers research transparency and reproducibility, as other researchers cannot access the underlying data to validate or extend findings."
+      "impact": "This significantly hampers reproducibility and transparency, as researchers cannot verify or reuse the data without clear access information."
     },
     {
       "category": "code_availability",
-      "location": "Methodology, Paragraph 2.2",
-      "issue": "While it mentions that Python packages are listed in Appendix 6.1, there is no mention of publicly sharing the actual code or scripts used for data analysis, model training, or evaluation.",
+      "location": "Introduction & Methods section",
+      "issue": "There is no mention of whether the original code implementations, models, or analysis scripts from the included studies are publicly shared or accessible.",
       "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Lack of accessible code impairs reproducibility and limits the ability of others to verify or build upon the computational methods."
+      "impact": "This limits the ability of other researchers to reproduce or build upon the models, reducing transparency and scientific rigor."
     },
     {
       "category": "documentation",
-      "location": "Methodology, Paragraph 2.2",
-      "issue": "No detailed documentation or repository links are provided for the code or analysis pipelines, making it difficult to understand or replicate the procedures.",
+      "location": "Methodology & Data Description sections",
+      "issue": "The review notes that many studies do not report detailed feature sets, sampling methods, or performance metrics consistently, indicating incomplete documentation of methodologies.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Insufficient documentation reduces transparency and hampers reproducibility efforts."
+      "impact": "Poor documentation impairs reproducibility and understanding of the models' development and evaluation processes."
     },
     {
       "category": "restrictions",
-      "location": "Abstract, Paragraph 1",
-      "issue": "Data use is described as strictly limited and only accessible upon consent, but no details on how external researchers can request access or whether data sharing is possible under certain conditions.",
+      "location": "Discussion section",
+      "issue": "The review highlights that most datasets are private, with only a minority being publicly available, but it does not justify or explain the access restrictions or whether data sharing is feasible under certain conditions.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Unclear access restrictions limit external validation and secondary analyses, affecting transparency."
+      "impact": "Lack of justification for restrictions limits transparency about data accessibility and hampers efforts to facilitate open science."
     },
     {
       "category": "reproducibility",
-      "location": "Discussion, Paragraph 4.4",
-      "issue": "While the study mentions the use of publicly available Python packages, it does not specify whether the entire analysis pipeline, trained models, or hyperparameters are shared openly.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This limits the ability of others to reproduce the exact results or adapt the models for further research."
+      "location": "Discussion & Conclusion sections",
+      "issue": "There is no indication that the review or the original studies provide detailed protocols, code repositories, or data sharing guidelines to support reproducibility.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "This severely restricts the ability of others to replicate findings or validate models, undermining scientific credibility."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "The use of DiGA data is strictly limited. Therefore, only users who provided consent under Article 4, Section 2, 4 of the DiGA regulations (DiGA-Verordnung, DiGAV) were included.",
-      "improved_version": "Include a statement explicitly providing access to the anonymized datasets through a data repository or upon reasonable request, with clear instructions for data access procedures, respecting privacy regulations.",
-      "explanation": "Explicitly sharing anonymized data enhances transparency and allows external validation, improving research reproducibility.",
-      "location": "Methodology, Paragraph 2.1.1",
+      "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users.",
+      "improved_version": "The review should explicitly state whether the datasets from the included studies are publicly available, available upon request, or proprietary, and provide links or access conditions where applicable.",
+      "explanation": "Clear data access information enhances transparency and enables reproducibility by allowing other researchers to obtain the same data for validation or further analysis.",
+      "location": "Data Description section",
       "category": "data_sharing",
       "focus": "data_sharing"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "While it mentions that Python packages are listed in Appendix 6.1, there is no mention of publicly sharing the actual code or scripts used for data analysis, model training, or evaluation.",
-      "improved_version": "Provide a link to a public code repository (e.g., GitHub, GitLab) containing all scripts, notebooks, and configuration files used for data preprocessing, model training, and evaluation, with detailed README documentation.",
-      "explanation": "Sharing the complete codebase enables full reproducibility and facilitates adoption and extension by other researchers.",
-      "location": "Methodology, Paragraph 2.2",
+      "original_text": "There is no mention of whether the original code implementations, models, or analysis scripts from the included studies are publicly shared or accessible.",
+      "improved_version": "The review should include a statement on the availability of code repositories, such as links to GitHub or other platforms, and specify whether code is shared under open licenses.",
+      "explanation": "Providing access to code repositories significantly improves reproducibility and allows others to verify and extend the models used in the studies.",
+      "location": "Methodology section",
       "category": "code_availability",
       "focus": "code_availability"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "No detailed documentation or repository links are provided for the code or analysis pipelines, making it difficult to understand or replicate the procedures.",
-      "improved_version": "Develop comprehensive documentation, including step-by-step instructions, environment setup, dependencies, and example commands, hosted alongside the code repository.",
-      "explanation": "Well-documented code significantly improves usability and reproducibility for external researchers.",
-      "location": "Methodology, Paragraph 2.2",
+      "original_text": "The review notes that many studies do not report detailed feature sets, sampling methods, or performance metrics consistently.",
+      "improved_version": "Authors should recommend or enforce standardized reporting guidelines for methodology, including detailed descriptions of feature engineering, sampling techniques, and performance metrics, and suggest depositing such details in supplementary materials or repositories.",
+      "explanation": "Standardized documentation ensures that other researchers can accurately reproduce the models and compare results across studies.",
+      "location": "Methodology & Data Description sections",
       "category": "documentation",
       "focus": "documentation"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Data use is described as strictly limited and only accessible upon consent, but no details on how external researchers can request access or whether data sharing is possible under certain conditions.",
-      "improved_version": "Add a dedicated 'Data Availability' section specifying conditions for data access, including contact details or links to data access portals, and any necessary data use agreements.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifying access procedures promotes transparency and enables other researchers to validate findings or conduct secondary analyses.",
-      "location": "Abstract, Paragraph 1",
+      "original_text": "Most datasets are private, with only a minority being publicly available, but it does not justify or explain the access restrictions.",
+      "improved_version": "The review should include a discussion on the reasons for data access restrictions and recommend best practices for data anonymization and sharing under ethical guidelines to facilitate open science.",
+      "explanation": "Justifying restrictions and providing pathways for data sharing under ethical standards can promote transparency while respecting privacy concerns.",
+      "location": "Discussion section",
       "category": "restrictions",
       "focus": "restrictions"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "While the study mentions the use of publicly available Python packages, it does not specify whether the entire analysis pipeline, trained models, or hyperparameters are shared openly.",
-      "improved_version": "Publish the trained models, hyperparameter configurations, and analysis pipelines in the public repository, with version control and detailed documentation on how to reproduce the results.",
-      "explanation": "Sharing trained models and configurations ensures that others can replicate the exact experiments and validate the reported performance metrics.",
-      "location": "Discussion, Paragraph 4.4",
+      "original_text": "There is no indication that the review or the original studies provide detailed protocols, code repositories, or data sharing guidelines.",
+      "improved_version": "The review should advocate for the inclusion of publicly accessible repositories containing code, data, and detailed protocols, and encourage authors to publish these alongside their studies.",
+      "explanation": "Open repositories enhance reproducibility and facilitate cumulative science by providing ready access to all necessary resources.",
+      "location": "Conclusion section",
       "category": "reproducibility",
       "focus": "reproducibility"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The datasets are anonymized and access is limited, but no mention of data sharing under controlled access or data use agreements.",
-      "improved_version": "Establish a controlled access data sharing framework, such as a data use agreement or data enclave, and provide detailed instructions for researchers to apply for access, ensuring privacy compliance.",
-      "explanation": "Controlled access mechanisms balance data privacy with the need for external validation, enhancing transparency and reproducibility.",
-      "location": "Abstract, Paragraph 1",
+      "original_text": "The review mentions that many studies do not report performance metrics consistently, hindering comparison.",
+      "improved_version": "It should recommend adopting standardized reporting frameworks, such as including all relevant performance metrics (AUC, F1, accuracy, precision, recall) with confidence intervals, and depositing results in open repositories.",
+      "explanation": "Consistent reporting standards improve comparability and meta-analyses, advancing the field's transparency.",
+      "location": "Results section",
+      "category": "documentation",
+      "focus": "documentation"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review highlights that datasets are often proprietary and not shared openly.",
+      "improved_version": "Where possible, authors should be encouraged to share anonymized datasets or synthetic data that mimic the original data, and provide access instructions or data repositories.",
+      "explanation": "Sharing data, even in anonymized form, greatly enhances reproducibility and validation efforts.",
+      "location": "Data Description section",
       "category": "data_sharing",
       "focus": "data_sharing"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The paper references Appendix 6.1 for hyperparameter grids but does not provide code or scripts for hyperparameter tuning.",
-      "improved_version": "Share the hyperparameter tuning scripts and configuration files in the public repository, along with logs or records of the tuning process.",
-      "explanation": "Transparency in hyperparameter selection supports reproducibility and allows others to evaluate the robustness of the models.",
-      "location": "Methodology, Paragraph 2.2",
+      "original_text": "There is no mention of whether the original code implementations, models, or analysis scripts from the included studies are publicly shared or accessible.",
+      "improved_version": "The review should recommend that all studies deposit their code and models in open platforms like GitHub, GitLab, or Zenodo, with clear licensing and versioning information.",
+      "explanation": "Open code repositories are critical for reproducibility, peer validation, and further development of models.",
+      "location": "Methodology section",
       "category": "code_availability",
       "focus": "code_availability"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "No explicit mention of the software environment or containerization (e.g., Docker) for reproducing the analysis.",
-      "improved_version": "Provide a Dockerfile or environment.yml file specifying all software dependencies and environment setup instructions to facilitate environment replication.",
-      "explanation": "Containerized environments ensure consistent software configurations, reducing reproducibility barriers caused by dependency issues.",
-      "location": "Discussion, Paragraph 4.4",
+      "original_text": "The review notes inconsistent reporting of performance metrics across studies.",
+      "improved_version": "It should suggest adopting a common set of evaluation metrics and reporting standards, such as the TRIPOD guidelines for predictive modeling, and encourage sharing of raw results and code for independent validation.",
+      "explanation": "Standardized reporting improves transparency, comparability, and cumulative knowledge building.",
+      "location": "Results & Discussion sections",
+      "category": "documentation",
+      "focus": "documentation"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review indicates that most datasets are private, limiting access.",
+      "improved_version": "Authors should be encouraged to share datasets under appropriate ethical and privacy constraints, possibly via controlled access repositories or synthetic data generation, and clearly state access procedures.",
+      "explanation": "Facilitating data access under ethical standards promotes transparency and reproducibility without compromising privacy.",
+      "location": "Discussion section",
+      "category": "restrictions",
+      "focus": "restrictions"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "There is no explicit mention of whether the review or the original studies provide detailed protocols, code repositories, or data sharing guidelines.",
+      "improved_version": "The review should recommend that authors include detailed methodological protocols, analysis scripts, and data sharing instructions in supplementary materials or dedicated repositories to support reproducibility.",
+      "explanation": "Comprehensive documentation ensures that other researchers can accurately replicate and validate the models and analyses.",
+      "location": "Conclusion section",
       "category": "reproducibility",
       "focus": "reproducibility"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The analysis relies on proprietary or restricted datasets, but no mention of synthetic or simulated datasets for methodological validation.",
-      "improved_version": "Create and share synthetic datasets that mimic the statistical properties of the original data, or provide detailed data simulation scripts, to enable method validation without privacy concerns.",
-      "explanation": "Synthetic data allows broader testing and validation of methods, enhancing transparency while respecting privacy restrictions.",
-      "location": "Discussion, Paragraph 4.4",
-      "category": "data_sharing",
-      "focus": "data_sharing"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The paper does not specify whether the analysis code has been peer-reviewed or validated independently.",
-      "improved_version": "Include validation reports or peer review comments on the shared code and models, or specify that the code has been independently validated, to increase trustworthiness.",
-      "explanation": "Independent validation of code and models enhances credibility and supports research transparency."
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "data_sharing_assessment": "The manuscript does not provide explicit links or instructions for accessing the datasets used, citing strict limitations due to consent and privacy regulations. This restricts external validation and replication efforts, reducing overall transparency.",
-    "code_availability": "There is no indication that the analysis scripts, models, or hyperparameter configurations are publicly shared. This omission hampers reproducibility and limits the ability of others to verify or extend the computational methods.",
-    "documentation_completeness": "The manuscript references appendices for hyperparameter grids but lacks comprehensive documentation, such as detailed setup instructions, environment specifications, or usage guides, which are essential for reproducibility.",
-    "restrictions_justification": "Data access restrictions are justified by privacy and consent limitations, but the absence of clear procedures for data requests or controlled access mechanisms diminishes transparency and external validation potential.",
-    "reproducibility_support": "While the study mentions the use of standard Python packages, it does not provide code repositories, environment files, or trained models, which are critical for reproducing the exact results and verifying findings."
+    "data_sharing_assessment": "The review indicates that most datasets are proprietary, with only a minority being publicly available, and lacks explicit statements about data sharing policies or access conditions. This limits reproducibility and transparency, as external researchers cannot verify or reuse the data unless access is clarified.",
+    "code_availability": "There is no mention of whether the original codebases, models, or analysis scripts from the included studies are publicly accessible. This omission hampers efforts to reproduce results or extend the models, reducing overall transparency.",
+    "documentation_completeness": "Many studies do not report detailed feature engineering processes, sampling methods, or performance metrics consistently. This incomplete documentation impairs understanding and replication of the methodologies used.",
+    "restrictions_justification": "While the review notes that datasets are often private, it does not justify these restrictions or discuss potential pathways for sharing data under ethical or privacy constraints, which could enhance transparency.",
+    "reproducibility_support": "The absence of references to publicly available code repositories, detailed protocols, or data sharing guidelines indicates limited support for reproducibility, undermining confidence and scientific rigor."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the study demonstrates solid methodological rigor but falls short in providing accessible data and code resources. To enhance research transparency and reproducibility, the authors should consider sharing anonymized datasets where possible, providing comprehensive code repositories with documentation, and establishing clear procedures for data access within privacy constraints. These steps would elevate the quality and impact of the research, aligning with best practices in open science."
+  "summary": "Overall, the review demonstrates significant gaps in data and code availability, with most datasets remaining proprietary and no clear evidence of shared code repositories. While the research field shows promising methodologies, the lack of explicit sharing policies and comprehensive documentation hampers reproducibility and transparency. To improve, the field should adopt standardized reporting, promote open data and code sharing, and justify access restrictions where necessary. These steps will enhance scientific rigor, facilitate validation, and accelerate progress in churn prediction research."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/R5_results.json

@@ -2,166 +2,193 @@
   "statistical_rigor_score": 3,
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
-      "category": "assumptions",
-      "location": "Methodology: Model training and evaluation",
-      "issue": "While the authors mention normalizing features and applying stratified cross-validation, there is limited discussion on verifying key assumptions of the statistical models used, such as the independence of observations, multicollinearity among features, or the distributional assumptions underlying the ML algorithms.",
+      "category": "test_selection",
+      "location": "Abstract & Results sections",
+      "issue": "The review reports a variety of machine learning algorithms and performance metrics but lacks detailed discussion on the appropriateness of the specific statistical tests used for model evaluation, such as whether cross-validation, hold-out validation, or statistical significance testing was employed appropriately.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Insufficient assumption verification can compromise the validity of the model performance estimates and may lead to overfitting or biased results."
+      "impact": "Without explicit validation procedures and statistical test appropriateness, the reliability of performance comparisons across studies is uncertain."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "assumptions",
+      "location": "Methodology & Data Preparation sections",
+      "issue": "There is limited mention of assumption verification for statistical models, such as checking for multicollinearity, distributional assumptions, or independence of observations, especially in the context of ML algorithms like regression or survival models.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "Unverified assumptions can lead to biased or invalid model results, reducing the validity of the conclusions."
     },
     {
       "category": "sample_size",
-      "location": "Methodology: Dataset description",
-      "issue": "Although large sample sizes are used, there is no explicit sample size justification or power analysis to confirm that the datasets are sufficient for the complexity of the models and the number of features used.",
+      "location": "Results section",
+      "issue": "While dataset sizes are reported, there is no discussion on sample size justification or power analysis to determine whether studies were adequately powered to detect meaningful effects.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Lack of sample size justification may raise concerns about the robustness and generalizability of the findings."
+      "impact": "Insufficient sample sizes can lead to overfitting or underpowered tests, affecting the robustness of the findings."
     },
     {
       "category": "multiple_comparisons",
-      "location": "Results: Model performance evaluation",
-      "issue": "Multiple performance metrics (AUC, accuracy, F1, precision, recall) are reported across numerous prediction windows without correction for multiple comparisons, increasing the risk of Type I errors.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Uncorrected multiple testing inflates the likelihood of false-positive findings, potentially overstating model performance."
+      "location": "Results & Discussion sections",
+      "issue": "Many studies report multiple performance metrics without correction for multiple comparisons, increasing the risk of Type I errors.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "This can lead to false-positive findings and overestimation of model performance."
     },
     {
       "category": "effect_size",
-      "location": "Results: Model performance",
-      "issue": "The study reports various metrics like AUC and F1 scores but does not provide effect sizes or confidence intervals for differences between models or across time points.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Absence of effect size measures limits the interpretability of the practical significance of improvements in model performance."
+      "location": "Results section",
+      "issue": "The review notes performance metrics like accuracy and AUC but does not mention effect size measures or their interpretation in the context of model improvements.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "Lack of effect size reporting hampers understanding of the practical significance of model performance differences."
     },
     {
       "category": "confidence_intervals",
-      "location": "Results: Model evaluation metrics",
-      "issue": "Performance metrics are presented as point estimates with standard deviations, but no confidence intervals are provided, which are essential for understanding the precision of these estimates.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Lacking confidence intervals reduces clarity on the statistical uncertainty around the reported metrics."
+      "location": "Results section",
+      "issue": "There is minimal mention of confidence intervals around performance metrics, which are essential for assessing the precision of estimates.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "Without confidence intervals, the reliability and generalizability of the reported metrics are unclear."
     },
     {
       "category": "p_value",
-      "location": "Discussion: Model comparisons",
-      "issue": "There is no mention of p-values or statistical tests to compare model performance metrics across different weeks or interventions, which could substantiate claims of improvements.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Without formal statistical testing, conclusions about performance differences remain descriptive rather than inferential."
+      "location": "Discussion & Results sections",
+      "issue": "The interpretation of p-values is not explicitly discussed; many performance metrics are reported without accompanying significance testing.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This limits the ability to distinguish statistically significant improvements from random variation."
     },
     {
       "category": "power",
-      "location": "Methodology: Model evaluation",
-      "issue": "No power analysis is reported to justify the sample sizes for the predictive modeling, especially for subgroups such as nonadherent users or specific weeks.",
+      "location": "Limitations section",
+      "issue": "No mention of statistical power analysis to justify the sample sizes used in the individual studies.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Insufficient power may lead to unreliable estimates of model performance, especially for less frequent classes."
+      "impact": "Potential underpowered studies may produce unreliable or non-reproducible results."
     },
     {
       "category": "missing_data",
-      "location": "Data preparation",
-      "issue": "The handling of missing data is not explicitly described; it is unclear whether imputation, exclusion, or other methods were used, which can bias results if not properly managed.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Improper handling of missing data can distort model training and evaluation, affecting validity."
+      "location": "Methodology & Data sections",
+      "issue": "Handling of missing data is inconsistently reported; only some studies mention imputation or exclusion strategies.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "Unaddressed missing data can bias results and reduce model validity."
     },
     {
       "category": "outliers",
-      "location": "Data preprocessing",
-      "issue": "There is no discussion of outlier detection or treatment, despite the presence of highly skewed variables and extreme values (e.g., SDs much larger than means).",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Unaddressed outliers can influence model training, leading to overfitting or biased importance measures."
+      "location": "Data Preparation section",
+      "issue": "There is limited discussion on outlier detection or treatment, which can influence model training and performance.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "Ignoring outliers may lead to skewed models or inflated performance metrics."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "While the authors mention normalizing features and applying stratified cross-validation, there is limited discussion on verifying key assumptions of the statistical models used, such as the independence of observations, multicollinearity among features, or the distributional assumptions underlying the ML algorithms.",
-      "improved_version": "Include a dedicated section on assumption verification, such as testing for multicollinearity among features (e.g., variance inflation factor), assessing independence of observations, and examining feature distributions. This will strengthen confidence in the robustness of the modeling approach.",
-      "explanation": "Explicitly verifying assumptions ensures that the models are appropriate for the data and that performance metrics are valid, reducing the risk of biased or overfitted results.",
-      "location": "Methodology: Model training and evaluation",
-      "category": "assumptions"
+      "original_text": "The findings demonstrate a wide variety of applied ML algorithms - from logistic regression to custom deep neural networks - to predict users' churn probabilities and survival times in mobile apps.",
+      "improved_version": "Explicitly specify the validation procedures used for each ML algorithm, such as cross-validation or train-test splits, and justify their appropriateness for the dataset sizes and model complexity.",
+      "explanation": "Clear validation strategies ensure the robustness of performance estimates and facilitate comparison across studies.",
+      "location": "Abstract",
+      "category": "test_selection",
+      "focus": "test_selection"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Although large sample sizes are used, there is no explicit sample size justification or power analysis to confirm that the datasets are sufficient for the complexity of the models and the number of features used.",
-      "improved_version": "Conduct and report a formal power analysis or sample size justification tailored to the expected effect sizes and model complexity, especially for subgroup analyses such as nonadherent users.",
-      "explanation": "A power analysis provides evidence that the sample size is adequate to detect meaningful differences or performance levels, enhancing the study\u2019s credibility.",
-      "location": "Methodology: Dataset description",
-      "category": "sample_size"
+      "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users.",
+      "improved_version": "Include a discussion on whether the sample sizes were adequate based on power analysis or rule-of-thumb criteria for the specific models employed, and report any sample size justification provided by the original studies.",
+      "explanation": "Sample size justification enhances confidence in the statistical validity and generalizability of the results.",
+      "location": "Results",
+      "category": "sample_size",
+      "focus": "sample_size"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Multiple performance metrics (AUC, accuracy, F1, precision, recall) are reported across numerous prediction windows without correction for multiple comparisons, increasing the risk of Type I errors.",
-      "improved_version": "Apply statistical corrections for multiple comparisons, such as Bonferroni or Holm adjustments, when testing differences in performance metrics across multiple time points or models. Alternatively, focus on a primary metric with confidence intervals for comparisons.",
-      "explanation": "Correcting for multiple testing reduces the likelihood of false-positive claims, ensuring that reported performance improvements are statistically robust.",
-      "location": "Results: Model performance evaluation",
-      "category": "multiple_comparisons"
+      "original_text": "Many studies report multiple performance metrics without correction for multiple comparisons.",
+      "improved_version": "Recommend the application of multiple comparison correction methods, such as Bonferroni or False Discovery Rate adjustments, when multiple metrics are tested or compared.",
+      "explanation": "This reduces the risk of false-positive findings and increases the credibility of performance claims.",
+      "location": "Results & Discussion",
+      "category": "multiple_comparisons",
+      "focus": "multiple_comparisons"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The study reports various metrics like AUC and F1 scores but does not provide effect sizes or confidence intervals for differences between models or across time points.",
-      "improved_version": "Include confidence intervals (e.g., 95%) for all performance metrics and conduct statistical tests (e.g., paired t-tests or bootstrap comparisons) to quantify the significance of differences between models or over time.",
-      "explanation": "Effect sizes and confidence intervals facilitate interpretation of the magnitude and certainty of performance differences, supporting more rigorous conclusions.",
-      "location": "Results: Model evaluation metrics",
-      "category": "effect_size"
+      "original_text": "Performance metrics like accuracy and AUC are reported, but effect sizes are not discussed.",
+      "improved_version": "Encourage reporting of effect sizes or differences in performance metrics with confidence intervals to contextualize the magnitude and uncertainty of improvements.",
+      "explanation": "Effect sizes provide insight into the practical significance of model improvements beyond mere statistical significance.",
+      "location": "Results",
+      "category": "effect_size",
+      "focus": "effect_size"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Performance metrics are presented as point estimates with standard deviations, but no confidence intervals are provided, which are essential for understanding the precision of these estimates.",
-      "improved_version": "Report confidence intervals (e.g., bootstrap 95%) for all key performance metrics to reflect the statistical uncertainty around these estimates.",
-      "explanation": "Confidence intervals provide a clearer picture of the reliability of the metrics, aiding in assessing the robustness of the models.",
-      "location": "Results: Model evaluation metrics",
-      "category": "confidence_intervals"
+      "original_text": "Minimal mention is made of confidence intervals around reported metrics.",
+      "improved_version": "Include confidence intervals for all key performance metrics, such as AUC, accuracy, and F1-score, to indicate the precision of estimates.",
+      "explanation": "Confidence intervals enhance interpretability and help assess the reliability of the reported performance measures.",
+      "location": "Results",
+      "category": "confidence_intervals",
+      "focus": "confidence_intervals"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "There is no mention of p-values or statistical tests to compare model performance metrics across different weeks or interventions, which could substantiate claims of improvements.",
-      "improved_version": "Perform formal statistical tests (e.g., paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests) on performance metrics across weeks or interventions to determine if observed differences are statistically significant, and report the p-values.",
-      "explanation": "Statistical testing provides rigorous evidence for performance improvements, moving beyond descriptive comparisons.",
-      "location": "Discussion: Model comparisons",
-      "category": "p_value"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "No power analysis is reported to justify the sample sizes for the predictive modeling, especially for subgroups such as nonadherent users or specific weeks.",
-      "improved_version": "Include a post-hoc or a priori power analysis to demonstrate that the sample sizes are sufficient to detect meaningful differences in model performance, especially for smaller subgroups.",
-      "explanation": "Power analysis ensures that the study is adequately equipped to make reliable inferences, reducing the risk of Type II errors.",
-      "location": "Methodology: Model evaluation",
-      "category": "power"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The handling of missing data is not explicitly described; it is unclear whether imputation, exclusion, or other methods were used, which can bias results if not properly managed.",
-      "improved_version": "Describe explicitly how missing data were handled, such as using multiple imputation, data exclusion criteria, or other methods, and justify the chosen approach.",
-      "explanation": "Transparent handling of missing data prevents bias and enhances reproducibility and validity of the results.",
-      "location": "Data preparation",
-      "category": "missing_data"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "There is no discussion of outlier detection or treatment, despite the presence of highly skewed variables and extreme values (e.g., SDs much larger than means).",
-      "improved_version": "Implement and report outlier detection methods (e.g., IQR-based, Z-scores) and describe how outliers were treated (e.g., winsorization, exclusion) to ensure they do not unduly influence model training.",
-      "explanation": "Addressing outliers improves model stability and the interpretability of feature importance measures.",
-      "location": "Data preprocessing",
-      "category": "outliers"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "While the authors mention normalization techniques, there is no discussion on whether the data distributions were examined or if transformations were necessary beyond square root or standard scaling.",
-      "improved_version": "Assess and report the distributional properties of features before normalization, and consider applying transformations (e.g., log, Box-Cox) if variables are highly skewed, to improve model performance and assumption validity.",
-      "explanation": "Proper data transformation ensures that features meet the assumptions of the modeling algorithms and enhances predictive accuracy.",
-      "location": "Data preparation",
-      "category": "assumptions"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The models are evaluated primarily on internal validation metrics without external validation or testing on independent datasets.",
-      "improved_version": "Validate the models on independent external datasets or through prospective validation to assess generalizability beyond the current sample.",
-      "explanation": "External validation confirms that the models are robust and applicable across different populations and settings, increasing their practical utility.",
+      "original_text": "The review reports p-values in some contexts but does not interpret them explicitly.",
+      "improved_version": "Explicitly interpret p-values in the context of model performance comparisons, and specify the significance thresholds used.",
+      "explanation": "Clear interpretation of p-values aids in understanding whether observed differences are statistically meaningful.",
       "location": "Discussion",
-      "category": "generalizability"
+      "category": "p_value",
+      "focus": "p_value"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The authors do not specify whether the models' hyperparameters were tuned using nested cross-validation or other robust methods to prevent overfitting.",
-      "improved_version": "Implement nested cross-validation for hyperparameter tuning to avoid data leakage and overfitting, and report the process in detail.",
-      "explanation": "Nested validation provides unbiased estimates of model performance and ensures that hyperparameter tuning does not inflate performance metrics.",
-      "location": "Methodology: Model training",
-      "category": "power"
+      "original_text": "There is no discussion of the statistical power of the studies.",
+      "improved_version": "Recommend that future studies perform and report power analyses to justify sample sizes and assess the likelihood of detecting true effects.",
+      "explanation": "Power analysis ensures studies are adequately equipped to detect meaningful differences, reducing false negatives.",
+      "location": "Limitations",
+      "category": "power",
+      "focus": "power"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Handling of missing data is inconsistently reported.",
+      "improved_version": "Require detailed reporting on missing data handling procedures, such as imputation methods or exclusion criteria, and assess their impact on model performance.",
+      "explanation": "Transparent missing data strategies prevent bias and improve reproducibility.",
+      "location": "Methodology",
+      "category": "missing_data",
+      "focus": "missing_data"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Limited discussion on outlier detection and treatment.",
+      "improved_version": "Advocate for explicit outlier detection and treatment procedures, such as winsorization or robust modeling techniques, and evaluate their influence on model outcomes.",
+      "explanation": "Proper outlier management enhances model stability and validity of performance metrics.",
+      "location": "Data Preparation",
+      "category": "outliers",
+      "focus": "outliers"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review synthesizes performance metrics but does not analyze the statistical significance of differences between models.",
+      "improved_version": "Encourage the use of statistical tests, such as paired t-tests or non-parametric equivalents, to compare model performances and establish significance.",
+      "explanation": "Statistical testing of performance differences strengthens claims about model superiority.",
+      "location": "Results & Discussion",
+      "category": "test_selection",
+      "focus": "test_selection"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review does not specify whether assumptions for models like Cox regression or survival analysis were verified.",
+      "improved_version": "Recommend that studies explicitly verify assumptions such as proportional hazards for Cox models or distributional assumptions for regression analyses, and report these checks.",
+      "explanation": "Assumption verification is critical for the validity of inferential models and their conclusions.",
+      "location": "Methodology",
+      "category": "assumptions",
+      "focus": "assumptions"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "There is no mention of whether models were tested for overfitting or whether validation techniques were employed to prevent it.",
+      "improved_version": "Advocate for the use of validation techniques like cross-validation, bootstrapping, or external validation datasets to assess and prevent overfitting.",
+      "explanation": "Proper validation ensures the model's generalizability and robustness in real-world settings.",
+      "location": "Analysis",
+      "category": "power",
+      "focus": "power"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The discussion does not address the potential impact of dataset heterogeneity on statistical validity.",
+      "improved_version": "Recommend stratified analyses or meta-analytic approaches that account for dataset heterogeneity, and report heterogeneity metrics such as I\u00b2 where applicable.",
+      "explanation": "Accounting for heterogeneity improves the interpretability and applicability of findings across different contexts.",
+      "location": "Discussion",
+      "category": "missing_data",
+      "focus": "missing_data"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "test_selection": "The study employs random forest algorithms, which are appropriate for classification tasks involving structured data. However, the rationale for choosing random forests over other algorithms (e.g., neural networks, boosting) is not explicitly discussed, nor is there a comparison of multiple models to justify this selection.",
-    "assumption_verification": "The authors mention normalization and stratified cross-validation but do not report tests for multicollinearity, independence, or distributional assumptions. Including such diagnostics would strengthen confidence in the modeling process.",
-    "sample_size_justification": "While large datasets are used, the manuscript lacks a formal sample size calculation or power analysis to confirm that the datasets are sufficiently powered to detect meaningful differences or performance metrics, especially in subgroup analyses.",
-    "multiple_comparisons": "Multiple performance metrics are reported across numerous prediction windows without correction. Applying multiple comparison corrections or focusing on primary metrics would reduce false-positive risk.",
-    "effect_size_reporting": "The manuscript reports performance metrics but does not include effect sizes or confidence intervals for differences between models or time points, limiting interpretability of the magnitude of improvements.",
-    "confidence_intervals": "Performance metrics are presented as point estimates with standard deviations, but confidence intervals are not provided. Including these would clarify the precision of the estimates.",
-    "p_value_interpretation": "No formal statistical tests or p-values are reported for comparing model performances across weeks or interventions. Incorporating such tests would substantiate claims of performance improvements.",
-    "statistical_power": "There is no mention of power analysis to justify sample sizes for the modeling, which could impact the reliability of performance estimates, especially for less frequent classes.",
-    "missing_data_handling": "The approach to handling missing data is not described. Clarifying whether imputation or exclusion was used is essential to assess potential biases.",
-    "outlier_treatment": "No discussion of outlier detection or treatment is included. Addressing outliers could improve model stability and feature importance accuracy."
+    "test_selection": "The review mentions various ML algorithms and performance metrics but lacks detailed discussion on the validation procedures employed in each study. Proper validation methods, such as k-fold cross-validation, hold-out validation, or nested validation, are essential to ensure that performance estimates are unbiased and generalizable. Explicitly reporting these procedures and their appropriateness for the dataset size and model complexity would significantly enhance the credibility of the findings.",
+    "assumption_verification": "There is limited information on whether the original studies verified key assumptions underlying their statistical models, such as the proportional hazards assumption in Cox regression or the independence of observations. Systematic assumption checks, such as residual analysis or tests for multicollinearity, should be standard practice and explicitly reported to validate the model results.",
+    "sample_size_justification": "Many studies report dataset sizes but do not justify whether these sizes are sufficient based on power analysis or effect size considerations. Including such justifications would strengthen confidence that the studies are adequately powered to detect meaningful differences and reduce the risk of Type II errors.",
+    "multiple_comparisons": "The analysis highlights that multiple performance metrics are often reported without correction for multiple comparisons. Applying statistical correction methods like Bonferroni or FDR adjustments would mitigate the risk of false positives and improve the reliability of performance claims.",
+    "effect_size_reporting": "While performance metrics such as accuracy and AUC are reported, effect sizes quantifying the magnitude of improvements or differences between models are rarely included. Reporting standardized effect sizes or confidence intervals around performance differences would clarify their practical significance.",
+    "confidence_intervals": "Most performance metrics are presented as point estimates without accompanying confidence intervals. Including these intervals would provide insight into the precision and stability of the estimates, aiding in interpretation and comparison.",
+    "p_value_interpretation": "The review notes some p-value reporting but does not clarify how these values are interpreted or whether they are used to assess statistical significance. Clear thresholds and contextual interpretation should be standard to avoid misrepresentation of significance.",
+    "statistical_power": "There is no discussion of whether the individual studies conducted power analyses to justify their sample sizes. Incorporating power considerations would help determine if the studies are capable of detecting true effects, reducing the likelihood of false negatives.",
+    "missing_data_handling": "Handling of missing data is inconsistently reported across studies. Transparent documentation of imputation methods, exclusion criteria, and their impact on results is necessary to assess potential biases and ensure reproducibility.",
+    "outlier_treatment": "Limited discussion exists on outlier detection and treatment strategies. Explicit procedures for identifying and managing outliers, such as winsorization or robust modeling, would improve model stability and validity of performance metrics."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the study demonstrates a solid application of machine learning for predicting nonadherence in mHealth interventions, with large datasets and relevant features. However, it would benefit from more rigorous assumption testing, explicit sample size justification, correction for multiple comparisons, and detailed reporting of confidence intervals and missing data handling. These enhancements would elevate the statistical rigor and credibility of the findings, aligning the work with best practices in predictive modeling research."
+  "summary": "Overall, the review demonstrates a solid understanding of machine learning applications in churn prediction but reveals gaps in statistical rigor, particularly regarding validation procedures, assumption verification, and reporting standards. Addressing these issues through explicit validation, assumption checks, and comprehensive reporting would elevate the quality and reliability of future research in this domain."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/R6_results.json

@@ -3,158 +3,192 @@
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
       "category": "derivations",
-      "location": "Mathematical Framework section, pages 6-7",
-      "issue": "The derivation of the nonadherence and churn prediction models relies heavily on the use of random forest algorithms, but the mathematical details of feature importance calculations and the specific hyperparameter tuning process are not explicitly described or justified, which could lead to misunderstandings about the robustness of the models.",
+      "location": "Mathematical Framework section, pages 14-16",
+      "issue": "The review references various mathematical models (e.g., Cox Regression, survival ensembles, IBS) but does not provide explicit derivations or formulas, leading to ambiguity about the exact mathematical assumptions and derivations used in the models.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This omission limits the transparency and reproducibility of the modeling approach, potentially affecting the perceived validity of the results."
+      "impact": "This limits the ability to verify the correctness of the models' mathematical underpinnings, potentially affecting reproducibility and understanding of the models' validity."
     },
     {
-      "category": "equations",
-      "location": "Equations presentation, pages 7-8",
-      "issue": "The equations for performance metrics (e.g., AUC, F1, precision, recall) are referenced but not explicitly written out or defined with formulas, which could cause ambiguity for readers unfamiliar with these metrics.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "This reduces clarity and makes it harder for readers to verify or interpret the reported performance values."
+      "category": "algorithms",
+      "location": "Algorithm description, pages 9-11",
+      "issue": "While the review categorizes algorithms into low, medium, and high complexity, it lacks detailed descriptions of the specific implementations, hyperparameters, and training procedures used in the studies.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This hampers assessment of algorithm correctness and comparability across studies, affecting the overall technical rigor."
     },
     {
       "category": "terminology",
-      "location": "Throughout the document, especially in the introduction and discussion",
-      "issue": "Terms like 'nonadherence,' 'churn,' and 'disengagement' are used interchangeably or without precise definitions, despite their nuanced differences in the literature.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This could lead to conceptual confusion and misinterpretation of the study's scope and findings."
+      "location": "Throughout the document, especially pages 4-6",
+      "issue": "Some technical terms (e.g., 'survival ensemble', 'custom neural network') are used without precise definitions or references, which could lead to misunderstandings among readers unfamiliar with specific models.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "This may cause minor confusion but generally does not impact the core technical accuracy."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "equations",
+      "location": "Mathematical Framework, pages 14-16",
+      "issue": "Equations are presented in a descriptive manner without clear formatting, labels, or step-by-step derivations, making it difficult to interpret the mathematical logic.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "This significantly affects clarity, reproducibility, and verification of the models' mathematical correctness."
     },
     {
       "category": "completeness",
-      "location": "Methodology section, pages 6-7",
-      "issue": "While the feature selection process is described broadly, specific details about the feature engineering, such as how missing data was handled or how features were aggregated, are lacking.",
+      "location": "Methodology and Results sections, pages 6-10",
+      "issue": "The review summarizes performance metrics but does not include detailed statistical validation procedures, confidence intervals, or significance testing results.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This hampers reproducibility and understanding of the model inputs, potentially affecting the validity of the results."
+      "impact": "This limits the assessment of the robustness and reliability of the reported models' performances."
     },
     {
-      "category": "logical",
-      "location": "Results and discussion sections, pages 11-22",
-      "issue": "The interpretation that higher model performance in later weeks is solely due to more behavioral data availability does not consider potential confounders such as user fatigue or external factors influencing engagement.",
+      "category": "logical_consistency",
+      "location": "Discussion section, pages 16-19",
+      "issue": "The narrative suggests that complex models do not always outperform simpler ones, but lacks detailed analysis or statistical evidence supporting this claim, leading to potential logical gaps.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "This could oversimplify the causal explanations and overstate the predictive power of behavioral features alone."
+      "impact": "This affects the logical robustness of the conclusions regarding model selection strategies."
     },
     {
       "category": "implementation",
-      "location": "Model training and evaluation, pages 7-8",
-      "issue": "Details about the specific software packages, version numbers, and computational resources used are only briefly mentioned in the appendix, limiting full reproducibility.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "This affects the ability of other researchers to replicate or validate the modeling pipeline."
+      "location": "Methodology, pages 6-7",
+      "issue": "Details about data preprocessing, feature engineering, and model training procedures are summarized but lack specifics such as parameter tuning, cross-validation strategies, or software tools used.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This impairs reproducibility and assessment of the technical correctness of the implementations."
     },
     {
       "category": "edge_cases",
-      "location": "Discussion, pages 25-26",
-      "issue": "The potential impact of users with irregular or sporadic usage patterns on model performance is acknowledged but not systematically analyzed or addressed, which could lead to biases or reduced accuracy in real-world settings.",
+      "location": "Results and discussion, pages 10-19",
+      "issue": "The review mentions dataset imbalances and sampling techniques but does not elaborate on how models perform on edge cases, such as very short or very long user engagement durations.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This limits the generalizability and robustness of the models in diverse user populations."
+      "impact": "This limits understanding of model robustness in atypical or challenging scenarios."
     },
     {
       "category": "complexity",
-      "location": "Technical analysis, pages 24-25",
-      "issue": "While the models' performance metrics are reported, the computational complexity, training time, and scalability considerations are not discussed, which are important for practical deployment.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "This omission hampers understanding of the feasibility of implementing these models in real-time or resource-constrained environments."
+      "location": "Algorithm categorization, pages 9-11",
+      "issue": "While the review discusses model complexity qualitatively, it does not provide quantitative complexity analysis (e.g., computational complexity, training time), which is essential for practical deployment considerations.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This affects the assessment of algorithm efficiency and scalability."
     },
     {
       "category": "documentation",
-      "location": "Appendix, pages 29-34",
-      "issue": "The hyperparameter grids and feature importance analyses are mentioned but not fully detailed or linked to the main text, reducing transparency.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "This affects the transparency and reproducibility of the modeling process."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "derivations",
-      "location": "Discussion, pages 25-26",
-      "issue": "The conceptual link between behavioral engagement features and adherence prediction is asserted but not formally modeled or supported with theoretical derivations, which could strengthen the argument.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "This limits the theoretical grounding of the predictive approach."
+      "location": "Throughout the review, especially pages 6-7",
+      "issue": "The description of data extraction, feature importance analysis, and performance metrics lacks detailed documentation of procedures, criteria, and thresholds used.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This hampers transparency, reproducibility, and critical evaluation of the reported findings."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "The derivation of the nonadherence and churn prediction models relies heavily on the use of random forest algorithms, but the mathematical details of feature importance calculations and the specific hyperparameter tuning process are not explicitly described or justified, which could lead to misunderstandings about the robustness of the models.",
-      "improved_version": "Include explicit formulas and descriptions of feature importance measures used in the random forest models, such as Gini importance or permutation importance, and detail the hyperparameter tuning process, including parameter ranges, selection criteria, and validation procedures.",
-      "explanation": "Providing detailed mathematical and procedural descriptions enhances transparency, reproducibility, and confidence in the robustness of the models.",
-      "location": "Mathematical Framework section, pages 6-7",
-      "category": "derivations"
+      "original_text": "The review references various mathematical models (e.g., Cox Regression, survival ensembles, IBS) but does not provide explicit derivations or formulas, leading to ambiguity about the exact mathematical assumptions and derivations used in the models.",
+      "improved_version": "Include explicit mathematical formulations for key models such as Cox Regression, survival ensembles, and IBS, with clear assumptions, equations, and derivation steps where applicable.",
+      "explanation": "Providing detailed formulas and derivations enhances clarity, allows verification of correctness, and supports reproducibility.",
+      "location": "Mathematical Framework section, pages 14-16",
+      "category": "derivations",
+      "focus": "derivations"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The equations for performance metrics (e.g., AUC, F1, precision, recall) are referenced but not explicitly written out or defined with formulas, which could cause ambiguity for readers unfamiliar with these metrics.",
-      "improved_version": "Add explicit formulas for key performance metrics such as AUC, F1-score, precision, and recall, along with definitions of true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives, either in the main text or as an appendix.",
-      "explanation": "Explicit formulas improve clarity, facilitate understanding, and enable independent verification of the reported results.",
-      "location": "Equations presentation, pages 7-8",
-      "category": "equations"
+      "original_text": "While the review categorizes algorithms into low, medium, and high complexity, it lacks detailed descriptions of the specific implementations, hyperparameters, and training procedures used in the studies.",
+      "improved_version": "Add detailed descriptions of the implementation specifics for each algorithm category, including hyperparameters, training procedures, and validation strategies used in the referenced studies.",
+      "explanation": "This improves understanding of algorithm correctness, comparability, and practical applicability.",
+      "location": "Algorithm description, pages 9-11",
+      "category": "implementation",
+      "focus": "implementation"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Terms like 'nonadherence,' 'churn,' and 'disengagement' are used interchangeably or without precise definitions, despite their nuanced differences in the literature.",
-      "improved_version": "Provide clear, operational definitions for each term\u2014such as 'nonadherence' as failure to meet the prescribed activity threshold, 'churn' as complete discontinuation, and 'disengagement' as reduced activity\u2014supported by references to relevant literature.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifying terminology ensures conceptual precision, reduces ambiguity, and aligns the study with established definitions.",
-      "location": "Introduction, pages 2-3",
-      "category": "terminology"
+      "original_text": "Equations are presented in a descriptive manner without clear formatting, labels, or step-by-step derivations, making it difficult to interpret the mathematical logic.",
+      "improved_version": "Format all equations with proper LaTeX or mathematical notation, include labels, and provide step-by-step derivations or explanations for complex formulas.",
+      "explanation": "Enhanced formatting and explanations improve clarity, interpretability, and correctness verification.",
+      "location": "Mathematical Framework, pages 14-16",
+      "category": "equations",
+      "focus": "equations"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "While the feature selection process is described broadly, specific details about the feature engineering, such as how missing data was handled or how features were aggregated, are lacking.",
-      "improved_version": "Detail the feature engineering steps, including methods for handling missing data (e.g., imputation, exclusion), feature aggregation techniques (e.g., mean, sum, median), and any dimensionality reduction or selection procedures employed.",
-      "explanation": "Providing these details enhances reproducibility and allows for critical assessment of the feature engineering process.",
-      "location": "Methodology section, pages 6-7",
-      "category": "completeness"
+      "original_text": "The review summarizes performance metrics but does not include detailed statistical validation procedures, confidence intervals, or significance testing results.",
+      "improved_version": "Incorporate detailed descriptions of statistical validation methods, including confidence intervals, p-values, and significance tests used to evaluate model performance.",
+      "explanation": "This enhances the technical robustness and credibility of performance claims.",
+      "location": "Results, pages 10-11",
+      "category": "content_completeness",
+      "focus": "completeness"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The interpretation that higher model performance in later weeks is solely due to more behavioral data availability does not consider potential confounders such as user fatigue or external factors influencing engagement.",
-      "improved_version": "Discuss potential confounding factors influencing model performance over time, such as user fatigue, seasonal effects, or external life events, and suggest methods for disentangling these influences in future analyses.",
-      "explanation": "Acknowledging confounders provides a more nuanced interpretation and guides future research to validate causal mechanisms.",
-      "location": "Results and discussion, pages 11-22",
-      "category": "logical"
+      "original_text": "The narrative suggests that complex models do not always outperform simpler ones, but lacks detailed analysis or statistical evidence supporting this claim, leading to potential logical gaps.",
+      "improved_version": "Include statistical comparisons, such as paired tests or confidence intervals, to substantiate claims about the relative performance of simple versus complex models.",
+      "explanation": "This strengthens the logical consistency and validity of the conclusions drawn.",
+      "location": "Discussion, pages 16-19",
+      "category": "logical_consistency",
+      "focus": "logical consistency"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Details about the specific software packages, version numbers, and computational resources used are only briefly mentioned in the appendix, limiting full reproducibility.",
-      "improved_version": "Specify the exact software packages, including version numbers (e.g., scikit-learn v0.24.2, Python 3.8), hardware specifications, and computational environment details used for model training and evaluation.",
-      "explanation": "Precise documentation supports reproducibility and allows others to replicate the computational setup accurately.",
-      "location": "Appendix, pages 29-34",
-      "category": "documentation"
+      "original_text": "Details about data preprocessing, feature engineering, and model training procedures are summarized but lack specifics such as parameter tuning, cross-validation strategies, or software tools used.",
+      "improved_version": "Provide comprehensive details on data preprocessing steps, feature engineering methods, hyperparameter tuning procedures, cross-validation strategies, and software or frameworks employed.",
+      "explanation": "This improves reproducibility and ensures the correctness of implementation procedures.",
+      "location": "Methodology, pages 6-7",
+      "category": "implementation",
+      "focus": "implementation"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The potential impact of users with irregular or sporadic usage patterns on model performance is acknowledged but not systematically analyzed or addressed, which could lead to biases or reduced accuracy in real-world settings.",
-      "improved_version": "Conduct subgroup analyses or sensitivity tests focusing on users with irregular usage patterns, and consider incorporating features that capture usage variability to improve model robustness in diverse real-world scenarios.",
-      "explanation": "Addressing this enhances the model's applicability and reliability across different user behaviors.",
-      "location": "Discussion, pages 25-26",
-      "category": "edge_cases"
+      "original_text": "The review mentions dataset imbalances and sampling techniques but does not elaborate on how models perform on edge cases, such as very short or very long user engagement durations.",
+      "improved_version": "Include analysis of model performance on edge cases, such as users with minimal or extensive engagement durations, and discuss how models handle such scenarios.",
+      "explanation": "This enhances understanding of model robustness and applicability in diverse real-world situations.",
+      "location": "Results, pages 10-19",
+      "category": "edge_cases",
+      "focus": "edge_cases"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "While the models' performance metrics are reported, the computational complexity, training time, and scalability considerations are not discussed, which are important for practical deployment.",
-      "improved_version": "Include an analysis of the computational complexity (e.g., training time, resource requirements) of the models, and discuss scalability aspects for deployment in real-world settings, possibly with reference to hardware or cloud infrastructure.",
-      "explanation": "Understanding computational demands informs feasibility and planning for implementation in practice.",
-      "location": "Technical analysis, pages 24-25",
-      "category": "complexity"
+      "original_text": "While the review discusses model complexity qualitatively, it does not provide quantitative complexity analysis (e.g., computational complexity, training time), which is essential for practical deployment considerations.",
+      "improved_version": "Add quantitative assessments of model complexity, including computational complexity (Big O notation), training and inference times, and resource requirements.",
+      "explanation": "This supports practical decision-making regarding model deployment and scalability.",
+      "location": "Algorithm categorization, pages 9-11",
+      "category": "complexity",
+      "focus": "complexity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The hyperparameter grids and feature importance analyses are mentioned but not fully detailed or linked to the main text, reducing transparency.",
-      "improved_version": "Provide comprehensive hyperparameter grid details, including parameter ranges and selection criteria, and include full feature importance results with visualizations or tables directly linked to the main text for clarity.",
-      "explanation": "Enhanced transparency facilitates replication and critical appraisal of the modeling choices.",
-      "location": "Appendix, pages 29-34",
-      "category": "documentation"
+      "original_text": "The description of data extraction, feature importance analysis, and performance metrics lacks detailed documentation of procedures, criteria, and thresholds used.",
+      "improved_version": "Document detailed procedures for data extraction, feature importance ranking criteria, thresholds for feature selection, and performance evaluation protocols, including any software tools or libraries used.",
+      "explanation": "This improves transparency, reproducibility, and critical evaluation of the findings.",
+      "location": "Methodology, pages 6-7",
+      "category": "documentation",
+      "focus": "documentation"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The conceptual link between behavioral engagement features and adherence prediction is asserted but not formally modeled or supported with theoretical derivations, which could strengthen the argument.",
-      "improved_version": "Incorporate a theoretical framework or formal models (e.g., behavioral theories, statistical models) that underpin the relationship between engagement features and adherence outcomes, supported by relevant literature.",
-      "explanation": "This strengthens the scientific grounding and interpretability of the predictive approach.",
-      "location": "Discussion, pages 25-26",
-      "category": "derivations"
+      "original_text": "The review references various models but does not specify the hyperparameter tuning process or validation strategies employed in the studies.",
+      "improved_version": "Include detailed descriptions of hyperparameter tuning methods (grid search, random search, Bayesian optimization), validation strategies (k-fold, hold-out), and criteria for model selection.",
+      "explanation": "This ensures the correctness of model training procedures and facilitates replication.",
+      "location": "Algorithm description, pages 9-11",
+      "category": "implementation",
+      "focus": "implementation"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The discussion on model performance lacks mention of potential overfitting issues or methods used to prevent overfitting, such as regularization or early stopping.",
+      "improved_version": "Discuss strategies employed in the studies to prevent overfitting, including regularization techniques, early stopping, dropout, or cross-validation, and how these impact model correctness.",
+      "explanation": "This enhances understanding of model robustness and correctness in real-world deployment.",
+      "location": "Discussion, pages 16-19",
+      "category": "edge_cases",
+      "focus": "edge_cases"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review does not specify the software frameworks or tools used for model development and evaluation, which are relevant for reproducibility.",
+      "improved_version": "Specify the software frameworks, libraries, or tools (e.g., scikit-learn, TensorFlow, PyTorch) used in the referenced studies for model implementation and evaluation.",
+      "explanation": "This improves technical reproducibility and correctness verification.",
+      "location": "Methodology, pages 6-7",
+      "category": "documentation",
+      "focus": "documentation"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review mentions the importance of feature recency but does not specify how temporal dependencies are modeled or validated in the models.",
+      "improved_version": "Describe how temporal dependencies and recency effects are explicitly modeled (e.g., time-series features, LSTM architectures) and validated in the studies.",
+      "explanation": "This clarifies the correctness of temporal modeling approaches and their impact on model accuracy.",
+      "location": "Mathematical Framework, pages 14-16",
+      "category": "derivations",
+      "focus": "derivations"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "derivation_correctness": "The paper primarily relies on empirical machine learning models, specifically random forests, but lacks detailed mathematical derivations of the feature importance measures, hyperparameter tuning procedures, or the theoretical basis for the selected features. Including explicit formulas and justifications would improve the rigor and transparency of the modeling approach.",
-    "algorithm_accuracy": "The use of random forest algorithms is appropriate given their robustness and interpretability. The performance metrics are comprehensively reported across multiple prediction windows, demonstrating good model accuracy. However, the absence of detailed hyperparameter tuning procedures and potential overfitting assessments limits full confidence in the models' robustness.",
-    "terminology_accuracy": "The paper generally uses technical terms correctly, but the interchangeable use of 'nonadherence,' 'churn,' and 'disengagement' without precise definitions could cause conceptual confusion. Clarifying these terms with operational definitions aligned with literature standards would enhance clarity.",
-    "equation_clarity": "Performance metrics are referenced but not explicitly defined with formulas, which could hinder understanding for readers unfamiliar with these measures. Including explicit equations for metrics like AUC, F1, precision, and recall would improve clarity.",
-    "content_completeness": "The methodology covers data collection, feature selection, model training, and evaluation, but lacks detailed descriptions of feature engineering steps, missing data handling, and hyperparameter selection processes. Providing these details would improve reproducibility and technical rigor.",
-    "logical_consistency": "The discussion logically interprets the results, especially regarding the increasing predictive performance over time. However, it attributes performance improvements solely to data availability without considering other factors such as user fatigue or external influences, which could be addressed for a more nuanced interpretation.",
-    "implementation_details": "Details about software packages, versions, and computational resources are minimal, mostly relegated to the appendix. Explicitly stating these in the main text would support reproducibility.",
-    "edge_case_handling": "The study acknowledges potential issues with irregular usage patterns but does not systematically analyze or incorporate strategies to handle such edge cases, which could impact model robustness in diverse real-world scenarios.",
-    "complexity_analysis": "The paper reports performance metrics but omits discussion of computational complexity, training time, or scalability considerations, which are critical for practical deployment of these models.",
-    "technical_documentation": "Hyperparameter grids, feature importance analyses, and detailed model evaluation results are provided but not fully integrated into the main text or linked clearly, limiting transparency and reproducibility."
+    "derivation_correctness": "The review references various statistical and machine learning models but lacks explicit derivations or formulas, which are essential for verifying the mathematical correctness of the models. Including detailed equations, assumptions, and derivation steps would enhance transparency and allow for independent validation.",
+    "algorithm_accuracy": "While the review categorizes algorithms and reports performance metrics, it does not detail the implementation specifics, hyperparameter tuning, or validation procedures used in the studies. Providing such details would improve confidence in the reported algorithm correctness and performance claims.",
+    "terminology_accuracy": "Most technical terms are used appropriately; however, some terms like 'survival ensemble' or 'custom neural network' could benefit from precise definitions or references to standard models to avoid ambiguity and ensure clarity for readers.",
+    "equation_clarity": "Equations are presented in a narrative style without proper formatting, labels, or step-by-step derivations, which diminishes clarity. Using LaTeX formatting and including derivation steps would significantly improve interpretability.",
+    "content_completeness": "The review summarizes performance metrics but lacks detailed statistical validation, confidence intervals, or significance testing results. Including these would provide a more comprehensive assessment of model robustness and reliability.",
+    "logical_consistency": "The discussion suggests that complex models do not always outperform simpler ones, but lacks statistical evidence or detailed analysis. Incorporating formal comparisons or significance testing would strengthen the logical consistency of these claims.",
+    "implementation_details": "Details about data preprocessing, feature engineering, hyperparameter tuning, and software tools are summarized but insufficient for replication. Providing explicit procedures and parameters would improve implementation correctness and reproducibility.",
+    "edge_case_handling": "The review mentions dataset imbalances but does not analyze model performance on edge cases, such as users with minimal activity or extremely long engagement durations. Addressing this would clarify model robustness in diverse scenarios.",
+    "complexity_analysis": "The categorization of models by complexity is qualitative; including quantitative assessments such as computational complexity, training times, and resource requirements would better inform practical deployment considerations.",
+    "technical_documentation": "Descriptions of data extraction, feature importance, and performance evaluation lack detailed documentation of procedures, criteria, and thresholds. Enhancing this documentation would improve transparency and facilitate replication."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the study demonstrates a solid empirical approach to predicting nonadherence and churn in mHealth interventions, with strong performance metrics and practical implications. However, it would benefit from more detailed mathematical derivations, explicit definitions, comprehensive methodological transparency, and consideration of real-world complexities. Addressing these issues would elevate the technical rigor and reproducibility of the work, making it highly valuable for advancing predictive analytics in digital health."
+  "summary": "Overall, the review provides a solid high-level overview of churn prediction methodologies in mobile apps but exhibits moderate gaps in mathematical derivations, implementation specifics, and detailed validation procedures. Addressing these issues with explicit formulas, comprehensive procedural descriptions, and statistical validation would elevate the technical rigor and reproducibility of the work, moving it toward a 'Good' (4) or 'Excellent' (5) rating. Currently, it is acceptable but leaves room for improvement in technical depth and clarity."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/R7_results.json

@@ -3,168 +3,160 @@
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
       "category": "methods_results",
-      "location": "Section 2.2 and Section 3.2",
-      "issue": "While the methods specify prediction at weekly and monthly intervals with specific features, the results section presents performance metrics across many days/weeks/months without always explicitly linking back to the exact prediction windows or features used. This can cause confusion about whether the reported metrics correspond to the pre-specified prediction intervals.",
+      "location": "Section 3.1, paragraph starting with 'The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size...'",
+      "issue": "While the methods detail the data collection and sampling techniques, the results section does not explicitly link how these sampling strategies impacted model performance metrics reported later. This creates a gap in understanding the influence of data preprocessing on outcomes.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Moderate; it may lead to misinterpretation of the temporal scope of the results and their alignment with the methods."
+      "impact": "Reduces clarity on how methodological choices directly affected predictive performance, potentially misleading readers about the robustness of results."
     },
     {
       "category": "results_conclusions",
-      "location": "Section 3.2 and Section 4.1",
-      "issue": "The results show high predictive performance for nonadherence and churn, but the conclusions sometimes generalize these findings as broadly applicable without emphasizing the specific contexts or limitations, such as the high retention rates in the datasets used.",
+      "location": "Section 3.2, paragraph starting with 'Regarding RQ1, studies evaluated and compared an average of 3.6...'",
+      "issue": "The conclusion states that no particular model emerged as superior, but the results highlight that ensemble and neural network models often performed best. This inconsistency could confuse readers about the strength of evidence for specific algorithms.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Moderate; it could overstate the generalizability of the findings beyond the studied interventions."
+      "impact": "Weakens the validity of the conclusion regarding model performance, affecting the overall coherence between results and conclusions."
     },
     {
       "category": "logical_flow",
-      "location": "Section 3 and Section 4",
-      "issue": "The transition from detailed prediction results to discussion of implications sometimes lacks explicit linking language, making the flow from data to interpretation less smooth.",
+      "location": "Throughout the document, especially between sections 3.3 and 3.4",
+      "issue": "The transition from discussing feature importance to the application of features in predictive models is abrupt. The logical connection between feature significance and their practical utility in churn prevention strategies is not explicitly articulated.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Low; it slightly hampers readability but does not affect core understanding."
+      "impact": "Impairs smooth narrative flow, making it harder for readers to follow how feature importance informs model design and intervention strategies."
     },
     {
       "category": "terminology",
-      "location": "Throughout the document",
-      "issue": "Terms like 'nonadherence,' 'churn,' and 'disengagement' are used with overlapping meanings, sometimes interchangeably, without always clarifying distinctions or consistent definitions.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "High; inconsistent terminology can cause confusion about what exactly is being predicted or measured."
+      "location": "Throughout the document, e.g., 'behavioral features', 'contextual features', 'performance metrics'",
+      "issue": "Inconsistent use of terminology, such as sometimes referring to 'performance metrics' collectively and other times specifying 'AUC, F1-Score, Accuracy' without clear definitions or distinctions.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "Potentially confuses readers unfamiliar with specific metrics or feature categories, affecting clarity."
     },
     {
       "category": "hypothesis",
-      "location": "Section 1 and 4",
-      "issue": "The hypothesis that behavioral app engagement features can predict nonadherence over extended durations is supported by the results, but the introduction could more explicitly state the primary hypotheses tested and expected differences between interventions.",
+      "location": "Introduction and discussion sections",
+      "issue": "The review states research questions but does not explicitly formulate hypotheses or expected outcomes, which could guide interpretation and analysis.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Low; clearer hypotheses would improve clarity of the research aims."
+      "impact": "Limits the framing of the review as a hypothesis-driven investigation, reducing clarity of research intent."
     },
     {
       "category": "interpretation",
-      "location": "Section 4",
-      "issue": "While the models perform well, the discussion sometimes implies that high predictive accuracy directly translates into effective intervention strategies without discussing potential limitations, such as false positives or user reengagement rates.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Moderate; it may overstate the practical utility without acknowledging challenges."
+      "location": "Section 4, paragraph starting with 'The synthesis of included studies also underscored the importance of sampling techniques...'",
+      "issue": "While the importance of sampling techniques is discussed, the interpretation of how these techniques influence model generalizability or real-world applicability is somewhat superficial.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "Weakens the depth of analysis regarding how methodological choices affect practical deployment of models."
     },
     {
       "category": "citations",
-      "location": "Throughout the document",
-      "issue": "Some references (e.g., [21]) are used multiple times with different contexts, and some citations (e.g., [50]) are not always perfectly aligned with the specific claims, risking inconsistency.",
+      "location": "Throughout the document, e.g., in the introduction and results sections",
+      "issue": "Some references are inconsistent in formatting (e.g., missing brackets, inconsistent author-year styles) and some citations (e.g., [12, 77, 80]) are used multiple times without clear differentiation of their specific contributions.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Low; proper citation alignment would improve scholarly rigor."
+      "impact": "Reduces professionalism and clarity, potentially confusing readers about sources."
     },
     {
       "category": "figures",
-      "location": "Section 3.2 and Figures 5-8",
-      "issue": "Figures are referenced with performance metrics over days/weeks, but the figure captions could more explicitly specify the prediction window or the exact prediction task to clarify what the data represent.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Low; enhances clarity and interpretability."
+      "location": "Section 3.2, Figure 2",
+      "issue": "Figure 2 is referenced but not included in the provided text, and its description lacks sufficient detail to understand the categorization of algorithms without visual aid.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "Impairs comprehension of the classification of algorithms, affecting the clarity of results presentation."
     },
     {
       "category": "tables",
-      "location": "Section 3.2",
-      "issue": "Tables present detailed performance metrics but do not always specify the exact prediction window or the features used, which could cause confusion about the context of the results.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Moderate; clarity of the prediction context would improve interpretability."
+      "location": "Section 3.3, Table 2",
+      "issue": "Table 2 summarizes feature categories, but the text sometimes refers to 'detailed information in Appendix 4.2' instead of integrating key findings directly into the main text, which could hinder quick understanding.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "Reduces immediate clarity and accessibility of key data, impacting the logical flow."
     },
     {
       "category": "supplementary",
       "location": "Throughout the document",
-      "issue": "Appendices contain detailed statistics and hyperparameters, but cross-referencing between main text and appendices could be more explicit to ensure consistency and ease of understanding.",
+      "issue": "References to appendices (e.g., 4.1, 4.2, 4.3) are frequent, but the content of these appendices is not provided, making it difficult to assess the completeness and consistency of supplementary data.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Low; improves transparency and replicability."
+      "impact": "Limits the ability to verify and contextualize detailed methodological and reporting standards, affecting overall transparency."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "Our models identified an average of 94% of nonadherent users between Weeks 2 and 13 in Vivira (mean AUC = 0.95)...",
-      "improved_version": "Our weekly prediction models in Vivira, targeting the interval from Week 2 to Week 13, identified an average of 94% of nonadherent users, with performance metrics (e.g., AUC) explicitly linked to these specific prediction windows.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the exact prediction intervals and links performance metrics to the specified prediction windows, improving methodological transparency.",
-      "location": "Section 3.2.1",
-      "category": "figures_tables",
+      "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users (Median = 25,000, IQR = 79,436 - 4,089).",
+      "improved_version": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, from as few as 61 users to over 37 million users (Median = 25,000; IQR = 79,436\u20134,089).",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the statistical presentation of the data, improving readability and consistency in reporting descriptive statistics.",
+      "location": "Section 3.1",
+      "category": "methodology",
       "focus": "methods_results"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "While the models perform well, the discussion sometimes implies that high predictive accuracy directly translates into effective intervention strategies without discussing potential limitations.",
-      "improved_version": "While the models demonstrate strong predictive accuracy, translating these into effective intervention strategies requires careful consideration of false positives, user reengagement rates, and real-world implementation challenges.",
-      "explanation": "Adds nuance to the interpretation, acknowledging limitations and avoiding overgeneralization.",
-      "location": "Section 4.2",
-      "category": "discussion",
+      "original_text": "The review also explored additional factors and methods influencing churn prediction outcomes highlighted in relevant studies, as well as the outcomes of churn prevention strategies employed alongside churn prediction models.",
+      "improved_version": "The review further examined factors and methods influencing churn prediction outcomes, including the effectiveness of prevention strategies that were implemented alongside prediction models.",
+      "explanation": "Enhances clarity by explicitly linking factors influencing outcomes with their practical application in prevention strategies, improving logical coherence.",
+      "location": "Abstract and Section 3.4",
+      "category": "results_conclusions",
+      "focus": "results_conclusions"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The study identified that behavioral features related to users\u2019 activity and progress within apps are the most predictive across domains.",
+      "improved_version": "The study identified that behavioral features, particularly those related to users\u2019 activity and progress within apps, are the most consistent predictors of churn across various domains.",
+      "explanation": "Specifies the scope of the statement, reinforcing the generalizability and importance of these features, thus strengthening the interpretation.",
+      "location": "Section 3.3",
+      "category": "interpretation",
       "focus": "interpretation"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Terms like 'nonadherence,' 'churn,' and 'disengagement' are used somewhat interchangeably.",
-      "improved_version": "For clarity, we define 'nonadherence' as failure to meet the intended use threshold, 'churn' as complete discontinuation of app use, and 'disengagement' as reduced activity or partial use, ensuring consistent terminology throughout.",
-      "explanation": "Provides clear, consistent definitions to distinguish overlapping terms, reducing confusion.",
-      "location": "Introduction and throughout",
-      "category": "terminology",
-      "focus": "terminology"
+      "original_text": "The performance metrics of the best models were inconsistently reported across studies, limiting meta-analytic synthesis.",
+      "improved_version": "The performance metrics of the best models were reported inconsistently across studies, which hampers direct comparison and meta-analytic synthesis.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the impact of reporting inconsistency, emphasizing its effect on synthesis and interpretation of results.",
+      "location": "Section 3.4",
+      "category": "citations",
+      "focus": "citations"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The high retention rates in our datasets suggest good generalizability.",
-      "improved_version": "The relatively high retention rates observed in our datasets may limit the generalizability of the models to interventions with lower engagement or higher attrition, which warrants further validation in diverse contexts.",
-      "explanation": "Acknowledges potential bias due to sample characteristics, tempering overgeneralization.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
-      "category": "supplementary",
-      "focus": "interpretation"
+      "original_text": "The transition from discussing feature importance to the application of features in predictive models is abrupt.",
+      "improved_version": "The discussion on feature importance naturally transitions into how these features are utilized in building predictive models, highlighting their practical relevance in model design and performance optimization.",
+      "explanation": "Creates a smoother logical flow, connecting the significance of features with their practical application, enhancing narrative coherence.",
+      "location": "Section 3.3 to 3.4",
+      "category": "logical_flow",
+      "focus": "logical_flow"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The performance metrics across days/weeks/months are presented without always explicitly linking to the specific features or prediction windows used.",
-      "improved_version": "Performance metrics for each prediction window are explicitly linked to the features and data used at that interval, as detailed in the methods, ensuring clarity about the context of each result.",
-      "explanation": "Enhances clarity by explicitly connecting results to the methods, reducing ambiguity.",
+      "original_text": "Figure 2 categorizes applied algorithms for churn prediction across included studies (n = 50).",
+      "improved_version": "Figure 2 visually categorizes the applied algorithms for churn prediction across the included studies (n = 50), illustrating the distribution of algorithm types and their complexity levels.",
+      "explanation": "Provides a clearer description of the figure's purpose, aiding reader understanding and ensuring figure-text alignment.",
       "location": "Section 3.2",
-      "category": "figures_tables",
-      "focus": "methods_results"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The term 'nonadherence' is used broadly, sometimes overlapping with 'churn' and 'disengagement'.",
-      "improved_version": "We consistently define 'nonadherence' as failing to meet the prescribed use threshold, 'churn' as complete discontinuation, and 'disengagement' as reduced or inconsistent use, to maintain terminological clarity.",
-      "explanation": "Ensures consistent use of terminology, improving conceptual clarity.",
-      "location": "Throughout",
-      "category": "terminology",
-      "focus": "terminology"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The introduction discusses hypotheses but does not explicitly state the primary hypotheses tested.",
-      "improved_version": "This study hypothesizes that behavioral app engagement features can accurately predict nonadherence and churn over extended periods, and that prediction performance will be consistent across interventions and prediction windows.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the core hypotheses, guiding reader expectations and framing the results.",
-      "location": "Section 1",
-      "category": "introduction",
-      "focus": "hypothesis"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Figures are referenced with performance metrics but lack explicit mention of the prediction window or task.",
-      "improved_version": "Figures illustrating prediction performance explicitly specify the prediction window (e.g., Day 1-82) and the specific task (e.g., churn prediction), to clarify the context of the data presented.",
-      "explanation": "Improves figure interpretability by clarifying what the data represent.",
-      "location": "Section 3",
       "category": "figures",
       "focus": "figures"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Tables present detailed metrics but do not always specify the exact features or prediction intervals used.",
-      "improved_version": "Tables include annotations indicating the features used and the specific prediction window (e.g., Week 2, Month 4), ensuring clarity about the context of each performance metric.",
-      "explanation": "Enhances transparency and allows for better comparison across results.",
-      "location": "Section 3",
-      "category": "tables",
-      "focus": "tables"
+      "original_text": "All applied features were grouped into behavioral and contextual categories, with subcategories such as activity, progress, transactional, social, onboarding, demographic, location, device, and health features.",
+      "improved_version": "All features used in the studies were systematically categorized into behavioral features (including activity, progress, transactional, and social subcategories) and contextual features (such as onboarding, demographic, location, device, and health features).",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the hierarchical structure of feature categories, improving terminology consistency and reader comprehension.",
+      "location": "Section 3.3",
+      "category": "terminology",
+      "focus": "terminology"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Appendices contain detailed statistics but could benefit from clearer cross-referencing.",
-      "improved_version": "Main text references specific appendix tables (e.g., Appendix 6.2) when discussing feature importance or detailed performance metrics, facilitating easier navigation and verification.",
-      "explanation": "Improves document coherence and ease of access to supplementary data.",
-      "location": "Throughout",
+      "original_text": "The supplementary material (Appendix 4.2) provides detailed rankings of feature importances.",
+      "improved_version": "Appendix 4.2 contains detailed rankings of feature importances derived from model-based analyses, supporting the summarized findings in the main text.",
+      "explanation": "Links supplementary material explicitly to the main findings, emphasizing its role in supporting the analysis and improving transparency.",
+      "location": "Section 3.3",
       "category": "supplementary",
       "focus": "supplementary"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review highlights the need for standardized reporting guidelines for future research.",
+      "improved_version": "The review underscores the importance of adopting standardized reporting guidelines to enhance comparability and reproducibility in future churn prediction studies.",
+      "explanation": "Specifies the purpose of standardization, reinforcing its significance for research coherence and quality.",
+      "location": "Section 5",
+      "category": "conclusion",
+      "focus": "logical_flow"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "methods_results_alignment": "The methodology describes prediction at weekly and monthly intervals with specific features, which is reflected in the results showing performance metrics across these intervals. However, some results aggregate performance over extended days/weeks without explicitly linking back to the specific features or prediction windows used, which could cause confusion. Explicitly aligning each performance metric with the corresponding prediction window and features would enhance clarity.",
-    "results_conclusions_alignment": "The results demonstrate high accuracy and robustness of the models, supporting the conclusion that nonadherence can be predicted effectively. Nonetheless, the discussion sometimes overstates the applicability without sufficiently acknowledging the context-specific nature of the datasets, such as high retention rates and controlled settings. Clarifying these limitations would improve the logical coherence between findings and interpretations.",
-    "logical_flow": "The manuscript generally follows a logical progression from hypothesis to methodology, results, and discussion. However, transitions between detailed results and broader implications could be smoother with explicit linking sentences. For example, explicitly stating how the performance metrics support the potential for targeted interventions would strengthen the narrative.",
-    "terminology_consistency": "Terms like 'nonadherence,' 'churn,' and 'disengagement' are used with overlapping meanings. Consistently defining and differentiating these terms early in the manuscript and applying these definitions throughout would improve clarity and prevent ambiguity.",
-    "hypothesis_testing": "While the introduction hints at the predictive capacity of behavioral features, it would benefit from explicitly stating the primary hypotheses, such as the expected performance levels and generalizability across interventions, to frame the analysis more clearly.",
-    "interpretation_consistency": "The discussion emphasizes the high predictive accuracy but sometimes implies direct intervention utility without discussing potential limitations like false positives or user reengagement rates. A balanced interpretation acknowledging these factors would enhance credibility.",
-    "citation_consistency": "References are generally well-used, but some citations (e.g., [21]) are repeated in different contexts. Ensuring each citation precisely supports the specific claim would improve scholarly rigor.",
-    "figure_text_alignment": "Figures are referenced with performance metrics, but captions could specify the exact prediction window and task to clarify what the data represent, improving interpretability.",
-    "table_text_alignment": "Tables provide detailed metrics but lack explicit mention of the features or prediction intervals used. Adding this information would facilitate better understanding and comparison.",
-    "supplementary_consistency": "Appendix references are frequent and useful, but clearer cross-referencing in the main text would improve navigation and transparency, especially regarding hyperparameters and feature importance analyses."
+    "methods_results_alignment": "The methods section thoroughly describes data collection, sampling, and feature extraction, but the results do not consistently link how these methodological choices impacted model performance metrics. Explicitly discussing the influence of sampling techniques and feature selection on performance outcomes would strengthen the connection between methodology and results.",
+    "results_conclusions_alignment": "While the results highlight that no single model outperforms others universally, the conclusions tend to emphasize the effectiveness of ensemble and neural models. Clarifying that performance varies by context and that multiple models can be effective would improve alignment.",
+    "logical_flow": "The narrative transitions from discussing feature importance to model performance and then to prevention strategies without clear connective tissue. Incorporating transitional sentences that explicitly relate how feature importance informs model choice and intervention design would enhance flow.",
+    "terminology_consistency": "Terms such as 'behavioral features', 'contextual features', and 'performance metrics' are used variably. Establishing consistent definitions early and adhering to them throughout would improve clarity and reduce ambiguity.",
+    "hypothesis_testing": "The review states research questions but lacks explicit hypotheses or expected relationships. Formulating hypotheses\u2014for example, that behavioral features are more predictive than contextual features\u2014would provide clearer analytical direction.",
+    "interpretation_consistency": "The discussion on the utility of features and algorithms sometimes overgeneralizes findings. Emphasizing the variability across studies and contexts would provide a more nuanced interpretation aligned with the heterogeneous data.",
+    "citation_consistency": "References are sometimes inconsistently formatted (e.g., missing brackets, inconsistent author-year styles). Standardizing citation formatting and clearly attributing specific findings to sources would improve professionalism.",
+    "figure_text_alignment": "Figure 2 is referenced but not included, and its description lacks sufficient detail. Including the figure with a comprehensive caption would aid understanding of algorithm categorization.",
+    "table_text_alignment": "Table 2 summarizes feature categories, but the main text sometimes refers to detailed appendices instead of summarizing key points. Integrating essential data into the main text would improve immediate comprehension.",
+    "supplementary_consistency": "References to appendices are frequent, but the content of these appendices is not provided. Ensuring that supplementary materials are complete and accessible would enhance transparency and reproducibility."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the manuscript demonstrates strong internal consistency and logical coherence, especially in linking the methodology to the results and discussing implications. Minor improvements in explicitly linking performance metrics to specific prediction windows, clarifying terminology, and refining figure/table captions would further enhance clarity and consistency. The high predictive performance across diverse interventions supports the potential utility of behavioral app engagement features for nonadherence prediction, but careful framing of limitations and contextual factors is advisable to avoid overgeneralization."
+  "summary": "Overall, the review demonstrates strong logical coherence and comprehensive coverage of the topic. Minor inconsistencies in terminology, citation formatting, and figure integration slightly detract from clarity. Addressing these issues with targeted revisions\u2014such as explicit linking between methodology and results, clearer figure descriptions, and standardized citations\u2014would elevate the manuscript's clarity, coherence, and scholarly rigor."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/S10_results.json

@@ -1,127 +1,168 @@
 {
   "score": 4,
   "critical_remarks": [
+    {
+      "category": "completeness",
+      "location": "Section 3.4 Churn Prevention Strategies",
+      "issue": "Limited reporting on actual intervention outcomes; only four studies report experimental results, which constrains the strength of conclusions about effectiveness.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "Reduces confidence in the practical applicability of churn prevention strategies derived from prediction models, limiting the review's utility for implementation guidance."
+    },
     {
       "category": "relevance",
-      "location": "Section 1 Abstract",
-      "issue": "While the abstract summarizes the main findings, it lacks explicit connection to the detailed supplementary data and figures, which are crucial for understanding the robustness of the models.",
+      "location": "Introduction and Methods",
+      "issue": "The extensive background on traditional churn prediction domains (telecom, banking) is somewhat tangential to the focus on mobile apps, which could be more explicitly emphasized.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This reduces the clarity of how the supplementary results support the main claims, potentially limiting the reader's ability to evaluate the data's relevance."
+      "impact": "Potentially dilutes the focus on mobile app-specific challenges and solutions, affecting the perceived relevance of the review."
     },
     {
       "category": "clarity",
-      "location": "Section 2 Methods",
-      "issue": "The description of feature selection and model training is dense and technical, which may hinder comprehension for readers unfamiliar with ML methodologies.",
+      "location": "Section 3.2 Prediction Algorithms and Performances",
+      "issue": "The detailed enumeration of algorithms and their frequencies, while comprehensive, is dense and may overwhelm readers unfamiliar with machine learning taxonomy.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This affects accessibility, making it harder for a broader audience to understand and evaluate the methodological rigor."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "completeness",
-      "location": "Section 3 Prediction Results",
-      "issue": "While detailed performance metrics are provided, there is limited discussion of potential confounding factors or model limitations in the supplementary results, such as the impact of class imbalance or demographic variables.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This omission hampers a full understanding of the robustness and generalizability of the models."
+      "impact": "Impairs readability and quick comprehension, potentially hindering accessibility for a broader audience."
     },
     {
       "category": "organization",
-      "location": "Overall structure",
-      "issue": "The extensive tables and figures, while detailed, are interspersed within dense text, which can disrupt flow and make navigation challenging.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "This affects readability and usability, especially for readers seeking specific data points."
+      "location": "Section 3.3 Applied Features and Feature Importances",
+      "issue": "The presentation of feature importance analyses is lengthy and somewhat repetitive, with multiple subsections that could be better structured for clarity.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "Reduces navigability and hampers quick understanding of key findings related to feature contributions."
     },
     {
-      "category": "accessibility",
-      "location": "Appendix and Figures",
-      "issue": "Many figures and tables are referenced but not always clearly labeled or summarized in the main text, reducing quick interpretability.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Limits the ease with which readers can grasp key findings from visual data."
+      "category": "completeness",
+      "location": "Section 4 Discussion",
+      "issue": "While the discussion covers many aspects, it lacks detailed consideration of limitations related to dataset heterogeneity and reporting standards, which are only briefly mentioned.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "Limits critical appraisal of the robustness and generalizability of the review's conclusions."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "clarity",
+      "location": "Tables and Figures",
+      "issue": "Table 1 and Figure 2 are referenced but not included in the provided text, which hampers full understanding of performance metrics and algorithm categorization.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "Reduces transparency and makes it difficult for readers to verify and interpret key quantitative findings."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "relevance",
+      "location": "Appendix references",
+      "issue": "Appendices are mentioned (e.g., 4.1, 4.2, 4.3) but are not included, limiting access to detailed search strategies, data extraction sheets, and reporting standards.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "Impairs reproducibility and comprehensive evaluation of the review process."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "The rich data collected by mHealth interventions raise the question of whether \u2013 and to what extent \u2013 nonadherence can be predicted using these data.",
-      "improved_version": "The detailed engagement data collected by mHealth interventions directly inform the question of how accurately nonadherence can be predicted, emphasizing the data's relevance.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the connection between data collection and the predictive modeling focus, enhancing relevance.",
-      "location": "Section 1 Abstract",
-      "category": "relevance",
-      "focus": "connection"
+      "original_text": "The review protocol was submitted to OSF Registries on May 5, 2023.",
+      "improved_version": "Include a direct link or DOI to the registered protocol to enhance transparency and reproducibility.",
+      "explanation": "Providing direct access to the protocol allows readers to verify the predefined methodology, increasing credibility.",
+      "location": "Section 2 Methods",
+      "category": "clarity",
+      "focus": "accessibility"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "In Vivira, we predicted nonadherence weekly from Weeks 2 to 13 based on users\u2019 daily app activity variables (active or inactive) and the daily number of completed exercises variables (continuous) of the preceding weeks.",
-      "improved_version": "In Vivira, weekly nonadherence was predicted from Weeks 2 to 13 using features such as daily app activity (active/inactive) and the number of exercises completed per day in the prior week, providing clear methodological detail.",
-      "explanation": "Enhances clarity by explicitly stating the features used and their temporal scope, aiding understanding.",
-      "location": "Section 2.2 Feature Selection, Model Training, and Evaluation",
-      "category": "clarity",
+      "original_text": "The initial pool of 1,502 screened articles was narrowed down to 50 included studies.",
+      "improved_version": "Summarize the main reasons for exclusion at each screening stage in a concise table or flowchart for clarity.",
+      "explanation": "Visual summaries improve transparency and help readers quickly grasp the selection process.",
+      "location": "Section 3.1 Study Selection",
+      "category": "organization",
+      "focus": "structure"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The datasets used varied widely in sample size, from 61 to 37 million users.",
+      "improved_version": "Provide a summarized table or figure illustrating dataset sizes, sources, and characteristics across studies.",
+      "explanation": "Structured visualization aids comparison and highlights dataset diversity, supporting assessment of generalizability.",
+      "location": "Section 3.1",
+      "category": "organization",
       "focus": "presentation"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Models predicting churn (users\u2019 last login within program duration) achieved mean AUCs of 0.87 for both apps.",
-      "improved_version": "Churn prediction models, based on users\u2019 last login within the program duration, achieved mean AUCs of 0.87 in both interventions, demonstrating consistent performance across datasets.",
-      "explanation": "Improves clarity and emphasizes the consistency and robustness of the models.",
-      "location": "Section 3. Prediction Results",
-      "category": "clarity",
+      "original_text": "The review discusses various ML algorithms, but the categorization could be clearer.",
+      "improved_version": "Rearrange the algorithm descriptions into a summarized table categorizing them by complexity, type, and frequency of use.",
+      "explanation": "A table enhances clarity, facilitates quick reference, and improves overall organization.",
+      "location": "Section 3.2",
+      "category": "organization",
+      "focus": "structure"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Performance metrics are reported inconsistently across studies.",
+      "improved_version": "Include a standardized comparison chart or table that normalizes key performance metrics (e.g., AUC, accuracy) across studies, with notes on reporting discrepancies.",
+      "explanation": "Standardization aids comparison and supports more accurate synthesis of model performance.",
+      "location": "Section 3.3",
+      "category": "organization",
       "focus": "presentation"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The descriptive analysis further emphasizes this relationship, showing that the decline in adherence over time in Vivira and Manoa is largely driven by churn.",
-      "improved_version": "The descriptive analysis highlights that the decline in adherence over time in both interventions is primarily attributable to user churn, reinforcing the link between engagement and discontinuation.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the causal relationship and improves coherence between descriptive and predictive findings.",
-      "location": "Section 4.1 Discussion",
-      "category": "coherence",
-      "focus": "alignment"
+      "original_text": "Feature importance analyses are summarized but could benefit from clearer visualization.",
+      "improved_version": "Add a visual summary (e.g., bar chart or heatmap) of the top five most important features across studies, highlighting their categories.",
+      "explanation": "Visual summaries improve accessibility and facilitate quick understanding of key predictors.",
+      "location": "Section 3.3",
+      "category": "presentation",
+      "focus": "accessibility"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Many of these users continue to log in after being flagged, such as through targeted in-app interventions.",
-      "improved_version": "A significant proportion of users flagged by the models continue to log in afterward, indicating opportunities for timely in-app interventions to prevent full disengagement.",
-      "explanation": "Enhances clarity and emphasizes practical implications for intervention strategies.",
-      "location": "Section 4.2",
-      "category": "clarity",
-      "focus": "presentation"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The models' performance improves as more behavioral data becomes available, aligning with prior research.",
-      "improved_version": "Model performance improves over time as additional behavioral engagement data is collected, consistent with findings from previous studies on user retention and churn prediction.",
-      "explanation": "Provides clearer context and links to existing literature, enhancing relevance and coherence.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4 Limitations and Future Work",
+      "original_text": "The discussion mentions dataset heterogeneity but lacks detailed critique.",
+      "improved_version": "Expand the discussion on how dataset heterogeneity and inconsistent reporting standards impact the validity of cross-study comparisons.",
+      "explanation": "A nuanced critique informs readers of limitations and guides future standardization efforts.",
+      "location": "Section 4",
       "category": "completeness",
       "focus": "thoroughness"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The supplementary materials include detailed tables and figures, but their dense presentation may hinder quick interpretation.",
-      "improved_version": "While comprehensive, the dense presentation of tables and figures could be complemented with summarized key points or visual abstracts to facilitate quicker interpretation.",
-      "explanation": "Suggests actionable ways to improve accessibility and usability.",
-      "location": "Overall",
-      "category": "accessibility",
-      "focus": "usability"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The hyperparameter grids are provided in Appendix 6.1, but detailed hyperparameter tuning procedures are not elaborated.",
-      "improved_version": "Appendix 6.1 provides hyperparameter grids; however, including a brief overview of the hyperparameter tuning process (e.g., search ranges, validation approach) would clarify the methodological rigor.",
-      "explanation": "Enhances transparency and completeness of methodological details.",
-      "location": "Section 2.2",
-      "category": "completeness",
-      "focus": "thoroughness"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Many figures and tables are referenced, but some lack clear labels or legends, which may impede interpretation.",
-      "improved_version": "Ensure all figures and tables are clearly labeled with descriptive titles and legends, and include summaries in the main text to improve interpretability and usability.",
-      "explanation": "Improves accessibility and clarity for readers navigating complex visual data.",
+      "original_text": "Figures and tables are referenced but not included.",
+      "improved_version": "Ensure that all referenced figures and tables (e.g., Figure 1, Table 1, Figure 2) are included in the supplementary materials or appendices.",
+      "explanation": "Complete visual data supports transparency and allows independent verification of findings.",
       "location": "Throughout the document",
       "category": "accessibility",
       "focus": "usability"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The discussion mentions the importance of behavioral features but could better contextualize their predictive power relative to demographic or clinical features.",
-      "improved_version": "The discussion could be strengthened by explicitly comparing the predictive contributions of behavioral engagement features with demographic and clinical variables, highlighting the unique advantages of objective app data.",
-      "explanation": "Enhances relevance and completeness by situating the findings within broader predictor sets."
+      "original_text": "Appendix 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 are mentioned but not provided.",
+      "improved_version": "Include all appendices with detailed search strategies, data extraction sheets, and reporting standards to enable reproducibility.",
+      "explanation": "Full transparency of methods enhances credibility and facilitates future replication.",
+      "location": "End of document",
+      "category": "completeness",
+      "focus": "detail"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review emphasizes behavioral features but could better specify their operationalization.",
+      "improved_version": "Provide specific examples of behavioral features used, their measurement methods, and how they relate to churn prediction performance.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifying operationalization enhances understanding of feature relevance and guides future feature engineering.",
+      "location": "Section 3.3",
+      "category": "clarity",
+      "focus": "detail"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The discussion on model performance lacks a critical appraisal of overfitting or model robustness.",
+      "improved_version": "Add a paragraph discussing potential overfitting issues, model validation strategies, and robustness across datasets.",
+      "explanation": "Addressing these aspects provides a balanced view of model reliability and applicability.",
+      "location": "Section 4",
+      "category": "completeness",
+      "focus": "thoroughness"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review suggests future research directions but could specify methodological standards.",
+      "improved_version": "Recommend specific reporting standards and validation protocols for future studies to improve comparability.",
+      "explanation": "Guidelines promote consistency, enabling more effective meta-analyses and synthesis.",
+      "location": "Section 5",
+      "category": "relevance",
+      "focus": "alignment"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The overall presentation is comprehensive but dense.",
+      "improved_version": "Incorporate summaries, key takeaway boxes, and clearer subheadings to improve readability.",
+      "explanation": "Enhanced structure facilitates navigation and comprehension for diverse audiences.",
+      "location": "Throughout",
+      "category": "clarity",
+      "focus": "presentation"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "relevance_analysis": "The supplementary materials are highly relevant to the main text, providing detailed data, figures, and methodological specifics that underpin the reported predictive performance. They substantiate claims about the models' accuracy and generalizability, offering transparency and depth that support the main conclusions.",
-    "clarity_analysis": "While the materials are comprehensive, the presentation is dense, with extensive tables and figures that could benefit from clearer labeling, summaries, and visual aids. Some descriptions of methods and results are technical and could be simplified or clarified to enhance accessibility for a broader audience.",
-    "consistency_analysis": "The supplementary data align well with the main text, reinforcing the narrative about model performance and the importance of behavioral features. However, explicit cross-references and summaries linking supplementary figures to main findings would improve coherence.",
-    "completeness_analysis": "The materials are thorough, including detailed descriptive statistics, performance metrics, and feature importance analyses. Nonetheless, additional contextual information about model limitations, potential confounders, and the influence of demographic variables would provide a more complete picture.",
-    "organization_analysis": "The supplementary materials are logically structured into sections covering datasets, methods, results, and appendices. However, integrating more summaries and cross-references within the main text would improve navigation and comprehension, especially given the volume of detailed data."
+    "relevance_analysis": "The supplementary materials are highly relevant to the main text, providing detailed methodological descriptions, extensive data on algorithms, features, and performance metrics that underpin the review's findings. They support the main narrative by offering transparency and depth, although some sections could better emphasize their direct connection to the core research questions.",
+    "clarity_analysis": "While the materials are thorough, the presentation is dense, with complex tables and lengthy descriptions that may challenge readability. Visual aids like summarized tables, flowcharts, and figures could significantly enhance clarity and accessibility, especially for readers less familiar with machine learning terminology.",
+    "consistency_analysis": "The supplementary materials align well with the main text in terms of scope and content. However, references to figures and appendices are inconsistent, with some visual elements missing or not included, which affects coherence. Ensuring all referenced materials are present and uniformly formatted would improve consistency.",
+    "completeness_analysis": "The materials are comprehensive, covering search strategies, data extraction, feature categorization, and performance metrics. Nonetheless, critical elements such as appendices, detailed search terms, and visual summaries are absent, limiting reproducibility and in-depth evaluation of the review process.",
+    "organization_analysis": "The structure follows logical sections but could benefit from clearer segmentation and summarization. Grouping related content into well-defined subsections, using tables and visual summaries, would improve navigability and facilitate quicker understanding of key insights."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the supplementary materials are of high quality, demonstrating rigorous analysis and comprehensive data presentation. The main areas for improvement involve enhancing clarity through better labeling, summaries, and explanations, as well as providing more contextual and methodological details to improve accessibility and completeness. These enhancements would make the materials more user-friendly and strengthen their support for the main manuscript."
+  "summary": "Overall, the supplementary materials are of good quality, demonstrating thoroughness and relevance. They effectively support the main review but would benefit from enhanced organization, visual summaries, and inclusion of all referenced appendices and figures. Addressing these issues would elevate the clarity, accessibility, and reproducibility of the work, making it a strong resource for researchers and practitioners in the field."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/S1_results.json

@@ -4,62 +4,48 @@
     {
       "category": "title_clarity",
       "location": "Title",
-      "issue": "The current title clearly indicates the focus on predicting nonadherence but could benefit from more specificity regarding the intervention type and prediction approach.",
+      "issue": "The current title clearly indicates the focus on user churn prediction and systematic review, but it could be more specific about the application domain (mobile apps) and the methodological scope (machine learning models).",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "While understandable, a more precise title could enhance immediate comprehension and attract targeted readership."
+      "impact": "While understandable, the title may not fully convey the breadth of the review or attract targeted readership interested in mobile app analytics."
     },
     {
       "category": "title_length",
       "location": "Title",
-      "issue": "The title is concise but slightly lengthy, which may affect visibility in search results.",
+      "issue": "The title is somewhat lengthy, which may reduce immediate readability and impact.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "A slightly shorter, more impactful title could improve discoverability without sacrificing clarity."
+      "impact": "A more concise title could enhance visibility and quick comprehension without losing essential information."
     },
     {
       "category": "keywords_relevance",
       "location": "Keywords",
-      "issue": "No keywords section is explicitly present; thus, relevance cannot be assessed.",
+      "issue": "No keywords section is present; thus, relevance cannot be assessed.",
       "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Lack of explicit keywords may reduce search engine optimization and discoverability."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "keywords_coverage",
-      "location": "Keywords",
-      "issue": "No keywords section is present; coverage cannot be evaluated.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Absence of keywords limits indexing and discoverability in digital searches."
+      "impact": "Lack of keywords hampers discoverability in search engines and indexing databases, reducing the manuscript's visibility."
     },
     {
       "category": "guidelines",
       "location": "Title",
-      "issue": "The title follows standard conventions for scientific articles, clearly stating the main focus.",
+      "issue": "The title follows standard conventions by being descriptive and informative, but it could benefit from emphasizing key terms for SEO.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Supports proper indexing and reader understanding."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "discoverability",
-      "location": "Title",
-      "issue": "The current title is descriptive but could be optimized for SEO by including relevant keywords such as 'machine learning' or 'digital health'.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Improved discoverability and higher ranking in relevant searches."
+      "impact": "Improved keyword inclusion would align better with field standards for discoverability."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "Predicting Nonadherence to Mobile Health Interventions",
-      "improved_version": "Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Nonadherence in Digital Health Interventions for Chronic Disease Management",
-      "explanation": "This revised title enhances clarity by specifying the methodology ('Machine Learning-Based'), improves impact through emphasizing the predictive approach, and boosts SEO by including relevant keywords like 'Machine Learning', 'Digital Health Interventions', and 'Chronic Disease Management'. It maintains standards by being descriptive and precise, aligning with academic conventions for research titles.",
+      "original_text": "User Churn Prediction with Mobile App Data: Systematic Review",
+      "improved_version": "Mobile App User Churn Prediction Using Machine Learning: Systematic Review of Algorithms and Features",
+      "explanation": "This revised title enhances clarity by specifying 'Mobile App User Churn Prediction' and emphasizes the methodological focus on 'Machine Learning,' which improves search engine optimization (SEO) and aligns with academic standards. It balances informativeness with conciseness, making it more impactful and discoverable for researchers interested in mobile analytics and churn modeling.",
       "location": "Title",
       "category": "title",
       "focus": "comprehensive_improvement"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "title_analysis": "The current title effectively indicates the focus on predicting nonadherence but lacks specificity regarding the intervention type and the predictive methodology. It is clear and understandable but could be more impactful and optimized for search engines by including relevant keywords. The title adheres to standard conventions for scientific articles, being concise and descriptive, which supports proper indexing and reader comprehension.",
+    "title_analysis": "The current title effectively communicates the core topic of user churn prediction and the systematic review approach. However, it could be more specific by including the application domain (mobile apps) and the methodological focus (machine learning algorithms), which would improve clarity, relevance, and searchability. A slightly shorter, more targeted title would enhance impact and align with standard academic practices for titles in this research area.",
     "keywords_analysis": "No keywords section found",
-    "guidelines_compliance": "The title follows standard scientific conventions by clearly stating the research focus in a concise manner. It effectively communicates the core topic, aligning with typical academic standards for research titles.",
-    "discoverability_assessment": "While the current title is descriptive, it could benefit from SEO optimization by incorporating relevant keywords such as 'machine learning', 'digital health', and 'nonadherence prediction'. This would enhance its visibility in digital searches and improve discoverability among targeted audiences.",
-    "audience_alignment": "The title is suitable for researchers, clinicians, and digital health professionals interested in predictive analytics and mHealth interventions. Its clarity and specificity align with the expectations of an academic and professional audience seeking innovative solutions for adherence challenges."
+    "guidelines_compliance": "The title adheres to conventional standards by being descriptive and informative. Incorporating targeted keywords related to mobile apps, churn prediction, and machine learning would improve discoverability and align with best practices for indexing and search optimization.",
+    "discoverability_assessment": "The absence of a dedicated keywords section limits the manuscript's visibility in search engines and academic databases. Including a well-curated keywords list emphasizing terms like 'mobile app churn,' 'machine learning,' 'user retention,' and 'predictive modeling' would significantly enhance discoverability and facilitate targeted searches.",
+    "audience_alignment": "The current title appeals to researchers interested in churn prediction and systematic reviews but could better attract practitioners and developers by explicitly mentioning 'mobile apps' and 'machine learning,' which are highly relevant to industry stakeholders seeking practical insights into user retention strategies."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the manuscript's title is clear and adheres to academic standards but can be significantly improved for searchability and impact by including specific methodological and topical keywords. The absence of an explicit keywords section limits discoverability, but a well-crafted, keyword-rich title can mitigate this. The suggested revision balances clarity, accuracy, impact, SEO, and standards, making it more effective for academic dissemination and digital indexing."
+  "summary": "Overall, the manuscript's title is sufficiently clear and informative but can be optimized for greater impact, clarity, and discoverability. The lack of a keywords section is a notable omission that hampers search engine optimization. Implementing the suggested title revision and including targeted keywords will improve the manuscript's visibility, adherence to academic standards, and relevance to the intended audience."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/S2_results.json

@@ -4,135 +4,143 @@
     {
       "category": "structure",
       "location": "Abstract",
-      "issue": "The abstract is overly detailed and lengthy, combining background, methodology, results, and implications without clear section separation, which hampers quick comprehension.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Reduces clarity and makes it difficult for readers to quickly grasp key contributions and structure of the study."
+      "issue": "The abstract combines background, methodology, results, and implications in a dense paragraph without clear sectional separation, making it hard to quickly grasp key points.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "Reduces readability and quick comprehension, potentially hindering the reader's ability to assess the study's scope and findings efficiently."
     },
     {
       "category": "content",
-      "location": "Introduction and Methods",
-      "issue": "The abstract lacks explicit mention of the specific machine learning algorithms used, hyperparameters, and the validation approach, which are critical for assessing methodological rigor.",
+      "location": "Abstract",
+      "issue": "While it mentions synthesizing 50 studies and key findings, it lacks specific quantitative results or detailed performance metrics that would demonstrate the significance of the findings.",
       "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Limits the reader's ability to evaluate the technical validity and reproducibility of the study."
+      "impact": "Limits the abstract's ability to communicate the study's contribution and the strength of evidence, reducing its impact."
     },
     {
       "category": "clarity",
-      "location": "Results and Discussion",
-      "issue": "Many technical terms and statistical metrics are presented with minimal explanation, which could be confusing for readers unfamiliar with specific metrics like AUC, F1, or the concept of churn in this context.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Impairs readability and accessibility, especially for interdisciplinary or non-expert audiences."
+      "location": "Abstract",
+      "issue": "Some technical terms and concepts (e.g., 'survival times,' 'performance metrics') are introduced without sufficient context or explanation for a broad audience.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "May hinder understanding for readers unfamiliar with specific ML or churn prediction terminology."
     },
     {
       "category": "standards",
-      "location": "Overall writing",
-      "issue": "The abstract contains excessive technical detail and data tables that are more appropriate for the main manuscript, not the abstract, which should be concise and focused.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Violates standard scientific abstract conventions, potentially overwhelming the reader and obscuring main findings."
+      "location": "Abstract",
+      "issue": "The abstract does not explicitly state the research design (systematic review) in the opening sentence, which is a key standard for clarity in review articles.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "Could cause confusion about the nature of the study, affecting transparency and reproducibility."
     },
     {
       "category": "impact",
-      "location": "Conclusion and implications",
-      "issue": "The abstract emphasizes prediction performance but underplays the practical implications, such as how these models could be integrated into clinical workflows or app design.",
+      "location": "Abstract",
+      "issue": "The implications and practical significance of the findings are mentioned generally but lack specific insights into how this review advances the field or informs future research/practice.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Limits perceived significance and real-world applicability of the research."
+      "impact": "Weakens the abstract's ability to communicate the study's importance and potential impact on the field."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "The rich data collected by mHealth interventions raise the question of whether \u2013 and to what extent \u2013 nonadherence can be predicted using these data.",
-      "improved_version": "This study investigates whether behavioral engagement data from mHealth interventions can accurately predict nonadherence and user churn.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the research question upfront, making the abstract more focused and accessible.",
+      "original_text": "User churn, where users prematurely discontinue the use of a product or service, poses significant challenges across various industry domains, including gaming, healthcare, or education.",
+      "improved_version": "User churn, defined as the premature discontinuation of a product or service, presents significant challenges across multiple industries such as gaming, healthcare, and education.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the definition and improves readability by reducing redundancy and enhancing flow.",
       "location": "Abstract",
       "category": "clarity",
-      "focus": "organization"
+      "focus": "readability"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Our models identified an average of 94% of nonadherent users between Weeks 2 and 13 in Vivira (mean AUC = 0.95), defined as completing fewer than eight therapeutic exercises per week.",
-      "improved_version": "Our models achieved an average AUC of 0.95, correctly identifying approximately 94% of nonadherent users\u2014defined as those completing fewer than eight exercises weekly\u2014between Weeks 2 and 13 in Vivira.",
-      "explanation": "Rephrases for clarity and conciseness, emphasizing key metrics and definitions upfront.",
-      "location": "Results",
-      "category": "clarity",
-      "focus": "results"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "We developed machine learning models for the prediction of nonadherence in two mHealth interventions, one for nonspecific and degenerative back pain over a program duration of 90 days (Vivira, n = 8,372), and another for hypertension self-management over 186 days (Manoa, n = 6,674).",
-      "improved_version": "This study developed ML-based prediction models for nonadherence in two mHealth interventions: Vivira for back pain (90 days, n=8,372) and Manoa for hypertension (186 days, n=6,674).",
-      "explanation": "Streamlines the sentence for better readability and emphasizes the core information.",
+      "original_text": "The findings demonstrate a wide variety of applied ML algorithms - from logistic regression to custom deep neural networks - to predict users' churn probabilities and survival times in mobile apps.",
+      "improved_version": "The results reveal a diverse range of machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, support vector machines, and advanced deep neural networks, used to predict both user churn probabilities and the timing of churn events in mobile applications.",
+      "explanation": "Adds specificity and clarity about the types of algorithms and outcomes, emphasizing the breadth and technical scope.",
       "location": "Abstract",
-      "category": "organization",
-      "focus": "organization"
+      "category": "content",
+      "focus": "completeness"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Our models identified an average of 86% of nonadherent users between months 2 and 6 (mean AUC = 0.82), defined as completing fewer than one blood pressure measurement week per month.",
-      "improved_version": "In Manoa, models achieved an average AUC of 0.82, correctly predicting 86% of nonadherent users\u2014defined as those completing fewer than one blood pressure measurement week per month\u2014between months 2 and 6.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the metric and definition, improving technical clarity.",
-      "location": "Results",
-      "category": "clarity",
-      "focus": "results"
+      "original_text": "Furthermore, it emphasizes the necessity for consistent methodologies and reporting standards to enhance future research.",
+      "improved_version": "Additionally, the review highlights the critical need for standardized methodologies and reporting practices to improve comparability and reproducibility in future churn prediction research.",
+      "explanation": "Specifies the importance of standardization and its role in advancing the field, making the statement more impactful.",
+      "location": "Abstract",
+      "category": "impact",
+      "focus": "significance"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The use of DiGA data is strictly limited. Therefore, only users who provided consent under Article 4, Section 2, 4 of the DiGA regulations (DiGA-Verordnung, DiGAV) were included.",
-      "improved_version": "Due to data privacy regulations, only users who consented under DiGA-specific regulations (DiGA-Verordnung, DiGAV) were included in the analysis.",
-      "explanation": "Simplifies technical language for clarity and conciseness.",
+      "original_text": "The literature search and selection was conducted per the PRISMA guidelines.",
+      "improved_version": "The literature search and selection process strictly adhered to the PRISMA guidelines, ensuring transparency and methodological rigor.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the quality standard and emphasizes the systematic approach, enhancing credibility.",
       "location": "Methods",
-      "category": "clarity",
-      "focus": "clarity"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The models predicted nonadherence weekly from Weeks 2 to 13 based on users\u2019 daily app activity variables (active or inactive) and the daily number of completed exercises variables (continuous) of the preceding weeks.",
-      "improved_version": "Models predicted weekly nonadherence from Weeks 2 to 13 using prior week\u2019s daily activity status (active/inactive) and total exercises completed.",
-      "explanation": "Condenses technical details for clarity while maintaining essential information.",
-      "location": "Methods",
-      "category": "clarity",
+      "category": "standards",
       "focus": "methodology"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Our findings show that nonadherence to mHealth interventions can be accurately predicted over extended program durations, both in terms of adherence relative to intended use as defined by Sieverink et al. (2017) and in its most severe form \u2013 churn (i.e., complete discontinuation of use).",
-      "improved_version": "Our results demonstrate that nonadherence and user churn can be accurately predicted over long-term intervention periods, supporting the potential for proactive engagement strategies.",
-      "explanation": "Summarizes key findings succinctly and emphasizes practical relevance.",
-      "location": "Discussion",
-      "category": "impact",
-      "focus": "impact"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The models correctly identified an average of 94.2% (SD = 4.2%, mean AUC = 0.95) of nonadherent users\u2014defined as those completing fewer than eight exercises weekly\u2014between Weeks 2 and 13 in Vivira.",
-      "improved_version": "In Vivira, models achieved a mean AUC of 0.95 and correctly identified approximately 94% of nonadherent users\u2014those completing fewer than eight exercises weekly\u2014across Weeks 2 to 13.",
-      "explanation": "Enhances clarity by integrating metrics and definitions smoothly.",
+      "original_text": "Most studies focused on mobile games, followed by mobile health applications.",
+      "improved_version": "The majority of included studies (66%) focused on mobile games, with subsequent research on mobile health applications and other domains, reflecting research trends over time.",
+      "explanation": "Provides clearer quantification and contextualizes the distribution, improving completeness and understanding of research landscape.",
       "location": "Results",
-      "category": "clarity",
-      "focus": "results"
+      "category": "content",
+      "focus": "completeness"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The study further emphasizes that behavioral app engagement data collected closer to the prediction event had a stronger impact on model performance.",
-      "improved_version": "Our analysis indicates that behavioral engagement data obtained nearer to the prediction point significantly enhances model accuracy.",
-      "explanation": "Simplifies language for better readability and emphasizes the key insight.",
-      "location": "Discussion",
-      "category": "clarity",
-      "focus": "interpretation"
+      "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users.",
+      "improved_version": "The datasets employed across studies exhibited substantial variability in size, from small samples of 61 users to large-scale datasets comprising up to 37 million users, indicating diverse data availability and scalability challenges.",
+      "explanation": "Highlights the range and implications for generalizability and scalability, adding depth to the content.",
+      "location": "Results",
+      "category": "content",
+      "focus": "completeness"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The findings suggest that simple app engagement features, such as daily app activity, are sufficient to predict future user behavior, which can be leveraged for targeted interventions.",
-      "improved_version": "These results imply that basic engagement metrics, like daily activity, are effective predictors of future adherence, enabling targeted intervention strategies.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the implication and enhances readability.",
+      "original_text": "Most studies defined churn as a function of user inactivity, most commonly after a specific cutoff date.",
+      "improved_version": "The predominant definition of churn across studies was based on user inactivity, typically after a predefined period without activity, though definitions varied and impacted prediction outcomes.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the variability and its relevance, providing context for interpretation of results.",
+      "location": "Results",
+      "category": "content",
+      "focus": "completeness"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review synthesized the five most important features across all included studies that conducted model-based feature importance analyses.",
+      "improved_version": "The review identified and synthesized the top five most influential features, based on model-based importance analyses, across studies that evaluated feature contributions to prediction performance.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the process and significance of feature importance ranking, improving technical clarity.",
+      "location": "Results",
+      "category": "content",
+      "focus": "completeness"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Studies evaluated and compared an average of 3.6 (SD = 1.9, Range = 1-10) different ML algorithms for churn prediction.",
+      "improved_version": "On average, studies evaluated approximately 3.6 machine learning algorithms (SD = 1.9, range 1\u201310), highlighting the exploratory and comparative nature of model selection in this research area.",
+      "explanation": "Provides clearer interpretation of the data and emphasizes the comparative approach, enhancing clarity.",
+      "location": "Results",
+      "category": "content",
+      "focus": "completeness"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Few studies have rigorously evaluated churn prevention strategies in controlled settings.",
+      "improved_version": "Despite the promising potential of churn prediction models, only a limited number of studies have rigorously tested targeted churn prevention strategies within controlled experimental settings.",
+      "explanation": "Strengthens the statement by emphasizing the gap and its significance for practical application.",
       "location": "Discussion",
       "category": "impact",
-      "focus": "implications"
+      "focus": "significance"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The models\u2019 performance improves over time as more behavioral data becomes available, underscoring their robustness for long-term prediction.",
-      "improved_version": "Model performance improves with increased data over time, demonstrating robustness for long-term adherence prediction.",
-      "explanation": "Concise and emphasizes the key point about robustness.",
-      "location": "Discussion",
-      "category": "clarity",
-      "focus": "interpretation"
+      "original_text": "The abstract does not explicitly state the research design (systematic review) in the opening sentence.",
+      "improved_version": "This systematic review comprehensively analyzes existing literature on user churn prediction in mobile apps, focusing on machine learning methodologies and features.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the research design upfront, aligning with scientific standards for transparency.",
+      "location": "Abstract",
+      "category": "standards",
+      "focus": "organization"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The implications and practical significance of the findings are mentioned generally but lack specific insights into how this review advances the field or informs future research/practice.",
+      "improved_version": "The findings provide actionable insights for researchers and practitioners, emphasizing behavioral features as key predictors and highlighting the need for standardized reporting to facilitate future meta-analyses and practical implementations.",
+      "explanation": "Specifies the contribution and practical relevance, strengthening impact communication.",
+      "location": "Abstract",
+      "category": "impact",
+      "focus": "significance"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "structure_analysis": "The abstract attempts to combine background, methods, results, and implications but lacks clear segmentation, making it dense and difficult to parse quickly. A more structured approach with distinct sections or clearer logical flow would improve readability.",
-    "content_analysis": "While comprehensive, the abstract is overly detailed, including extensive statistical data and tables that are more suitable for the main manuscript. It covers key findings but could benefit from more emphasis on the novelty, significance, and practical applications of the models developed.",
-    "clarity_assessment": "The language is technical and sometimes verbose, with numerous abbreviations and metrics introduced without sufficient explanation. Simplifying language and providing brief explanations of key terms would enhance accessibility, especially for interdisciplinary audiences.",
-    "standards_compliance": "The abstract exceeds typical length and detail expected at this stage, including detailed tables and statistical metrics that are better suited for the main text. It also lacks explicit section labels (e.g., Background, Methods, Results, Conclusion), which are standard for clarity.",
-    "impact_evaluation": "The abstract demonstrates promising predictive performance, but it underplays the potential real-world impact, such as how these models could be integrated into clinical workflows or app features to improve adherence and health outcomes. Highlighting these implications would strengthen its significance."
+    "structure_analysis": "The abstract initially presents the background and motivation, followed by the aims and scope of the review, then briefly describes the methodology, key findings, and implications. However, it could benefit from clearer segmentation into background, methods, results, and conclusions to improve readability and logical flow.",
+    "content_analysis": "The abstract covers the scope, methodology, and broad findings, but lacks specific quantitative results such as performance metrics or effect sizes that demonstrate the significance of the findings. Including concrete data would strengthen the impact and clarity of the contribution.",
+    "clarity_assessment": "While generally well-written, some sentences are dense and contain technical jargon that could be simplified or clarified for broader audiences. Certain terms are introduced without context, which may hinder understanding for non-specialist readers.",
+    "standards_compliance": "The abstract mentions the systematic review approach and adherence to PRISMA guidelines, but it could explicitly state the research type at the outset for clarity. It also lacks explicit mention of the review's novelty or specific contribution compared to existing literature.",
+    "impact_evaluation": "The abstract communicates the potential of churn prediction models and highlights behavioral features' importance. However, it underplays the practical implications and the novelty of the review\u2019s insights, which could be emphasized more to demonstrate its significance for advancing research and practice."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the abstract presents a thorough and data-rich overview of the study, demonstrating promising predictive models for nonadherence in mHealth interventions. However, its excessive length, dense technical detail, and lack of clear structure hinder quick comprehension and reduce accessibility. Streamlining content, emphasizing key findings and implications, and adopting a more organized format would significantly enhance its clarity, impact, and adherence to scientific standards."
+  "summary": "Overall, the abstract provides a comprehensive overview of the systematic review, including background, methodology, and key findings. However, it would benefit from clearer structural segmentation, inclusion of specific quantitative results, and more explicit articulation of its contribution and practical implications. Enhancing clarity and emphasizing the novelty and impact of the findings would elevate its quality and effectiveness in communicating the study\u2019s significance."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/S3_results.json

@@ -4,119 +4,135 @@
     {
       "category": "context",
       "location": "Section 2 (Introduction)",
-      "issue": "While the background on NCDs and mHealth is comprehensive, it lacks a concise overview of the current state of adherence prediction specifically in mHealth interventions, which would better contextualize the research gap.",
+      "issue": "While the background on user churn and machine learning is comprehensive, it lacks a clear, concise overview of the specific challenges and nuances of mobile app churn compared to other domains, which could better justify the focus on mobile apps.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This diminishes clarity on the novelty and specific need for the study, potentially making the contribution less compelling."
+      "impact": "This limits the reader's understanding of why mobile app churn prediction warrants a dedicated review, potentially weakening the perceived importance of the study."
     },
     {
       "category": "problem",
       "location": "Section 2 (Introduction)",
-      "issue": "The problem statement about nonadherence is somewhat scattered, with multiple definitions and metrics introduced without a clear, unified framing of the core issue.",
+      "issue": "The problem statement mentions the lack of a review in the mobile app context but does not explicitly specify the limitations of existing studies or the specific gaps in methodology, features, or performance reporting that this review aims to address.",
       "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This affects the clarity of the research problem, making it harder for readers to grasp the precise challenge the study addresses."
+      "impact": "This reduces clarity on the unique problem this review tackles, making the contribution less compelling and specific."
     },
     {
       "category": "objectives",
       "location": "Section 2 (Introduction)",
-      "issue": "The objectives are somewhat buried within the description of the study design, lacking a clear, standalone statement of research questions or hypotheses.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This reduces the clarity of the study\u2019s aims, potentially confusing readers about the specific goals."
+      "issue": "The research questions are clearly listed but could benefit from more explicit linkage to the identified gaps, such as how they address inconsistencies or the need for standardization in reporting.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "This affects the perceived clarity of how the objectives directly respond to the literature gaps, slightly weakening the focus."
     },
     {
       "category": "significance",
       "location": "Section 2 (Introduction)",
-      "issue": "Although the importance of predicting nonadherence is implied, there is limited explicit justification of how this advances the field or impacts healthcare practice.",
+      "issue": "While the importance of churn prediction is discussed broadly, the introduction does not sufficiently emphasize the specific impact of this review on practical applications like health, education, or personalized systems, which could strengthen justification.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This weakens the justification for the study, making its contribution less persuasive."
+      "impact": "This limits the reader's appreciation of the review's broader implications and real-world significance."
     },
     {
       "category": "structure",
       "location": "Section 2 (Introduction)",
-      "issue": "The flow from background to problem, then to research gap and objectives, is somewhat disjointed, with some paragraphs overlapping in content and lacking smooth transitions.",
+      "issue": "The flow from background to problem statement to objectives is somewhat dense and could be better organized with clearer signposting or subheadings to guide the reader.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "This affects readability and coherence, potentially making it harder for readers to follow the logical progression."
+      "impact": "This affects readability and the logical progression, potentially making it harder for readers to grasp the core motivations quickly."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "The rising prevalence and economic burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) present a significant challenge to patients and healthcare systems, calling for innovative, scalable, and cost-effective solutions.",
-      "improved_version": "Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are increasingly prevalent worldwide, imposing substantial health and economic burdens on patients and healthcare systems, thereby necessitating innovative, scalable, and cost-effective intervention strategies.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the scope and emphasizes the urgency, setting a stronger foundation for the importance of the research.",
-      "location": "Section 2",
+      "original_text": "User churn, also referred to as user attrition, loss, abandonment, or dropout, is a well-recognized phenomenon characterized by users' discontinuation of a product or service. It has posed significant challenges across diverse industries, calling for strategies to mitigate its impact [1, 23, 28, 68, 84].",
+      "improved_version": "User churn, or attrition, refers to users discontinuing a product or service prematurely. This phenomenon presents critical challenges across various industries\u2014such as gaming, healthcare, and education\u2014necessitating effective prediction and intervention strategies to improve user retention and engagement.",
+      "explanation": "This revision clarifies the scope and importance of churn in specific domains, setting a more targeted background that justifies the focus on mobile apps.",
+      "location": "Section 2 (Introduction)",
       "category": "context",
       "focus": "background"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Yet, despite growing evidence and availability, mHealth interventions face high nonadherence, where users fail to use these tools as intended or discontinue use entirely before achieving desired outcomes.",
-      "improved_version": "Despite the proliferation of mHealth interventions supported by increasing evidence, user adherence remains a critical challenge, with many users failing to engage as intended or discontinuing use prematurely, thus limiting their potential benefits.",
-      "explanation": "Provides clearer framing of the problem, highlighting the gap between evidence and real-world engagement.",
-      "location": "Section 2",
+      "original_text": "While the progress in churn prediction research is acknowledged, no review has yet been undertaken to summarize them in the context of mobile apps.",
+      "improved_version": "Despite extensive research on churn prediction in domains like telecommunications and finance, there is a notable gap: no comprehensive review has synthesized studies specifically focused on mobile app contexts, which differ in data types, features, and user behaviors.",
+      "explanation": "This explicitly states the gap, emphasizing the novelty and necessity of the review, strengthening the problem statement.",
+      "location": "Section 2 (Introduction)",
+      "category": "problem",
+      "focus": "gap"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review also explores additional factors and methods influencing churn prediction outcomes highlighted in relevant studies, as well as the outcomes of churn prevention strategies employed alongside churn prediction models.",
+      "improved_version": "This review aims to analyze not only the machine learning algorithms and features used but also to evaluate the effectiveness of various churn prevention strategies integrated with prediction models, addressing a key gap in understanding their practical impact.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the dual focus on methodological synthesis and practical outcomes, making the objectives more explicit and comprehensive.",
+      "location": "Section 2 (Introduction)",
+      "category": "objectives",
+      "focus": "objectives"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The significance of this review lies in its potential to guide developers and researchers in selecting appropriate models and features for mobile app churn prediction.",
+      "improved_version": "The significance of this review stems from its potential to inform both researchers and practitioners about effective algorithms, features, and strategies for mobile app churn prediction, ultimately supporting the development of more personalized and adaptive user retention systems.",
+      "explanation": "Enhances justification by linking the review\u2019s outcomes to tangible improvements in system personalization and user engagement.",
+      "location": "Section 2 (Introduction)",
+      "category": "significance",
+      "focus": "significance"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The paper is organized as follows: Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion.",
+      "improved_version": "The paper is organized into sections covering Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusions, with clear subheadings guiding the reader through the systematic review process, findings, and implications.",
+      "explanation": "Adding detail about organization improves readability and signals a well-structured approach, enhancing flow.",
+      "location": "Section 2 (Introduction)",
+      "category": "structure",
+      "focus": "flow"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users.",
+      "improved_version": "The datasets across studies exhibited significant variability in size, from small samples of 61 users to large-scale datasets with up to 37 million users, reflecting diverse data sources and contexts in mobile app research.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the implication of dataset variability, emphasizing the heterogeneity in data sources and challenges in standardization.",
+      "location": "Section 3.1 (Results)",
+      "category": "context",
+      "focus": "background"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Most studies evaluated and compared multiple ML algorithms, but no single model consistently outperformed others across all contexts.",
+      "improved_version": "While many studies evaluated multiple machine learning algorithms, no single model emerged as universally superior; instead, performance depended on specific datasets, features, and application contexts, underscoring the need for tailored model selection.",
+      "explanation": "Highlights the importance of context-specific model choice, guiding practitioners to adopt an iterative, empirical approach.",
+      "location": "Section 3.2 (Results)",
+      "category": "problem",
+      "focus": "gap"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Behavioral features related to users\u2019 activity and progress within apps were identified as most important for predicting churn.",
+      "improved_version": "Across multiple studies, behavioral features capturing user activity and progress\u2014such as login frequency and completed tasks\u2014consistently ranked as the most influential predictors of churn, highlighting their universal applicability.",
+      "explanation": "Strengthens the statement by emphasizing consistency and universality, supporting the focus on behavioral data.",
+      "location": "Section 3.3 (Results)",
+      "category": "significance",
+      "focus": "background"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Few studies have rigorously evaluated churn prevention strategies in controlled settings, indicating a gap in evidence for practical deployment.",
+      "improved_version": "Despite the recognized potential of churn prediction models to enable targeted interventions, only a limited number of studies have empirically tested the effectiveness of such strategies in controlled trials, revealing a critical gap between predictive modeling and real-world application.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the gap and emphasizes the importance of bridging research and practice, strengthening the significance argument.",
+      "location": "Section 3.4 (Results)",
+      "category": "problem",
+      "focus": "gap"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Inconsistent reporting standards hinder meta-analyses and cross-study comparisons.",
+      "improved_version": "The lack of standardized reporting on datasets, features, and performance metrics impedes the ability to conduct comprehensive meta-analyses and compare findings across studies, highlighting the need for unified reporting guidelines.",
+      "explanation": "Explicitly states the consequence and the need for standardization, which can guide future research practices.",
+      "location": "Section 5 (Limitations and Recommendations)",
       "category": "problem",
       "focus": "problem"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The rich data collected by mHealth interventions raise the question of whether \u2013 and to what extent \u2013 nonadherence can be predicted using these data.",
-      "improved_version": "The extensive behavioral data generated by mHealth interventions present an opportunity to predict nonadherence, yet the extent to which such data can reliably forecast disengagement remains underexplored.",
-      "explanation": "Frames the research gap more explicitly, emphasizing the novelty and importance of predictive modeling in this context.",
-      "location": "Section 2",
-      "category": "problem",
-      "focus": "gap"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Our models identified an average of 94% of nonadherent users between Weeks 2 and 13 in Vivira (mean AUC = 0.95), defined as completing fewer than eight therapeutic exercises per week.",
-      "improved_version": "Our predictive models achieved high accuracy, correctly identifying approximately 94% of nonadherent users in Vivira during Weeks 2 to 13, where nonadherence was operationalized as completing fewer than eight exercises weekly.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the operational definition of nonadherence and emphasizes the model's performance, strengthening the link to the research objectives.",
-      "location": "Abstract",
+      "original_text": "This review aims to provide a detailed overview of churn prediction research in mobile apps, identifying effective ML algorithms and features.",
+      "improved_version": "This review aims to systematically synthesize existing research on churn prediction in mobile apps, identifying effective machine learning algorithms, key features, and methodological best practices to inform future studies and applications.",
+      "explanation": "Provides a clearer scope and emphasizes the systematic nature and practical relevance of the review.",
+      "location": "Section 2 (Introduction)",
       "category": "objectives",
       "focus": "objectives"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Building on Jakob et al. (2024), we also examine the proportion of users who reengage after a correct prediction, offering insights into the potential for targeted strategies to promote adherence before churn occurs.",
-      "improved_version": "Extending prior work, we analyze the proportion of users who reengage following accurate nonadherence predictions, providing insights into how predictive models can inform proactive, targeted adherence-promoting strategies.",
-      "explanation": "Highlights the innovative aspect and practical implications, clarifying the study's contribution.",
-      "location": "Introduction",
-      "category": "objectives",
-      "focus": "objectives"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "This study addresses this research gap by evaluating nonadherence prediction models in two distinct mHealth interventions (Vivira and Manoa) across different regulatory environments (i.e. SHI and PHI), medical conditions addressed (i.e. nonspecific back pain and arterial hypertension), program durations (i.e. 90 and 186 days), user demographics, as well as different therapeutic approaches (i.e. guided movement therapy and personalized hypertension self-management).",
-      "improved_version": "This study fills the research gap by developing and evaluating nonadherence prediction models across two diverse mHealth interventions\u2014Vivira (back pain) and Manoa (hypertension)\u2014spanning different regulatory contexts, medical conditions, program lengths, and user populations, thereby assessing the models' generalizability and robustness.",
-      "explanation": "Streamlines the description, emphasizing the diversity and broad applicability of the approach, enhancing clarity on scope.",
-      "location": "Introduction",
-      "category": "problem",
-      "focus": "gap"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "To provide a comprehensive perspective, we predict nonadherence relative to the intended use of the interventions, following the definition by Sieverink et al. (2017), as well as its most severe form: churn (i.e., complete discontinuation).",
-      "improved_version": "We operationalize nonadherence based on the definition by Sieverink et al. (2017), encompassing both suboptimal engagement and complete discontinuation (churn), to comprehensively capture user disengagement patterns.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the operational definitions and their significance, strengthening conceptual clarity.",
-      "location": "Introduction",
-      "category": "objectives",
-      "focus": "objectives"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Our findings show that nonadherence to mHealth interventions can be accurately predicted over extended program durations, both in terms of adherence relative to intended use as defined by Sieverink et al. (2017) and in its most severe form \u2013 churn (i.e., complete discontinuation of use).",
-      "improved_version": "Our results demonstrate that user nonadherence, including both partial disengagement and complete churn, can be reliably predicted over long-term intervention periods, highlighting the potential for early identification and targeted retention strategies.",
-      "explanation": "Strengthens the significance by explicitly linking prediction to practical intervention benefits.",
-      "location": "Discussion",
-      "category": "significance",
-      "focus": "significance"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Our descriptive analysis further emphasizes this relationship, showing that the decline in adherence over time in Vivira and Manoa is largely driven by churn (i.e., users discontinuing entirely).",
-      "improved_version": "Descriptive analyses reveal that the observed decline in adherence over time in both interventions is predominantly attributable to user churn, underscoring the importance of early prediction for retention efforts.",
-      "explanation": "Provides a clearer link between descriptive findings and the importance of the research focus, emphasizing practical implications.",
-      "location": "Discussion",
-      "category": "significance",
-      "focus": "significance"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "context_analysis": "The introduction offers a broad overview of NCDs and the role of mHealth interventions, citing relevant literature and regulatory contexts. However, it could benefit from a more specific discussion of the current state of adherence prediction in digital health, including existing models and their limitations, to better establish the research niche.",
-    "problem_analysis": "The core issue of user nonadherence and churn is identified, but the problem statement lacks a unified, precise framing. Clarifying the distinction between different adherence metrics and emphasizing the gap in long-term, stage-specific prediction models would strengthen the narrative.",
-    "objectives_analysis": "The objectives are embedded within the description of methods and results, making them less explicit. Clearly stating research questions or hypotheses\u2014such as 'Can behavioral app engagement data predict nonadherence over extended periods?'\u2014would improve clarity.",
-    "significance_assessment": "The significance is implied through references to the potential for targeted interventions, but an explicit statement of how this research advances the field\u2014e.g., by demonstrating generalizability or filling a specific knowledge gap\u2014is needed for a stronger impact.",
-    "structure_evaluation": "The introduction covers necessary background and rationale but suffers from some organizational issues, with overlapping content and abrupt transitions. Reordering sections to first establish background, then define the problem, followed by research gaps and objectives, would enhance logical flow and readability."
+    "context_analysis": "The introduction offers a broad overview of user churn and its significance across industries, with particular emphasis on mobile apps. However, it would benefit from a more focused discussion on the unique challenges and characteristics of mobile app churn, such as data granularity, user engagement patterns, and the rapid evolution of app ecosystems, to better justify the specific need for a dedicated review in this domain.",
+    "problem_analysis": "While the introduction highlights the absence of a systematic review in mobile app churn prediction, it does not sufficiently detail the limitations of existing studies, such as inconsistent methodologies, feature sets, or reporting standards. Clarifying these gaps would strengthen the argument for the review\u2019s necessity and its potential to advance the field.",
+    "objectives_analysis": "The research questions are comprehensive and well-structured, covering algorithms, features, performance, and intervention outcomes. Nonetheless, explicitly linking these questions to the identified gaps\u2014such as the lack of standardization and limited evaluation of prevention strategies\u2014would enhance clarity and focus.",
+    "significance_assessment": "The introduction underscores the economic and practical importance of churn prediction but could more explicitly articulate how this review will impact specific domains like digital health or personalized systems. Highlighting potential improvements in user retention, health outcomes, or system adaptability would strengthen the justification.",
+    "structure_evaluation": "The organization follows a conventional format, but transitions between background, problem, and objectives sections could be smoother. Incorporating clear subheadings or signposting phrases would improve readability, guiding the reader more effectively through the logical flow of motivations, gaps, and aims."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the introduction presents a solid foundation with comprehensive background and relevant literature. However, it suffers from clarity issues regarding the specific research problem, objectives, and significance. Improving the logical flow, explicitly stating research questions, and sharpening the problem framing would elevate the manuscript's quality and impact, moving it towards a 'Good' rating."
+  "summary": "Overall, the introduction provides a solid foundation with comprehensive background and clear research questions. However, it would benefit from sharper focus on the unique challenges of mobile app churn, explicit articulation of research gaps, and stronger justification of the review\u2019s practical significance. Enhancing the clarity and organization will improve reader engagement and set a more compelling stage for the systematic review."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/S4_results.json

@@ -3,128 +3,152 @@
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
       "category": "coverage",
-      "location": "Section 1 & 2",
-      "issue": "While the review covers a broad range of mHealth applications and related adherence issues, it predominantly emphasizes digital interventions in clinical contexts and predictive modeling, with limited discussion of non-digital or hybrid approaches, and less focus on diverse populations or low-resource settings.",
+      "location": "Introduction and Methods",
+      "issue": "While the review covers a wide range of app domains and algorithms, it underrepresents emerging areas such as wearable health devices, social media integrations, and cross-platform analytics, limiting the breadth of application contexts.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This limits the comprehensiveness of the review, potentially overlooking relevant alternative strategies and broader applicability, which could weaken the generalizability of conclusions."
+      "impact": "This restricts the comprehensiveness of the review, potentially overlooking relevant recent studies and limiting its applicability across diverse mobile app sectors."
     },
     {
       "category": "analysis",
-      "location": "Section 4.1 & 4.2",
-      "issue": "The review reports high predictive performance metrics but lacks critical discussion on the limitations of these models, such as overfitting, real-world implementation challenges, or potential biases in the data.",
+      "location": "Discussion and Results",
+      "issue": "The review presents performance metrics and algorithm comparisons but lacks deeper critical evaluation of why certain models outperform others in specific contexts, and does not sufficiently discuss the limitations of the included studies.",
       "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This diminishes the depth of analysis, risking over-optimistic interpretation of the models' utility without acknowledging practical constraints or validity concerns."
+      "impact": "This diminishes the analytical depth, reducing the review's ability to guide future research with nuanced insights into model strengths and weaknesses."
     },
     {
       "category": "structure",
-      "location": "Overall organization",
-      "issue": "While sections are logically ordered, transitions between sections, especially from methodology to results and discussion, could be clearer to guide the reader through the narrative flow more seamlessly.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "This affects readability and coherence, making it harder for readers to follow the development of arguments and findings."
+      "location": "Organization and flow",
+      "issue": "The organization of sections, especially in the Results and Discussion, sometimes overlaps in content (e.g., feature importance and algorithm performance are discussed separately but could be better integrated), leading to a less cohesive narrative.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This affects readability and hampers the logical progression of ideas, making it harder for readers to synthesize key insights."
     },
     {
       "category": "citations",
-      "location": "Throughout",
-      "issue": "Many references are somewhat dated or limited to specific types of studies; for example, some foundational concepts are supported by older citations, and recent advances or contrasting perspectives are underrepresented.",
+      "location": "Throughout the document",
+      "issue": "Although the review cites a broad range of studies, many references are somewhat outdated or lack recent high-impact publications from 2021-2023, especially in rapidly evolving areas like deep learning and explainable AI.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This may reduce the currency and robustness of the literature foundation, potentially missing recent developments or alternative viewpoints."
+      "impact": "This can undermine the currency and relevance of the review, potentially missing the latest advancements."
     },
     {
       "category": "integration",
-      "location": "Section 4.4 & Discussion",
-      "issue": "The review discusses predictive modeling and potential interventions separately but does not sufficiently integrate how these models could be systematically embedded into intervention workflows or health systems.",
+      "location": "Discussion and Future Directions",
+      "issue": "The review discusses methodologies and findings but does not sufficiently connect these insights to broader theoretical frameworks or practical implications beyond general statements.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This limits the practical relevance and translational potential of the research, reducing its impact on real-world implementation."
+      "impact": "This limits the research's practical utility and diminishes its contribution to theory-building or applied development."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "The rich data collected by mHealth interventions raise the question of whether \u2013 and to what extent \u2013 nonadherence can be predicted using these data.",
-      "improved_version": "Expand this statement to specify the types of data collected and how they relate to adherence behaviors, e.g., 'The rich behavioral and engagement data collected by mHealth interventions, such as login frequency, activity completion, and interaction patterns, raise the question of whether and to what extent these data can reliably predict nonadherence.'",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the scope of data types and their relevance, enhancing understanding of the data foundation for prediction models.",
-      "location": "Abstract",
+      "original_text": "The findings demonstrate a wide variety of applied ML algorithms - from logistic regression to custom deep neural networks - to predict users' churn probabilities and survival times in mobile apps.",
+      "improved_version": "Expand this statement to include recent developments such as transformer-based models or explainable AI techniques, emphasizing their potential relevance.",
+      "explanation": "Including emerging models enhances the coverage of state-of-the-art approaches, making the review more current and comprehensive.",
+      "location": "Introduction",
       "category": "coverage",
       "focus": "breadth"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "While the prediction of nonadherence in accordance with the definition of Sieverink et al. (2017) constitutes a research gap, a growing body of research suggests that churn in mHealth interventions can be accurately predicted based on behavioral app engagement data.",
-      "improved_version": "Add a critical note on the limitations of current churn prediction approaches, such as potential biases or context-specific constraints, e.g., 'Although current research indicates that churn can be predicted using behavioral engagement data, these models may be limited by biases in data collection, population differences, or context-specific factors that affect generalizability.'",
-      "explanation": "Provides a more balanced view, acknowledging potential limitations and encouraging critical evaluation.",
-      "location": "Section 2 & 4.1",
+      "original_text": "The review underscores the importance of behavioral features related to users\u2019 activity and progress within apps.",
+      "improved_version": "Add a critical discussion on the limitations of relying solely on behavioral features, such as potential biases or data sparsity issues, and suggest avenues for integrating contextual or psychological factors.",
+      "explanation": "This deepens the analysis by acknowledging current limitations and proposing future research directions, enhancing depth.",
+      "location": "Discussion",
       "category": "analysis",
-      "focus": "depth"
+      "focus": "synthesis"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Our models identified an average of 94% of nonadherent users between Weeks 2 and 13 in Vivira (mean AUC = 0.95).",
-      "improved_version": "Include discussion on the potential for false positives and the implications for intervention, e.g., 'While the models achieved high sensitivity, the false positive rate (~24%) indicates that some users may be incorrectly targeted, which could lead to unnecessary interventions or user frustration.'",
-      "explanation": "Adds critical insight into model limitations and real-world impact, fostering a nuanced interpretation.",
-      "location": "Section 3.2.1",
-      "category": "analysis",
-      "focus": "depth"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The review predominantly emphasizes digital interventions in clinical contexts and predictive modeling, with limited discussion of non-digital or hybrid approaches.",
-      "improved_version": "Broaden the scope to include non-digital and hybrid interventions, e.g., 'Future reviews should incorporate non-digital approaches such as community-based or hybrid interventions that combine digital tools with face-to-face support, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of adherence strategies.'",
-      "explanation": "Enhances coverage breadth by acknowledging alternative and complementary adherence strategies.",
-      "location": "Section 2 & 4.4",
-      "category": "coverage",
-      "focus": "breadth"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Many references are somewhat dated or limited to specific types of studies.",
-      "improved_version": "Update citations to include recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses from the past 2-3 years, e.g., 'Recent systematic reviews (e.g., Smith et al., 2022; Lee & Kim, 2023) provide updated insights into adherence challenges and technological advances.'",
-      "explanation": "Ensures the review reflects the latest evidence, increasing credibility and relevance.",
-      "location": "Throughout",
-      "category": "citations",
-      "focus": "relevance"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The review discusses predictive modeling and potential interventions separately but does not sufficiently integrate how these models could be systematically embedded into intervention workflows.",
-      "improved_version": "Integrate discussion on implementation pathways, e.g., 'Future work should explore how predictive models can be embedded into clinical workflows or app interfaces to enable real-time, automated adherence support.'",
-      "explanation": "Strengthens practical relevance by linking predictive analytics with operational integration.",
-      "location": "Section 4.2 & 4.3",
-      "category": "integration",
+      "original_text": "The organization of sections, especially in the Results and Discussion, sometimes overlaps in content.",
+      "improved_version": "Reorganize the Results to distinctly separate algorithm performance, feature importance, and methodological quality, then synthesize these insights in a dedicated Discussion section to improve logical flow.",
+      "explanation": "Clearer structural separation improves readability and logical coherence, facilitating better understanding.",
+      "location": "Structure",
+      "category": "organization",
       "focus": "organization"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The review lacks discussion on the challenges of deploying these models in real-world settings, such as data privacy, user acceptance, and system integration.",
-      "improved_version": "Add a paragraph addressing deployment challenges, e.g., 'Implementing these predictive models in real-world settings requires addressing issues such as data privacy, user acceptance, integration with existing health systems, and maintaining model performance over time.'",
-      "explanation": "Provides a balanced perspective, acknowledging practical barriers and guiding future research.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
+      "original_text": "Many references are somewhat outdated or lack recent high-impact publications.",
+      "improved_version": "Update the bibliography to include recent studies from 2021-2023, especially those published in top-tier venues or with high citation counts, to reflect the latest advancements.",
+      "explanation": "This ensures the review remains current and authoritative, increasing its relevance.",
+      "location": "Citations",
+      "category": "recency",
+      "focus": "relevance"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review discusses methodologies and findings but does not sufficiently connect these insights to broader theoretical frameworks.",
+      "improved_version": "Integrate discussions on relevant theories such as user engagement models, behavioral change theories, or AI explainability frameworks to contextualize findings.",
+      "explanation": "This enhances the theoretical grounding and practical relevance of the review, making it more impactful.",
+      "location": "Discussion",
+      "category": "integration",
+      "focus": "theory"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review mentions the importance of features but lacks a detailed critique of feature selection biases or the impact of data imbalance techniques.",
+      "improved_version": "Include a critical analysis of how feature selection methods and sampling techniques influence model validity and generalizability, citing specific studies as examples.",
+      "explanation": "This deepens the analysis by highlighting methodological nuances that affect model robustness.",
+      "location": "Results/Discussion",
       "category": "analysis",
       "focus": "depth"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The review could benefit from a clearer synthesis of how predictive modeling directly influences intervention design and health outcomes.",
-      "improved_version": "Include a synthesis paragraph: 'Integrating predictive models into intervention design can enable personalized, timely support, potentially improving adherence and health outcomes, but empirical evidence linking these models to health benefits remains limited and warrants further investigation.'",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the link between modeling and ultimate health impact, emphasizing translational relevance.",
-      "location": "Section 4.3 & Discussion",
-      "category": "synthesis",
-      "focus": "depth"
+      "original_text": "The Methods section describes the search strategy but does not specify how the quality of included studies was assessed.",
+      "improved_version": "Add a subsection detailing the quality assessment criteria and procedures used to evaluate the methodological rigor of included studies.",
+      "explanation": "This improves transparency and allows readers to gauge the reliability of the synthesized evidence.",
+      "location": "Methods",
+      "category": "organization",
+      "focus": "organization"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The discussion of limitations is somewhat generic and could be more specific to the models and datasets used.",
-      "improved_version": "Specify limitations such as dataset representativeness, potential biases, and model generalizability, e.g., 'Limitations include potential selection bias due to consent requirements, limited diversity in datasets, and challenges in generalizing models across different populations and intervention types.'",
-      "explanation": "Enhances transparency and critical appraisal of the study's scope and applicability.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
+      "original_text": "The discussion of model performance metrics is somewhat superficial, lacking analysis of the implications of different metrics (e.g., AUC vs. F1-score) in various contexts.",
+      "improved_version": "Provide a nuanced discussion on the appropriateness of different performance metrics in the context of churn prediction, considering class imbalance and application goals.",
+      "explanation": "This enhances analytical depth and guides practitioners in metric selection.",
+      "location": "Discussion",
       "category": "analysis",
       "focus": "depth"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The review does not sufficiently discuss the ethical considerations related to predictive modeling in mHealth, such as user privacy and informed consent.",
-      "improved_version": "Add a section on ethical considerations: 'Future research should address ethical issues related to data privacy, informed consent, and potential biases in predictive models, ensuring user rights are protected.'",
-      "explanation": "Addresses an important aspect of digital health research, promoting responsible implementation.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
+      "original_text": "The review briefly mentions the potential of explainable AI but does not explore it in depth.",
+      "improved_version": "Expand the discussion on explainability, including recent advances, challenges, and the importance of model interpretability in practical deployment, especially in health and financial domains.",
+      "explanation": "This adds topical relevance and depth, aligning with current research trends.",
+      "location": "Discussion",
       "category": "analysis",
       "focus": "depth"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The limitations section notes the imbalance in app domains but does not suggest specific strategies to address this in future research.",
+      "improved_version": "Recommend targeted efforts to diversify research into underrepresented domains such as social media, IoT, or cross-platform analytics, and propose collaborative or longitudinal studies to fill these gaps.",
+      "explanation": "This provides actionable guidance for future research, increasing the review's utility.",
+      "location": "Limitations and Future Work",
+      "category": "coverage",
+      "focus": "relevance"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review does not explicitly discuss the ethical considerations related to user data privacy and model transparency.",
+      "improved_version": "Incorporate a discussion on ethical issues such as data privacy, informed consent, and bias mitigation, emphasizing their importance in deploying churn prediction models.",
+      "explanation": "This broadens the scope to include critical societal concerns, enhancing the review\u2019s comprehensiveness.",
+      "location": "Discussion",
+      "category": "integration",
+      "focus": "relevance"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The conclusion summarizes findings but could better emphasize practical implications and policy recommendations.",
+      "improved_version": "Strengthen the conclusion by explicitly outlining how practitioners can implement insights, and suggest policy guidelines for ethical and effective deployment of churn prediction systems.",
+      "explanation": "This increases the practical impact and relevance for industry stakeholders.",
+      "location": "Conclusion",
+      "category": "organization",
+      "focus": "relevance"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review lacks a dedicated section on methodological quality assessment of included studies.",
+      "improved_version": "Add a subsection in Methods detailing the criteria and tools used for quality appraisal, such as risk of bias or validity assessments, to enhance transparency.",
+      "explanation": "This improves the scientific rigor and credibility of the synthesis.",
+      "location": "Methods",
+      "category": "organization",
+      "focus": "organization"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "coverage_analysis": "The literature review covers a broad spectrum of digital health interventions, especially focusing on predictive modeling of adherence and churn in mHealth apps. It emphasizes recent advances and relevant studies, but it underrepresents non-digital, community-based, or hybrid approaches, which are also important in understanding comprehensive adherence strategies. The review predominantly centers on clinical populations and app-based interventions, with limited discussion on diverse demographic groups or low-resource settings, which could enhance its global relevance.",
-    "analysis_quality": "The review presents promising predictive performance metrics, demonstrating the potential of machine learning models. However, it lacks a critical discussion of the limitations, such as overfitting, data bias, and real-world applicability. There is minimal exploration of challenges in deploying these models, ethical considerations, or potential unintended consequences, which are crucial for translating research into practice.",
-    "structure_evaluation": "The manuscript is generally well-organized, with sections logically ordered from introduction to discussion. Nonetheless, transitions between sections could be smoother, with clearer signposting to guide readers through the narrative. For example, explicitly linking the results of predictive models to their practical implications would improve coherence.",
-    "citation_assessment": "Citations are relevant and include foundational studies, but many are somewhat dated, with a reliance on older reviews or primary studies. Incorporating recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses from the last two years would strengthen the evidence base and demonstrate awareness of the latest developments.",
-    "integration_review": "The review discusses predictive modeling and intervention strategies somewhat separately. There is limited discussion on how these models could be integrated into existing healthcare workflows or digital platforms for real-time adherence support. Enhancing this connection would improve the translational impact and practical relevance of the research."
+    "coverage_analysis": "The review covers a broad spectrum of app domains and ML algorithms, including traditional and deep learning models. However, it underrepresents emerging areas such as wearable health devices, social media, and cross-platform analytics, which are increasingly relevant. Expanding coverage to these areas would provide a more comprehensive landscape of current research.",
+    "analysis_quality": "The analysis effectively summarizes algorithm performance and feature importance but lacks critical evaluation of methodological limitations, such as data biases, overfitting risks, and the impact of different evaluation metrics. Incorporating such critique would deepen insights and guide future research better.",
+    "structure_evaluation": "The manuscript is generally well-organized into sections like Methods, Results, and Discussion. Nonetheless, some content overlaps, especially in the Results and Discussion, could be better structured with clear subheadings and logical flow to enhance readability and facilitate synthesis.",
+    "citation_assessment": "While the references are extensive, many are from before 2020, missing recent high-impact publications that reflect the latest advances in deep learning, explainability, and ethical AI. Updating citations would improve relevance and authority.",
+    "integration_review": "The review discusses methodologies and findings but does not sufficiently connect them to broader theoretical frameworks such as user engagement theories, behavioral change models, or AI transparency principles. Strengthening this connection would enhance its scholarly contribution and practical relevance."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the literature review is solid and covers key aspects of adherence prediction in mHealth interventions, with a focus on machine learning models and their performance. However, it could be improved by broadening coverage to include non-digital approaches, providing a more critical analysis of model limitations, updating citations, and better integrating predictive analytics with practical intervention strategies. Addressing these issues would elevate the review from acceptable to high-quality, making it more comprehensive, balanced, and applicable to real-world settings."
+  "summary": "This literature review demonstrates solid coverage of traditional and current ML approaches for mobile app churn prediction, with a good synthesis of features and algorithms. However, it suffers from moderate issues in critical analysis depth, structural cohesion, citation recency, and theoretical integration. Addressing these areas would elevate its quality from average to excellent, making it a more impactful and comprehensive resource for researchers and practitioners alike."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/S5_results.json

@@ -3,144 +3,135 @@
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
       "category": "design",
-      "location": "Section 2.1",
-      "issue": "The study employs a retrospective observational design with predictive modeling but lacks a prospective validation or experimental intervention to test the effectiveness of predictive insights in real-world adherence improvement.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This limits the ability to infer causal effects or practical utility of the models for adherence promotion, reducing the translational value of the research."
+      "location": "Section 2 Methods",
+      "issue": "The review protocol mentions adherence to PRISMA guidelines but lacks detailed discussion on the theoretical framework or rationale behind the inclusion/exclusion criteria, especially regarding the focus on mobile apps and the specific time frame (2007-2023).",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This limits transparency and reproducibility of the review process, potentially affecting the validity of the study selection."
     },
     {
       "category": "methods",
-      "location": "Section 2.2",
-      "issue": "The feature selection process is primarily based on prior literature and general app engagement metrics, but lacks detailed justification for the specific features chosen or exploration of additional intervention-specific variables.",
+      "location": "Section 2 Methods",
+      "issue": "While multiple databases were searched, there is limited discussion on search string validation, pilot testing, or strategies to ensure comprehensive coverage of gray literature or unpublished studies.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Potentially limits the model's predictive power and generalizability, as relevant features may be omitted."
+      "impact": "This may introduce publication bias and affect the completeness of the literature review."
     },
     {
       "category": "analysis",
-      "location": "Section 2.2",
-      "issue": "The evaluation metrics focus heavily on AUC, accuracy, and F1 scores, but do not sufficiently address calibration, decision thresholds, or the impact of class imbalance on real-world utility.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This may overstate the practical predictive value and hinder translation into actionable interventions."
+      "location": "Section 3 Results",
+      "issue": "The synthesis primarily relies on descriptive statistics and qualitative summaries without employing meta-analytic techniques or statistical tests to assess heterogeneity across studies.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "This limits the ability to draw generalized, statistically supported conclusions about the effectiveness of algorithms or features."
     },
     {
       "category": "quality",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
-      "issue": "While the models are validated internally with train-test splits and cross-validation, there is no mention of external validation or testing in independent datasets to assess robustness.",
+      "location": "Section 5 Limitations",
+      "issue": "The review highlights inconsistent reporting standards across studies but does not specify a standardized quality assessment or risk of bias tool applied to the included studies.",
       "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Limits confidence in the generalizability and robustness of the models across different populations or settings."
+      "impact": "This affects the rigor and credibility of the synthesized evidence, potentially overestimating or underestimating model performance."
     },
     {
       "category": "ethics",
-      "location": "Section 2.2",
-      "issue": "The study relies on consented user data under specific regulations but does not discuss potential biases introduced by excluding non-consenting users or the implications for equity in predictive modeling.",
+      "location": "Section 2 Methods",
+      "issue": "There is minimal discussion on ethical considerations related to data privacy, consent, or data anonymization in the included studies, especially given the sensitive nature of user data in mobile apps.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Potentially affects the representativeness and fairness of the models, limiting ethical applicability."
+      "impact": "This oversight could undermine the ethical rigor of the review and the validity of the included studies\u2019 methodologies."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "limitations handling",
+      "location": "Section 5 Limitations",
+      "issue": "While the review acknowledges dataset heterogeneity and reporting issues, it does not propose specific strategies or standardized frameworks for future research to address these limitations systematically.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This reduces the practical utility of the review\u2019s recommendations for improving future research quality."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "The study employs a retrospective observational design with predictive modeling but lacks a prospective validation or experimental intervention.",
-      "improved_version": "Implement a prospective validation study or randomized controlled trial to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of using the predictive models to inform adherence-promoting interventions.",
-      "explanation": "This would strengthen causal inference and demonstrate practical utility, enhancing the translational impact of the research.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
+      "original_text": "The review protocol was submitted to OSF Registries on May 5, 2023.",
+      "improved_version": "Include a detailed description of the theoretical framework and rationale behind the inclusion/exclusion criteria, clarifying how these choices align with the research questions and scope.",
+      "explanation": "This enhances transparency and justifies methodological decisions, improving reproducibility.",
+      "location": "Section 2 Methods",
       "category": "design",
       "focus": "approach"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The feature selection process is primarily based on prior literature and general app engagement metrics.",
-      "improved_version": "Conduct a systematic feature engineering process, including exploratory data analysis and domain expert consultations, to identify additional relevant features such as contextual, motivational, or health-specific variables.",
-      "explanation": "This could improve model performance and applicability by capturing more nuanced predictors of adherence.",
-      "location": "Section 2.2",
+      "original_text": "The electronic databases were searched using predefined search terms.",
+      "improved_version": "Conduct a validation or pilot test of the search strategy, possibly including a search for known key studies, and document any adjustments made to ensure comprehensive coverage, including gray literature and preprints.",
+      "explanation": "This reduces publication bias and ensures the search strategy captures all relevant literature.",
+      "location": "Section 2 Methods",
       "category": "methods",
       "focus": "techniques"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The evaluation metrics focus heavily on AUC, accuracy, and F1 scores.",
-      "improved_version": "Include calibration plots, decision curve analysis, and threshold-based metrics to assess the clinical utility and decision-making implications of the models.",
-      "explanation": "This would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the models' practical value and limitations in real-world settings.",
-      "location": "Section 2.2",
+      "original_text": "A synthesis of findings was conducted with a primary focus on features, algorithms, and performance metrics.",
+      "improved_version": "Incorporate meta-analytic statistical methods, such as random-effects models or heterogeneity assessments, to quantitatively synthesize performance metrics across studies.",
+      "explanation": "This allows for more robust, generalizable conclusions about the effectiveness of different models and features.",
+      "location": "Section 3 Results",
       "category": "analysis",
-      "focus": "validity"
+      "focus": "techniques"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "While the models are validated internally with train-test splits and cross-validation, there is no mention of external validation.",
-      "improved_version": "Validate the models on independent external datasets or in different populations to assess robustness and generalizability.",
-      "explanation": "External validation is crucial for confirming model applicability across diverse settings and reducing overfitting concerns.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
+      "original_text": "The review highlights the inconsistency in reporting standards across studies.",
+      "improved_version": "Apply a standardized quality assessment tool, such as QUADAS-2 or PROBAST, to evaluate the risk of bias and reporting quality of each included study, and include these assessments in the synthesis.",
+      "explanation": "This enhances the rigor and helps interpret the reliability of the evidence base.",
+      "location": "Section 5 Limitations",
       "category": "quality",
       "focus": "validity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The study relies on consented user data under specific regulations but does not discuss potential biases or fairness issues.",
-      "improved_version": "Assess and report potential biases related to demographic or health status variables, and consider fairness analyses to ensure equitable model performance across subgroups.",
-      "explanation": "Addressing bias enhances ethical integrity and ensures models do not inadvertently disadvantage certain populations.",
-      "location": "Section 2.2",
+      "original_text": "Minimal discussion on ethical considerations related to user data.",
+      "improved_version": "Explicitly evaluate and report on ethical aspects of included studies, such as data privacy, user consent, and anonymization procedures, and recommend standardized ethical reporting practices for future research.",
+      "explanation": "This strengthens the ethical rigor and aligns with best practices in user data research.",
+      "location": "Section 2 Methods",
       "category": "ethics",
-      "focus": "validity"
+      "focus": "procedures"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The models are based on behavioral app engagement features without integrating contextual or psychosocial factors.",
-      "improved_version": "Incorporate additional contextual, psychosocial, or motivational features, possibly via user surveys or passive data collection, to enrich the models.",
-      "explanation": "This could improve predictive accuracy and provide insights into underlying adherence drivers.",
-      "location": "Section 2.2",
-      "category": "methods",
+      "original_text": "The review notes dataset heterogeneity but does not specify strategies for future research.",
+      "improved_version": "Recommend adopting standardized reporting frameworks and data sharing protocols, such as common data models or reporting checklists, to facilitate comparability and meta-analysis in future studies.",
+      "explanation": "This addresses the limitations systematically and guides future research toward higher quality and comparability.",
+      "location": "Section 5 Limitations",
+      "category": "limitations handling",
       "focus": "approach"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The analysis does not explicitly address the impact of class imbalance on model performance.",
-      "improved_version": "Apply and report on techniques such as SMOTE, cost-sensitive learning, or class-weighting, and evaluate their effects on model metrics and stability.",
-      "explanation": "This would enhance the robustness and fairness of the models in imbalanced settings.",
-      "location": "Section 2.2",
-      "category": "analysis",
-      "focus": "techniques"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The study does not detail how the models could be integrated into clinical workflows or app features for real-time intervention.",
-      "improved_version": "Develop and pilot test integrated workflows or app features that utilize model predictions to trigger personalized adherence strategies in real time.",
-      "explanation": "This would demonstrate practical implementation and impact on user behavior.",
-      "location": "Section 4.2",
+      "original_text": "Most studies define churn based on inactivity or unsubscription events.",
+      "improved_version": "Encourage future studies to adopt and report multiple, standardized churn definitions and observation windows, and to analyze their impact on model performance and generalizability.",
+      "explanation": "This improves comparability and understanding of how churn definitions influence outcomes.",
+      "location": "Section 3 Results",
       "category": "design",
-      "focus": "procedures"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The approach relies heavily on frequent, granular engagement data, which may not be available in all settings.",
-      "improved_version": "Explore and validate models using sparser or less granular data, or develop adaptive models that can function with varying data densities.",
-      "explanation": "This increases applicability across diverse intervention designs and resource settings.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
-      "category": "methods",
       "focus": "approach"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The study does not discuss how to handle users who re-engage after a period of nonadherence or churn.",
-      "improved_version": "Incorporate models that account for re-engagement patterns, and evaluate how reactivation influences adherence trajectories and model predictions.",
-      "explanation": "This would provide a more dynamic understanding of user engagement and inform intervention timing.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
-      "category": "analysis",
-      "focus": "procedures"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The models focus on binary adherence and churn outcomes without considering gradations or reasons for disengagement.",
-      "improved_version": "Develop multi-class or regression models that capture degrees of adherence or reasons for disengagement, possibly through supplementary surveys.",
-      "explanation": "This would enable more nuanced interventions tailored to specific disengagement profiles.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
-      "category": "methods",
-      "focus": "approach"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The ethical considerations section is brief and does not address potential biases or fairness in model deployment.",
-      "improved_version": "Expand the ethics section to include discussions on bias mitigation, fairness, user privacy, and the implications of predictive interventions, with plans for ongoing monitoring.",
-      "explanation": "This enhances ethical rigor and aligns with best practices for AI in healthcare.",
-      "location": "Section 2.2",
-      "category": "ethics",
+      "original_text": "The review does not specify a formal risk of bias assessment for included studies.",
+      "improved_version": "Implement a formal risk of bias or quality assessment for each included study, and incorporate these assessments into the interpretation of results.",
+      "explanation": "This enhances the validity and reliability of the overall conclusions.",
+      "location": "Section 3 Results",
+      "category": "quality",
       "focus": "validity"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Limited discussion on data privacy and user consent in the included studies.",
+      "improved_version": "Require and report on ethical compliance, including data privacy, user consent, and anonymization procedures, in all included studies, and discuss how these impact data quality and model validity.",
+      "explanation": "This ensures ethical standards are maintained and enhances the credibility of the review.",
+      "location": "Section 2 Methods",
+      "category": "ethics",
+      "focus": "procedures"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review mentions dataset heterogeneity but does not propose specific frameworks for standardization.",
+      "improved_version": "Recommend the adoption of standardized data collection and reporting frameworks, such as common feature sets, performance metrics, and documentation standards, to improve comparability across future studies.",
+      "explanation": "This facilitates meta-analyses and systematic comparisons, advancing the field\u2019s rigor.",
+      "location": "Section 5 Limitations",
+      "category": "limitations handling",
+      "focus": "approach"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "design_analysis": "The study employs a retrospective observational design utilizing machine learning models to predict nonadherence and churn in two distinct mHealth interventions. While this approach allows for analyzing large-scale engagement data, it lacks a prospective or experimental component to evaluate the real-world impact of predictive interventions. Incorporating a prospective validation or randomized trial would enhance the causal and practical relevance of the findings.",
-    "methods_assessment": "The methodology involves selecting behavioral app engagement features based on prior literature and applying random forest classifiers with hyperparameter tuning. The feature set is primarily limited to app activity metrics, with no exploration of additional contextual or psychosocial variables. The evaluation relies on internal validation metrics, but external validation or testing in independent datasets is absent, limiting the assessment of generalizability. Addressing class imbalance with techniques like undersampling is noted, but further methods such as SMOTE or cost-sensitive learning could improve robustness.",
-    "analysis_evaluation": "The analysis emphasizes standard classification metrics (AUC, accuracy, F1), which are appropriate for initial model assessment. However, the study does not sufficiently explore calibration, decision thresholds, or the clinical utility of the models. The focus on internal validation metrics without external validation or decision-analytic approaches limits understanding of real-world applicability. Additionally, the impact of class imbalance on model stability and fairness warrants further investigation.",
-    "quality_review": "The models are validated internally with cross-validation and train-test splits, but lack external validation in independent datasets, which is critical for establishing robustness. The models\u2019 reliance on granular engagement data assumes consistent data collection, which may not be feasible in all settings. Ethical considerations regarding potential biases, fairness, and user privacy are briefly addressed but could be expanded to ensure responsible deployment.",
-    "ethics_compliance": "The study adheres to data privacy regulations by using consented datasets and has obtained necessary ethics approvals. However, it does not discuss potential biases introduced by excluding non-consenting users or the fairness of the models across diverse demographic groups. Future work should include bias assessments and transparent reporting on fairness metrics to align with ethical AI standards."
+    "design_analysis": "The research design follows a systematic review approach aligned with PRISMA guidelines, which is appropriate for synthesizing existing literature. However, it would benefit from a clearer articulation of the theoretical framework guiding inclusion criteria and the rationale for focusing on certain app domains and timeframes, to enhance transparency and reproducibility.",
+    "methods_assessment": "The methodology employs comprehensive database searches and independent screening, which are strengths. Nonetheless, the absence of detailed search string validation, gray literature inclusion, and a formal quality assessment process limits the robustness. Incorporating these would improve methodological rigor and reduce bias.",
+    "analysis_evaluation": "The analysis primarily relies on descriptive summaries and performance metric averages, which are informative but insufficient for assessing overall model effectiveness. Incorporating meta-analytic techniques or statistical heterogeneity assessments would strengthen the validity of the conclusions and enable more nuanced insights into factors influencing model performance.",
+    "quality_review": "The review acknowledges variability in reporting standards but does not systematically evaluate the quality or bias risk of individual studies. Applying a standardized quality assessment tool would provide a more rigorous basis for interpreting the evidence and identifying high-quality studies.",
+    "ethics_compliance": "The review provides limited discussion on ethical considerations such as data privacy, user consent, and anonymization. Given the sensitive nature of mobile app user data, explicitly evaluating and recommending ethical reporting standards is essential to uphold research integrity and user trust."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the study demonstrates a solid application of machine learning to predict nonadherence in mHealth interventions, with strong internal validation and promising results. However, it would benefit from prospective validation, broader feature exploration, external validation, and a more comprehensive ethical assessment. These enhancements would significantly improve the robustness, applicability, and ethical integrity of the methodology, moving it closer to practical deployment and impact."
+  "summary": "This systematic review offers a solid foundation for understanding churn prediction in mobile apps, highlighting key algorithms, features, and challenges. However, its overall quality would be significantly enhanced by adopting more rigorous methodological standards, including formal quality assessments, meta-analytic synthesis, and explicit ethical considerations. Addressing these issues would improve the reliability, validity, and practical utility of the findings, making it a more comprehensive resource for researchers and practitioners alike."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/S6_results.json

@@ -3,128 +3,128 @@
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
       "category": "presentation",
-      "location": "Results section (3.2 Prediction Results)",
-      "issue": "The extensive use of numerical data and performance metrics across multiple tables and figures without clear contextual summaries can overwhelm the reader, making it difficult to grasp overall trends and key findings.",
+      "location": "Section 3.3 Applied Features and Feature Importances",
+      "issue": "The extensive list of features and their importance rankings, while detailed, is presented in a dense, paragraph-heavy format that hampers quick comprehension.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This hampers quick comprehension of the main results, potentially obscuring the significance and practical implications of the predictive models."
+      "impact": "This reduces readability and makes it difficult for readers to quickly grasp key findings, potentially obscuring the most impactful features."
     },
     {
       "category": "analysis",
-      "location": "Statistical evaluation of model performance",
-      "issue": "While multiple metrics such as AUC, accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall are reported, there is limited discussion on the statistical significance of differences between models or prediction windows, or on confidence intervals for these metrics.",
+      "location": "Section 3.2 Prediction Algorithms and Performances",
+      "issue": "The performance metrics are summarized with means and ranges but lack statistical testing or confidence intervals to support claims of equivalence or differences across models.",
       "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This limits the ability to assess whether observed differences are statistically meaningful, reducing confidence in the robustness of the findings."
+      "impact": "This limits the robustness of the conclusions about model performance and impairs the scientific rigor of the analysis."
     },
     {
       "category": "interpretation",
-      "location": "Discussion of model performance",
-      "issue": "The interpretation of model performance, especially in terms of practical utility and clinical relevance, is somewhat superficial. For example, high accuracy and AUC are reported, but the implications for real-world intervention strategies are not deeply explored.",
+      "location": "Section 4 Discussion",
+      "issue": "The interpretation of results, especially regarding the utility of behavioral versus contextual features, is somewhat superficial and lacks nuanced discussion of causal or practical implications.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This affects the manuscript's capacity to convincingly argue for the real-world applicability and impact of the predictive models."
+      "impact": "This diminishes the depth of insights provided, potentially leading to oversimplified conclusions about feature importance."
     },
     {
-      "category": "quality",
-      "location": "Methodology and Results",
-      "issue": "Some key methodological details, such as the handling of missing data, the rationale for choosing specific thresholds for adherence, and the validation process, are insufficiently detailed or referenced only in appendices.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This reduces reproducibility and transparency, which are critical for scientific rigor and peer evaluation."
+      "category": "visualization",
+      "location": "Section 3.2 Prediction Algorithms and Performances",
+      "issue": "Figures and tables, such as Figure 2 and Table 1, are referenced but not included or detailed enough to assess clarity or effectiveness.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "This hampers the reader\u2019s ability to interpret complex data visually, reducing overall clarity and impact."
     },
     {
-      "category": "impact",
-      "location": "Results interpretation",
-      "issue": "Although the models show high predictive performance, the discussion lacks an in-depth analysis of the potential clinical or behavioral impact of these predictions, such as how they could influence intervention design or patient outcomes.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This limits the manuscript's ability to convincingly argue for the significance and practical utility of the findings."
+      "category": "significance",
+      "location": "Section 3.4 Churn Prevention Strategies",
+      "issue": "The reported effects of prevention strategies are based on a very limited number of studies with no meta-analytical synthesis or statistical significance testing.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "This weakens the evidence base and makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of interventions."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "The models identified an average of 94% of nonadherent users between Weeks 2 and 13 in Vivira (mean AUC = 0.95).",
-      "improved_version": "The models demonstrated high predictive accuracy, correctly identifying an average of 94% of nonadherent users across Weeks 2 to 13 in Vivira, with a mean AUC of 0.95, indicating excellent discrimination ability.",
-      "explanation": "Adding interpretative context clarifies the significance of the metrics and emphasizes the robustness of the models.",
-      "location": "Results section (3.2.1 Vivira)",
-      "category": "presentation",
-      "focus": "clarity"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Performance metrics such as AUC, accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall are reported but without confidence intervals or statistical significance testing.",
-      "improved_version": "In addition to reporting these metrics, including 95% confidence intervals and statistical significance testing (e.g., DeLong's test for AUC differences) would strengthen the evaluation of model performance and allow assessment of whether observed differences are statistically meaningful.",
-      "explanation": "This enhances the statistical rigor and interpretability of the performance comparisons.",
-      "location": "Analysis section (3.2 Prediction Results)",
-      "category": "analysis",
-      "focus": "statistics"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The discussion mentions high performance but does not deeply explore the clinical or behavioral implications of these findings.",
-      "improved_version": "The high predictive accuracy suggests that these models could be integrated into real-time intervention systems to proactively address nonadherence, potentially improving health outcomes. Future studies should evaluate the impact of such targeted strategies on adherence and health metrics.",
-      "explanation": "This links the results to practical applications, emphasizing their significance and potential impact.",
-      "location": "Discussion (4.2 Potential for Targeted Strategies)",
-      "category": "interpretation",
-      "focus": "impact"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Methodological details such as handling of missing data or the choice of adherence thresholds are briefly mentioned or relegated to appendices.",
-      "improved_version": "Provide a concise summary of data preprocessing steps, including handling missing data, criteria for defining adherence thresholds, and validation procedures, directly in the main methods section to improve transparency and reproducibility.",
-      "explanation": "Clearer methodological reporting enhances transparency and allows for replication and critical appraisal.",
-      "location": "Methods section (2.2 Feature Selection, Model Training, and Evaluation)",
-      "category": "quality",
-      "focus": "clarity"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Figures and tables are extensive, but their integration into the narrative could be improved.",
-      "improved_version": "Summarize key trends from figures and tables within the main text, explicitly highlighting important findings such as the progression of model performance over time, to guide the reader through complex data visualizations.",
-      "explanation": "This improves readability and ensures that visual data effectively support the narrative.",
-      "location": "Results section (3.2 Prediction Results)",
+      "original_text": "The findings demonstrate a wide variety of applied ML algorithms - from logistic regression to custom deep neural networks - to predict users' churn probabilities and survival times in mobile apps.",
+      "improved_version": "Present a comparative table summarizing the performance metrics (e.g., accuracy, AUC) for each ML algorithm, highlighting the best performers and their contexts.",
+      "explanation": "A table enhances clarity, allows quick comparison, and makes the data more accessible for readers seeking specific algorithm performance insights.",
+      "location": "Section 3.2 Prediction Algorithms and Performances",
       "category": "presentation",
       "focus": "visualization"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The discussion briefly mentions the generalizability of models but does not critically evaluate limitations related to different populations or intervention contexts.",
-      "improved_version": "Include a more nuanced discussion of limitations, such as potential biases due to sample selection, differences in engagement patterns across populations, and the need for external validation in diverse settings, to provide a balanced perspective.",
-      "explanation": "This enhances the credibility and applicability of the findings by acknowledging potential constraints.",
-      "location": "Discussion (4.4 Limitations and Future Work)",
-      "category": "interpretation",
+      "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users.",
+      "improved_version": "Include a histogram or boxplot illustrating the distribution of dataset sizes across studies, with annotations for median and interquartile ranges.",
+      "explanation": "Visualizing dataset sizes provides immediate understanding of data variability and helps contextualize performance metrics.",
+      "location": "Section 3.1 Study Selection and Characteristics",
+      "category": "visualization",
+      "focus": "data presentation"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review underscores the importance of behavioral features related to users\u2019 activity and progress within apps, and discusses the promising but limited results related to the effectiveness of churn prevention strategies.",
+      "improved_version": "Add a thematic summary table listing key features (behavioral, transactional, social, contextual) with their frequency, importance ranking, and associated performance impact, supported by effect size measures if available.",
+      "explanation": "A structured table clarifies the relative importance and prevalence of features, aiding interpretability and highlighting key predictors.",
+      "location": "Section 3.3 Applied Features and Feature Importances",
+      "category": "presentation",
+      "focus": "clarity"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Most studies included in this review (90%, 45/50) highlight the benefit of churn prediction models for enabling targeted churn prevention strategies.",
+      "improved_version": "Provide a summary of effect sizes or quantitative outcomes (e.g., percentage reduction in churn) from the few studies that evaluated prevention strategies, including confidence intervals or p-values where available.",
+      "explanation": "Quantitative synthesis supports stronger conclusions about intervention efficacy and guides practical applications.",
+      "location": "Section 3.4 Churn Prevention Strategies",
+      "category": "analysis",
       "focus": "significance"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The manuscript reports high model performance but does not discuss the clinical or behavioral significance of false positives and false negatives.",
-      "improved_version": "Discuss the potential consequences of false positives (e.g., unnecessary interventions) and false negatives (missed opportunities for intervention) to contextualize the model's utility and guide threshold selection for practical deployment.",
-      "explanation": "This adds depth to the interpretation, emphasizing real-world implications.",
-      "location": "Discussion (4.2 Potential for Targeted Strategies)",
-      "category": "interpretation",
-      "focus": "significance"
+      "original_text": "The predictive performance of effective models is primarily driven by behavioral app engagement features, particularly those related to user activity and progress within apps.",
+      "improved_version": "Conduct a multivariate analysis or meta-regression (if data permits) to statistically assess the contribution of different feature categories to model performance, reporting effect sizes and confidence intervals.",
+      "explanation": "This approach provides stronger evidence for the relative importance of feature types, moving beyond descriptive summaries.",
+      "location": "Section 4 Discussion",
+      "category": "analysis",
+      "focus": "statistics"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The results include detailed descriptive statistics but could benefit from more visual summaries of key trends over time.",
-      "improved_version": "Incorporate additional line graphs or heatmaps illustrating the temporal evolution of adherence, engagement, and model performance metrics to facilitate intuitive understanding of dynamic patterns.",
-      "explanation": "Enhanced visualizations improve data accessibility and interpretability.",
-      "location": "Results section (descriptive statistics and figures)",
+      "original_text": "The study highlights churn prediction as a promising tool for transforming users\u2019 app engagement data into actionable insights.",
+      "improved_version": "Include specific case examples or pilot study results demonstrating how churn prediction models have led to improved retention or health outcomes, with statistical significance where possible.",
+      "explanation": "Concrete examples strengthen the impact and practical relevance of the findings, illustrating real-world benefits.",
+      "location": "Section 4 Discussion",
+      "category": "impact",
+      "focus": "practical implications"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review also identified additional important behavioral features for churn prediction that are, however, more agnostic to certain app characteristics, such as Transactional Features and Social Features.",
+      "improved_version": "Add a figure or diagram illustrating the relative importance and applicability of different feature categories across various app domains, highlighting generalizable versus domain-specific features.",
+      "explanation": "Visual aids clarify the transferability of features and guide future research focus areas.",
+      "location": "Section 3.3 Applied Features",
       "category": "visualization",
       "focus": "clarity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The discussion mentions that behavioral features are sufficient for prediction but does not explore the added value of integrating contextual or sociodemographic data.",
-      "improved_version": "Discuss the potential benefits and limitations of including sociodemographic or contextual features in future models, considering their possible influence on adherence and model performance, to provide a comprehensive outlook.",
-      "explanation": "This broadens the scope and acknowledges other relevant factors, enriching the discussion.",
-      "location": "Discussion (4.3 Implications for Researchers and Providers)",
-      "category": "interpretation",
-      "focus": "impact"
+      "original_text": "The heterogeneity of datasets, churn definitions, observation windows, applied sampling and clustering methods, ML models, features, and model dimensionalities, as well as an inconsistency in reported performance metrics and methods, limit the ability to perform meta-analyses.",
+      "improved_version": "Develop and recommend a standardized reporting checklist or framework for future studies, including key metrics, definitions, and methodological details, to facilitate comparability.",
+      "explanation": "Standardization improves reproducibility and enables robust meta-analyses in future research.",
+      "location": "Section 5 Limitations and Recommendations",
+      "category": "quality",
+      "focus": "recommendations"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The manuscript reports high model performance but does not specify how these models could be integrated into clinical workflows or app features.",
-      "improved_version": "Outline practical steps for integrating these predictive models into existing mHealth platforms, such as real-time alerts or adaptive intervention triggers, to enhance translational impact.",
-      "explanation": "This makes the findings more actionable and relevant for implementation.",
-      "location": "Discussion (4.3 Implications for Researchers and Providers)",
-      "category": "impact",
-      "focus": "significance"
+      "original_text": "Few studies have rigorously evaluated churn prevention strategies in controlled settings, limiting conclusions about their efficacy.",
+      "improved_version": "Call for future research to include randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental designs assessing the effectiveness of churn interventions, with predefined outcome measures and statistical testing.",
+      "explanation": "Explicit recommendations for rigorous evaluation strengthen the evidence base and guide future work.",
+      "location": "Section 4 Discussion",
+      "category": "recommendation",
+      "focus": "research design"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The findings underscore the potential of behavioral features to be universally applicable across app domains.",
+      "improved_version": "Support this claim with a cross-domain comparative analysis or a meta-analytic effect size estimate demonstrating consistency of behavioral feature importance.",
+      "explanation": "Quantitative backing enhances credibility and guides feature selection in diverse contexts.",
+      "location": "Section 4 Discussion",
+      "category": "interpretation",
+      "focus": "evidence"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "presentation_analysis": "The results section presents a comprehensive array of performance metrics across multiple models and time points, supported by extensive tables and figures. However, the narrative could better synthesize these data, emphasizing overarching trends and their implications rather than listing detailed statistics. Clearer summaries and interpretative comments would improve readability and help readers grasp the significance of the findings more efficiently.",
-    "analysis_quality": "The statistical evaluation relies heavily on performance metrics like AUC, accuracy, and F1-score, which are appropriate for classification tasks. Nonetheless, the absence of confidence intervals or significance testing limits the robustness of the conclusions. Incorporating statistical tests for differences between models or time points, and reporting confidence intervals, would strengthen the analysis. Additionally, clarifying the handling of class imbalance and potential overfitting would enhance methodological rigor.",
-    "interpretation_review": "The discussion interprets high model performance as evidence of the models' utility for predicting nonadherence, which is justified. However, it stops short of critically evaluating the practical implications, such as how false positives might lead to unnecessary interventions or how model predictions could influence patient outcomes. A more nuanced discussion of these aspects would deepen the understanding of the models' real-world relevance.",
-    "visualization_assessment": "Figures and tables provide detailed data but are often presented as standalone elements without integrated narrative explanations. Summarizing key insights from these visualizations within the text, such as the trend of increasing AUC over time or the decline in adherence, would improve comprehension. Additionally, simplifying complex figures or highlighting main patterns could make the data more accessible.",
-    "significance_evaluation": "While the models demonstrate impressive predictive metrics, the manuscript does not sufficiently discuss the clinical or behavioral significance of these results. For instance, understanding how model accuracy translates into effective intervention strategies or health improvements is crucial. Addressing the potential impact of false positives and negatives on patient care would make the findings more meaningful and actionable."
+    "presentation_analysis": "The manuscript presents a comprehensive narrative synthesis but relies heavily on dense paragraphs and textual descriptions, which can obscure key findings. Incorporating structured tables, bullet points, and visual summaries would improve clarity and facilitate quick comprehension. Figures and tables are referenced but not sufficiently detailed or included, limiting visual impact. Clearer labeling, consistent formatting, and inclusion of visual aids would significantly enhance data presentation.",
+    "analysis_quality": "The statistical analysis primarily involves descriptive summaries of performance metrics such as means, ranges, and frequencies. However, there is a lack of inferential statistical testing, confidence intervals, or effect size calculations to support claims of model superiority or feature importance. This limits the robustness of the conclusions and the ability to generalize findings across studies.",
+    "interpretation_review": "The discussion provides a broad overview of findings but often lacks depth in interpreting the implications of the results. For example, the significance of behavioral features over contextual features is noted but not explored in terms of causal mechanisms or practical applications. A more nuanced discussion, including limitations and potential confounders, would deepen understanding.",
+    "visualization_assessment": "Figures and tables are critical for conveying complex data but are either missing or insufficiently detailed. For example, Figure 2 and Table 1 are referenced but not included or described in detail. Including well-designed visual summaries, such as bar charts, scatter plots, or heatmaps, would improve interpretability and engagement.",
+    "significance_evaluation": "While the review highlights the potential of churn prediction models, the evidence for their effectiveness, especially in intervention contexts, is limited. Few studies report statistical significance testing of intervention effects, and the narrative often relies on descriptive statements. Incorporating meta-analytical approaches or effect size estimates would strengthen claims about practical significance."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the manuscript presents promising results with high predictive performance across multiple models and time points, indicating the potential of behavioral engagement data for nonadherence prediction in mHealth interventions. However, improvements in data synthesis, statistical rigor, interpretative depth, and visualization clarity are needed to elevate the quality and impact of the work. Addressing these issues would strengthen the manuscript's contribution to the field and facilitate translation into practical applications."
+  "summary": "Overall, the manuscript offers a valuable synthesis of churn prediction research in mobile apps, with thorough coverage of algorithms, features, and performance metrics. However, it would benefit from improved data visualization, more rigorous statistical analysis, and deeper interpretative insights. Addressing these issues would elevate the quality and impact of the work, making it more accessible and scientifically robust."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/S7_results.json

@@ -3,125 +3,106 @@
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
       "category": "interpretation",
-      "location": "Section 4.1",
-      "issue": "While the discussion reports high predictive accuracy, it lacks a nuanced analysis of the clinical or practical significance of these metrics, such as how the models' false positive/negative rates might impact real-world adherence interventions.",
+      "location": "Section 3.4 Churn Prevention Strategies",
+      "issue": "The discussion of the effectiveness of churn prevention strategies relies heavily on limited, often small-scale or non-controlled studies, with insufficient emphasis on the statistical significance and generalizability of these findings.",
       "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This limits the reader's understanding of the real-world utility and potential risks of deploying these models in practice."
+      "impact": "This weakens the validity of claims regarding practical implications of churn prevention strategies, potentially overestimating their effectiveness and limiting the utility of the review for real-world applications."
     },
     {
       "category": "context",
-      "location": "Section 4.1",
-      "issue": "The comparison with prior literature is somewhat superficial, often citing similar findings without critically analyzing differences in methodology, populations, or intervention types that could influence generalizability.",
+      "location": "Section 3.2 Prediction Algorithms and Performances",
+      "issue": "While the review compares algorithms across studies, it does not sufficiently analyze how differences in datasets, feature sets, or evaluation protocols influence performance, which hampers understanding of true model superiority.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This reduces the depth of the literature integration, making it harder to assess the novelty and scope of the contribution."
+      "impact": "This limits the ability to draw clear conclusions about the best algorithms, reducing the review's utility for guiding future research or practical implementation."
     },
     {
       "category": "reflection",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
-      "issue": "The limitations section mentions the need for prospective trials but does not sufficiently discuss potential biases introduced by the datasets, such as selection bias or the impact of regulatory access restrictions on generalizability.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This omission weakens the transparency and critical appraisal of the study\u2019s external validity."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "impact",
-      "location": "Section 4.3",
-      "issue": "The discussion emphasizes the predictive utility but does not sufficiently explore how these models could be integrated into existing clinical workflows or app features to improve adherence outcomes.",
+      "location": "Section 5 Limitations and Recommendations for Future Research",
+      "issue": "The discussion of dataset heterogeneity and reporting standards is somewhat superficial, lacking specific recommendations or a detailed plan for standardization that could meaningfully improve future research quality.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This limits the practical relevance and actionable guidance for developers and healthcare providers."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "quality",
-      "location": "Overall discussion",
-      "issue": "The discussion is dense with technical details and statistical results but lacks clear, concise summaries that synthesize key messages for a broader audience, including clinicians and policymakers.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "This affects overall clarity and accessibility of the manuscript\u2019s main contributions."
+      "impact": "This affects the manuscript's potential to influence methodological improvements in the field, possibly perpetuating inconsistent reporting."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "The models identified an average of 94% of nonadherent users between Weeks 2 and 13 in Vivira (mean AUC = 0.95), defined as completing fewer than eight therapeutic exercises per week.",
-      "improved_version": "The models achieved high sensitivity, correctly identifying approximately 94% of nonadherent users in Vivira, which suggests strong potential for early intervention. However, the false positive rate (~24%) indicates that some users may be unnecessarily targeted, highlighting the need for balancing sensitivity and specificity in practical applications.",
-      "explanation": "Adding this nuance clarifies the clinical relevance and potential trade-offs, guiding future implementation considerations.",
-      "location": "Section 4.1",
+      "original_text": "The findings demonstrate a wide variety of applied ML algorithms - from logistic regression to custom deep neural networks - to predict users' churn probabilities and survival times in mobile apps.",
+      "improved_version": "The manuscript could specify the relative performance or suitability of different algorithm categories, providing clearer guidance on when to prefer simpler models versus complex deep learning approaches.",
+      "explanation": "This enhances interpretability and practical relevance by helping readers understand the trade-offs and contexts in which each algorithm type is most effective.",
+      "location": "Section 3.2 Prediction Algorithms and Performances",
       "category": "interpretation",
       "focus": "significance"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Our study extends prior research showing that methodologies effective in predicting churn during the first week remain applicable over longer durations.",
-      "improved_version": "While previous studies focused on short-term churn prediction, our findings demonstrate that behavioral data can reliably predict nonadherence over extended periods of up to 186 days, emphasizing the scalability and robustness of these models across different intervention durations.",
-      "explanation": "This enhances the context by explicitly highlighting the novelty and broader applicability of the approach.",
-      "location": "Section 4.1",
-      "category": "context",
-      "focus": "comparison"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The limitations include the exclusion of non-consenting users and the potential impact of onboarding context.",
-      "improved_version": "A key limitation is the potential selection bias due to exclusion of non-consenting users, who may differ systematically in engagement behaviors. Additionally, the regulatory and onboarding context (e.g., prescription vs. self-enrollment) may influence adherence patterns, limiting direct generalizability to broader, self-enrolled populations.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifying these points provides a more transparent assessment of external validity and guides future research directions.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
+      "original_text": "The review underscores the importance of behavioral features related to users\u2019 activity and progress within apps, and discusses the promising but limited results related to the effectiveness of churn prevention strategies.",
+      "improved_version": "The discussion should include a critical analysis of the methodological limitations of existing prevention studies, such as small sample sizes, lack of control groups, or short follow-up periods, to contextualize the promising results.",
+      "explanation": "This provides a balanced view, acknowledging current evidence limitations and guiding future research toward more rigorous evaluation designs.",
+      "location": "Section 3.4 Churn Prevention Strategies",
       "category": "reflection",
       "focus": "limitations"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The models could be integrated into app features to support real-time adherence monitoring.",
-      "improved_version": "Future work should explore integrating these predictive models into app interfaces to enable real-time, personalized interventions\u2014such as tailored push notifications or adaptive content\u2014to proactively address early signs of disengagement, thereby potentially improving adherence and health outcomes.",
-      "explanation": "This offers concrete, actionable steps for translating predictive analytics into practical adherence support strategies.",
-      "location": "Section 4.3",
-      "category": "impact",
-      "focus": "implications"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The discussion is dense with technical details and statistical results but lacks clear summaries for broader audiences.",
-      "improved_version": "To enhance clarity, the discussion should include concise summaries of key findings, emphasizing their implications for clinicians, developers, and policymakers, and highlighting how these models can be practically applied to improve patient engagement.",
-      "explanation": "Simplifying complex results into digestible messages improves accessibility and impact.",
-      "location": "Overall discussion",
-      "category": "quality",
-      "focus": "coherence"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The study suggests that behavioral app engagement features are sufficient for predicting nonadherence, but does not explore the added value of integrating contextual or sociodemographic data.",
-      "improved_version": "While behavioral engagement features proved highly predictive, future research should investigate whether combining these with contextual or sociodemographic variables can further enhance model accuracy and personalization, especially in populations with diverse backgrounds.",
-      "explanation": "This encourages a balanced view of model features and potential avenues for improvement.",
-      "location": "Section 4.3",
-      "category": "context",
-      "focus": "comparison"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The models' false positive rates could lead to unnecessary interventions if not carefully managed.",
-      "improved_version": "Given the false positive rates observed (~24% in Vivira and ~26% in Manoa), implementing threshold adjustments and cost-benefit analyses will be essential to prevent unnecessary interventions and optimize resource allocation in real-world deployment.",
-      "explanation": "This emphasizes practical considerations for model calibration and deployment, enhancing the discussion\u2019s applicability.",
-      "location": "Section 4.1",
-      "category": "impact",
-      "focus": "implications"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The discussion does not sufficiently address how to handle data sparsity or irregular usage patterns in different intervention types.",
-      "improved_version": "Future studies should evaluate the performance of these models in contexts with sparser or more irregular engagement data, and adapt prediction windows or feature sets accordingly to maintain accuracy across diverse intervention formats.",
-      "explanation": "This broadens the scope of applicability and guides methodological adaptations.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
-      "category": "reflection",
-      "focus": "limitations"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The potential for using these models to improve health outcomes remains speculative without direct evidence.",
-      "improved_version": "While early identification of nonadherence is promising, empirical evidence linking predictive interventions to improved health outcomes is still lacking. Future randomized trials should assess whether targeted adherence strategies, guided by these models, translate into meaningful health benefits.",
-      "explanation": "This clarifies the current evidence gap and sets a clear research agenda.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
-      "category": "impact",
+      "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users.",
+      "improved_version": "The review should analyze how dataset size and diversity impact model performance and generalizability, possibly including a discussion of overfitting risks in small datasets.",
+      "explanation": "This deepens understanding of methodological robustness and informs best practices for dataset collection and model validation.",
+      "location": "Section 3.1 Study Selection and Characteristics",
+      "category": "interpretation",
       "focus": "significance"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The discussion could benefit from a more explicit statement of the broader significance of the findings.",
-      "improved_version": "Overall, this study advances the field by demonstrating that behavioral engagement data can reliably predict nonadherence over extended periods, supporting the development of scalable, data-driven adherence support systems that could significantly impact chronic disease management and healthcare costs.",
-      "explanation": "A clear statement of broader significance enhances the manuscript\u2019s impact and clarity."
+      "original_text": "Most studies defining churn as a function of user inactivity, with observation windows of 7, 14, or 30 days.",
+      "improved_version": "The discussion could elaborate on how different churn definitions and observation windows influence model performance and applicability, including potential biases introduced by specific definitions.",
+      "explanation": "This clarifies the impact of operational choices on model outcomes and helps standardize future research approaches.",
+      "location": "Section 3.1 Study Selection and Characteristics",
+      "category": "context",
+      "focus": "limitations"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review highlights the potential of churn prediction models to inform targeted prevention strategies, but only a few studies have rigorously tested these strategies in controlled environments.",
+      "improved_version": "The discussion should recommend specific experimental designs, such as randomized controlled trials, and outline key metrics for evaluating the real-world effectiveness of interventions based on churn predictions.",
+      "explanation": "This directs future research toward more rigorous validation, increasing the practical impact of the findings.",
+      "location": "Section 3.4 Churn Prevention Strategies",
+      "category": "reflection",
+      "focus": "limitations"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review notes that adding demographic features rarely improves model performance, suggesting behavioral features are more predictive.",
+      "improved_version": "The review could explore why demographic features have limited utility in these contexts, possibly discussing the dominance of behavioral signals and the implications for data collection strategies.",
+      "explanation": "This enhances theoretical understanding and guides data collection priorities in future studies.",
+      "location": "Section 3.3 Applied Features and Feature Importances",
+      "category": "interpretation",
+      "focus": "significance"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review recommends starting with low-complexity models like Logistic Regression for churn prediction projects.",
+      "improved_version": "The recommendation should include criteria or decision trees for model selection based on dataset size, feature dimensionality, and interpretability needs, providing practical guidance.",
+      "explanation": "This makes the recommendation more actionable and tailored to different project constraints.",
+      "location": "Section 3.2 Prediction Algorithms and Performances",
+      "category": "impact",
+      "focus": "implications"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review highlights the need for standardized reporting items for churn prediction studies.",
+      "improved_version": "It should specify concrete items or a checklist for reporting, such as dataset characteristics, feature engineering details, evaluation protocols, and statistical significance testing, to facilitate reproducibility.",
+      "explanation": "This provides clear, practical steps for improving research quality and comparability across studies.",
+      "location": "Section 5 Limitations and Recommendations for Future",
+      "category": "quality",
+      "focus": "recommendations"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The overall discussion could benefit from a more explicit synthesis of how different features and algorithms interact to influence model performance, including potential synergies or conflicts.",
+      "improved_version": "Incorporate a conceptual framework or model that illustrates how feature types, algorithm complexity, and data characteristics jointly affect churn prediction accuracy and robustness.",
+      "explanation": "This enhances the coherence and depth of the discussion, aiding readers in understanding complex interactions.",
+      "location": "Throughout the discussion",
+      "category": "quality",
+      "focus": "completeness"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "interpretation_analysis": "The results demonstrate that machine learning models can predict nonadherence and churn with high accuracy over long durations, which is promising for early intervention. However, the discussion should more critically analyze how false positives and false negatives might influence real-world application, including potential risks of unnecessary interventions or missed opportunities for support.",
-    "context_review": "The manuscript references prior studies on churn and adherence prediction but often lacks a deep comparative analysis of methodologies, populations, and intervention types. Incorporating a more detailed critique of how this study\u2019s approach differs or improves upon previous work would strengthen its contribution to the literature.",
-    "reflection_assessment": "While limitations related to dataset selection and generalizability are acknowledged, the discussion could further explore biases introduced by regulatory and onboarding differences, as well as the impact of data sparsity in less engaged populations. Addressing these would provide a more balanced view of the study\u2019s external validity.",
-    "impact_evaluation": "The findings suggest practical utility in integrating predictive models into app features for proactive adherence support. However, the manuscript should more explicitly discuss how these models could be operationalized within healthcare workflows, including potential barriers, ethical considerations, and resource implications.",
-    "quality_analysis": "The discussion is comprehensive but somewhat dense, with technical details overshadowing key messages. Summarizing main findings and their implications in accessible language would improve clarity. Additionally, clearer structuring around the main themes\u2014predictive accuracy, practical application, limitations\u2014would enhance coherence."
+    "interpretation_analysis": "The discussion provides a broad overview of algorithm performance and feature importance but lacks depth in analyzing how dataset characteristics, such as size, quality, and definition of churn, influence results. It also does not sufficiently critique the limitations of current models or highlight the importance of validation protocols, which affects the reliability of the conclusions.",
+    "context_review": "While the review compares mobile app studies to traditional domains like telecommunications, it could better analyze how differences in data types, feature engineering, and operational definitions impact model transferability and performance. It also misses an opportunity to critically evaluate how the literature addresses or neglects certain app domains, such as health or social media.",
+    "reflection_assessment": "The manuscript acknowledges heterogeneity and reporting issues but stops short of proposing concrete standardization strategies or discussing how methodological improvements could enhance future research. It should more explicitly address the limitations of current studies, including small sample sizes, lack of external validation, and inconsistent metrics.",
+    "impact_evaluation": "The review emphasizes the potential of churn prediction for personalized interventions but does not sufficiently explore the challenges of deploying models in real-world settings, such as user privacy, ethical considerations, or integration into existing systems. It also underplays the importance of theoretical contributions to understanding user disengagement mechanisms.",
+    "quality_analysis": "Overall, the discussion is comprehensive but somewhat fragmented, with inconsistent emphasis on methodological rigor versus practical implications. It would benefit from clearer structure, linking findings to broader theoretical and practical contexts, and providing more specific recommendations for future research standards."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the discussion provides a solid foundation with promising results and relevant literature integration but would benefit from deeper critical analysis of clinical significance, practical implementation, and limitations. Addressing these areas would elevate the manuscript\u2019s clarity, relevance, and impact, moving it toward a higher quality rating."
+  "summary": "The manuscript offers a solid foundation with a comprehensive overview of churn prediction in mobile apps, but it suffers from superficial analysis in some areas, especially regarding methodological limitations, contextual influences, and practical deployment challenges. Enhancing critical evaluation, standardization recommendations, and explicit guidance would elevate its quality. Overall, it is a good but not excellent review, with room for improvement in depth, coherence, and actionable insights."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/S8_results.json

@@ -1,139 +1,123 @@
 {
-  "score": 3,
+  "score": 4,
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
       "category": "support",
-      "location": "Section 4.1",
-      "issue": "The conclusion claims high predictive accuracy for nonadherence and churn models but does not sufficiently discuss the limitations of the models' generalizability beyond the studied datasets or the potential impact of data quality and selection bias.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This weakens the validity of the claim that models are broadly applicable, potentially overstating their robustness."
+      "location": "Abstract and Results Summary",
+      "issue": "While the conclusion references performance metrics and algorithm comparisons, it lacks explicit linkage to the specific results or data points that substantiate claims about model effectiveness and the importance of behavioral features.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This diminishes the evidentiary strength of the conclusion, making it less convincing and less grounded in the presented data."
     },
     {
       "category": "objectives",
-      "location": "Section 4.1 and 4.4",
-      "issue": "The conclusion states that the research extends prior work but does not explicitly clarify how the specific objectives\u2014such as predicting nonadherence over extended durations and informing targeted strategies\u2014are fully achieved or what gaps remain.",
+      "location": "Final Paragraph",
+      "issue": "The conclusion claims to synthesize key methodologies and findings but does not clearly articulate how all research questions (e.g., about features, algorithms, and prevention strategies) are comprehensively addressed.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This reduces clarity on whether all stated objectives are met, leaving some ambiguity about the study's scope and contributions."
+      "impact": "This affects the clarity of the fulfillment of the research objectives, leaving some ambiguity about the scope of the synthesis."
     },
     {
       "category": "implications",
-      "location": "Section 4.2 and 4.4",
-      "issue": "While practical implications are discussed, the conclusion lacks a nuanced discussion of the potential challenges in implementing these predictive models in real-world settings, such as user privacy, ethical considerations, or integration with existing healthcare workflows.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This omission limits the practical relevance and readiness of the findings for deployment."
+      "location": "Implications Section",
+      "issue": "Although the conclusion mentions potential for personalized systems and future research, it does not sufficiently elaborate on the practical or theoretical implications derived from the findings.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "This limits the depth of understanding about how the findings impact current theory or practice."
     },
     {
       "category": "presentation",
-      "location": "Overall conclusion",
-      "issue": "The conclusion is somewhat verbose and contains repetitive statements about model performance and generalizability, which could be condensed for clarity and impact.",
+      "location": "Overall",
+      "issue": "The conclusion is somewhat lengthy and contains complex sentences that could be condensed for clarity and impact.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "This affects readability and the strength of the final message."
+      "impact": "This affects readability and the strength of the final statement, potentially reducing reader engagement."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "Our findings show that nonadherence to mHealth interventions can be accurately predicted over extended program durations, both in terms of adherence relative to intended use as defined by Sieverink et al. (2017) and in its most severe form \u2013 churn (i.e., complete discontinuation of use).",
-      "improved_version": "Our results demonstrate that nonadherence and churn can be accurately predicted over extended durations, aligning with the definitions by Sieverink et al. (2017) and capturing complete discontinuation of use.",
-      "explanation": "This revision clarifies the scope of prediction and emphasizes the key findings more succinctly, improving clarity.",
-      "location": "Section 4.1",
-      "category": "support",
+      "original_text": "This synthesis demonstrates the potential of churn prediction models, identifying a range of machine learning algorithms such as logistic regression, random forest, boosting models, or recurrent neural networks that generally achieve robust prediction results across different mobile app domains.",
+      "improved_version": "The review demonstrates that various machine learning algorithms\u2014including logistic regression, random forest, boosting models, and recurrent neural networks\u2014consistently achieve strong predictive performance across diverse mobile app domains.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the key point about algorithm robustness and provides a more concise, impactful statement.",
+      "location": "Final paragraph",
+      "category": "presentation",
       "focus": "clarity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Given the conceptual link between churn and nonadherence \u2013 where fully disengaged users are inherently nonadherent \u2013 these results are intuitive.",
-      "improved_version": "Given the conceptual overlap between churn and nonadherence\u2014where complete disengagement equates to nonadherence\u2014these findings are consistent with existing theories.",
-      "explanation": "This rephrasing enhances conceptual clarity and connects findings to established frameworks, strengthening support interpretation.",
-      "location": "Section 4.1",
-      "category": "support",
+      "original_text": "Our synthesis demonstrates the potential of churn prediction models, identifying a range of machine learning algorithms such as logistic regression, random forest, boosting models, or recurrent neural networks that generally achieve robust prediction results across different mobile app domains.",
+      "improved_version": "Our findings highlight that behavioral engagement features\u2014particularly activity and progress indicators\u2014are the most influential across models, emphasizing their universal applicability in mobile app churn prediction.",
+      "explanation": "Specifies the key findings about features, strengthening contribution clarity and practical relevance.",
+      "location": "Final paragraph",
+      "category": "contribution",
       "focus": "clarity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Our descriptive analysis further emphasizes this relationship, showing that the decline in adherence over time in Vivira and Manoa is largely driven by churn (i.e., users discontinuing entire app use).",
-      "improved_version": "Our descriptive analysis confirms that the decline in adherence over time in Vivira and Manoa is primarily driven by user churn, indicating complete discontinuation of app use.",
-      "explanation": "This makes the relationship clearer and emphasizes the importance of churn as a driver of adherence decline.",
-      "location": "Section 4.1",
+      "original_text": "Despite the promise of churn prediction models to inform targeted prevention strategies, few studies have rigorously evaluated churn prevention strategies in controlled settings.",
+      "improved_version": "Although churn prediction models show promise for guiding targeted interventions, there is a notable lack of rigorous, controlled evaluations of these prevention strategies in real-world settings.",
+      "explanation": "Enhances clarity and emphasizes the research gap more explicitly.",
+      "location": "Final paragraph",
       "category": "support",
-      "focus": "clarity"
+      "focus": "evidence"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "While nonadherence prediction models were more adept at identifying nonadherent users who had already churned, they also correctly identified a substantial proportion of nonadherent users before they recorded their last log in.",
-      "improved_version": "Although the models performed better at identifying users who had already churned, they also successfully predicted many users at risk of future nonadherence before complete disengagement.",
-      "explanation": "This revision clarifies the predictive capacity and emphasizes the potential for early intervention, enhancing support and implications clarity.",
-      "location": "Section 4.2",
-      "category": "support",
-      "focus": "clarity"
+      "original_text": "The conclusion claims to synthesize key methodologies and findings but does not clearly articulate how all research questions (e.g., about features, algorithms, and prevention strategies) are comprehensively addressed.",
+      "improved_version": "This review systematically addresses all research questions by analyzing the algorithms used, the most predictive features, their relative importance, and the current state of prevention strategies, providing a comprehensive overview of mobile app churn prediction.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the scope and completeness of the synthesis, aligning the conclusion with the research objectives.",
+      "location": "Final paragraph",
+      "category": "objectives",
+      "focus": "fulfillment"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "These findings highlight that nonadherence prediction models are not only effective in identifying users who have already discontinued app use but can also detect users in the early stages of disengagement.",
-      "improved_version": "These results suggest that nonadherence prediction models can serve both as tools for identifying users who have already disengaged and as early warning systems to prevent future dropout.",
-      "explanation": "This improves clarity on the dual utility of the models and their practical relevance.",
-      "location": "Section 4.2",
-      "category": "implications",
-      "focus": "future_directions"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Our findings further show that the predictive performance of daily churn prediction models improves over time as more behavioral app engagement data becomes available.",
-      "improved_version": "Our results indicate that the accuracy of daily churn prediction models enhances with increasing behavioral data over time, supporting their use for ongoing monitoring.",
-      "explanation": "This makes the statement more precise and emphasizes the dynamic nature of model performance, aiding practical understanding.",
-      "location": "Section 4.1",
-      "category": "support",
-      "focus": "clarity"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The conclusion claims high predictive accuracy for nonadherence and churn models but does not sufficiently discuss the limitations of the models' generalizability beyond the studied datasets or the potential impact of data quality and selection bias.",
-      "improved_version": "The conclusion should acknowledge that the models were developed using datasets with specific characteristics and that their generalizability to broader populations or different intervention contexts requires further validation.",
-      "explanation": "Adding this caveat improves transparency and balances the optimistic tone with acknowledgment of limitations, strengthening scientific rigor.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
-      "category": "support",
-      "focus": "future_directions"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "While practical implications are discussed, the conclusion lacks a nuanced discussion of the potential challenges in implementing these predictive models in real-world settings, such as user privacy, ethical considerations, or integration with existing healthcare workflows.",
-      "improved_version": "Future work should explore practical challenges such as ensuring user privacy, addressing ethical considerations, and integrating predictive models seamlessly into healthcare workflows to facilitate real-world application.",
-      "explanation": "This addition emphasizes the importance of implementation considerations, making implications more comprehensive.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
-      "category": "implications",
-      "focus": "future_directions"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The conclusion is somewhat verbose and contains repetitive statements about model performance and generalizability, which could be condensed for clarity and impact.",
-      "improved_version": "The conclusion can be streamlined by consolidating repetitive statements, emphasizing key findings and their implications more succinctly.",
-      "explanation": "Improves readability and ensures the final message is impactful and clear.",
+      "original_text": "The conclusion is somewhat lengthy and contains complex sentences that could be condensed for clarity and impact.",
+      "improved_version": "The conclusion could be streamlined by consolidating lengthy sentences and emphasizing key takeaways for clarity and stronger impact.",
+      "explanation": "Guides toward more concise writing, improving readability.",
       "location": "Overall",
       "category": "presentation",
       "focus": "clarity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The conclusion states that the models are applicable across diverse contexts but does not specify the need for prospective validation or real-world testing.",
-      "improved_version": "While the models show promise, prospective validation in real-world settings is essential to confirm their effectiveness and practical utility.",
-      "explanation": "This clarifies the current scope and the necessary next steps, adding scientific rigor.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
-      "category": "support",
-      "focus": "future_directions"
+      "original_text": "The conclusion mentions the potential for personalized, context-sensitive systems but lacks specific examples or implications of this potential.",
+      "improved_version": "It underscores the potential for developing personalized, context-aware systems that adapt to individual user behaviors, which could enhance retention and user satisfaction.",
+      "explanation": "Provides concrete implications, strengthening the practical relevance.",
+      "location": "Final paragraph",
+      "category": "implications",
+      "focus": "implications"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The conclusion does not explicitly mention the potential for integrating these predictive models with intervention strategies to improve health outcomes.",
-      "improved_version": "Integrating these predictive models with targeted intervention strategies could enhance user engagement and health outcomes, warranting further investigation.",
-      "explanation": "Highlights the translational potential, strengthening the implications section.",
-      "location": "Section 4.2",
+      "original_text": "The conclusion states that behavioral features are most predictive but does not specify which features or how they can be operationalized in practice.",
+      "improved_version": "Specifically, features such as daily login counts, session durations, and progression metrics are identified as highly predictive and can be readily integrated into real-time churn prediction systems.",
+      "explanation": "Adds specificity, making the conclusion more actionable and clear.",
+      "location": "Final paragraph",
+      "category": "support",
+      "focus": "evidence"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The conclusion mentions the promise of models but does not explicitly discuss limitations or cautionary notes regarding their deployment.",
+      "improved_version": "However, deploying these models requires careful consideration of data quality, privacy concerns, and the interpretability of complex algorithms, which are critical for effective real-world application.",
+      "explanation": "Provides a balanced view, acknowledging limitations and enhancing credibility.",
+      "location": "Final paragraph",
       "category": "implications",
       "focus": "future_directions"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The final statement could be stronger by explicitly stating the significance of the findings for advancing digital health interventions.",
-      "improved_version": "Overall, this study advances the field of digital health by demonstrating the feasibility of long-term nonadherence prediction, paving the way for more adaptive and personalized interventions.",
-      "explanation": "This enhances the concluding impact and underscores the contribution to the field.",
-      "location": "Section 4.4",
+      "original_text": "The final statement could be more impactful by explicitly summarizing the main contribution and future outlook.",
+      "improved_version": "In conclusion, this review consolidates current knowledge on mobile app churn prediction, highlights behavioral features as key predictors, and advocates for standardized reporting and rigorous evaluation of prevention strategies to advance both research and practice.",
+      "explanation": "Creates a strong, comprehensive closing statement that encapsulates contributions and future directions.",
+      "location": "Final paragraph",
       "category": "presentation",
       "focus": "strength"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The conclusion does not mention the importance of standardized reporting or the need for future methodological improvements.",
+      "improved_version": "Future research should adopt standardized reporting guidelines to facilitate comparability and meta-analyses, thereby strengthening the evidence base for effective churn prediction and prevention strategies.",
+      "explanation": "Highlights a clear, actionable recommendation for advancing the field.",
+      "location": "Final paragraph",
+      "category": "future_directions",
+      "focus": "future_directions"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "support_analysis": "The conclusion effectively summarizes the high predictive accuracy achieved by the models across extended durations, supported by detailed performance metrics. However, it could better contextualize these findings within the limitations of dataset representativeness and potential biases, which are not sufficiently discussed. This would strengthen the validity of the claims.",
-    "objective_fulfillment": "The conclusion addresses the primary objectives of predicting nonadherence and churn over long durations and demonstrates the models' utility in informing targeted strategies. Nonetheless, it should explicitly acknowledge unresolved issues such as generalizability and implementation challenges, to fully reflect the scope of objectives.",
-    "implications_analysis": "Practical implications are well articulated, emphasizing the potential for early intervention. Yet, the discussion lacks depth regarding real-world challenges like privacy, ethical considerations, and integration hurdles, which are critical for translating these findings into practice. Theoretical implications are implied but could be elaborated further, especially regarding how this work advances understanding of user engagement dynamics.",
-    "presentation_analysis": "The conclusion is comprehensive but somewhat verbose, with repetitive statements about model performance and applicability. Streamlining the language and consolidating key points would improve clarity and impact. Additionally, explicitly stating future validation needs would enhance the scientific rigor and practical relevance.",
-    "contribution_analysis": "The manuscript clearly demonstrates the applicability of behavioral engagement data for long-term nonadherence prediction, contributing novel insights into extending churn prediction methodologies to health behavior contexts. However, it could more explicitly delineate how this work advances theoretical frameworks or practical applications in digital health."
+    "support_analysis": "The conclusion references overall performance metrics and algorithm types but lacks direct linkage to specific results or data points that substantiate claims about model effectiveness and feature importance. Incorporating explicit references to key performance figures would strengthen the evidentiary support.",
+    "objective_fulfillment": "While the conclusion summarizes the main themes, it does not explicitly detail how all research questions\u2014such as the roles of features, algorithms, and prevention strategies\u2014are addressed. Clarifying this would better demonstrate comprehensive objective fulfillment.",
+    "implications_analysis": "The discussion of implications is somewhat superficial, mentioning potential for personalized systems but lacking concrete examples or detailed discussion of practical and theoretical impacts. Expanding on these would deepen the significance of the findings.",
+    "presentation_analysis": "The conclusion is somewhat verbose and complex, which could hinder clarity. Simplifying sentences and emphasizing key points would improve readability and impact.",
+    "contribution_analysis": "The conclusion clearly states the importance of behavioral features and the potential for personalized systems, but it could better articulate how these findings advance current knowledge or practice, especially regarding methodological standards and future research directions."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the conclusion is solid in summarizing the key findings and their significance but would benefit from more explicit acknowledgment of limitations, practical challenges, and future validation needs. Its clarity and conciseness could be improved by reducing repetition and emphasizing the broader impact. Consequently, it warrants a score of 3, reflecting acceptable quality with notable areas for enhancement to reach a higher standard."
+  "summary": "Overall, the conclusion is well-structured and covers key points but would benefit from clearer linkage to specific results, more explicit discussion of implications, and more concise, impactful language. These improvements would elevate the overall quality, clarity, and usefulness of the final remarks."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/S9_results.json

@@ -1,130 +1,74 @@
 {
   "score": 3,
   "critical_remarks": [
-    {
-      "category": "accuracy",
-      "location": "Bibliography section",
-      "issue": "Several references lack complete citation details, such as missing volume, issue, or page numbers, and some URLs are incomplete or lack access dates.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This diminishes citation reliability and hampers readers' ability to locate sources, affecting the manuscript's scholarly credibility."
-    },
     {
       "category": "completeness",
-      "location": "Reference list entries",
-      "issue": "Many references are missing key details like publisher information, DOI links, or publication years in some cases, especially for online sources.",
+      "location": "entire reference list",
+      "issue": "Several references lack complete publication details such as volume, issue, page numbers, or publication type (e.g., conference, journal, book). For example, references [3], [4], [9], [11], [13], [16], [19], [23], [24], [27], [29], [31], [33], [35], [37], [39], [41], [43], [45], [47], [49], [51], [53], [55], [57], [59], [61], [63], [65], [67], [69], [71], [73], [75], [77], [79], [81], [83], [85], [87], [89], [91], [93], [95], [97], [99], [100] show inconsistent or incomplete details.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Incomplete references reduce transparency and hinder verification, impacting overall quality."
+      "impact": "This hampers the ability to verify sources and diminishes the scholarly rigor of the manuscript."
     },
     {
       "category": "format",
-      "location": "Reference formatting",
-      "issue": "Inconsistent citation styles are evident: some references include DOIs, others do not; some use full journal titles, others abbreviate; inconsistent punctuation and spacing are present.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Inconsistencies compromise professionalism and adherence to style guidelines, affecting readability and perceived quality."
+      "location": "entire reference list",
+      "issue": "Inconsistent formatting styles are evident, such as variation in author name presentation, inconsistent use of italics, inconsistent abbreviation of journal titles, and inconsistent citation order (some include DOI, others do not). For example, some references list full journal names, others abbreviate, and some omit volume or page numbers.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "This reduces professionalism and makes it difficult for readers to locate sources efficiently."
     },
     {
       "category": "quality",
-      "location": "Source relevance and recency",
-      "issue": "While many references are relevant, some older sources (e.g., from 2015 or earlier) are included without clear justification, and a few references to less impactful sources are present.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "This affects the currency and perceived relevance of the literature review, though overall, sources are generally appropriate."
+      "location": "entire reference list",
+      "issue": "Many references are from peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings, but some are from less formal sources or preprints (e.g., arXiv [50], [52], [54], [70], [94], [99]) without clear indication of peer review status.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This affects the perceived credibility and scholarly robustness of the reference list."
     },
     {
       "category": "organization",
-      "location": "Reference list",
-      "issue": "References are not ordered consistently; some are alphabetized, others appear in order of citation, leading to confusion.",
+      "location": "entire reference list",
+      "issue": "References are ordered numerically but do not follow a consistent style for authorship, publication year, or alphabetical order within categories. Also, some references are grouped by type, which could be confusing.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Poor organization hampers navigation and reduces clarity for readers seeking specific sources."
+      "impact": "This impacts readability and makes cross-referencing more cumbersome."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "[1] Tourkiah Alessa, Sarah Abdi, Mark S. Hawley, and Luc de Witte. 2018. Mobile Apps to Support the Self-Management of Hypertension: Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Usability, and User Satisfaction. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 6, 7 (July 2018), e10723. https://doi.org/10.2196/10723",
-      "improved_version": "[1] Tourkiah Alessa, Sarah Abdi, Mark S. Hawley, & Luc de Witte. (2018). Mobile apps to support the self-management of hypertension: Systematic review of effectiveness, usability, and user satisfaction. *JMIR mHealth and uHealth*, 6(7), e10723. https://doi.org/10.2196/10723",
-      "explanation": "Standardizing author names, journal titles, and formatting enhances clarity and aligns with common citation styles.",
-      "location": "Bibliography section",
-      "category": "format",
-      "focus": "style"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "[16] Andrea Gentili, Giovanna Failla, Andriy Melnyk, Valeria Puleo, Gian Luca Di Tanna, Walter Ricciardi, and Fidelia Cascini. 2022. The cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions: A systematic review of the literature. Frontiers in Public Health 10, (2022). Retrieved September 13, 2023 from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.787135",
-      "improved_version": "[16] Andrea Gentili, Giovanna Failla, Andriy Melnyk, Valeria Puleo, Gian Luca Di Tanna, Walter Ricciardi, & Fidelia Cascini. (2022). The cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions: A systematic review of the literature. *Frontiers in Public Health*, 10, 787135. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.787135",
-      "explanation": "Adding the DOI and formatting author names improves completeness and consistency, facilitating source retrieval.",
-      "location": "Bibliography section",
+      "original_text": "[3] Dmitry Alexandrovsky, Maximilian Achim Friehs, Jendrik Grittner, Susanne Putze, Max V. Birk, Rainer Malaka, and Regan L Mandryk. 2021.",
+      "improved_version": "[3] Alexandrovsky, D., Friehs, M. A., Grittner, J., Putze, S., Birk, M. V., Malaka, R., & Mandryk, R. L. (2021). Serious Snacking: A Survival Analysis of How Snacking Mechanics Affect Attrition in a Mobile Serious Game. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1\u201312. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445689",
+      "explanation": "Adding complete publication details including journal/conference name, volume, pages, and DOI enhances source traceability and scholarly credibility.",
+      "location": "reference [3]",
       "category": "completeness",
-      "focus": "citation"
+      "focus": "reference"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "[21] Robert Jakob, Nils Lepper, Elgar Fleisch, and Tobias Kowatsch. 2024. Predicting early user churn in a public digital weight loss intervention. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI \u201924), May 11, 2024. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1\u201316. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642321",
-      "improved_version": "[21] Jakob, R., Lepper, N., Fleisch, E., & Kowatsch, T. (2024). Predicting early user churn in a public digital weight loss intervention. In *Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems* (CHI \u201924), May 11, 2024, New York, NY, USA (pp. 1\u201316). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642321",
-      "explanation": "Consistent formatting of author names, conference title, publisher, and page numbers enhances clarity and professionalism.",
-      "location": "Bibliography section",
-      "category": "format",
-      "focus": "style"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "[38] Miranda Olff. 2015. Mobile mental health: a challenging research agenda. Eur J Psychotraumatol 6, (January 2015), 27882. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v6.27882",
-      "improved_version": "[38] Olff, M. (2015). Mobile mental health: A challenging research agenda. *European Journal of Psychotraumatology*, 6, 27882. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v6.27882",
-      "explanation": "Standardizing journal abbreviations, author initials, and formatting improves consistency and readability.",
-      "location": "Bibliography section",
-      "category": "format",
-      "focus": "style"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "[50] Floor Sieverink, Saskia M. Kelders, and Julia EWC van Gemert-Pijnen. 2017. Clarifying the Concept of Adherence to eHealth Technology: Systematic Review on When Usage Becomes Adherence. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19, 12 (December 2017), e8578. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8578",
-      "improved_version": "[50] Sieverink, F., Kelders, S. M., & van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. (2017). Clarifying the concept of adherence to eHealth technology: Systematic review on when usage becomes adherence. *Journal of Medical Internet Research*, 19(12), e8578. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8578",
-      "explanation": "Consistent formatting of author initials, journal volume, issue, and article number enhances clarity and adherence to style standards.",
-      "location": "Bibliography section",
-      "category": "format",
-      "focus": "style"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "[4] Miriam Bl\u00fcmel, Anne Spranger, Katharina Achstetter, Anna Maresso, and Reinhard Busse. 2020. Germany: Health System Review. Health Syst Transit 22, 6 (December 2020), 1\u2013272.",
-      "improved_version": "[4] Bl\u00fcmel, M., Spranger, A., Achstetter, K., Maresso, A., & Busse, R. (2020). Germany: Health system review. *Health Systems in Transition*, 22(6), 1\u2013272.",
-      "explanation": "Adding full journal title, volume, issue, and formatting improves completeness and consistency.",
-      "location": "Bibliography section",
+      "original_text": "[50] Xi Liu, Muhe Xie, Xidao Wen, Rui Chen, Yong Ge, Nick Duffield, and Na Wang. 2018.",
+      "improved_version": "[50] Liu, X., Xie, M., Wen, X., Chen, R., Ge, Y., Duffield, N., & Wang, N. (2018). A Semi-Supervised and Inductive Embedding Model for Churn Prediction of Large-Scale Mobile Games. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.06573.",
+      "explanation": "Including the full title, publication source, and link (e.g., arXiv) clarifies the nature of the source and improves accessibility.",
+      "location": "reference [50]",
       "category": "completeness",
-      "focus": "citation"
+      "focus": "reference"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "[64] R. Jay Widmer, Nerissa M. Collins, C. Scott Collins, Colin P. West, Lilach O. Lerman, and Amir Lerman. 2015. Digital Health Interventions for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 90, 4 (April 2015), 469\u2013480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.12.026",
-      "improved_version": "[64] Widmer, R. J., Collins, N. M., Collins, C. S., West, C. P., Lerman, L. O., & Lerman, A. (2015). Digital health interventions for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. *Mayo Clinic Proceedings*, 90(4), 469\u2013480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.12.026",
-      "explanation": "Standardizing author names, journal formatting, and DOI enhances accuracy and professionalism.",
-      "location": "Bibliography section",
-      "category": "format",
-      "focus": "style"
+      "original_text": "[4] Saki Amagai, Sarah Pila, Aaron J. Kaat, Cindy J. Nowinski, and Richard C. Gershon. 2022.",
+      "improved_version": "[4] Amagai, S., Pila, S., Kaat, A. J., Nowinski, C. J., & Gershon, R. C. (2022). Challenges in Participant Engagement and Retention Using Mobile Health Apps: Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(4), e35120. https://doi.org/10.2196/35120",
+      "explanation": "Completing the reference with journal name, volume, issue, pages, and DOI ensures clarity and allows accurate source retrieval.",
+      "location": "reference [4]",
+      "category": "completeness",
+      "focus": "reference"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "[66] Wanshan Yang, Ting Huang, Junlin Zeng, Gemeng Yang, Jintian Cai, Lijun Chen, Shivakant Mishra, and Youjian Eugene Liu. 2019. Mining Player In-game Time Spending Regularity for Churn Prediction in Free Online Games. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), August 2019. IEEE, London, United Kingdom, 1\u20138. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2019.8848033",
-      "improved_version": "[66] Yang, W., Huang, T., Zeng, J., Yang, G., Cai, J., Chen, L., Mishra, S., & Liu, Y. E. (2019). Mining player in-game time spending regularity for churn prediction in free online games. In *2019 IEEE Conference on Games* (CoG) (pp. 1\u20138). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2019.8848033",
-      "explanation": "Consistent formatting of authors, conference title, and page numbers improves clarity and style adherence.",
-      "location": "Bibliography section",
-      "category": "format",
-      "focus": "style"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "[49] James Shaw, Payal Agarwal, Laura Desveaux, Daniel Cornejo Palma, Vess Stamenova, Trevor Jamieson, Rebecca Yang, R. Sacha Bhatia, and Onil Bhattacharyya. 2018. Beyond \u201cimplementation\u201d: digital health innovation and service design. npj Digital Med 1, 1 (September 2018), 1\u20135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0059-8",
-      "improved_version": "[49] Shaw, J., Agarwal, P., Desveaux, L., Palma, D. C., Stamenova, V., Jamieson, T., Yang, R., Bhatia, R. S., & Bhattacharyya, O. (2018). Beyond implementation: Digital health innovation and service design. *NPJ Digital Medicine*, 1, 1\u20135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0059-8",
-      "explanation": "Standardizing author initials, journal title, and formatting enhances accuracy and consistency.",
-      "location": "Bibliography section",
-      "category": "format",
-      "focus": "style"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "[60] Youfa Wang, Hong Xue, Yaqi Huang, Lili Huang, and Dongsong Zhang. 2017. A Systematic Review of Application and Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions for Obesity and Diabetes Treatment and Self-Management. Adv Nutr 8, 3 (May 2017), 449\u2013462. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.116.014100",
-      "improved_version": "[60] Wang, Y., Xue, H., Huang, Y., Huang, L., & Zhang, D. (2017). A systematic review of application and effectiveness of mHealth interventions for obesity and diabetes treatment and self-management. *Advances in Nutrition*, 8(3), 449\u2013462. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.116.014100",
-      "explanation": "Consistent formatting of author names, journal title, volume, issue, and DOI improves completeness and style.",
-      "location": "Bibliography section",
-      "category": "format",
-      "focus": "style"
+      "original_text": "[11] V. Bonometti, C. Ringer, M. Hall, A.R. Wade, and A. Drachen. 2019.",
+      "improved_version": "[11] Bonometti, V., Ringer, C., Hall, M., Wade, A. R., & Drachen, A. (2019). Modelling Early User-Game Interactions for Joint Estimation of Survival Time and Churn Probability. IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), 1\u20138. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2019.8848038",
+      "explanation": "Adding conference name, pages, and DOI improves source clarity and citation completeness.",
+      "location": "reference [11]",
+      "category": "completeness",
+      "focus": "reference"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "accuracy_analysis": "The references contain numerous inaccuracies, including missing volume, issue, page numbers, and incomplete URLs, which compromise the ability to verify sources. Some DOIs are present but not consistently formatted, and some references lack essential details, impacting citation correctness.",
-    "completeness_analysis": "Many references lack full bibliographic details such as publisher information, publication year, and DOI links, especially for online sources. This reduces transparency and makes source retrieval difficult, affecting the scholarly rigor of the manuscript.",
-    "format_analysis": "There is inconsistency in citation styles: some references include DOIs, others do not; journal titles are variably abbreviated or spelled out; author names are inconsistently formatted; punctuation and spacing vary. These issues diminish professionalism and adherence to style guidelines.",
-    "quality_analysis": "Most sources are relevant and recent, primarily from 2015 onward, with appropriate focus on digital health and churn prediction. However, some older references could be better justified or replaced with more current studies to enhance the literature base.",
-    "organization_analysis": "The reference list is not uniformly organized\u2014some are alphabetized, others follow citation order\u2014leading to confusion. Consistent ordering (e.g., alphabetically) would improve navigation and clarity."
+    "completeness_analysis": "The current reference list contains numerous entries with incomplete details such as missing journal or conference names, volume, issue, page numbers, or publication identifiers like DOI. Many references are from preprint servers or less formal sources, which require clearer identification. Improving completeness ensures that each source can be accurately located and verified, enhancing the scholarly rigor of the manuscript.",
+    "format_analysis": "The references exhibit inconsistent formatting styles, including variations in author name presentation (full names vs initials), inconsistent use of italics or quotation marks, and differing citation structures. Some references include DOIs, others do not, and the order of information varies. Standardizing formatting according to a recognized style (e.g., APA, IEEE) will improve professionalism and readability.",
+    "quality_analysis": "While most references are from peer-reviewed journals, conference proceedings, or reputable sources, some are from preprint archives or less formal platforms without clear peer review status. Clarifying the publication type and ensuring that only credible, peer-reviewed sources are emphasized will strengthen the reference list's scholarly quality.",
+    "organization_analysis": "The references are numbered in the order they appear but lack consistent grouping or alphabetical order within categories. The mixture of journal articles, conference papers, reports, and preprints without clear categorization can hinder navigation. Organizing references systematically\u2014either alphabetically or by type\u2014can improve clarity and ease of use."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the reference list demonstrates a solid foundation of relevant literature but suffers from inconsistencies in formatting, incomplete citation details, and organizational issues. Addressing these will significantly enhance the manuscript's scholarly quality and professionalism."
+  "summary": "The reference list demonstrates a solid foundation with relevant sources but suffers from inconsistencies in completeness, formatting, and organization. Addressing these issues through standardization, comprehensive details, and clearer categorization will significantly enhance the scholarly quality and professionalism of the manuscript. Focused improvements in reference completeness and formatting will facilitate verification and increase the credibility of the research presented."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/W1_results.json

@@ -3,168 +3,176 @@
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
       "category": "grammar",
-      "location": "Abstract, paragraph 2",
-      "issue": "Inconsistent use of hyphenation in 'cost-effective solutions' (hyphenated) and 'high nonadherence' (not hyphenated).",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Reduces consistency and professionalism in technical writing."
+      "location": "Abstract, paragraph 1",
+      "issue": "Inconsistent use of singular and plural forms, e.g., 'applied machine learning (ML) algorithms and features for predicting churn in mobile apps by synthesizing methodologies and outcomes of 50 selected studies' (plural 'features' with singular 'predicting').",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "Reduces clarity and grammatical correctness, potentially confusing readers."
     },
     {
       "category": "spelling",
-      "location": "Introduction, paragraph 2",
-      "issue": "The term 'hyperglycemia' is correctly spelled, but in some instances, similar medical terms like 'hyperglycemia' are inconsistently capitalized or hyphenated in other parts of the text.",
+      "location": "References section",
+      "issue": "Several references contain minor typographical inconsistencies, e.g., 'Perisic' vs. 'Perianez' (possible typo), and inconsistent use of diacritics in author names.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Minor; affects uniformity but not comprehension."
+      "impact": "Minimal impact on readability but affects professionalism and citation accuracy."
     },
     {
       "category": "punctuation",
-      "location": "Results, section 3.2.1",
-      "issue": "Inconsistent use of commas in lists, e.g., 'mean AUC of 0.95 (SD = 0.02), a mean accuracy of 0.91 (SD = 0.04), a mean F1-score of 0.94 (SD = 0.04), a mean precision of 0.93 (SD = 0.04), and a mean recall of 0.94 (SD = 0.04)'\u2014the serial comma is missing before 'and'.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Affects clarity and adherence to academic style conventions."
+      "location": "Results, section 3.2",
+      "issue": "Inconsistent use of commas in lists, e.g., 'Logistic Regression (n = 28), Decision Tree (n = 21), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN, n = 7), Naive Bayes (n = 6), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO, n = 2), homogeneous and inhomogeneous Poisson process (n = 1), and Regularized Discriminant Analysis (RDA, n = 1)' (missing Oxford comma).",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "Affects readability and consistency in list formatting."
     },
     {
       "category": "sentence_structure",
-      "location": "Discussion, paragraph 4.1",
-      "issue": "Several sentences are overly long and complex, making them difficult to follow, e.g., 'Given the conceptual link between churn and nonadherence \u2013 where fully disengaged users are inherently nonadherent \u2013 these results are intuitive.'",
+      "location": "Discussion, paragraph 2",
+      "issue": "Long, complex sentences with multiple clauses, e.g., 'Mean performance metrics of reported best-performing models in included mobile app studies (Accuracy = 86%, AUC = 0.83, F1-Score = 0.81) are comparable to reported mean accuracies between 82%-86% in telecommunication services [58], indicating that churn prediction in mobile apps is likewise feasible.'",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Reduces readability and clarity."
+      "impact": "Reduces clarity; readers may struggle to parse the sentence."
     },
     {
-      "category": "verb_tense",
+      "category": "verb tense",
+      "location": "Methodology, section 2",
+      "issue": "Inconsistent tense usage, e.g., 'A review protocol was submitted' (past) vs. 'search terms related to churn prediction, mobile app data, and ML methodologies: ...' (present).",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "Slightly affects temporal clarity; consistency would improve flow."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "subject-verb agreement",
+      "location": "Results, section 3.1",
+      "issue": "Inconsistent agreement, e.g., 'The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users (Median = 25,000, IQR = 79,436 - 4,089).'",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "Minor, but consistency in plural/singular forms enhances professionalism."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "article usage",
       "location": "Introduction, paragraph 2",
-      "issue": "Inconsistent tense usage, e.g., 'A growing body of evidence suggests that mHealth interventions can effectively support...' (present tense) versus 'the prediction of nonadherence in accordance with the definition of Sieverink et al. (2017) constitutes a research gap' (present tense), but later 'Jakob et al. (2024) recently predicted churn' (past tense).",
+      "issue": "Incorrect article use, e.g., 'Churn prediction combines user-specific data with ML algorithms to estimate the likelihood and timing of a user churning.' (should be 'the likelihood and timing of user churning').",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Slightly affects temporal clarity but generally understandable."
+      "impact": "Slightly affects grammatical correctness and clarity."
     },
     {
-      "category": "subject-verb",
-      "location": "Results, section 3.2.2",
-      "issue": "Inconsistent subject-verb agreement, e.g., 'models achieved a mean AUC of 0.87... indicating the models' ability to accurately identify nonadherent users'\u2014the plural 'models' correctly takes 'achieved,' but in some places, plural nouns are paired with singular verbs.",
+      "category": "preposition usage",
+      "location": "Results, section 3.2",
+      "issue": "Incorrect preposition, e.g., 'studies evaluated and compared an average of 3.6 (SD = 1.9, Range = 1-10) different ML algorithms for churn prediction with 16% (8/50) of studies only evaluating a single algorithm.' (should be 'studies evaluated and compared an average of 3.6 ... across studies').",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Minor; does not significantly affect understanding."
+      "impact": "Reduces clarity of the comparative statement."
     },
     {
-      "category": "articles",
-      "location": "Methodology, section 2.2",
-      "issue": "Incorrect article use in 'a 7-Day prediction window was based on the DHIs\u2019 intended weekly use'\u2014'a' is correct, but elsewhere 'the' is omitted before specific terms, e.g., 'the German Digital Healthcare Act' (correct), but inconsistent elsewhere.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Minor; affects grammatical correctness and style consistency."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "prepositions",
-      "location": "Discussion, paragraph 4.4",
-      "issue": "Incorrect or awkward preposition use, e.g., 'a user who last logs in during the final week of the cycle may not be a ",
+      "category": "conjunction usage",
+      "location": "Discussion, paragraph 3",
+      "issue": "Overuse of 'and' leading to lengthy sentences, e.g., 'These algorithms match and, in some instances where researchers developed custom NN models, also extend approaches applied in non-mobile app contexts, particularly in the telecommunications and financial services domain, which have traditionally been the most studied fields in churn prediction research.'",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Reduces clarity and grammatical correctness."
+      "impact": "Impairs readability; splitting into shorter sentences would improve clarity."
     },
     {
-      "category": "conjunctions",
-      "location": "Introduction, paragraph 2",
-      "issue": "Overuse of 'and' leading to lengthy, compound sentences that could be split for clarity.",
+      "category": "academic conventions",
+      "location": "Throughout the manuscript",
+      "issue": "Inconsistent citation style, e.g., '[1, 23, 28, 68, 84]' vs. '(2017)', inconsistent formatting of references, and occasional missing or inconsistent use of abbreviations.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Reduces readability and makes sentences cumbersome."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "academic_conventions",
-      "location": "Throughout the document",
-      "issue": "Inconsistent citation formatting; some references use brackets, others use parentheses, and some lack proper punctuation.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Impairs professionalism and adherence to academic standards."
+      "impact": "Hinders professional presentation and may confuse readers."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "The rich data collected by mHealth interventions raise the question of whether \u2013 and to what extent \u2013 nonadherence can be predicted using these data.",
-      "improved_version": "The rich data collected by mHealth interventions raise the question of whether\u2014and to what extent\u2014nonadherence can be predicted using these data.",
-      "explanation": "Replacing hyphens with en dashes improves typographical correctness and readability in formal writing.",
-      "location": "Abstract, paragraph 2",
+      "original_text": "User churn, where users prematurely discontinue the use of a product or service, poses significant challenges across various industry domains, including gaming, healthcare, or education.",
+      "improved_version": "User churn, defined as users prematurely discontinuing the use of a product or service, poses significant challenges across various industry domains, including gaming, healthcare, and education.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the definition of user churn and corrects the list punctuation by replacing 'or' with 'and' for clarity.",
+      "location": "Abstract, paragraph 1",
+      "category": "abstract",
+      "focus": "sentence_structure"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Inconsistent use of singular and plural forms, e.g., 'applied machine learning (ML) algorithms and features for predicting churn in mobile apps by synthesizing methodologies and outcomes of 50 selected studies' (plural 'features' with singular 'predicting').",
+      "improved_version": "The applied machine learning (ML) algorithms and features used to predict churn in mobile apps are synthesized from the methodologies and outcomes of 50 selected studies.",
+      "explanation": "Ensures subject-verb agreement and clarifies the sentence structure for better readability.",
+      "location": "Abstract, paragraph 1",
+      "category": "grammar",
+      "focus": "sentence_structure"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Several references contain minor typographical inconsistencies, e.g., 'Perisic' vs. 'Perianez' (possible typo), and inconsistent use of diacritics in author names.",
+      "improved_version": "Ensure consistency in author names and diacritics in all references, e.g., verify correct spelling of 'Peri\u0161i\u0107' and 'Perianez'.",
+      "explanation": "Corrects potential typos and maintains consistency in citations, enhancing professionalism.",
+      "location": "References section",
+      "category": "spelling",
+      "focus": "spelling"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Inconsistent use of commas in lists, e.g., 'Logistic Regression (n = 28), Decision Tree (n = 21), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN, n = 7), Naive Bayes (n = 6), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO, n = 2), homogeneous and inhomogeneous Poisson process (n = 1), and Regularized Discriminant Analysis (RDA, n = 1)' (missing Oxford comma).",
+      "improved_version": "Logistic Regression (n = 28), Decision Tree (n = 21), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN, n = 7), Naive Bayes (n = 6), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO, n = 2), homogeneous and inhomogeneous Poisson processes (n = 1), and Regularized Discriminant Analysis (RDA, n = 1).",
+      "explanation": "Adds Oxford comma for list consistency and pluralizes 'process' to match the context.",
+      "location": "Results, section 3.2",
       "category": "punctuation",
       "focus": "punctuation"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "In Manoa, our models correctly identified an average of 86% of nonadherent users between months 2 and 6 (mean AUC = 0.82), defined as completing fewer than one blood pressure measurement week per month.",
-      "improved_version": "In Manoa, our models correctly identified an average of 86% of nonadherent users between months 2 and 6 (mean AUC = 0.82), defined as completing fewer than one blood pressure measurement week per month.",
-      "explanation": "Ensuring clarity in the phrase 'blood pressure measurement week' by maintaining consistent terminology enhances precision.",
-      "location": "Abstract, paragraph 2",
+      "original_text": "Long, complex sentences with multiple clauses, e.g., 'Mean performance metrics of reported best-performing models in included mobile app studies (Accuracy = 86%, AUC = 0.83, F1-Score = 0.81) are comparable to reported mean accuracies between 82%-86% in telecommunication services [58], indicating that churn prediction in mobile apps is likewise feasible.'",
+      "improved_version": "The mean performance metrics of the best-performing models in the included mobile app studies\u2014such as Accuracy (86%), AUC (0.83), and F1-Score (0.81)\u2014are comparable to the mean accuracies reported in telecommunication services (82%\u201386%) [58]. This indicates that churn prediction in mobile apps is similarly feasible.",
+      "explanation": "Splits a lengthy sentence into clearer, digestible parts, improving readability and clarity.",
+      "location": "Discussion, section 3.2",
       "category": "sentence_structure",
       "focus": "sentence_structure"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "In Vivira, we predicted nonadherence weekly from Weeks 2 to 13 based on users\u2019 daily app activity variables (active or inactive) and the daily number of completed exercises variables (continuous) of the preceding weeks.",
-      "improved_version": "In Vivira, we predicted nonadherence weekly from Weeks 2 to 13 based on users\u2019 daily app activity variables (active or inactive) and the number of completed exercises (continuous) from the preceding weeks.",
-      "explanation": "Removing redundancy ('variables') and clarifying the phrase improves sentence clarity and conciseness.",
-      "location": "Methodology, section 2.2",
-      "category": "sentence_structure",
-      "focus": "sentence_structure"
+      "original_text": "Inconsistent tense usage, e.g., 'A review protocol was submitted' (past) vs. 'search terms related to churn prediction, mobile app data, and ML methodologies: ...' (present).",
+      "improved_version": "Maintain consistent tense throughout; for example, use past tense for all methodological descriptions: 'A review protocol was submitted, and the search terms related to churn prediction, mobile app data, and ML methodologies were developed accordingly.'",
+      "explanation": "Ensures temporal consistency, which enhances clarity and professionalism.",
+      "location": "Methodology, section 2",
+      "category": "verb_tense",
+      "focus": "verb_tense"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The use of DiGA data is strictly limited. Therefore, only users who provided consent under Article 4, Section 2, 4 of the DiGA regulations (DiGA-Verordnung, DiGAV) were included.",
-      "improved_version": "The use of DiGA data is strictly limited. Therefore, only users who provided consent under Article 4, Section 2, and 4 of the DiGA regulations (DiGA-Verordnung, DiGAV) were included.",
-      "explanation": "Adding 'and' clarifies the enumeration, aligning with standard list punctuation in formal writing.",
-      "location": "Methodology, section 2.1.1",
-      "category": "punctuation",
-      "focus": "punctuation"
+      "original_text": "Inconsistent agreement, e.g., 'The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users.'",
+      "improved_version": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models vary widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users.",
+      "explanation": "Aligns tense with the general discussion, ensuring consistency.",
+      "location": "Results, section 3.1",
+      "category": "subject-verb",
+      "focus": "subject-verb agreement"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Our findings show that nonadherence to mHealth interventions can be accurately predicted over extended program durations, both in terms of adherence relative to intended use as defined by Sieverink et al. (2017) and in its most severe form \u2013 churn (i.e., complete discontinuation of use).",
-      "improved_version": "Our findings show that nonadherence to mHealth interventions can be accurately predicted over extended program durations, both in terms of adherence relative to intended use, as defined by Sieverink et al. (2017), and in its most severe form\u2014churn (i.e., complete discontinuation of use).",
-      "explanation": "Using commas to set off the clause improves readability; replacing the hyphen with an em dash aligns with academic style conventions.",
-      "location": "Discussion, paragraph 4.1",
-      "category": "punctuation",
-      "focus": "punctuation"
+      "original_text": "Incorrect article use, e.g., 'Churn prediction combines user-specific data with ML algorithms to estimate the likelihood and timing of a user churning.' (should be 'the likelihood and timing of user churning').",
+      "improved_version": "Churn prediction combines user-specific data with ML algorithms to estimate the likelihood and timing of user churn.",
+      "explanation": "Removes unnecessary article and improves grammatical correctness.",
+      "location": "Introduction, paragraph 2",
+      "category": "articles",
+      "focus": "article usage"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "In contrast, the performance of nonadherence prediction models in Manoa was comparatively lower, correctly identifying an average of 86% (SD = 7.6%, mean AUC = 0.82) of nonadherent users between Months 2 and 6 at a relatively higher false positive rate of 49.5% (SD = 12.9%).",
-      "improved_version": "In contrast, the performance of nonadherence prediction models in Manoa was comparatively lower, correctly identifying an average of 86% (SD = 7.6; mean AUC = 0.82) of nonadherent users between Months 2 and 6, at a relatively higher false positive rate of 49.5% (SD = 12.9).",
-      "explanation": "Clarifying the punctuation around SD and separating clauses improves clarity and conforms to standard reporting of statistical data.",
-      "location": "Results, section 3.2.2",
-      "category": "punctuation",
-      "focus": "punctuation"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Our results further show that the predictive performance of daily churn prediction models improves over time as more behavioral app engagement data becomes available.",
-      "improved_version": "Our results further show that the predictive performance of daily churn prediction models improves over time as more behavioral app engagement data become available.",
-      "explanation": "Subject-verb agreement correction: 'data' is plural, so 'becomes' should be 'become' for grammatical correctness.",
-      "location": "Discussion, paragraph 4.1",
-      "category": "grammar",
-      "focus": "grammar"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "This approach is further supported by prediction studies in other app domains that achieved superior performance with random forest models across multiple tested ML algorithms [14, 21, 39, 45, 59].",
-      "improved_version": "This approach is further supported by prediction studies in other app domains that have achieved superior performance with random forest models across multiple tested ML algorithms [14, 21, 39, 45, 59].",
-      "explanation": "Adding 'have' clarifies the tense and improves grammatical correctness in the present perfect context.",
-      "location": "Discussion, paragraph 4.3",
-      "category": "grammar",
-      "focus": "grammar"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Future research should aim to replicate nonadherence prediction models in diverse mHealth contexts and evaluate their integration with targeted preventive strategies in prospective trials to assess the impact of these combined approaches on app usage, adherence, and health outcomes.",
-      "improved_version": "Future research should aim to replicate nonadherence prediction models across diverse mHealth contexts and evaluate their integration with targeted preventive strategies in prospective trials to assess the impact of these combined approaches on app usage, adherence, and health outcomes.",
-      "explanation": "Replacing 'in' with 'across' improves lexical precision and aligns with standard academic phrasing for broad applicability.",
-      "location": "Discussion, section 4.4",
+      "original_text": "Incorrect preposition, e.g., 'studies evaluated and compared an average of 3.6 (SD = 1.9, Range = 1-10) different ML algorithms for churn prediction with 16% (8/50) of studies only evaluating a single algorithm.'",
+      "improved_version": "studies evaluated and compared an average of 3.6 (SD = 1.9, range = 1\u201310) different ML algorithms for churn prediction, with 16% (8/50) of studies evaluating only a single algorithm.",
+      "explanation": "Improves prepositional phrase clarity and sentence flow.",
+      "location": "Results, section 3.2",
       "category": "prepositions",
-      "focus": "prepositions"
+      "focus": "preposition usage"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The overall assessment paragraph: This detailed review indicates that the manuscript demonstrates solid command of scientific language, with minor issues related to punctuation consistency, sentence length, and style conventions. Addressing these will enhance clarity, professionalism, and adherence to academic standards, making the document more accessible and impactful for scholarly audiences.",
-      "improved_version": "Overall, the manuscript demonstrates a solid command of scientific language, with minor issues related to punctuation consistency, sentence length, and style conventions. Addressing these will enhance clarity, professionalism, and adherence to academic standards, thereby making the document more accessible and impactful for scholarly audiences.",
-      "explanation": "Adding 'Overall' and 'thereby' improves flow and emphasizes the conclusion, aligning with formal academic writing style.",
-      "location": "Summary",
-      "category": "academic_conventions",
-      "focus": "academic_conventions"
+      "original_text": "Overuse of 'and' leading to lengthy sentences, e.g., 'These algorithms match and, in some instances where researchers developed custom NN models, also extend approaches applied in non-mobile app contexts, particularly in the telecommunications and financial services domain, which have traditionally been the most studied fields in churn prediction research.'",
+      "improved_version": "These algorithms match and, in some cases where researchers developed custom neural network models, extend approaches used in non-mobile app contexts. Notably, these include the telecommunications and financial services domains, which have traditionally been the most studied fields in churn prediction research.",
+      "explanation": "Splits a complex sentence into clearer parts, enhancing readability.",
+      "location": "Discussion, paragraph 3",
+      "category": "conjunctions",
+      "focus": "conjunction usage"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Inconsistent citation style, e.g., '[1, 23, 28, 68, 84]' vs. '(2017)', inconsistent formatting of references, and occasional missing or inconsistent use of abbreviations.",
+      "improved_version": "Standardize citation style throughout the manuscript, following a consistent format such as '[1, 23, 28, 68, 84]' or '(Author, Year)'. Ensure all abbreviations are defined upon first use and used consistently.",
+      "explanation": "Enhances professionalism and clarity in referencing, facilitating easier cross-referencing.",
+      "location": "Throughout the manuscript",
+      "category": "academic conventions",
+      "focus": "citation style"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "grammar_correctness": "The manuscript generally maintains correct grammar, but some sentences are overly long or complex, which can lead to grammatical ambiguity. Minor issues include inconsistent subject-verb agreement with plural nouns like 'data' and occasional misplaced modifiers.",
-    "spelling_accuracy": "Spelling is accurate throughout; however, consistency in technical terms such as 'hyperglycemia' and 'hyperglycemia' is essential. Medical terminology is correctly spelled but should be uniformly capitalized or lowercase as per style guides.",
-    "punctuation_usage": "Punctuation inconsistencies include missing serial (Oxford) commas in lists, improper hyphenation, and inconsistent use of em dashes versus hyphens. Correct punctuation enhances clarity and aligns with academic style standards.",
-    "sentence_structure": "Many sentences are lengthy and contain multiple clauses, which hampers readability. Breaking complex sentences into shorter, clearer statements would improve comprehension and flow.",
-    "verb_tense_consistency": "While most of the manuscript uses present tense for general statements, some sections switch to past tense when describing previous studies or specific results. Maintaining a consistent tense, preferably present tense for ongoing relevance, would improve coherence.",
-    "subject-verb_agreement": "Most subject-verb agreements are correct; however, attention is needed when referring to plural data ('data' should be paired with 'are' rather than 'is'). Consistency in agreement throughout the manuscript is crucial.",
-    "article_usage": "Articles are generally used correctly, but some instances lack definite or indefinite articles where needed, especially before specific terms like 'prediction window' or 'app activity.' Proper article use enhances grammatical correctness.",
-    "preposition_usage": "Prepositions such as 'in,' 'on,' 'at,' and 'during' are mostly correct but occasionally awkward or inconsistent, affecting clarity. For example, 'predict churn at the end of Day 14' could be clearer as 'predict churn at Day 14.'",
-    "conjunction_usage": "Overuse of 'and' in lengthy sentences creates a cumbersome style. Breaking sentences with additional punctuation or splitting into multiple sentences would improve readability.",
-    "academic_conventions": "Citation formatting varies; some references lack proper punctuation or formatting. Consistent application of a specific style (e.g., APA, Vancouver) is recommended. Additionally, the use of hyphens, dashes, and abbreviations should conform to style guides to maintain professionalism."
+    "grammar_correctness": "The manuscript generally maintains grammatical correctness, but some sentences are overly long or complex, which can hinder clarity. Ensuring subject-verb agreement and consistent tense usage across sections will improve readability.",
+    "spelling_accuracy": "Most spelling is accurate; however, proper nouns such as author names should be verified for correct diacritics and spelling consistency. Minor typographical errors in references should be corrected for professionalism.",
+    "punctuation_usage": "Punctuation inconsistencies, especially in lists and complex sentences, can affect clarity. Using Oxford commas and proper list punctuation will enhance readability.",
+    "sentence_structure": "Several sentences are lengthy and contain multiple clauses, which can be difficult to parse. Breaking long sentences into shorter, clearer ones will improve comprehension.",
+    "verb_tense_consistency": "The manuscript shifts between past and present tense, particularly in methodological descriptions. Maintaining a consistent tense, usually past tense for methods and results, will enhance coherence.",
+    "subject-verb_agreement": "Minor issues with agreement, especially in sentences describing dataset characteristics and model performance, should be addressed to uphold grammatical standards.",
+    "article_usage": "Articles such as 'the' and 'a' are sometimes misused or omitted, affecting grammatical correctness. Correct article placement will improve sentence clarity.",
+    "preposition_usage": "Incorrect prepositions appear in some sentences, impacting the clarity of relationships between concepts. Correct preposition choice will clarify meaning.",
+    "conjunction_usage": "Overuse of conjunctions like 'and' in lengthy sentences reduces readability. Splitting complex sentences will help.",
+    "academic_conventions": "Inconsistent citation formats and abbreviation use detract from the manuscript\u2019s professionalism. Adhering to a standard referencing style and defining abbreviations upon first use will improve the scholarly presentation."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the manuscript exhibits a solid command of scientific language with clear reporting of complex data. Minor issues related to punctuation, sentence length, and style conventions are present but easily correctable. Addressing these will significantly enhance readability, professionalism, and adherence to academic standards, making the work more impactful for scholarly audiences."
+  "summary": "Overall, the manuscript demonstrates solid academic writing but would benefit from targeted revisions to improve clarity, consistency, and professionalism. Addressing complex sentence structures, ensuring grammatical and stylistic consistency, and standardizing citations will significantly enhance readability and scholarly quality."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/W2_results.json

@@ -1,186 +1,171 @@
 {
-  "narrative_structure_score": 3,
+  "narrative_structure_score": 4,
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
-      "category": "narrative_coherence",
-      "location": "Abstract and Introduction",
-      "issue": "The abstract provides a comprehensive overview but lacks a clear linkage to the specific research questions or hypotheses, which are only fully elaborated later in the introduction. This creates a disconnect in the narrative flow from broad context to specific aims.",
+      "category": "abstract",
+      "location": "Abstract",
+      "issue": "The abstract provides a comprehensive overview but lacks explicit mention of the research gap and the specific contribution of this review compared to prior work.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This affects the reader\u2019s ability to immediately grasp the core research focus and its significance, potentially reducing engagement and clarity."
+      "impact": "This limits clarity on the novelty and significance of the review, potentially reducing reader engagement and understanding of its unique value."
     },
     {
-      "category": "logical_progression",
-      "location": "Results and Discussion",
-      "issue": "Results are presented with detailed statistical metrics but without explicit interpretation or connection to the hypotheses, which hampers understanding of how findings support or refute initial assumptions.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This diminishes the logical flow from data to interpretation, making it harder for readers to follow the narrative of evidence supporting the study\u2019s claims."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "transitions",
-      "location": "Between sections (e.g., Methods to Results, Results to Discussion)",
-      "issue": "Transitions are abrupt; sections often end with data or technical details without guiding the reader into the next section\u2019s purpose or implications.",
+      "category": "introduction",
+      "location": "Introduction, paragraphs 1-4",
+      "issue": "While the introduction covers background and motivation, the flow between general churn concepts and the specific focus on mobile apps could be more seamless, with clearer signposting of the research gap.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This hampers smooth reading flow and can cause confusion about how sections relate, reducing overall narrative cohesion."
+      "impact": "This affects the narrative coherence, making it harder for readers to follow the rationale for the review."
     },
     {
-      "category": "paragraph_organization",
-      "location": "Methods and Results",
-      "issue": "Some paragraphs contain dense technical details or multiple ideas without clear topic sentences or logical segmentation, leading to difficulty in following the argument or process.",
+      "category": "literature review",
+      "location": "Literature review, sections 2-3",
+      "issue": "The review synthesizes a large body of evidence but sometimes jumps between topics (e.g., algorithms, features, datasets) without clear transitions, leading to fragmented flow.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This affects clarity and makes it harder for readers to identify key points or follow the progression of ideas."
+      "impact": "This hampers logical progression and makes it challenging for readers to connect related themes and understand the overall landscape."
     },
     {
-      "category": "topic_sentences",
-      "location": "Multiple sections",
-      "issue": "Many paragraphs lack explicit topic sentences that clearly state their purpose or main idea, especially in the Methods and Results sections.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This reduces paragraph focus and hampers the reader\u2019s ability to quickly grasp the purpose of each paragraph, weakening overall coherence."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "evidence_integration",
-      "location": "Introduction and Discussion",
-      "issue": "Supporting evidence is often listed with citations but not integrated into the narrative with critical analysis or synthesis, leading to a fragmented presentation of background and implications.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This limits the development of a compelling, cohesive argument and diminishes reader engagement."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "conclusion_alignment",
-      "location": "Conclusion",
-      "issue": "The conclusion summarizes findings but does not explicitly revisit the initial hypotheses or research questions, missing an opportunity to reinforce the narrative arc.",
+      "category": "methodology",
+      "location": "Methods section",
+      "issue": "The description of the search strategy and inclusion criteria is detailed but could benefit from clearer subheadings or stepwise explanation to improve readability.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "This affects the sense of closure and coherence of the research story."
+      "impact": "This affects paragraph organization, potentially making it harder for readers to quickly grasp the methodological rigor."
     },
     {
-      "category": "hypothesis_tracking",
-      "location": "Throughout the paper",
-      "issue": "The research questions or hypotheses are not explicitly restated or tracked throughout the Results and Discussion, making it difficult to see how evidence addresses initial aims.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This hampers the logical flow from research questions to conclusions, reducing clarity of the research narrative."
+      "category": "results",
+      "location": "Results, sections 3.1-3.4",
+      "issue": "The presentation of findings, especially in tables and figures, is dense; some key points could be better highlighted through summaries or thematic grouping.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This impacts reader engagement and the clarity of the narrative flow of results."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "discussion",
+      "location": "Discussion section",
+      "issue": "The discussion effectively interprets findings but occasionally repeats points from earlier sections without synthesizing insights into a cohesive narrative.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "This diminishes the narrative coherence and the development of an overarching argument."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "conclusion",
+      "location": "Conclusion",
+      "issue": "The conclusion summarizes key findings but could more explicitly tie back to the initial research questions and highlight the implications for future research and practice.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "This affects conclusion alignment and leaves the narrative somewhat open-ended."
     },
     {
       "category": "visual_integration",
-      "location": "Figures and Tables",
-      "issue": "Figures and tables are detailed but lack explicit references or explanations within the text that guide interpretation, making it harder for readers to connect visual data with narrative points.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This weakens visual storytelling and can cause disconnects between data and interpretation."
+      "location": "Throughout the paper",
+      "issue": "Figures and tables are informative but could be better integrated into the text with explicit references and explanations of their relevance.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "Improving visual integration would enhance the visual narrative and support reader comprehension."
     },
     {
       "category": "reader_engagement",
-      "location": "Entire document",
-      "issue": "The dense technical language and extensive data presentation, without narrative framing or storytelling elements, reduce overall engagement and accessibility.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This may discourage broader readership and make the complex data less approachable."
+      "location": "Throughout the paper",
+      "issue": "The dense technical language and extensive detail may challenge reader engagement, especially for non-specialist audiences.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This could limit accessibility and reduce overall engagement with the narrative."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "The rising prevalence and economic burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) present a significant challenge to patients and healthcare systems, calling for innovative, scalable, and cost-effective solutions.",
-      "improved_version": "Given the increasing prevalence and economic impact of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), this study aims to explore whether machine learning models can predict nonadherence to mobile health interventions, thereby informing targeted strategies to improve health outcomes.",
-      "explanation": "This revision explicitly states the research aim, linking background context to the study\u2019s purpose, enhancing narrative coherence.",
+      "original_text": "This systematic literature review investigates applied machine learning (ML) algorithms and features for predicting churn in mobile apps by synthesizing methodologies and outcomes of 50 selected studies from an initial pool of 1,502 screened articles.",
+      "improved_version": "This systematic review synthesizes methodologies and outcomes from 50 studies on machine learning-based churn prediction in mobile apps, filling a notable gap in the literature.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the contribution and scope of the review, emphasizing its novelty and significance.",
       "location": "Abstract",
       "category": "abstract",
-      "focus": "hypothesis_tracking"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Our models identified an average of 94% of nonadherent users between Weeks 2 and 13 in Vivira (mean AUC = 0.95), defined as completing fewer than eight therapeutic exercises per week.",
-      "improved_version": "The models achieved high accuracy, correctly identifying an average of 94% of nonadherent users between Weeks 2 and 13 in Vivira, where nonadherence was defined as completing fewer than eight exercises weekly. This demonstrates the models\u2019 effectiveness in early detection.",
-      "explanation": "Adding interpretative context clarifies the significance of the metrics, improving evidence integration and reader understanding.",
-      "location": "Results",
-      "category": "evidence_integration",
-      "focus": "supporting_evidence_integration"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The introduction highlights the potential of mHealth interventions but does not clearly connect to the specific hypotheses or research questions.",
-      "improved_version": "Building on the established potential of mHealth interventions, this study investigates whether behavioral engagement data can reliably predict nonadherence and user churn, addressing a critical gap in the literature.",
-      "explanation": "This explicitly links background to research questions, improving logical progression and hypothesis tracking.",
-      "location": "Introduction",
-      "category": "introduction",
-      "focus": "hypothesis_tracking"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Results are presented with detailed statistical metrics but without explicit interpretation or connection to the hypotheses.",
-      "improved_version": "The results show that models can predict nonadherence with high accuracy over extended periods, supporting the hypothesis that behavioral app data are predictive of user engagement patterns.",
-      "explanation": "Connecting data to hypotheses clarifies how findings support the research aims, improving narrative coherence.",
-      "location": "Results",
-      "category": "results",
-      "focus": "hypothesis_tracking"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Many paragraphs contain dense technical details or multiple ideas without clear topic sentences.",
-      "improved_version": "This paragraph introduces the predictive modeling approach, focusing on the choice of algorithms and feature selection to ensure clarity.",
-      "explanation": "Adding clear topic sentences helps organize content and guides the reader through complex technical details.",
-      "location": "Methodology",
-      "category": "paragraph_organization",
-      "focus": "topic_sentences"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Figures and tables are detailed but lack explicit references or explanations within the text.",
-      "improved_version": "In Figure 6.5, the trend of increasing AUC over weeks illustrates the models\u2019 improving predictive performance, highlighting their robustness over time.",
-      "explanation": "Explicitly referencing figures and explaining their significance enhances visual integration and narrative flow.",
-      "location": "Results",
-      "category": "visual_integration",
-      "focus": "visual_element_integration"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The conclusion summarizes findings but does not explicitly revisit the initial hypotheses or research questions.",
-      "improved_version": "In conclusion, our findings confirm that behavioral app engagement data can reliably predict nonadherence and churn, aligning with our initial hypotheses and underscoring the potential for targeted intervention strategies.",
-      "explanation": "Restating hypotheses and linking findings to initial aims reinforces narrative closure and coherence.",
-      "location": "Conclusion",
-      "category": "conclusion",
       "focus": "conclusion_alignment"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The discussion does not explicitly track the initial research questions or hypotheses.",
-      "improved_version": "This discussion explicitly revisits the research questions, evaluating how the results support the hypothesis that behavioral data can predict nonadherence and user disengagement.",
-      "explanation": "Explicitly tracking hypotheses throughout the discussion maintains narrative focus and clarity.",
-      "location": "Discussion",
-      "category": "hypothesis_tracking",
-      "focus": "hypothesis_tracking"
+      "original_text": "User churn, also referred to as user attrition, loss, abandonment, or dropout, is a well-recognized phenomenon characterized by users' discontinuation of a product or service.",
+      "improved_version": "User churn, often termed attrition, loss, abandonment, or dropout, refers to users discontinuing a product or service, posing significant challenges across industries.",
+      "explanation": "Provides clearer signposting and smoother flow into the specific focus on industry relevance.",
+      "location": "Introduction, paragraph 1",
+      "category": "paragraph_organization",
+      "focus": "logical_progression"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The extensive technical data presentation can be overwhelming without guiding narrative elements.",
-      "improved_version": "Integrate brief summaries of key data points within the narrative, such as: 'The high AUC values across weeks indicate consistent model performance, supporting the feasibility of real-time prediction.'",
-      "explanation": "Embedding summaries within the text improves engagement and comprehension, making complex data accessible.",
-      "location": "Results",
-      "category": "reader_engagement",
-      "focus": "reader_engagement"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The paper\u2019s dense technical language and data-heavy presentation reduce overall engagement.",
-      "improved_version": "Incorporate storytelling elements, such as case examples or user scenarios, to illustrate how predictions could be applied in real-world settings, thereby increasing engagement.",
-      "explanation": "Storytelling makes the technical content more relatable and engaging for a broader audience.",
-      "location": "Discussion",
-      "category": "reader_engagement",
-      "focus": "reader_engagement"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The paper lacks explicit signposting between sections, making navigation challenging.",
-      "improved_version": "Add transition sentences at the end of each section, e.g., 'Having established the predictive performance of our models, we now explore their implications for intervention strategies.'",
-      "explanation": "Clear transitions guide the reader smoothly through the narrative, enhancing structural coherence.",
-      "location": "Between sections",
-      "category": "transitions",
+      "original_text": "The review also explores additional factors and methods influencing churn prediction outcomes highlighted in relevant studies, as well as the outcomes of churn prevention strategies employed alongside churn prediction models.",
+      "improved_version": "Additionally, the review examines factors influencing churn prediction outcomes and evaluates the effectiveness of prevention strategies integrated with prediction models.",
+      "explanation": "Streamlines the sentence for clarity and better flow, linking related themes more cohesively.",
+      "location": "Abstract",
+      "category": "paragraph_organization",
       "focus": "transitions"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The hypotheses are not explicitly restated or revisited throughout the paper.",
-      "improved_version": "Restate the research hypotheses at the end of the introduction and explicitly evaluate how each is addressed in the results and discussion sections.",
-      "explanation": "Explicit hypothesis tracking clarifies the research narrative and helps readers assess how evidence supports initial aims.",
+      "original_text": "The literature search and selection was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.",
+      "improved_version": "Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search and selection process to ensure methodological rigor.",
+      "explanation": "Provides context and emphasizes the systematic approach, improving logical flow.",
+      "location": "Methods section",
+      "category": "paragraph_organization",
+      "focus": "transitions"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users (Median = 25,000, IQR = 79,436 - 4,089).",
+      "improved_version": "The datasets' sample sizes varied dramatically, from as few as 61 users to over 37 million, with a median of 25,000 users (IQR: 4,089\u201379,436), reflecting diverse data sources and scales.",
+      "explanation": "Adds clarity and context, aiding understanding of dataset heterogeneity.",
+      "location": "Results, section 3.1",
+      "category": "paragraph_organization",
+      "focus": "evidence_integration"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Most studies evaluated and compared multiple different ML models with mixed results, and no particular model emerged as a single best-performing model across a broad range of studies.",
+      "improved_version": "While most studies evaluated multiple ML models, no single algorithm consistently outperformed others across different contexts, highlighting the importance of context-specific model selection.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the nuance and emphasizes the variability, enhancing narrative coherence.",
+      "location": "Results, section 3.2",
+      "category": "topic_sentences",
+      "focus": "logical_progression"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review synthesizes evidence around these research questions, this review aims to identify studies that quantitatively evaluate user churn prediction models and to synthesize effective ML algorithms and features by comparing performance metrics and reported feature importances.",
+      "improved_version": "This review systematically addresses key research questions by identifying studies that quantitatively evaluate churn prediction models, synthesizing effective algorithms and features through performance comparisons and feature importance analyses.",
+      "explanation": "Improves clarity and reduces redundancy, strengthening the narrative flow.",
+      "location": "Introduction, paragraph 4",
+      "category": "topic_sentences",
+      "focus": "narrative_coherence"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Figures and tables are informative but could be better integrated into the text with explicit references and explanations of their relevance.",
+      "improved_version": "Figures and tables are well-constructed; however, explicitly referencing and discussing them within the text would enhance their integration, guiding readers to interpret visual data in context.",
+      "explanation": "Provides actionable advice to improve visual narrative and reader guidance.",
       "location": "Throughout the paper",
-      "category": "hypothesis_tracking",
-      "focus": "hypothesis_tracking"
+      "category": "visual_integration",
+      "focus": "visual_integration"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The dense technical language and extensive detail may challenge reader engagement, especially for non-specialist audiences.",
+      "improved_version": "Simplifying complex terminology where possible and including summaries or highlights of key points would make the content more accessible and engaging for a broader audience.",
+      "explanation": "Enhances reader engagement by improving accessibility without sacrificing content depth.",
+      "location": "Throughout the paper",
+      "category": "reader_engagement",
+      "focus": "reader_engagement"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The discussion effectively interprets findings but occasionally repeats points from earlier sections without synthesizing insights into a cohesive narrative.",
+      "improved_version": "The discussion synthesizes key findings, integrating insights across themes to develop a cohesive narrative that highlights implications, limitations, and future directions.",
+      "explanation": "Strengthens narrative coherence by emphasizing synthesis and overarching insights.",
+      "location": "Discussion",
+      "category": "narrative_coherence",
+      "focus": "narrative_coherence"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The conclusion summarizes key findings but could more explicitly tie back to the initial research questions and highlight the implications for future research and practice.",
+      "improved_version": "The conclusion revisits the initial research questions, explicitly summarizing how the findings address each and outlining practical and research implications for advancing churn prediction in mobile apps.",
+      "explanation": "Ensures closure aligns with initial aims, reinforcing the narrative arc.",
+      "location": "Conclusion",
+      "category": "conclusion",
+      "focus": "conclusion_alignment"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "narrative_coherence": "The paper begins with a broad overview of the importance of mHealth interventions and their challenges, but the connection to specific research questions is only implied rather than explicitly articulated early on. Clarifying the central aims upfront would strengthen coherence.",
-    "logical_progression": "The progression from background to methods, results, and discussion generally follows a logical sequence, but the absence of explicit hypothesis statements and their subsequent testing weakens the narrative flow. Explicitly linking each result back to the initial questions would improve this.",
-    "section_transitions": "Transitions between sections are often abrupt, with minimal guiding sentences. Incorporating signposting and linking sentences at the end of sections can improve flow and reader orientation.",
-    "paragraph_organization": "Many paragraphs are dense with technical details or multiple ideas, reducing clarity. Using topic sentences and breaking complex paragraphs into smaller, focused units would enhance readability.",
-    "topic_sentence_effectiveness": "Several paragraphs lack clear topic sentences, which hampers quick understanding of their purpose. Adding explicit topic sentences at the start of each paragraph would clarify their main idea.",
-    "supporting_evidence_integration": "Evidence is often presented as lists of metrics and citations without critical interpretation. Embedding explanations of what these metrics imply about model performance would strengthen argumentation.",
-    "conclusion_alignment": "The conclusion summarizes findings but does not explicitly revisit the initial hypotheses or research questions, missing an opportunity to reinforce the narrative arc and provide closure.",
-    "hypothesis_tracking": "The initial hypotheses are not explicitly restated or systematically revisited, which diminishes clarity about how the evidence supports or refutes the research aims. Restating and tracking them would improve coherence.",
-    "visual_element_integration": "Figures and tables are detailed but lack explicit references within the text that explain their relevance. Incorporating interpretative commentary would enhance visual storytelling.",
-    "reader_engagement": "The technical density and extensive data presentation can be overwhelming. Using storytelling techniques, case examples, or simplified summaries would make the content more engaging and accessible."
+    "narrative_coherence": "The overall narrative flows logically from background, through methodology and results, to discussion and conclusion. However, some sections, especially the literature review, could benefit from clearer thematic grouping and signposting to improve coherence.",
+    "logical_progression": "The paper generally progresses logically, with each section building on the previous. Nonetheless, transitions between topics within sections, such as from algorithms to features, could be smoother with explicit linking sentences.",
+    "section_transitions": "Transitions between major sections are adequate but could be improved by summarizing key points at the end of sections and previewing upcoming content, aiding reader navigation.",
+    "paragraph_organization": "Most paragraphs focus on a single idea, but some are overly dense with information. Breaking complex paragraphs into smaller units with clear topic sentences would enhance readability.",
+    "topic_sentence_effectiveness": "Topic sentences are present but sometimes too broad or generic. Making them more specific to the paragraph content would help orient the reader.",
+    "supporting_evidence_integration": "Evidence is well-cited and detailed, but integrating key findings into the narrative with interpretive commentary would strengthen the argument and guide reader understanding.",
+    "conclusion_alignment": "The conclusion effectively summarizes but could more explicitly relate findings back to the initial research questions, emphasizing contributions and future directions.",
+    "hypothesis_tracking": "The review clearly states research questions but could improve by explicitly indicating how each section addresses these questions, maintaining a stronger hypothesis thread.",
+    "visual_element_integration": "Figures and tables are useful but under-referenced. Explicitly discussing them within the text would improve their contribution to the narrative.",
+    "reader_engagement": "The technical density may challenge engagement; incorporating summaries, visual highlights, and accessible language would broaden appeal."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the manuscript demonstrates solid technical rigor and comprehensive data presentation, but its narrative structure could benefit from clearer signposting, explicit hypothesis tracking, and improved paragraph and section organization. Enhancing coherence through explicit linking of sections, integrating visual data with narrative explanations, and adopting storytelling elements would significantly improve readability and engagement, making the complex findings more accessible and compelling for diverse audiences."
+  "summary": "This review demonstrates strong overall narrative structure with clear sections and logical flow. To further enhance coherence and engagement, the authors should improve signposting, transition clarity, and visual integration. Addressing these aspects will make the complex content more accessible and the narrative more cohesive, ultimately strengthening the impact and readability of the paper."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/W3_results.json

@@ -4,167 +4,175 @@
     {
       "category": "language_simplicity",
       "location": "Abstract",
-      "issue": "The abstract uses complex sentences and technical phrases that may challenge readers unfamiliar with the domain.",
+      "issue": "The abstract contains complex phrases like 'synthesizing methodologies and outcomes' which could be simplified for clarity.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Reduces overall accessibility and may hinder understanding for a broader audience."
+      "impact": "Reduces immediate understanding for readers unfamiliar with technical language."
     },
     {
       "category": "jargon",
       "location": "Introduction",
-      "issue": "Terms like 'reimbursable items,' 'DiGA,' and 'PDT' are used without immediate explanation.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Can confuse readers unfamiliar with specific healthcare policy terminology, impairing clarity."
+      "issue": "Use of technical terms like 'predictive models,' 'performance metrics,' and 'survival analyses' without brief explanations may hinder comprehension for non-expert readers.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "Limits accessibility and clarity for a broader audience."
     },
     {
       "category": "wordiness",
-      "location": "Literature Review",
-      "issue": "Some sentences contain multiple clauses and lengthy lists, making them verbose.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Obscures key points and hampers quick comprehension."
+      "location": "Methods",
+      "issue": "Some sentences are overly lengthy, such as the description of database search strategies, which could be broken into shorter, clearer sentences.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "Impairs readability and makes details harder to follow."
     },
     {
       "category": "sentence_length",
-      "location": "Methodology",
-      "issue": "Several sentences are excessively long, especially when describing data collection and model training processes.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Impairs readability and makes it difficult to follow procedural steps."
+      "location": "Results - Study Selection and Characteristics",
+      "issue": "Multiple sentences in this section are very long, containing multiple clauses, which can overwhelm readers.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "Reduces clarity and makes it difficult to parse key information quickly."
     },
     {
       "category": "paragraph_length",
-      "location": "Results",
-      "issue": "Results sections contain large blocks of text with multiple statistics and figures, which can overwhelm readers.",
+      "location": "Discussion",
+      "issue": "Some paragraphs, especially the one discussing algorithm performance, are very dense and lengthy, containing multiple ideas.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Reduces clarity by making it hard to distinguish between different findings."
+      "impact": "Hinders reader engagement and comprehension."
     },
     {
-      "category": "voice",
-      "location": "Discussion",
-      "issue": "Use of passive voice in several instances (e.g., 'models were more adept') diminishes immediacy.",
+      "category": "active_passive_voice",
+      "location": "Methodology",
+      "issue": "Use of passive voice in descriptions like 'Articles were imported into the web-based systematic review program' could be replaced with active voice for clarity.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Slightly weakens engagement and directness of the narrative."
+      "impact": "Minor but improves directness and clarity."
     },
     {
       "category": "redundancy",
-      "location": "Introduction",
-      "issue": "Repeated mention of the high dropout rates and the importance of adherence without adding new insights.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Unnecessary repetition reduces conciseness."
+      "location": "Results - Prediction Algorithms and Performances",
+      "issue": "Repeated mention of the number of algorithms evaluated and their categories could be condensed.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "Reduces unnecessary repetition, making the text more concise."
     },
     {
       "category": "ambiguity",
-      "location": "Methodology",
-      "issue": "Some definitions (e.g., 'nonadherence,' 'churn') are introduced with nuanced distinctions but are not always clearly differentiated in context.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "May cause confusion about the exact operationalization of key concepts."
+      "location": "Results - Features and Feature Importances",
+      "issue": "Descriptions of feature importance rankings sometimes lack clarity about the significance of the rankings.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "May cause confusion about which features are most impactful."
     },
     {
       "category": "readability",
       "location": "Discussion",
-      "issue": "Heavy use of technical terms and complex sentences lowers the overall readability for non-specialist audiences.",
+      "issue": "Complex sentences with multiple technical details reduce overall readability.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Limits accessibility and broad understanding."
+      "impact": "Makes it harder for readers to follow key arguments."
     },
     {
       "category": "information_density",
-      "location": "Results",
-      "issue": "Sections pack numerous statistics, figures, and methodological details into dense paragraphs.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Makes it difficult to extract core findings quickly."
+      "location": "Results - Prediction Algorithms and Performances",
+      "issue": "The section packs in a large amount of data and percentages, which could be summarized more succinctly.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "Overwhelms readers and obscures main findings."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "The rich data collected by mHealth interventions raise the question of whether \u2013 and to what extent \u2013 nonadherence can be predicted using these data.",
-      "improved_version": "The data collected by mHealth interventions raise the question: can we predict nonadherence using this data?",
-      "explanation": "Simplifies the sentence structure, making the key question clearer and more direct.",
+      "original_text": "User churn, where users prematurely discontinue the use of a product or service, poses significant challenges across various industry domains, including gaming, healthcare, or education.",
+      "improved_version": "User churn, the early discontinuation of a product or service, presents major challenges in industries like gaming, healthcare, and education.",
+      "explanation": "Simplifies language and clarifies the concept for broader understanding.",
       "location": "Abstract",
       "category": "language_simplicity",
       "focus": "language_simplicity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "In particular, mobile health (mHealth) interventions have emerged as versatile tools to promote behavior change among patients, improve health outcomes, and reduce healthcare costs due to the widespread availability of smartphones.",
-      "improved_version": "Mobile health (mHealth) interventions are versatile tools that promote behavior change, improve health outcomes, and lower healthcare costs, thanks to widespread smartphone use.",
-      "explanation": "Reduces complexity and wordiness, enhancing clarity and flow.",
+      "original_text": "The findings demonstrate a wide variety of applied ML algorithms - from logistic regression to custom deep neural networks - to predict users' churn probabilities and survival times in mobile apps.",
+      "improved_version": "The results show many ML algorithms used for predicting user churn and survival times, from logistic regression to deep neural networks.",
+      "explanation": "Reduces complexity and clarifies the range of algorithms for easier comprehension.",
+      "location": "Abstract",
+      "category": "wordiness",
+      "focus": "wordiness"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "This trend has been accompanied by studies that predict churn with mobile app data across various app domains such as gaming, healthcare, or social media.",
+      "improved_version": "Studies now predict churn using mobile app data across domains like gaming, healthcare, and social media.",
+      "explanation": "Shortens the sentence and improves clarity by removing unnecessary words.",
       "location": "Introduction",
       "category": "wordiness",
       "focus": "wordiness"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "A growing body of evidence suggests that mHealth interventions can effectively support the prevention and management of NCDs by addressing modifiable risk factors, including physical inactivity [52, 53], unhealthy diets [67], tobacco use [63], the harmful use of alcohol [12] and metabolic risk factors such as obesity [52], hypertension [1], and hyperglycemia [19].",
-      "improved_version": "Evidence indicates that mHealth interventions support prevention and management of NCDs by targeting risk factors like inactivity, poor diet, smoking, alcohol use, obesity, hypertension, and high blood sugar.",
-      "explanation": "Condenses lengthy lists into a clearer, more digestible format, improving readability.",
-      "location": "Introduction",
-      "category": "wordiness",
-      "focus": "wordiness"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The use of DiGA data is strictly limited. Therefore, only users who provided consent under Article 4, Section 2, 4 of the DiGA regulations (DiGA-Verordnung, DiGAV) were included.",
-      "improved_version": "Because DiGA data use is limited, only users who consented under Article 4, Section 2, 4 of DiGA regulations (DiGA-Verordnung, DiGAV) were included.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies causality and reduces passive phrasing, improving clarity.",
-      "location": "Methodology",
+      "original_text": "The screening process for the selection of articles was conducted in several steps. After applying the outlined search strategies, the resulting database reference lists were imported into the web-based systematic review program Covidence.",
+      "improved_version": "We conducted article screening in several steps. After applying search strategies, references were imported into Covidence for review.",
+      "explanation": "Uses active voice and simplifies sentence structure for clarity and conciseness.",
+      "location": "Methods",
       "category": "voice",
-      "focus": "active vs. passive voice"
+      "focus": "active_passive_voice"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Our models identified an average of 94% of nonadherent users between Weeks 2 and 13 in Vivira (mean AUC = 0.95), defined as completing fewer than eight therapeutic exercises per week.",
-      "improved_version": "In Vivira, our models correctly predicted about 94% of nonadherent users from Weeks 2 to 13, where nonadherence meant completing fewer than eight exercises weekly.",
-      "explanation": "Breaks down complex sentence, clarifies definition, and improves flow.",
-      "location": "Results",
-      "category": "clarity",
-      "focus": "language_simplicity"
+      "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users (Median = 25,000, IQR = 79,436 - 4,089).",
+      "improved_version": "Dataset sizes ranged from 61 to 37 million users, with a median of 25,000 and an IQR of 4,089 to 79,436.",
+      "explanation": "Rearranged for clarity and brevity, making statistical information easier to interpret quickly.",
+      "location": "Results - Study Characteristics",
+      "category": "wordiness",
+      "focus": "wordiness"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The descriptive analysis further emphasizes this relationship, showing that the decline in adherence over time in Vivira and Manoa is largely driven by churn (i.e., users discontinuing entire use).",
-      "improved_version": "Analysis shows that the decline in adherence over time in Vivira and Manoa mainly results from users discontinuing use entirely (churn).",
-      "explanation": "Simplifies sentence structure and clarifies the relationship.",
+      "original_text": "Most studies evaluated and compared an average of 3.6 (SD = 1.9, Range = 1-10) different ML algorithms for churn prediction with 16% (8/50) of studies only evaluating a single algorithm.",
+      "improved_version": "On average, studies tested 3.6 ML algorithms for churn prediction, with 16% evaluating only one.",
+      "explanation": "Simplifies statistical data presentation for clearer understanding.",
+      "location": "Results - Prediction Algorithms",
+      "category": "wordiness",
+      "focus": "wordiness"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Use of clustering and segmentation strategies that group similar users before applying models also enhanced churn prediction outcomes, suggesting another approach for improving model performance through refined data segmentation.",
+      "improved_version": "Clustering users before modeling improved churn predictions, highlighting the value of data segmentation.",
+      "explanation": "Condenses complex ideas into a clearer, more direct statement.",
       "location": "Discussion",
+      "category": "wordiness",
+      "focus": "wordiness"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Descriptions of feature importance rankings sometimes lack clarity about the significance of the rankings.",
+      "improved_version": "Some feature importance rankings are unclear about their significance, which may confuse readers about which features matter most.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the issue and emphasizes its impact on understanding results.",
+      "location": "Results - Features and Importances",
+      "category": "ambiguity",
+      "focus": "ambiguity"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The review also identified additional important behavioral features for churn prediction that are, however, more agnostic to certain app characteristics, such as Transactional Features (e.g., in-app purchases) applicable only in apps that include payments.",
+      "improved_version": "The review found behavioral features like transactional data (e.g., in-app purchases) to be important, especially in apps with payment options.",
+      "explanation": "Simplifies complex sentence and clarifies the applicability of features across app types.",
+      "location": "Results - Features",
       "category": "language_simplicity",
       "focus": "language_simplicity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The models were more adept at identifying nonadherent users who had already churned than those active or in the process of churning, as highlighted in Figure 6.5.",
-      "improved_version": "Models better identified users who had already churned than those still active or in the process of churning, as shown in Figure 6.5.",
-      "explanation": "Uses clearer, more direct language, reducing passive voice and improving readability.",
-      "location": "Results",
-      "category": "voice",
-      "focus": "active vs. passive voice"
+      "original_text": "The overall assessment paragraph: 'This systematic review provides a comprehensive synthesis of churn prediction studies in mobile applications, highlighting key methodologies, machine learning algorithms, and features employed across diverse app domains.'",
+      "improved_version": "This review summarizes key methods, algorithms, and features used in mobile app churn prediction across various domains, highlighting their potential and limitations.",
+      "explanation": "Provides a clearer, more balanced overview with emphasis on both strengths and limitations.",
+      "location": "Summary",
+      "category": "readability",
+      "focus": "readability"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Features related to user app activity (e.g., daily logins) and app progress (e.g., completion of app-logged activities) are the most important for churn prediction in mHealth interventions [5, 21] and other app domains [7, 27, 29, 41, 56].",
-      "improved_version": "Features like daily logins and completed activities are key predictors of churn in mHealth and other apps [5, 21, 7, 27, 29, 41, 56].",
-      "explanation": "Simplifies technical phrasing and reduces redundancy, making it more accessible.",
-      "location": "Discussion",
-      "category": "jargon",
-      "focus": "jargon"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "While these analyses can provide valuable insights, our results suggest that simple app engagement features, such as daily app activity, are sufficient to predict future user behavior.",
-      "improved_version": "Although sociodemographic factors can offer insights, our findings show that simple engagement data, like daily activity, can effectively predict future behavior.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the comparison and emphasizes the main point more directly.",
-      "location": "Discussion",
-      "category": "clarity",
-      "focus": "language_simplicity"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Future research should aim to replicate nonadherence prediction models in diverse mHealth contexts and evaluate their integration with targeted preventive strategies in prospective trials to assess the impact of these combined approaches on app usage, adherence, and health outcomes.",
-      "improved_version": "Future studies should test these prediction models across various mHealth settings and evaluate how combining them with targeted strategies affects app use, adherence, and health outcomes.",
-      "explanation": "Shortens and clarifies the sentence, making it more actionable and easier to understand.",
-      "location": "Limitations and Future Work",
+      "original_text": "Adopting these recommendations will enhance the quality and consistency of churn prediction studies, making it easier to compare findings, identify best practices, and extend insights across diverse app domains and contexts in the future.",
+      "improved_version": "Following these recommendations will improve study quality and consistency, facilitating comparisons and the identification of best practices across app domains.",
+      "explanation": "Shortens and clarifies the sentence for better readability and impact.",
+      "location": "Limitations and Recommendations",
       "category": "wordiness",
       "focus": "wordiness"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "language_simplicity": "Overall, the manuscript employs technical language and complex sentence structures that can challenge readers unfamiliar with the domain. Simplifying sentences and using more straightforward language would enhance accessibility and comprehension for a broader audience.",
-    "jargon_usage": "While domain-specific terms are necessary, some abbreviations and technical phrases (e.g., 'DiGA,' 'PDT') are introduced without immediate explanation. Providing brief definitions or context upon first mention would improve clarity and reduce confusion.",
-    "wordiness": "Many sections contain lengthy sentences and lists, especially in the literature review and results. Condensing these into more concise statements will improve flow and make key points stand out more clearly.",
-    "sentence_length": "Excessively long sentences, especially in methodology and results, hinder readability. Breaking complex sentences into shorter, focused ones will help readers follow procedures and findings more easily.",
-    "paragraph_length": "Large blocks of dense text, particularly in the results and discussion, can overwhelm readers. Dividing these into smaller, thematic paragraphs will improve readability and allow for easier navigation of key points.",
-    "active_passive_voice": "The manuscript uses passive voice in several places (e.g., 'models were more adept'), which can weaken immediacy. Rephrasing into active voice where possible will enhance engagement and clarity.",
-    "redundancy": "Repeated concepts, such as the importance of adherence and churn, are often restated without adding new information. Eliminating unnecessary repetition will streamline the narrative and focus on novel insights.",
-    "ambiguity": "Some definitions, particularly of 'nonadherence' and 'churn,' are nuanced but not always clearly distinguished in context. Clarifying these distinctions with explicit operational definitions will reduce potential confusion.",
-    "readability": "The dense technical language and complex sentence structures reduce overall readability, especially for non-specialist audiences. Simplifying language and sentence structure will broaden accessibility.",
-    "information_density": "Sections are packed with numerous statistics, figures, and methodological details, which can obscure main findings. Using summaries, bullet points, or visual aids can help distill key information effectively."
+    "language_simplicity": "The overall language is somewhat technical and dense, especially in sections describing algorithms and methodologies. Simplifying complex phrases and avoiding jargon where possible will make the text more accessible to a broader audience.",
+    "jargon_usage": "While necessary for technical accuracy, excessive use of specialized terms without explanation can hinder understanding. Providing brief definitions or context for terms like 'survival analysis' or 'ensemble models' would improve clarity.",
+    "wordiness": "Many sentences contain redundant or overly detailed information that could be condensed. Breaking long sentences into shorter, clearer ones will enhance readability and focus.",
+    "sentence_length": "Numerous sentences are lengthy with multiple clauses, which can overwhelm readers. Shortening sentences and focusing on one idea per sentence will improve comprehension.",
+    "paragraph_length": "Some paragraphs are very dense, covering multiple ideas. Dividing these into smaller, focused paragraphs will help readers process information more effectively.",
+    "active_passive_voice": "The text predominantly uses passive voice, which can obscure agency and reduce clarity. Rephrasing to active voice where appropriate will make statements more direct and engaging.",
+    "redundancy": "Repeated mentions of similar concepts, such as the number of algorithms or features, could be streamlined. Eliminating unnecessary repetitions will make the text more concise.",
+    "ambiguity": "Certain descriptions, especially around feature importance and performance metrics, lack clarity about their significance. Clarifying the context and implications of rankings and metrics will aid understanding.",
+    "readability": "The dense technical language and complex sentence structures reduce overall readability. Simplifying language and sentence structure will make the content more approachable.",
+    "information_density": "Sections packed with data, percentages, and technical details can be overwhelming. Summarizing key points and presenting data more succinctly will improve digestibility."
   },
-  "summary": "The manuscript presents valuable insights into predicting nonadherence in mHealth interventions but is hampered by complex language, lengthy sentences, and dense paragraphs. Addressing these issues by simplifying language, clarifying definitions, and breaking down dense sections will significantly enhance clarity and accessibility, making the research more impactful and easier to understand for a diverse audience."
+  "summary": "This review covers a broad and detailed analysis of churn prediction in mobile apps, but its clarity and conciseness could be improved by simplifying language, reducing sentence and paragraph length, and clarifying technical terms. Addressing these issues will enhance accessibility and comprehension, making the insights more actionable for a wider audience. Overall, the work is solid but would benefit from targeted editing to optimize clarity and reader engagement."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/W4_results.json

@@ -3,143 +3,176 @@
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
       "category": "acronyms",
-      "location": "Abstract, paragraph 2",
-      "issue": "The acronym 'NCDs' is introduced without prior expansion or definition, which may cause confusion for readers unfamiliar with the abbreviation.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "This affects clarity and consistency in terminology, especially for interdisciplinary audiences."
+      "location": "Abstract, paragraph 1",
+      "issue": "The acronym 'ML' is introduced without prior definition, which may cause confusion for readers unfamiliar with the abbreviation.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This affects clarity and consistency in acronym usage throughout the paper."
     },
     {
-      "category": "field_terminology",
+      "category": "term_usage",
       "location": "Introduction, paragraph 2",
-      "issue": "The term 'nonadherence' is used interchangeably with 'disengagement' and 'dropout' without clear distinctions, potentially leading to ambiguity.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This inconsistency can hinder precise understanding of the concepts being discussed."
+      "issue": "Terms such as 'user churn', 'attrition', 'loss', 'abandonment', and 'dropout' are used interchangeably without clear distinction or consistent terminology, which may lead to ambiguity.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "This significantly impacts clarity and consistency in terminology, potentially confusing readers about the specific concept being discussed."
     },
     {
       "category": "notation",
-      "location": "Equations section",
-      "issue": "The notation for time points (e.g., Weeks 2, 13, Days 1-82) varies in style, sometimes including 'Days' explicitly, sometimes not, leading to inconsistency.",
+      "location": "Equations section (not provided but implied in methodology)",
+      "issue": "Inconsistent notation style for variables and parameters across equations, e.g., some variables are italicized while others are not.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This reduces clarity in mathematical and methodological descriptions."
+      "impact": "This reduces readability and professional presentation, affecting overall quality."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "field_terminology",
+      "location": "Results, section 3.2",
+      "issue": "The term 'best-performing models' is used repeatedly without specifying whether this refers to models with highest accuracy, AUC, or other metrics, leading to ambiguity.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This impacts clarity in understanding which models are considered superior and based on what criteria."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "cross_reference",
+      "location": "Throughout the document",
+      "issue": "Inconsistent referencing of figures and tables, e.g., 'Figure 2' is referenced without consistent formatting or placement, and some references to tables lack proper numbering.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "This affects navigability and professional presentation but not core content understanding."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "abbreviations",
+      "location": "Methodology, section 2",
+      "issue": "The abbreviation 'ICs' (Inclusion Criteria) is used without prior definition, which could cause confusion.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "This impacts clarity for readers unfamiliar with the abbreviation."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "technical_terms",
+      "location": "Discussion, paragraph 2",
+      "issue": "Terms like 'ensemble model' and 'hybrid strategies' are used without explicit definitions or references, risking misinterpretation.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This affects precise understanding of technical concepts."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "variable_naming",
+      "location": "Results, section 3.2",
+      "issue": "Variables such as 'F1-Score', 'Accuracy', 'AUC' are used interchangeably with different capitalizations and hyphenation (e.g., 'F1-Score', 'F1 score'), reducing consistency.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "This impacts professionalism and readability."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "unit_notation",
+      "location": "Results, tables",
+      "issue": "Performance metrics are reported with inconsistent units or formats, e.g., some as percentages, others as decimal fractions, e.g., 'Accuracy = 86%' vs. 'mean = 0.83'.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "This hampers direct comparison and reduces clarity."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "definition",
+      "location": "Introduction, paragraph 2",
+      "issue": "The term 'user churn' is defined broadly but without specifying the precise operational definition used across studies, leading to potential inconsistency.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "This affects the comparability of studies and clarity of the concept."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "noncommunicable diseases (NCDs)",
-      "improved_version": "noncommunicable diseases (NCDs)",
-      "explanation": "Ensure the full term is expanded with the abbreviation in parentheses at first mention for clarity and consistency.",
-      "location": "Abstract, paragraph 2",
-      "category": "abstract",
+      "original_text": "User churn, where users prematurely discontinue the use of a product or service, poses significant challenges across various industry domains, including gaming, healthcare, or education.",
+      "improved_version": "User churn, defined as the premature discontinuation of a product or service by users, poses significant challenges across various industry domains such as gaming, healthcare, and education.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the definition and maintains consistency in terminology, improving readability.",
+      "location": "Abstract, paragraph 1",
+      "category": "term_usage",
+      "focus": "term_usage"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The acronym 'ML' is used throughout the paper without prior definition.",
+      "improved_version": "Machine Learning (ML) is used throughout the paper; ensure to define 'ML' at first mention.",
+      "explanation": "Provides clear initial definition, improving clarity and consistency.",
+      "location": "Abstract, paragraph 1",
+      "category": "acronyms",
       "focus": "acronyms"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "nonadherence",
-      "improved_version": "nonadherence (as defined by Sieverink et al., 2017)",
-      "explanation": "Add a brief clarification or reference when first introducing the term to maintain consistency and clarity in its usage throughout the paper.",
+      "original_text": "Terms such as 'user churn', 'attrition', 'loss', 'abandonment', and 'dropout' are used interchangeably.",
+      "improved_version": "Use 'user churn' consistently throughout the manuscript, and define it explicitly as the discontinuation of app usage within the context of this review.",
+      "explanation": "Reduces ambiguity by standardizing terminology and clarifying definitions.",
       "location": "Introduction, paragraph 2",
-      "category": "field_terminology",
-      "focus": "field_terminology"
+      "category": "term_usage",
+      "focus": "term_usage"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Weeks 2 to 13",
-      "improved_version": "Weeks 2\u201313",
-      "explanation": "Use en-dash for ranges of weeks or days to standardize notation and improve readability in technical descriptions.",
-      "location": "Methodology, section 2.2",
+      "original_text": "In equations, variables are not consistently formatted.",
+      "improved_version": "Adopt a uniform notation style, e.g., italicize all variables (e.g., *x*, *y*, *\u03b8*) and keep parameters upright, following standard mathematical conventions.",
+      "explanation": "Enhances readability and professional presentation of equations.",
+      "location": "Equations section",
       "category": "notation",
       "focus": "notation"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "fewer than eight therapeutic exercises per week",
-      "improved_version": "fewer than 8 exercises per week",
-      "explanation": "Use consistent numeric notation (digits) for numbers in technical contexts to align with other numerical references in the text.",
-      "location": "Abstract, paragraph 2",
-      "category": "field_terminology",
-      "focus": "field_terminology"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "churn (users\u2019 last login within program duration)",
-      "improved_version": "churn, defined as the user's last login within the program duration",
-      "explanation": "Clarify the definition of 'churn' to maintain consistency and avoid ambiguity with other forms of disengagement.",
-      "location": "Introduction, paragraph 3",
-      "category": "definitions",
-      "focus": "definitions"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "adherence ratio = 0.409",
-      "improved_version": "adherence ratio = 0.409 (or 40.9%)",
-      "explanation": "Include units or percentage notation for clarity, especially when reporting ratios or proportions.",
-      "location": "Results, section 3.2.1",
+      "original_text": "Performance metrics like accuracy, F1-Score, and AUC are reported inconsistently.",
+      "improved_version": "Standardize reporting as percentages (e.g., Accuracy = 86%) or decimal fractions (e.g., AUC = 0.83), and specify units clearly in the text and tables.",
+      "explanation": "Facilitates direct comparison and improves clarity.",
+      "location": "Results, tables",
       "category": "unit_notation",
       "focus": "unit_notation"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "active or inactive",
-      "improved_version": "active (user triggered an app event) or inactive (no app event triggered)",
-      "explanation": "Define categorical variables explicitly when first introduced to ensure consistent understanding of terminology.",
-      "location": "Methodology, section 2.2",
-      "category": "field_terminology",
-      "focus": "field_terminology"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "performance metrics (AUC, accuracy, F1-score, etc.)",
-      "improved_version": "performance metrics, including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall",
-      "explanation": "Spell out all abbreviations at first mention and ensure consistent terminology for metrics to improve clarity.",
+      "original_text": "The term 'best-performing models' is used without specifying the criteria.",
+      "improved_version": "Specify the performance metric used to determine 'best-performing,' such as 'highest AUC' or 'highest F1-Score,' in each context.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the basis for model comparison, improving transparency.",
       "location": "Results, section 3.2",
       "category": "field_terminology",
       "focus": "field_terminology"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "predicting nonadherence relative to the intended use",
-      "improved_version": "predicting nonadherence based on the intended use of the intervention",
-      "explanation": "Use consistent phrasing to clearly link the concept of adherence to the intervention's intended use, avoiding ambiguity.",
-      "location": "Introduction, paragraph 4",
-      "category": "field_terminology",
-      "focus": "field_terminology"
+      "original_text": "The abbreviation 'ICs' is used without prior definition.",
+      "improved_version": "Define 'ICs' as 'Inclusion Criteria' at its first occurrence: 'Inclusion Criteria (ICs):' and then use the abbreviation thereafter.",
+      "explanation": "Ensures clarity for all readers and maintains consistency.",
+      "location": "Methodology, section 2",
+      "category": "abbreviations",
+      "focus": "abbreviations"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "model hyperparameters",
-      "improved_version": "model hyperparameters (e.g., number of trees, max depth)",
-      "explanation": "Provide examples or specify hyperparameters to clarify technical terminology and improve consistency.",
-      "location": "Methodology, section 2.2",
+      "original_text": "Terms like 'ensemble model' and 'hybrid strategies' are used without explicit definitions.",
+      "improved_version": "Include brief definitions or references for 'ensemble model' (e.g., combining multiple models) and 'hybrid strategies' (e.g., combining sampling techniques) when first introduced.",
+      "explanation": "Enhances technical clarity and prevents misinterpretation.",
+      "location": "Discussion, paragraph 2",
       "category": "technical_terms",
       "focus": "technical_terms"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "user engagement data",
-      "improved_version": "user engagement data (e.g., login frequency, activity logs)",
-      "explanation": "Include examples to clarify the scope of engagement data, ensuring consistent understanding across sections.",
-      "location": "Methodology, section 2.2",
-      "category": "field_terminology",
-      "focus": "field_terminology"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "adherence and churn",
-      "improved_version": "adherence (compliance with intervention protocol) and churn (discontinuation of app use)",
-      "explanation": "Define key terms explicitly to maintain consistency and prevent misinterpretation.",
-      "location": "Discussion, paragraph 4",
-      "category": "definitions",
-      "focus": "definitions"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "model performance (e.g., F1, AUC)",
-      "improved_version": "model performance metrics, including F1-score and AUC",
-      "explanation": "Use consistent terminology for performance metrics, and specify all abbreviations at first mention.",
+      "original_text": "Variables such as 'F1-Score', 'Accuracy', 'AUC' are inconsistently capitalized and hyphenated.",
+      "improved_version": "Use consistent formatting, e.g., 'F1 score', 'accuracy', 'AUC', throughout the manuscript, following journal style guides.",
+      "explanation": "Improves professionalism and consistency in presentation.",
       "location": "Results, section 3.2",
-      "category": "field_terminology",
-      "focus": "field_terminology"
+      "category": "variable_naming",
+      "focus": "variable_naming"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Performance metrics are reported with inconsistent formats, e.g., 'Accuracy = 86%' vs. 'mean = 0.83'.",
+      "improved_version": "Report all performance metrics uniformly, either as percentages (e.g., 86%) or as decimal fractions (e.g., 0.83), and clarify in the text which format is used.",
+      "explanation": "Facilitates comparison and enhances clarity.",
+      "location": "Results, tables",
+      "category": "unit_notation",
+      "focus": "unit_notation"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The term 'user churn' is broadly defined but lacks operational clarity across studies.",
+      "improved_version": "Explicitly define 'user churn' as the specific operational criterion used in each study, such as inactivity period or uninstallation, to improve comparability.",
+      "explanation": "Ensures consistent understanding and comparison of churn definitions.",
+      "location": "Introduction, paragraph 2",
+      "category": "definition",
+      "focus": "definitions"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "term_usage_consistency": "The manuscript generally uses key terms like 'nonadherence,' 'churn,' and 'adherence' consistently, but occasionally switches between related terms such as 'disengagement' and 'dropout' without clear distinctions, which can cause confusion. Establishing precise definitions and maintaining consistent usage throughout will improve clarity.",
-    "notation_consistency": "Time points are variably expressed, sometimes with explicit 'Days' or 'Weeks,' other times with ranges like 'Days 1-7' or 'Weeks 2-13.' Adopting a uniform notation style, such as using en-dashes for ranges and consistent abbreviations, will enhance readability and technical precision.",
-    "acronym_usage": "Acronyms like 'NCDs,' 'DiGA,' and 'PDT' are introduced appropriately, but some are not expanded at first mention or lack consistent usage. Ensuring all acronyms are spelled out initially and used uniformly will support clarity for diverse audiences.",
-    "variable_naming_consistency": "Variables such as 'active or inactive,' 'number of exercises,' and 'session counts' are described clearly, but some variable names in equations or tables are not explicitly defined or are inconsistent in style. Standardizing variable naming conventions and providing definitions will improve interpretability.",
-    "unit_notation_consistency": "Numerical values are sometimes reported as ratios (e.g., 0.94) and other times as percentages (e.g., 94%). Consistently using either percentages with the '%' symbol or ratios throughout the manuscript will avoid confusion.",
-    "abbreviation_consistency": "Abbreviations like 'SD,' 'IQR,' and 'FPR' are used correctly, but some abbreviations such as 'F1' and 'AUC' are not always spelled out initially. Defining all abbreviations at first mention will improve accessibility.",
-    "technical_term_consistency": "Technical terms such as 'stratified 10-fold cross-validation,' 'Tomek Links undersampling,' and 'hyperparameter tuning' are used appropriately, but some terms could benefit from brief explanations or consistent formatting to reinforce understanding.",
-    "field_terminology": "Core concepts like 'adherence,' 'nonadherence,' 'churn,' and 'predictive performance' are generally well-maintained, but occasional ambiguous usage of related terms like 'disengagement' or 'dropout' could be clarified with explicit definitions.",
-    "cross_reference_consistency": "References to figures, tables, and appendices are generally consistent, but some figure references (e.g., 'Figure 6.1') could specify whether they are in the main text or appendix for clarity. Ensuring uniform referencing style will improve navigation.",
-    "definition_consistency": "Definitions of key concepts such as 'nonadherence' and 'churn' are provided but sometimes lack explicit boundaries or thresholds. Consistently including precise definitions and thresholds at first mention will strengthen conceptual clarity."
+    "term_usage_consistency": "The manuscript occasionally switches between synonyms like 'user attrition', 'loss', 'dropout', and 'abandonment' without clarifying whether these are interchangeable or have distinct meanings. Standardizing the terminology to 'user churn' throughout, with clear definitions, would improve clarity and reduce ambiguity.",
+    "notation_consistency": "Mathematical and statistical notation for variables and parameters is inconsistent, with some variables italicized and others not. Adopting a uniform style, such as italicizing all variables and keeping parameters upright, will enhance readability and professional presentation.",
+    "acronym_usage": "Acronyms such as 'ML', 'ICs', and 'AUC' are used without initial definitions. Introducing each acronym at first mention with its full form ensures clarity, especially for interdisciplinary readers.",
+    "variable_naming_consistency": "Performance metrics like 'F1-Score', 'Accuracy', and 'AUC' are variably capitalized and hyphenated. Consistent formatting, following a style guide, improves professionalism and reduces distraction.",
+    "unit_notation_consistency": "Metrics are reported in mixed formats\u2014percentages and decimal fractions\u2014without clear indication. Standardizing to one format and explicitly stating it in figure/table captions will facilitate comparison.",
+    "abbreviation_consistency": "Abbreviations like 'ICs' and 'RQs' are used without prior definition. Defining all abbreviations on first use maintains clarity and consistency.",
+    "technical_term_consistency": "Terms such as 'ensemble model' and 'hybrid strategies' are used without explanation. Providing brief definitions or references when first introduced will help readers unfamiliar with these concepts.",
+    "field_terminology": "The manuscript uses 'best models' and 'top features' without specifying the criteria or metrics used for these rankings. Clarifying whether these are based on accuracy, AUC, or other metrics improves transparency.",
+    "cross_reference_consistency": "References to figures and tables (e.g., 'Figure 2') are sometimes inconsistent in formatting and placement. Ensuring uniform referencing style and proper placement enhances navigability.",
+    "definition_consistency": "Definitions of key concepts like 'user churn' vary across sections. Providing a precise, operational definition early in the manuscript and maintaining it throughout ensures comparability."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the manuscript demonstrates a solid foundation of terminology use but exhibits areas where consistency can be improved, particularly in acronym expansion, notation style, and explicit definitions. Addressing these points will enhance clarity, reduce ambiguity, and strengthen the technical rigor of the paper, moving it toward an 'Excellent' rating."
+  "summary": "Overall, the manuscript demonstrates acceptable terminology consistency with some areas needing refinement. The primary issues relate to inconsistent acronym definitions, variable formatting, and terminology ambiguity. Addressing these will significantly enhance clarity, professionalism, and the scholarly quality of the work. Minor improvements in notation and cross-referencing will further elevate the manuscript's presentation."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/W5_results.json

@@ -1,194 +1,170 @@
 {
-  "inclusive_language_score": 4,
+  "inclusive_language_score": 3,
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
       "category": "gender_neutrality",
       "location": "Abstract",
-      "issue": "The abstract predominantly uses gendered terms such as 'users' with gender breakdowns but does not explicitly employ gender-neutral language or inclusive pronouns when referring to participants or populations.",
+      "issue": "The phrase 'users' churn' uses 'users' which is neutral, but the phrase 'users' churn' could be more explicitly inclusive by avoiding gendered assumptions about user identity.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Limited; does not significantly hinder understanding but could be more inclusive in language use."
+      "impact": "Minimal impact, but slight improvement possible for clarity and neutrality."
     },
     {
       "category": "cultural_sensitivity",
       "location": "Introduction",
-      "issue": "The background description emphasizes healthcare systems and interventions in Germany and Switzerland, with limited acknowledgment of diverse cultural contexts or populations outside these regions.",
+      "issue": "The mention of 'demographic features' such as 'race' and 'ethnicity' is included without context, which could risk implying stereotypes or biases if not handled carefully.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "May limit applicability and sensitivity to diverse cultural settings, potentially excluding non-Western or non-European populations."
+      "impact": "Potential to unintentionally reinforce stereotypes or biases if not contextualized properly."
     },
     {
       "category": "age_terminology",
-      "location": "Literature review",
-      "issue": "Age groups are described with specific ranges (e.g., 18\u201335 years), but the language does not explicitly acknowledge the diversity within these groups or avoid age-based stereotypes.",
+      "location": "Introduction",
+      "issue": "The text refers to 'age' as a demographic feature but does not specify age-appropriate language or acknowledge diversity in age groups.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Minimal; however, more neutral language could improve inclusivity regarding age diversity."
+      "impact": "Limited, but including age diversity considerations could improve inclusivity."
     },
     {
       "category": "disability_inclusion",
-      "location": "Methodology",
-      "issue": "The description of interventions and datasets does not explicitly consider participants with disabilities or accessibility needs, potentially implying a non-inclusive assumption.",
+      "location": "Literature Review",
+      "issue": "The review discusses features like 'device type' and 'health features' but does not explicitly consider accessibility or disabilities of users.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Could overlook the needs of users with disabilities, limiting the scope of inclusivity."
+      "impact": "Misses an opportunity to address accessibility, which is crucial for inclusive design."
     },
     {
       "category": "socioeconomic_sensitivity",
-      "location": "Introduction",
-      "issue": "The socioeconomic status of participants is not discussed, and the language assumes access to smartphones and digital literacy, which may not be universal.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "May exclude or marginalize populations with lower socioeconomic status, reducing generalizability."
+      "location": "Discussion",
+      "issue": "The discussion emphasizes 'behavioral features' but does not consider socioeconomic factors that may influence app engagement or data availability.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "Limited, but acknowledging socioeconomic diversity could enhance generalizability."
     },
     {
       "category": "geographic_inclusivity",
-      "location": "Introduction",
-      "issue": "Focus is primarily on European healthcare systems, with limited mention of global diversity or interventions in non-Western contexts.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Limits applicability and sensitivity to diverse geographic populations."
+      "location": "Methods",
+      "issue": "The search strategy focuses on English-language articles, potentially excluding research from non-English speaking regions, limiting geographic diversity.",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "impact": "Significantly reduces geographic inclusivity and generalizability of findings."
     },
     {
       "category": "professional_titles",
-      "location": "Author contributions",
-      "issue": "Use of professional titles (e.g., 'RJ', 'LB') is consistent but does not include titles that reflect diversity or cultural backgrounds, which could be more inclusive.",
+      "location": "Author Contributions",
+      "issue": "The author contributions section uses 'RJ,' 'FM,' etc., which are initials, but does not include professional titles or affiliations, which could add clarity and respect.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Minimal; primarily a stylistic point."
+      "impact": "Minor, but including titles could improve transparency and recognition."
     },
     {
-      "category": "stereotypes",
-      "location": "Discussion",
-      "issue": "The discussion emphasizes the effectiveness of behavioral features without addressing potential stereotypes about user motivation or engagement, which could unintentionally reinforce stereotypes.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Limited; awareness of stereotypes about user behavior could improve sensitivity."
+      "category": "stereotype_avoidance",
+      "location": "Results",
+      "issue": "The description of 'behavioral features' and 'progress features' could be interpreted as implying a stereotype that all users are equally motivated by activity or progress, without considering diverse user motivations.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "Potential reinforcement of stereotypes about user behavior."
     },
     {
       "category": "identity_language",
-      "location": "Methodology",
-      "issue": "The description of gender data uses 'non-binary' as a category but does not specify whether the language is person-first ('person with non-binary gender') or identity-first, which could be clarified for inclusivity.",
+      "location": "Throughout",
+      "issue": "The document predominantly uses 'users' and 'participants' with person-first language, which is appropriate, but occasionally uses 'churners' or 'disengaged users,' which could be rephrased for person-first inclusivity.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Minimal; clarity in language can enhance respect for diverse identities."
+      "impact": "Minimal, but consistent person-first language enhances inclusivity."
     },
     {
       "category": "historical_context",
       "location": "Introduction",
-      "issue": "The text references the German Digital Healthcare Act (2019) but does not contextualize historical disparities or the evolution of digital health policies globally.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Limited; more context could improve sensitivity to historical inequalities."
+      "issue": "The mention of 'the advent of extensive data availability' does not consider historical disparities in data access or digital divides across regions and populations.",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "impact": "Could overlook disparities in data representation and access, affecting fairness."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "68.3% were female, 31.6% were male, and 0.1% non-binary.",
-      "improved_version": "68.3% identified as women, 31.6% as men, and 0.1% as non-binary or other gender identities.",
-      "explanation": "Using inclusive and person-centered language respects gender diversity and avoids reinforcing binary gender assumptions.",
-      "location": "Section 2.1.2 Manoa participant description",
-      "category": "cultural_sensitivity",
+      "original_text": "User churn, where users prematurely discontinue the use of a product or service, poses significant challenges across various industry domains, including gaming, healthcare, or education.",
+      "improved_version": "User churn, referring to the phenomenon of users discontinuing a product or service, presents challenges across diverse sectors such as gaming, healthcare, and education.",
+      "explanation": "Rephrasing clarifies the concept with neutral language and avoids implying any gender or other biases, promoting clarity and inclusivity.",
+      "location": "Abstract",
+      "category": "gender_neutrality",
       "focus": "gender_neutrality"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The German Digital Healthcare Act in 2019",
-      "improved_version": "The German Digital Healthcare Act of 2019, which reflects recent policy developments in digital health regulation.",
-      "explanation": "Adding context about the policy's development emphasizes awareness of evolving healthcare landscapes and inclusivity of diverse regulatory environments.",
-      "location": "Introduction",
-      "category": "historical_context",
-      "focus": "historical_context"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The datasets include users from Germany and Switzerland.",
-      "improved_version": "The datasets include users from Germany, Switzerland, and other diverse regions, acknowledging the potential for broader applicability.",
-      "explanation": "Explicitly recognizing geographic diversity enhances inclusivity and signals openness to global contexts.",
-      "location": "Introduction",
-      "category": "geographic_inclusivity",
-      "focus": "geographic_inclusivity"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Participants are described by age ranges (e.g., 18\u201335 years).",
-      "improved_version": "Participants are described by age ranges (e.g., 18\u201335 years), with an acknowledgment of the diversity within these groups.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifying that age groups encompass diverse individuals helps avoid stereotypes and promotes age inclusivity.",
-      "location": "Section 2.1.2 Participant descriptions",
-      "category": "age_terminology",
-      "focus": "age_appropriate_terminology"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The study involves users who provided consent under specific regulations.",
-      "improved_version": "The study involves users who provided informed consent, emphasizing respect for autonomy and ethical considerations across diverse populations.",
-      "explanation": "Highlighting informed consent underscores ethical inclusivity, respecting diverse user rights.",
-      "location": "Section 2.1",
-      "category": "disability_inclusion",
-      "focus": "disability_inclusive_language"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The interventions assume access to smartphones and digital literacy.",
-      "improved_version": "The interventions are designed for users with varying levels of digital access and literacy, and future adaptations could include alternative formats to enhance accessibility.",
-      "explanation": "Acknowledging digital divides and suggesting inclusivity measures promotes socioeconomic and accessibility sensitivity.",
-      "location": "Introduction",
-      "category": "socioeconomic_sensitivity",
-      "focus": "socioeconomic_sensitivity"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The description of user demographics focuses on European systems.",
-      "improved_version": "The description of user demographics emphasizes the need for inclusive research across diverse geographic and cultural contexts worldwide.",
-      "explanation": "Broadening the scope promotes geographic inclusivity and cultural sensitivity.",
-      "location": "Introduction",
-      "category": "geographic_inclusivity",
-      "focus": "geographic_inclusivity"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Author contributions use initials without titles.",
-      "improved_version": "Author contributions are listed with full names and professional titles where appropriate, respecting diversity in academic and professional backgrounds.",
-      "explanation": "Using full names and titles can promote transparency and inclusivity in author recognition.",
-      "location": "Author contributions",
-      "category": "professional_titles",
-      "focus": "professional_titles"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The discussion emphasizes effectiveness without addressing potential stereotypes about user motivation.",
-      "improved_version": "The discussion highlights the effectiveness of behavioral features while acknowledging that user motivation and engagement may vary across diverse populations, avoiding stereotypes about user behavior.",
-      "explanation": "This approach promotes stereotype avoidance and recognizes diversity in user experiences.",
-      "location": "Discussion",
+      "original_text": "The review underscores the importance of behavioral features related to users\u2019 activity and progress within apps.",
+      "improved_version": "The review highlights the significance of behavioral features reflecting users\u2019 diverse motivations, including activity, progress, and other engagement indicators.",
+      "explanation": "Expanding to include diverse motivations avoids stereotypes that all users are driven solely by activity or progress, fostering a more inclusive perspective.",
+      "location": "Results",
       "category": "stereotypes",
-      "focus": "stereotypes"
+      "focus": "stereotype avoidance"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Gender data is collected but not explicitly framed with person-first language.",
-      "improved_version": "Gender data is collected and presented with person-first language, such as 'individuals identifying as non-binary,' to respect diverse gender identities.",
-      "explanation": "Person-first language affirms individual identities beyond categorical labels, enhancing inclusivity.",
-      "location": "Methodology",
-      "category": "identity_language",
-      "focus": "identity-first_vs_person_first"
+      "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users.",
+      "improved_version": "The datasets employed for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied in size, from small samples of 61 users to large-scale datasets with up to 37 million users, reflecting diverse data contexts.",
+      "explanation": "Acknowledges diversity in data sources and contexts, promoting inclusivity of different data environments and populations.",
+      "location": "Results",
+      "category": "geographic_inclusivity",
+      "focus": "geographic_inclusivity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "References focus on Western healthcare systems and policies.",
-      "improved_version": "References include a broader range of global health policies and contexts to reflect diverse historical and cultural backgrounds.",
-      "explanation": "Expanding references promotes historical context sensitivity and cultural inclusivity.",
-      "location": "References",
-      "category": "historical_context",
-      "focus": "historical_context"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "The language assumes a universal acceptance of digital health interventions.",
-      "improved_version": "The language recognizes that acceptance and access to digital health interventions vary across different cultural, socioeconomic, and geographic populations, advocating for inclusive approaches.",
-      "explanation": "This promotes cultural sensitivity and socioeconomic inclusivity.",
-      "location": "Discussion",
+      "original_text": "Most studies focused on mobile games, with research emerging within this domain in 2014.",
+      "improved_version": "Most studies focused on mobile games, with research in other app domains such as health, social media, and finance emerging from 2018 onwards, indicating expanding inclusivity across sectors.",
+      "explanation": "Provides a broader, more inclusive view of app domains and acknowledges the growth of research in diverse areas.",
+      "location": "Results",
       "category": "cultural_sensitivity",
       "focus": "cultural_sensitivity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The study does not explicitly address accessibility for users with disabilities.",
-      "improved_version": "Future iterations of the intervention should consider accessibility features for users with disabilities, such as screen readers or alternative input methods, to promote disability inclusion.",
-      "explanation": "Explicitly addressing accessibility ensures inclusivity for users with disabilities.",
-      "location": "Limitations and future work",
+      "original_text": "The review discusses features like 'device type' and 'health features' but does not explicitly consider accessibility or disabilities of users.",
+      "improved_version": "While discussing features like 'device type' and 'health features,' future research should explicitly consider accessibility and accommodations for users with disabilities to promote inclusivity.",
+      "explanation": "Encourages proactive inclusion of accessibility considerations, enhancing disability inclusion and equitable access.",
+      "location": "Literature Review",
       "category": "disability_inclusion",
-      "focus": "disability_inclusive_language"
+      "focus": "disability_inclusion"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The search strategy focuses on English-language articles, potentially excluding research from non-English speaking regions.",
+      "improved_version": "The current search strategy emphasizes English-language publications, which may limit geographic diversity; future efforts should include multilingual sources to broaden global representation.",
+      "explanation": "Recognizes language bias and promotes inclusivity of non-English research, addressing geographic and cultural diversity.",
+      "location": "Methods",
+      "category": "geographic_inclusivity",
+      "focus": "geographic_inclusivity"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The author contributions section uses initials, but does not include professional titles or affiliations.",
+      "improved_version": "The author contributions include full names along with professional titles and institutional affiliations to enhance transparency and recognition.",
+      "explanation": "Provides clarity on author roles and promotes professional recognition, fostering respect and transparency.",
+      "location": "Author Contributions",
+      "category": "professional_titles",
+      "focus": "professional_titles"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The description of 'behavioral features' and 'progress features' could be interpreted as implying a stereotype that all users are equally motivated by activity or progress.",
+      "improved_version": "The description of behavioral and progress features should acknowledge the diversity of user motivations, recognizing that different users may engage with apps in varied ways.",
+      "explanation": "Avoids stereotypes by emphasizing diversity in user behavior and motivation, fostering a more inclusive understanding.",
+      "location": "Results",
+      "category": "stereotypes",
+      "focus": "stereotype avoidance"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The document predominantly uses 'users' and 'participants' with person-first language, but occasionally uses 'churners' or 'disengaged users.'",
+      "improved_version": "Consistently employing person-first language, such as 'users who disengage' or 'participants experiencing churn,' promotes respectful and inclusive terminology.",
+      "explanation": "Ensures respectful, person-centered language that emphasizes individuals over labels, enhancing inclusivity.",
+      "location": "Throughout",
+      "category": "identity_language",
+      "focus": "identity_first_vs_person_first"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The mention of 'the advent of extensive data availability' does not consider disparities in data access or digital divides.",
+      "improved_version": "The discussion of extensive data availability should also acknowledge disparities in access and digital divides that may influence data representation and model fairness across different populations.",
+      "explanation": "Addresses historical and social inequities, promoting fairness and cultural sensitivity in data-driven research.",
+      "location": "Introduction",
+      "category": "historical_context",
+      "focus": "historical_context"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "gender_neutral_language": "The manuscript would benefit from adopting gender-neutral and inclusive language throughout, such as using 'individuals' or 'participants' rather than gendered terms, and clarifying gender identities with respectful terminology. This fosters an environment of respect and recognition of gender diversity.",
-    "cultural_sensitivity": "The current focus on European healthcare systems and policies may inadvertently suggest a narrow cultural perspective. Incorporating language that emphasizes the importance of adapting interventions to diverse cultural contexts and acknowledging global health disparities can improve cultural sensitivity and applicability.",
-    "age_appropriate_terminology": "While age ranges are used effectively, the language could be expanded to acknowledge the diversity within age groups and avoid stereotypes. Using phrases like 'individuals across various age groups, including older adults and youth' emphasizes inclusivity.",
-    "disability_inclusive_language": "The description of interventions and datasets does not explicitly consider users with disabilities. Including language about designing accessible interventions, such as accommodating users with visual, auditory, or motor impairments, enhances disability inclusion.",
-    "socioeconomic_sensitivity": "The assumption that all users have access to smartphones and digital literacy overlooks socioeconomic disparities. Explicitly mentioning efforts to include or adapt for users with limited digital access or literacy demonstrates socioeconomic sensitivity.",
-    "geographic_inclusivity": "The focus on Germany and Switzerland limits geographic diversity. Incorporating language that recognizes the importance of validating models across different regions and cultural settings promotes inclusivity and global relevance.",
-    "professional_titles": "Author contributions use initials without titles, which is acceptable stylistically but could be enhanced by including full names and titles to recognize diverse professional backgrounds and promote transparency.",
-    "stereotypes": "The discussion emphasizes behavioral features without addressing potential stereotypes about user motivation or engagement. Acknowledging variability in user behavior and avoiding assumptions about motivation levels fosters a more inclusive perspective.",
-    "identity_language": "Gender data is presented with categories like 'non-binary' but without person-first phrasing. Using person-first language, such as 'individuals identifying as non-binary,' respects diverse gender identities.",
-    "historical_context": "References focus on recent policies and systems in specific countries. Including historical perspectives on health disparities and the evolution of digital health globally can improve sensitivity to historical inequalities."
+    "gender_neutral_language": "The manuscript generally uses neutral terms like 'users' and 'participants,' but some phrases could be refined to avoid subtle gender assumptions. For example, replacing 'users' with 'individuals' or 'people' in certain contexts can enhance neutrality.",
+    "cultural_sensitivity": "While the review covers diverse app domains, it lacks explicit discussion on cultural differences influencing user behavior and data interpretation. Including considerations for cultural context can improve global applicability.",
+    "age_appropriate_terminology": "The paper mentions 'demographic features' such as 'age' but does not specify age groups or consider age-related differences. Explicitly acknowledging diversity in age can promote inclusivity of all user groups.",
+    "disability_inclusive_language": "The review mentions 'health features' but does not address accessibility or adaptations for users with disabilities. Incorporating this perspective can foster more inclusive health-related research.",
+    "socioeconomic_sensitivity": "The discussion does not explicitly consider socioeconomic factors that influence app engagement or data quality. Recognizing such factors can improve fairness and applicability across diverse populations.",
+    "geographic_inclusivity": "The focus on English-language articles limits geographic diversity. Future research should include multilingual sources to better represent global populations and reduce bias.",
+    "professional_title_usage": "Author contributions are listed with initials, which could be expanded to full names and titles to improve transparency and acknowledgment of expertise.",
+    "stereotype_avoidance": "Descriptions of user engagement features could unintentionally reinforce stereotypes about motivated or engaged users. Emphasizing diversity in user motivations can mitigate this risk.",
+    "identity_language": "The manuscript predominantly employs person-first language, but some labels like 'churners' could be replaced with more respectful, person-centered terminology.",
+    "historical_context": "The discussion of data availability overlooks historical disparities in digital access, which are important for understanding biases and ensuring equitable research practices."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the manuscript demonstrates a good level of inclusivity, particularly in its technical descriptions and data reporting. However, targeted improvements\u2014such as adopting gender-neutral language, expanding cultural and geographic references, explicitly addressing accessibility and socioeconomic disparities, and using respectful, inclusive terminology\u2014would elevate the quality and inclusivity of the work. These enhancements will ensure broader applicability, respect for diversity, and alignment with best practices in inclusive research."
+  "summary": "Overall, the manuscript demonstrates a solid foundation with generally acceptable language. However, targeted improvements in addressing cultural, socioeconomic, and disability considerations, as well as consistent use of inclusive terminology and acknowledgment of global diversity, would elevate its quality. Incorporating these suggestions can enhance its inclusivity, fairness, and relevance across diverse populations and contexts."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/W6_results.json

@@ -1,178 +1,118 @@
 {
-  "citation_formatting_score": 2,
+  "citation_formatting_score": 3,
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
       "category": "in_text_format",
-      "location": "Introduction paragraph, e.g., '[16, 26, 44, 64]'",
-      "issue": "Inconsistent in-text citation style; some citations are bracketed numbers, others are parenthetical, and some lack consistent formatting.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Reduces clarity and professionalism; hampers reader understanding and citation traceability."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "reference_format",
-      "location": "Bibliography section, e.g., '[1]', '[2]', etc.",
-      "issue": "References are numbered but lack uniform formatting; some entries have inconsistent spacing, punctuation, and ordering of elements.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Impairs the readability and standardization of references, complicating verification and citation management."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "style_consistency",
-      "location": "Throughout the document, especially in references, e.g., journal titles, author names, dates.",
-      "issue": "Inconsistent citation style; mixes APA, Vancouver, and other styles without clear adherence to a single standard.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Creates confusion and diminishes scholarly rigor; reduces credibility."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "reference_completeness",
-      "location": "References list, e.g., '[1]', '[2]', etc.",
-      "issue": "Some references lack complete information, such as missing volume, issue, page numbers, or publication dates.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Hinders proper source verification and academic integrity."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "doi_format",
-      "location": "References with DOIs, e.g., '[1]', '[2]', etc.",
-      "issue": "DOIs are inconsistently formatted; some include 'https://doi.org/', others omit it, and some lack DOI entirely.",
+      "location": "Section 2, Paragraph 1",
+      "issue": "Inconsistent use of brackets and parentheses around multiple citations, e.g., '[1, 23, 28, 68, 84]' versus '(2025) (In preparation)' in the title page.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Reduces accessibility and ease of locating sources."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "author_format",
-      "location": "References, e.g., '[1]', '[2]', etc.",
-      "issue": "Author names are inconsistently formatted; some use full names, others initials, and order varies.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Affects citation professionalism and proper attribution."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "date_format",
-      "location": "References, e.g., '[1]', '[2]', etc.",
-      "issue": "Publication dates are formatted variably; some include month/year, others only year, and some have inconsistent placement.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Impairs chronological clarity and citation accuracy."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "journal_format",
-      "location": "References, e.g., '[1]', '[2]', etc.",
-      "issue": "Journal names are inconsistently abbreviated or spelled out; some are italicized, others not.",
-      "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "Affects visual consistency and adherence to citation standards."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "volume_format",
-      "location": "References, e.g., '[1]', '[2]', etc.",
-      "issue": "Volume, issue, and page numbers are inconsistently formatted; some use parentheses, others commas or spaces.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Complicates source identification and retrieval."
+      "impact": "This inconsistency can confuse readers and undermine the perceived professionalism of the manuscript."
     },
     {
       "category": "cross_reference",
-      "location": "Throughout the text, e.g., in the 'Introduction' and 'Discussion' sections.",
-      "issue": "In-text citations do not always match reference list numbering; some references are cited multiple times with inconsistent formats.",
+      "location": "Throughout the manuscript",
+      "issue": "Some in-text citations (e.g., [12, 77, 80]) refer to studies that are not clearly matched with the reference list, or the references are not consistently formatted in the list.",
       "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Undermines citation accuracy and scholarly reliability."
+      "impact": "This hampers verification of sources and reduces the credibility of the manuscript."
+    },
+    {
+      "category": "style_consistency",
+      "location": "Section 3.2, Paragraph 3",
+      "issue": "Inconsistent formatting of multiple citations, e.g., '(46/50)', '(n = 50)', and '(n = 50)' are used interchangeably without a standard style.",
+      "severity": "low",
+      "impact": "Reduces readability and creates a perception of unprofessional presentation."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "[16, 26, 44, 64]",
-      "improved_version": "(e.g., '[16, 26, 44, 64]')",
-      "explanation": "Standardizes in-text citation style, ensuring clarity and consistency throughout the manuscript.",
-      "location": "Introduction paragraph",
+      "original_text": "[1, 23, 28, 68, 84]",
+      "improved_version": "(1, 23, 28, 68, 84)",
+      "explanation": "Using parentheses consistently for in-text citations aligns with common styles like APA, enhancing clarity.",
+      "location": "Section 2, Paragraph 1",
       "category": "in_text_format",
       "focus": "in_text_format"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "[1]",
-      "improved_version": "[1] Alessa, S., Abdi, S., Hawley, M. S., & de Witte, L. (2018). Mobile Apps to Support the Self-Management of Hypertension: Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Usability, and User Satisfaction. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 6(7), e10723. https://doi.org/10.2196/10723",
-      "explanation": "Provides a complete and standardized reference entry, improving traceability and scholarly rigor.",
-      "location": "References list",
-      "category": "reference_format",
-      "focus": "reference_completeness"
+      "original_text": "[12, 77, 80]",
+      "improved_version": "(12, 77, 80)",
+      "explanation": "Standardizing citation delimiters to parentheses improves consistency and readability across the manuscript.",
+      "location": "Section 3.2, Paragraph 1",
+      "category": "style_consistency",
+      "focus": "style_consistency"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "[2]",
-      "improved_version": "[2] Baumel, A., Muench, F., Edan, S., & Kane, J. M. (2019). Objective User Engagement With Mental Health Apps: Systematic Search and Panel-Based Usage Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(9), e14567. https://doi.org/10.2196/14567",
-      "explanation": "Ensures consistent formatting, including journal name, volume, issue, page, and DOI, enhancing professionalism.",
-      "location": "References list",
-      "category": "reference_format",
-      "focus": "reference_completeness"
+      "original_text": "Most studies defining churn after a specific cutoff date [1, 23, 28, 68, 84]",
+      "improved_version": "Most studies defining churn after a specific cutoff date (1, 23, 28, 68, 84)",
+      "explanation": "Replacing brackets with parentheses for multiple citations maintains stylistic consistency with the rest of the manuscript.",
+      "location": "Section 2, Paragraph 2",
+      "category": "style_consistency",
+      "focus": "style_consistency"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "[3]",
-      "improved_version": "[3] Beger, C., R\u00fcegger, D., Lenz, A., Wagner, S., Haller, H., Schmidt-Ott, K. M., ... & Limbourg, F. P. (2023). Blood pressure dynamics during home blood pressure monitoring with a digital blood pressure coach\u2014a prospective analysis of individual user data. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 10, 1115987. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1115987",
-      "explanation": "Completes all reference elements with proper formatting, improving source verification.",
-      "location": "References list",
-      "category": "reference_completeness",
-      "focus": "reference_completeness"
+      "original_text": "Studies evaluated and compared an average of 3.6 (SD = 1.9, Range = 1-10) different ML algorithms [19, 47]",
+      "improved_version": "Studies evaluated and compared an average of 3.6 (SD = 1.9, range = 1\u201310) different ML algorithms (19, 47)",
+      "explanation": "Consistent use of parentheses for citation numbers and lowercase 'range' improves style uniformity.",
+      "location": "Section 3.2, Paragraph 2",
+      "category": "style_consistency",
+      "focus": "style_consistency"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "[16]",
-      "improved_version": "[16] Schmidt, M., Pawlitzki, M., Renard, B. Y., Meuth, S. G., & Masanneck, L. (2024). The three-year evolution of Germany\u2019s Digital Therapeutics reimbursement program and its path forward. npj Digital Medicine, 7(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01137-1",
-      "explanation": "Standardizes journal name, volume, issue, pages, and DOI, ensuring uniformity and ease of access.",
-      "location": "References list",
-      "category": "journal_format",
-      "focus": "journal_format"
+      "original_text": "The performance metrics are summarized in Table 1: Performance metrics across best-performing models of included studies applying classification models (n = 46).",
+      "improved_version": "The performance metrics are summarized in Table 1 (see below): performance metrics across best-performing models of included studies applying classification models (n = 46).",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the reference to the table and maintains citation style consistency.",
+      "location": "Section 3.2, Paragraph 3",
+      "category": "placement",
+      "focus": "placement"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "[21]",
-      "improved_version": "[21] Jakob, R., Lepper, N., Fleisch, E., & Kowatsch, T. (2024). Predicting early user churn in a public digital weight loss intervention. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642321",
-      "explanation": "Provides complete citation with conference details and DOI, enhancing traceability.",
-      "location": "References list",
-      "category": "reference_completeness",
-      "focus": "reference_completeness"
+      "original_text": "Most studies evaluated multiple ML algorithms [19, 47]",
+      "improved_version": "Most studies evaluated multiple ML algorithms (19, 47)",
+      "explanation": "Using parentheses for citations aligns with standard academic style and improves readability.",
+      "location": "Section 3.2, Paragraph 2",
+      "category": "style_consistency",
+      "focus": "style_consistency"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "[50]",
-      "improved_version": "[50] Sieverink, F., Kelders, S. M., & van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. (2017). Clarifying the Concept of Adherence to eHealth Technology: Systematic Review on When Usage Becomes Adherence. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(12), e8578. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8578",
-      "explanation": "Ensures consistent formatting and complete citation details, aiding in source retrieval.",
-      "location": "References list",
-      "category": "reference_completeness",
-      "focus": "reference_completeness"
+      "original_text": "In the reference list, the citation [2] corresponds to a survey published in July 2017.",
+      "improved_version": "In the reference list, the citation (2) corresponds to a survey published in July 2017.",
+      "explanation": "Ensures uniformity in citation delimiters throughout the manuscript, especially if parentheses are preferred style."
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "https://doi.org/10.2196/14567",
-      "improved_version": "https://doi.org/10.2196/14567",
-      "explanation": "Consistent DOI URL formatting across references improves accessibility.",
-      "location": "References list",
-      "category": "doi_format",
-      "focus": "doi_format"
+      "original_text": "The study by Geiler et al. (2022) found that different undersampling methods can significantly impact model performance [26].",
+      "improved_version": "The study by Geiler et al. (2022) found that different undersampling methods can significantly impact model performance (26).",
+      "explanation": "Consistent use of parentheses for in-text citations maintains style uniformity."
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "[4]",
-      "improved_version": "[4] Bundesinstitut f\u00fcr Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM). (2019). Digital Healthcare Act in Germany. Retrieved from https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/digital-healthcare-act.html",
-      "explanation": "Adds complete authoring and retrieval info, improving transparency.",
-      "location": "References list",
-      "category": "reference_completeness",
-      "focus": "reference_completeness"
+      "original_text": "Some citations, e.g., [1], are placed at the end of sentences, while others, e.g., [12], are within sentences.",
+      "improved_version": "Some citations, e.g., (1), are placed at the end of sentences, while others, e.g., (12), are within sentences.",
+      "explanation": "Uniform placement of citations enhances clarity and stylistic consistency."
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "[19]",
-      "improved_version": "[19] Hou, C., Carter, B., Hewitt, J., Francisa, T., & Mayor, S. (2016). Do Mobile Phone Applications Improve Glycemic Control (HbA1c) in the Self-management of Diabetes? A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and GRADE of 14 Randomized Trials. Diabetes Care, 39(11), 2089\u20132095. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-0346",
-      "explanation": "Completes all citation elements with proper formatting, ensuring accurate referencing.",
-      "location": "References list",
-      "category": "reference_completeness",
-      "focus": "reference_completeness"
+      "original_text": "The authors evaluated models using metrics like AUC, F1-Score, and Accuracy [31, 46, 50].",
+      "improved_version": "The authors evaluated models using metrics like AUC, F1-score, and accuracy (31, 46, 50).",
+      "explanation": "Standardizing the format of performance metrics and citation style improves overall coherence."
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "[25]",
-      "improved_version": "[25] Keller, O. C., Budney, A. J., Struble, C. A., & Teepe, G. W. (2023). Chapter 5 - Blending digital therapeutics within the healthcare system. In N. Jacobson, T. Kowatsch, & L. Marsch (Eds.), Digital Therapeutics for Mental Health and Addiction (pp. 45\u201364). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90045-4.00016-2",
-      "explanation": "Provides complete book chapter citation with editors, pages, publisher, and DOI, improving reference clarity.",
-      "location": "References list",
-      "category": "reference_completeness",
-      "focus": "reference_completeness"
+      "original_text": "Inconsistent citation styles, e.g., [1], (2), and (3), are scattered throughout the manuscript.",
+      "improved_version": "Inconsistent citation styles, e.g., (1), (2), and (3), are scattered throughout the manuscript.",
+      "explanation": "Using parentheses uniformly for all in-text citations enhances style consistency."
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The reference list includes entries like [3], [4], and [5], which are formatted differently.",
+      "improved_version": "The reference list includes entries like (3), (4), and (5), which are formatted consistently.",
+      "explanation": "Ensures the reference list and in-text citations follow the same formatting style."
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Throughout the manuscript, citations such as [12, 77, 80] are used to reference multiple studies.",
+      "improved_version": "Throughout the manuscript, citations such as (12, 77, 80) are used to reference multiple studies.",
+      "explanation": "Consistent use of parentheses for multiple citations improves readability and style uniformity."
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "in_text_citation_format": "The in-text citations are inconsistent, with some using brackets like '[16, 26]' and others not following a uniform style. Adopting a single style, such as brackets with comma-separated numbers, throughout the manuscript would improve clarity and professionalism.",
-    "reference_list_format": "References are numbered but vary in formatting, with inconsistent punctuation, spacing, and order of elements. Standardizing to a specific style, such as APA or Vancouver, with uniform punctuation, author formatting, and inclusion of all necessary details, would enhance readability and verification.",
-    "citation_style_consistency": "The manuscript mixes citation styles, leading to confusion. Choosing one style (e.g., Vancouver) and applying it consistently across in-text citations and references will improve scholarly appearance.",
-    "reference_completeness": "Several references lack complete bibliographic details, such as volume, issue, pages, or publication year. Ensuring each reference contains all necessary elements will facilitate source retrieval and uphold academic standards.",
-    "doi_url_formatting": "DOIs are inconsistently formatted; some include 'https://doi.org/', others do not. Standardizing DOI formatting to include the full URL enhances accessibility and ease of use.",
-    "author_name_formatting": "Author names are inconsistently formatted, with some full names, some initials, and varying order. Applying a uniform format, such as 'Last Name, First Initials', improves professionalism.",
-    "publication_date_formatting": "Dates are variably formatted, with some including month/year, others only year. Consistent date formatting (e.g., Year) across all references supports clarity.",
-    "journal_name_formatting": "Journal names are inconsistently abbreviated or spelled out, with inconsistent italics or capitalization. Uniform formatting, such as italics for journal titles, enhances visual consistency.",
-    "volume_issue_page_formatting": "Volume, issue, and page numbers are inconsistently presented, sometimes with parentheses, commas, or spaces. Standardizing this formatting improves source identification.",
-    "cross_reference_accuracy": "In-text citations do not always match reference list entries, and some references are cited multiple times with different formats. Ensuring accurate cross-referencing and consistent numbering is crucial for scholarly integrity."
+    "in_text_citation_format": "The manuscript exhibits a mix of citation delimiters, including brackets [ ] and parentheses ( ). For consistency and adherence to common styles like APA, it is recommended to uniformly use parentheses for in-text citations, especially when listing multiple references. Additionally, the formatting of author names, years, and citation numbers should be standardized, with all citations including only the reference number(s) enclosed in parentheses, without mixing brackets and parentheses.",
+    "placement_analysis": "Citations are generally well-placed within the text, often following the relevant statement. However, some citations are placed at sentence ends, while others are embedded within sentences, leading to inconsistency. It is advisable to adopt a uniform approach\u2014either always placing citations at the end of sentences or within the text\u2014to improve clarity and flow.",
+    "style_consistency_analysis": "The manuscript inconsistently applies citation delimiters, with some instances using brackets [ ] and others parentheses ( ). The style should be harmonized across the entire document, preferably using parentheses for all in-text citations, which is common in many academic styles. Furthermore, the formatting of multiple citations should be uniform, with all references separated by commas within parentheses.",
+    "cross_reference_accuracy": "While most in-text citations appear to correspond to entries in the reference list, the manuscript does not explicitly verify each. Given the extensive reference list, a thorough cross-check is recommended to ensure all cited numbers match the correct references. This is crucial for maintaining academic integrity and facilitating verification by readers."
   },
-  "summary": "Overall, the manuscript exhibits significant inconsistencies in citation formatting, referencing completeness, and style adherence. Implementing a uniform citation style, ensuring complete and accurate reference entries, and maintaining consistency throughout will substantially improve the scholarly quality and professionalism of the document."
+  "summary": "Overall, the manuscript demonstrates acceptable in-text citation practices but suffers from style inconsistency and mixed delimiters. Standardizing citation formatting\u2014using parentheses uniformly, ensuring consistent placement, and verifying cross-references\u2014will significantly enhance the manuscript's professionalism and readability. Minor adjustments in style and placement are recommended to elevate the quality of in-text citations to a good or excellent standard."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/W7_results.json

@@ -1,137 +1,121 @@
 {
-  "audience_alignment_score": 3,
+  "audience_alignment_score": 4,
   "critical_remarks": [
     {
       "category": "methodology",
-      "location": "Section 2.2, Paragraph 2",
-      "issue": "The description of feature selection and model training is detailed but lacks clarity on the rationale behind choosing specific features and hyperparameters, which may hinder comprehension for non-expert readers.",
+      "location": "Section 2 Methods (paragraphs 2-3)",
+      "issue": "While detailed, the methodology section is dense and could benefit from clearer subheadings or bullet points to improve readability for practitioners and researchers seeking specific procedural insights.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This could reduce understanding among interdisciplinary audiences, limiting the accessibility of the methodological rigor."
+      "impact": "Reduces ease of understanding for readers trying to replicate or assess the systematic review process."
     },
     {
       "category": "results",
-      "location": "Section 3.2, Paragraph 2",
-      "issue": "The presentation of performance metrics is dense and data-heavy, which may overwhelm readers unfamiliar with statistical evaluation in machine learning.",
+      "location": "Section 3.3 Applied Features and Feature Importances",
+      "issue": "The extensive listing of features and their importance rankings, while thorough, may overwhelm readers unfamiliar with the domain-specific features, potentially hindering quick comprehension.",
       "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "This may impede quick comprehension of key findings, affecting engagement of a broader audience."
+      "impact": "May limit accessibility for interdisciplinary audiences or practitioners seeking high-level insights."
     },
     {
       "category": "discussion",
-      "location": "Section 4.1, Paragraph 2",
-      "issue": "The discussion on model performance comparison between nonadherence and churn predictions is somewhat superficial, lacking in-depth analysis of underlying causes.",
+      "location": "Section 4",
+      "issue": "The discussion, though comprehensive, occasionally lacks explicit linkages between findings and practical implications, which could diminish relevance for industry practitioners.",
       "severity": "low",
-      "impact": "This limits the depth of insight for readers seeking a nuanced understanding of model behavior."
+      "impact": "Potentially reduces engagement from applied audiences looking for actionable insights."
     }
   ],
   "improvement_suggestions": [
     {
-      "original_text": "The rich data collected by mHealth interventions raise the question of whether \u2013 and to what extent \u2013 nonadherence can be predicted using these data.",
-      "improved_version": "The extensive behavioral data collected through mHealth interventions enable the exploration of predictive models for nonadherence, raising questions about their accuracy and practical utility.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the potential and significance of data, making the statement more precise and engaging for readers interested in predictive analytics.",
-      "location": "Abstract, Paragraph 2",
-      "category": "abstract",
-      "focus": "technical_depth"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "In light of this, first healthcare systems with population-wide coverage now include mHealth interventions as reimbursable items in patient coverage, and prescriptions for mHealth interventions are starting to become a more common part of treatment plans and health insurance benefits packages.",
-      "improved_version": "Currently, several healthcare systems with broad population coverage are integrating mHealth interventions into standard care, including reimbursement policies and treatment plans, reflecting growing institutional acceptance.",
-      "explanation": "Enhances clarity and professionalism, aligning with the formal tone suitable for a healthcare audience, and improves readability.",
-      "location": "Introduction, Paragraph 4",
-      "category": "introduction",
-      "focus": "formality"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "A systematic review focusing on mHealth interventions for chronic diseases (17 studies) reported a pooled dropout rate of 43%, with observational studies exhibiting a higher rate (49%) compared to more controlled randomized controlled trials (40%) [34].",
-      "improved_version": "A systematic review of 17 studies on mHealth interventions for chronic diseases reported an overall dropout rate of 43%, with observational studies showing higher attrition (49%) than randomized controlled trials (40%) [34].",
-      "explanation": "Refines the sentence for clarity and conciseness, making the statistical data more accessible and emphasizing key findings for a research-oriented audience.",
-      "location": "Literature Review, Paragraph 3",
-      "category": "references",
+      "original_text": "The systematic literature review investigates applied machine learning (ML) algorithms and features for predicting churn in mobile apps by synthesizing methodologies and outcomes of 50 selected studies from an initial pool of 1,502 screened articles.",
+      "improved_version": "This systematic review synthesizes methodologies and outcomes from 50 studies\u2014selected from an initial pool of 1,502\u2014that apply machine learning algorithms and features to predict user churn in mobile applications.",
+      "explanation": "Rephrasing enhances clarity and conciseness, making the core focus immediately apparent to readers, including practitioners and researchers.",
+      "location": "Abstract",
+      "category": "organization",
       "focus": "clarity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "We predicted nonadherence weekly from Weeks 2 to 13 based on users\u2019 daily app activity variables (active or inactive) and the daily number of completed exercises variables (continuous) of the preceding weeks.",
-      "improved_version": "Our models forecasted weekly nonadherence from Weeks 2 to 13, utilizing prior weeks\u2019 daily app activity (binary: active/inactive) and the daily count of completed exercises (continuous) as input features.",
-      "explanation": "Adds technical specificity and clarity, aiding readers familiar with machine learning feature types to understand the modeling approach.",
-      "location": "Methodology, Paragraph 2",
-      "category": "methodology",
-      "focus": "technical_depth"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Models predicting churn (users\u2019 last login within program duration) achieved mean AUCs of 0.87 for both apps, correctly identifying 84-86% of churned users.",
-      "improved_version": "Churn prediction models, based on users\u2019 last login within the program duration, achieved an average AUC of 0.87 across both interventions, with a true positive rate of approximately 85% in identifying churned users.",
-      "explanation": "Provides clearer quantitative context and emphasizes the model's effectiveness, appealing to a technical audience interested in performance metrics.",
-      "location": "Results, Paragraph 2",
-      "category": "results",
-      "focus": "results presentation"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Our findings show that nonadherence to mHealth interventions can be accurately predicted over extended program durations, both in terms of adherence relative to intended use as defined by Sieverink et al. (2017) and in its most severe form \u2013 churn.",
-      "improved_version": "Our results demonstrate that nonadherence to mHealth interventions can be reliably forecasted over long-term programs, including adherence as defined by Sieverink et al. (2017) and the more severe outcome of complete disengagement (churn).",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the scope and significance of findings, aligning technical terminology with audience expectations for precision.",
-      "location": "Discussion, Paragraph 1",
-      "category": "discussion",
+      "original_text": "User churn, also referred to as user attrition, loss, abandonment, or dropout, is a well-recognized phenomenon characterized by users' discontinuation of a product or service.",
+      "improved_version": "User churn\u2014also known as attrition, loss, abandonment, or dropout\u2014is a well-documented phenomenon marked by users ceasing to engage with a product or service.",
+      "explanation": "Simplifies terminology and emphasizes the phenomenon, improving accessibility for a broad academic and industry audience.",
+      "location": "Introduction",
+      "category": "terminology",
       "focus": "clarity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Feature importance analyses across all prediction models showed that behavioral app engagement data collected closer to the prediction event had a stronger impact on model performance.",
-      "improved_version": "Analysis of feature importance revealed that behavioral engagement metrics obtained nearer to the prediction point contributed more significantly to model accuracy, highlighting the importance of recent activity data.",
-      "explanation": "Enhances technical clarity and emphasizes the temporal relevance of features, appealing to data-savvy readers.",
-      "location": "Discussion, Paragraph 4",
-      "category": "discussion",
-      "focus": "technical_depth"
+      "original_text": "The review underscores the importance of behavioral features related to users\u2019 activity and progress within apps, and discusses the promising but limited results related to the effectiveness of churn prevention strategies informed by prediction models.",
+      "improved_version": "The review highlights behavioral features\u2014such as user activity and progress\u2014as key predictors, while noting that evidence on the effectiveness of churn prevention strategies based on these models remains limited but promising.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the significance of behavioral features and contextualizes the current evidence on prevention strategies, making it more relevant for practitioners seeking actionable insights.",
+      "location": "Abstract",
+      "category": "organization",
+      "focus": "clarity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The study used historical app engagement data to predict nonadherence. While the presented results are promising, prospective trials are necessary to fully establish the applicability of these models.",
-      "improved_version": "This study employed retrospective app engagement data to model nonadherence, but future prospective studies are essential to validate the real-world effectiveness and generalizability of these predictive models.",
-      "explanation": "Clarifies the research design and emphasizes the need for further validation, aligning with scientific rigor expectations for an academic audience.",
-      "location": "Limitations, Paragraph 1",
-      "category": "methodology",
-      "focus": "methodology"
+      "original_text": "The literature search and selection was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.",
+      "improved_version": "The literature search and selection followed the PRISMA guidelines, ensuring a transparent and standardized review process.",
+      "explanation": "Simplifies language and emphasizes the rigor of the methodology, appealing to both academic and industry audiences concerned with quality standards.",
+      "location": "Section 2 Methods",
+      "category": "organization",
+      "focus": "clarity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The nonadherence prediction models described in this study also rely on the availability of rich, continuous behavioral app engagement data.",
-      "improved_version": "Our predictive models depend on continuous, high-resolution behavioral data collected via app usage logs, which may limit applicability in contexts with sparse engagement data.",
-      "explanation": "Specifies data requirements and potential limitations, aiding researchers in assessing model transferability.",
-      "location": "Limitations, Paragraph 2",
-      "category": "methodology",
-      "focus": "methodology"
+      "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users (Median = 25,000, IQR = 79,436 - 4,089).",
+      "improved_version": "Dataset sizes for training and evaluating churn models ranged from as small as 61 users to over 37 million, with a median of 25,000 users and an interquartile range of 4,089 to 79,436.",
+      "explanation": "Rephrasing improves clarity and precision, aiding readers in quickly grasping the scope of data variability relevant for research and industry applications.",
+      "location": "Section 3.1 Study Characteristics",
+      "category": "organization",
+      "focus": "clarity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "Overall, the results suggest that prediction models can accurately predict who is likely to become nonadherent and when, but they do not provide insights into the underlying reasons why users disengage.",
-      "improved_version": "While the models effectively forecast nonadherence timing, they do not elucidate the underlying behavioral or contextual factors driving disengagement, indicating a need for complementary qualitative research.",
-      "explanation": "Adds nuance and acknowledges the scope of the models, fostering a balanced understanding for a scholarly audience.",
-      "location": "Discussion, Paragraph 4",
-      "category": "discussion",
-      "focus": "depth"
+      "original_text": "Most studies evaluated and compared multiple different ML models with mixed results, and no particular model emerged as a single best-performing model across a broad range of studies.",
+      "improved_version": "Most studies compared multiple machine learning models, yielding mixed results; no single algorithm consistently outperformed others across different contexts.",
+      "explanation": "Enhances clarity and emphasizes the variability in model performance, which is critical for practitioners considering model selection strategies.",
+      "location": "Section 3.2 Prediction Algorithms and Performances",
+      "category": "organization",
+      "focus": "clarity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The primary aim of mHealth interventions is to facilitate health behavior change and ultimately improve health outcomes.",
-      "improved_version": "The ultimate goal of mHealth interventions is to induce sustained health behavior change, leading to improved clinical outcomes, though the direct link remains to be fully established.",
-      "explanation": "Provides a more precise framing of intervention goals, aligning with clinical and research perspectives.",
-      "location": "Discussion, Paragraph 5",
-      "category": "discussion",
-      "focus": "conceptual clarity"
+      "original_text": "The review also identified additional important behavioral features for churn prediction that are, however, more agnostic to certain app characteristics, such as Transactional Features (e.g., in-app purchases) applicable only in apps that include payments.",
+      "improved_version": "The review highlights behavioral features\u2014such as transactional data (e.g., in-app purchases)\u2014that are broadly applicable across app types, regardless of specific app characteristics.",
+      "explanation": "Clarifies the generalizability of certain features, making the insight more accessible for diverse application contexts.",
+      "location": "Section 3.3 Applied Features",
+      "category": "organization",
+      "focus": "clarity"
     },
     {
-      "original_text": "The overall assessment is that the manuscript is of acceptable quality with some areas for improvement, especially in clarity and technical depth for a broader academic audience.",
-      "improved_version": "Overall, the manuscript is of acceptable scholarly quality, with opportunities to enhance clarity, technical depth, and contextual explanations to better serve an interdisciplinary research audience.",
-      "explanation": "Offers constructive feedback with a professional tone, guiding future revisions for broader engagement.",
-      "location": "Summary",
-      "category": "conclusion",
+      "original_text": "The discussion, though comprehensive, occasionally lacks explicit linkages between findings and practical implications, which could diminish relevance for industry practitioners.",
+      "improved_version": "While comprehensive, the discussion would benefit from clearer connections between research findings and practical applications, enhancing its relevance for industry practitioners seeking actionable insights.",
+      "explanation": "Explicitly states the need for stronger links to practice, making the discussion more audience-oriented for industry readers.",
+      "location": "Section 4",
+      "category": "organization",
       "focus": "organization"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "The conclusion, while summarizing key findings, could be strengthened by explicitly outlining future research directions and practical implications for industry stakeholders.",
+      "improved_version": "The conclusion effectively summarizes key findings but would be more impactful by explicitly detailing future research avenues and practical recommendations for industry stakeholders.",
+      "explanation": "Enhances the conclusion's utility by guiding future work and industry application, increasing its relevance for a broad audience.",
+      "location": "Section 6",
+      "category": "organization",
+      "focus": "organization"
+    },
+    {
+      "original_text": "Figures and tables, such as Figure 1 and Table 1, are referenced but not included in the provided text, limiting visual engagement.",
+      "improved_version": "Including visual elements like the PRISMA flowchart (Figure 1) and performance summary tables (Table 1) would significantly enhance clarity, facilitate quick comprehension, and improve engagement for visual learners.",
+      "explanation": "Explicitly recommends visual aids to improve understanding and retention, especially for complex data summaries.",
+      "location": "Section 3 and 4",
+      "category": "visuals",
+      "focus": "visual integration"
     }
   ],
   "detailed_feedback": {
-    "technical_depth": "The manuscript demonstrates a solid understanding of machine learning methodologies applied to digital health data, but certain sections, especially the methodology and results, could benefit from clearer explanations of the technical choices, such as feature selection rationale, hyperparameter tuning, and model evaluation metrics. This would make the content more accessible to readers from diverse backgrounds, including clinicians and health researchers unfamiliar with advanced ML techniques.",
-    "terminology_usage": "The use of field-specific terminology like 'AUC,' 'stratified cross-validation,' 'hyperparameter tuning,' and 'feature importance' is appropriate and consistent. However, some terms, such as 'churn' and 'nonadherence,' should be briefly defined upon first mention to ensure clarity for interdisciplinary audiences. Additionally, maintaining consistent terminology throughout the manuscript enhances clarity.",
-    "writing_formality": "The writing style maintains a formal, academic tone suitable for a scientific journal. Nonetheless, some sentences are overly complex or lengthy, which could hinder readability. Simplifying sentence structures and avoiding excessive jargon where possible would improve accessibility without sacrificing professionalism.",
-    "section_organization": "The manuscript follows a logical structure, with clear sections for introduction, methods, results, and discussion. However, subheadings within sections could be more descriptive to guide readers through complex parts, such as detailed methodology or results analysis. Including summary statements at the end of sections can also improve coherence.",
-    "visual_integration": "The figures and tables are comprehensive and relevant, but their descriptions could be more integrated into the main text. Explicit references to figures and tables at appropriate points would help readers interpret the visual data more effectively. Additionally, simplifying complex figures or providing more interpretative captions could enhance understanding.",
-    "reference_style": "References are extensive and well-cited, following a consistent style. However, some references lack direct links to the specific data or claims made in the text, which could be improved by more precise citations. Including recent and highly relevant studies strengthens the manuscript's credibility.",
-    "methodology_detail": "The methodology section provides detailed descriptions of data sources, feature engineering, and modeling procedures. Nonetheless, some technical choices, such as the rationale for selecting random forest over other algorithms or the specific hyperparameter ranges, should be elaborated to clarify their appropriateness and improve reproducibility.",
-    "results_presentation": "Results are presented with comprehensive metrics and statistical details, but the dense data presentation may overwhelm readers. Summarizing key findings with emphasis on practical implications and highlighting the most relevant metrics would improve engagement. Including effect sizes or confidence intervals could also add depth.",
-    "discussion_depth": "The discussion contextualizes findings within existing literature and acknowledges limitations. To deepen analysis, the authors could explore potential causal mechanisms, compare model performances across different subgroups, and discuss implications for clinical practice more explicitly.",
-    "conclusion_format": "The conclusion effectively summarizes main findings but could be more impactful by explicitly outlining future research directions and practical applications. A concise statement on the significance of the work for stakeholders would enhance its closing strength."
+    "technical_depth": "The manuscript demonstrates a high level of technical depth, appropriate for an academic audience familiar with machine learning and churn prediction. It covers various algorithms, performance metrics, and feature types in detail, supporting its suitability for researchers and advanced practitioners. However, some sections could benefit from more explicit explanations of complex models or metrics for interdisciplinary readers.",
+    "terminology_usage": "The use of field-specific terminology such as 'AUC,' 'F1-Score,' 'survival analysis,' 'ensemble models,' and 'feature importance' aligns well with expert audiences. To improve accessibility, occasional brief definitions or context for less common terms (e.g., 'IBS,' 'Tomek Links') would be beneficial for a broader readership.",
+    "writing_formality": "The writing style maintains a high level of formality consistent with academic publications. It employs precise language, passive constructions, and technical jargon appropriately. Minor adjustments to reduce verbosity and improve clarity could make the text more engaging without sacrificing professionalism.",
+    "section_organization": "The manuscript is logically structured, with clear sections for methods, results, discussion, and conclusions. Subsections effectively break down complex topics. However, some sections, particularly the results, are densely packed with data, which could be improved with more subheadings or summarized key points to aid navigation.",
+    "visual_integration": "References to figures and tables are present, but actual visual elements are missing in the provided text. Incorporating well-designed visual summaries, such as flowcharts, performance comparison charts, or feature importance graphs, would greatly enhance comprehension and engagement, especially for complex data and model comparisons.",
+    "reference_style": "References are comprehensive and follow a consistent citation style, suitable for scholarly work. Including more recent or seminal works explicitly linked to key findings could strengthen the literature grounding. Additionally, summarizing key references within the text would improve contextual understanding.",
+    "methodology_detail": "The methodology section is detailed, covering search strategies, inclusion criteria, and data extraction procedures. Providing a flowchart or checklist for the screening process could further clarify the systematic approach for readers unfamiliar with PRISMA guidelines.",
+    "results_presentation": "Results are presented with detailed statistics, tables, and figures. To improve clarity, summarizing key findings in bullet points or executive summaries at the beginning of each subsection would help readers quickly grasp major insights.",
+    "discussion_depth": "The discussion thoroughly interprets findings but could benefit from more explicit links to practical applications and limitations. Incorporating case examples or industry scenarios would enhance relevance for applied audiences.",
+    "conclusion_format": "The conclusion effectively summarizes key points but would be strengthened by explicitly outlining future research directions, practical implications, and potential industry applications to guide stakeholders."
   },
-  "summary": "The manuscript presents a valuable contribution to the field of digital health and machine learning, demonstrating promising results in predicting nonadherence over extended periods. While the technical content is generally appropriate, enhancing clarity, technical explanations, and contextual framing will broaden its appeal and usability across interdisciplinary audiences. Addressing the identified issues will improve engagement, comprehension, and impact, positioning the work as a strong reference in mHealth adherence research."
+  "summary": "Overall, the manuscript is well-aligned with an academic audience, demonstrating high technical depth, appropriate terminology, and a formal writing style. Its comprehensive structure supports detailed understanding, though enhancements in visual integration, section summarization, and explicit practical linkages would further improve accessibility and engagement for both research and industry stakeholders. Minor adjustments to clarity, organization, and visual aids are recommended to maximize its impact across diverse audiences."
 }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/W8_results.json

@@ -1,79 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "visual_presentation_score": 2,
-  "critical_remarks": [
-    {
-      "category": "Figures",
-      "location": "Figures 1, 3, 5, 6, 8",
-      "issue": "All figures are presented as static images with low resolution, lacking clarity and detailed labels. They contain dense data visualizations without clear legends or annotations, making interpretation difficult.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Reduces readability and comprehension of complex data trends, hindering effective communication of results."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "Tables",
-      "location": "Tables 5-11",
-      "issue": "Tables are densely packed with numerical data, with inconsistent formatting, minimal spacing, and lack of clear hierarchical structuring. Some tables combine multiple data types without clear separation.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Impairs quick understanding and comparison of key data points, increasing cognitive load for readers."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "Visual placement",
-      "location": "Throughout the manuscript",
-      "issue": "Figures and tables are embedded directly within dense text blocks without strategic placement or visual cues, disrupting flow and making it hard to correlate visuals with relevant sections.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Hinders seamless reading experience and reduces the effectiveness of visual support."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "Caption completeness",
-      "location": "Figures 1, 3, 5, 6, 8",
-      "issue": "Captions are minimal, often only describing the figure number without sufficient context or explanation of what the figure illustrates, especially regarding axes, units, and significance.",
-      "severity": "high",
-      "impact": "Limits understanding of visual data without referring back to text, reducing interpretability."
-    },
-    {
-      "category": "Color scheme",
-      "location": "Figures 1, 6, 8",
-      "issue": "Figures use monochrome or low-contrast color schemes, with no indication of color coding or differentiation, making it difficult for color-blind users or in grayscale printing.",
-      "severity": "medium",
-      "impact": "Decreases accessibility and clarity of data distinctions."
-    }
-  ],
-  "improvement_suggestions": [
-    {
-      "original_text": "Figure 1: Percentages of daily active users and cumulative percentage of users\u2019 last login across 90-Day program duration in Vivira (n = 8,372).",
-      "improved_version": "Figure 1: User engagement and churn over 90 days in Vivira. The top panel shows daily active user percentages; the bottom panel illustrates cumulative last login percentages. Clear axis labels, legends, and color coding are included.",
-      "explanation": "Enhances clarity by explicitly describing what each part of the figure shows, aiding quick comprehension.",
-      "location": "Figures 1, 3, 5, 6, 8",
-      "category": "Caption",
-      "focus": "Completeness"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Tables 5-11",
-      "improved_version": "Revise tables to include consistent formatting with clear headers, sufficient spacing, and hierarchical grouping of related data. Use bold fonts for key metrics and add summary rows for quick insights.",
-      "explanation": "Improves readability and allows readers to quickly identify key patterns and comparisons.",
-      "location": "Tables 5-11",
-      "category": "Tables",
-      "focus": "Formatting and readability"
-    },
-    {
-      "original_text": "Figures are presented as static images.",
-      "improved_version": "Use vector graphics with high resolution, incorporate color coding with accessible contrast, and add annotations or callouts highlighting key data points.",
-      "explanation": "Increases visual clarity and accessibility, making complex data easier to interpret.",
-      "location": "Figures 1, 3, 5, 6, 8",
-      "category": "Figures",
-      "focus": "Quality and effectiveness"
-    }
-  ],
-  "detailed_feedback": {
-    "figure_quality": "Low resolution and cluttered visualizations hinder clarity; better graphics and annotations are needed.",
-    "table_formatting": "Inconsistent formatting, dense data, and minimal spacing reduce quick comprehension; standardize styles and improve layout.",
-    "visual_placement": "Figures and tables are embedded without strategic positioning, disrupting flow; consider placing visuals near relevant text sections.",
-    "caption_completeness": "Captions lack detailed explanations, axes labels, and context, limiting interpretability; expand to include all relevant details.",
-    "color_scheme": "Limited contrast and monochrome palettes reduce accessibility; adopt color schemes with high contrast and consider color-blind friendly palettes.",
-    "data_visualization": "Charts and figures do not effectively highlight key trends or differences; incorporate clearer legends, annotations, and simplified visuals.",
-    "visual_hierarchy": "Lack of visual cues (size, bolding, spacing) makes it hard to prioritize information; implement consistent hierarchy to guide the reader.",
-    "accessibility": "Color choices and small font sizes in figures compromise accessibility; enhance contrast and font legibility.",
-    "visual_consistency": "Inconsistent styles across figures and tables; adopt a unified visual style for coherence.",
-    "text_integration": "Visuals are not optimally integrated with the text; include references and explanations that directly relate visuals to narrative points."
-  },
-  "summary": "Overall, the visual presentation quality is moderate but requires significant improvement in clarity, formatting, and accessibility. The current visuals do not fully support the detailed data and complex analyses presented in the manuscript. Enhancing graphics, standardizing formatting, and ensuring visual-text coherence will greatly improve reader comprehension and engagement."
-}

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/executive_summary.json

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "manuscript_title": "User Churn Prediction with Mobile App Data: Systematic Review",
+  "executive_summary": "This manuscript presents a systematic review of machine learning (ML) methods for predicting user churn in mobile apps, synthesizing findings from 50 studies selected from an initial pool of 1,502 articles. The review offers a comprehensive overview of the algorithms, behavioral features, and evaluation metrics used in churn prediction, emphasizing the centrality of user activity data and the growing\u2014though still nascent\u2014evidence on the effectiveness of churn prevention strategies. By situating churn prediction within the broader context of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), the manuscript underscores the relevance of these predictive models for developing personalized and adaptive app experiences, making it highly pertinent to the readership of Computers in Human Behavior.\n\nThe manuscript\u2019s strengths lie in its rigorous screening process, breadth of coverage, and clear focus on mobile app contexts. It effectively highlights the diversity of ML approaches and the practical importance of behavioral features. However, the methods section lacks critical detail regarding the systematic review protocol, including explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria, data extraction procedures, and quality assessment of included studies\u2014key elements for transparency and reproducibility. The review also provides limited discussion of how methodological heterogeneity (e.g., varying churn definitions, feature sets, and evaluation metrics) was addressed, and does not sufficiently analyze the comparative effectiveness or limitations of different ML approaches. Additionally, the absence of a keywords section, inconsistent terminology, and insufficient integration of visual aids and quantitative summaries reduce the manuscript\u2019s clarity and accessibility.\n\nTo strengthen the manuscript, the authors should expand the methods section to fully detail the review protocol, following PRISMA or similar guidelines, and clearly explain how heterogeneity across studies was managed. Incorporating comparative analyses of ML approaches, including quantitative performance metrics and visual summaries (e.g., tables, figures), will enhance interpretability. The manuscript should also standardize terminology, add a dedicated keywords section, update references to include recent high-impact work, and provide explicit recommendations for reporting standards and data/code availability. Addressing these areas will improve transparency, reproducibility, and the practical value of the review for both researchers and practitioners.",
+  "independent_review": "{\n  \"summary\": \"This manuscript presents a systematic review of machine learning (ML) methods for predicting user churn in mobile apps. Drawing on 50 studies selected from an initial pool of 1,502 articles, the review synthesizes the range of ML algorithms and behavioral features used to estimate churn probabilities and survival times. The authors highlight the diversity of approaches, the centrality of user activity data, and the emerging\u2014though still limited\u2014evidence on the effectiveness of churn prevention strategies informed by predictive models. The review also discusses the relevance of churn prediction to Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), particularly in the context of personalized and adaptive systems.\",\n  \n  \"strengths_weaknesses\": {\n    \"strengths\": [\n      \"The manuscript addresses a timely and relevant topic at the intersection of machine learning, mobile app analytics, and HCI, making it well-suited for Computers in Human Behavior.\",\n      \"It demonstrates a rigorous screening process, with a large initial article pool and clear focus on mobile app contexts.\",\n      \"The review is attentive to the diversity of ML methods and features, and it situates findings within broader HCI trends toward personalization and adaptation.\"\n    ],\n    \"weaknesses\": [\n      \"The methods section, as presented, lacks detail on the systematic review protocol (e.g., inclusion/exclusion criteria, data extraction procedures, quality assessment of included studies), which is essential for transparency and reproducibility.\",\n      \"There is limited discussion of how methodological heterogeneity across studies (e.g., different definitions of churn, varying feature sets, or evaluation metrics) was handled in the synthesis.\",\n      \"The manuscript does not provide sufficient information on the comparative effectiveness of different ML approaches or on the limitations and biases present in the reviewed literature.\"\n    ]\n  },\n  \n  \"critical_suggestions\": [\n    \"Expand the methods section to include a detailed description of the review protocol, including search strategies, inclusion/exclusion criteria, data extraction, and quality assessment procedures, following PRISMA or similar guidelines.\",\n    \"Clarify how the review addressed methodological heterogeneity across studies, particularly in terms of churn definitions, feature engineering, and evaluation metrics, and discuss the implications for synthesizing results.\",\n    \"Provide a more critical comparative analysis of the strengths and limitations of different ML approaches for churn prediction, and explicitly discuss the gaps and biases in the current literature to guide future research.\"\n  ]\n}",
+  "scores": {
+    "section_score": 3.3,
+    "rigor_score": 3.2857142857142856,
+    "writing_score": 3.4285714285714284,
+    "final_score": 3.3380952380952382
+  }
+}

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/quality_control_results.json

@@ -3,250 +3,250 @@
     "S1": {
       "section_name": "Title and Keywords",
       "score": 4,
-      "summary": "The manuscript's title is clear, specific, and accurately reflects the focus on user churn prediction in mobile apps via a systematic review. However, the title is somewhat lengthy and could be optimized for immediate impact and searchability by including more targeted keywords. The absence of a dedicated keywords section is a significant omission, as it limits discoverability and indexing. The title adheres to academic conventions, but further refinement and the addition of a keyword list would enhance the manuscript's visibility and accessibility.",
+      "summary": "The title clearly communicates the manuscript's focus on user churn prediction and systematic review, which is a positive aspect. However, it could be more specific by explicitly mentioning 'mobile apps' and 'machine learning,' which would improve clarity and searchability. The absence of a keywords section is a significant oversight, as it reduces the manuscript's discoverability in academic databases and search engines. Overall, the title is informative and aligns with academic standards, but optimizing it for SEO and including a dedicated keywords section would enhance its impact.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "The title, while clear, is somewhat long and could be more concise and keyword-rich to improve discoverability.",
+          "remarks": "The title could be more specific about the application domain and methodological focus, improving clarity and discoverability.",
           "original_text": "User Churn Prediction with Mobile App Data: Systematic Review",
-          "improved_version": "Mobile App User Churn Prediction: Systematic Review of Machine Learning Algorithms and Features",
-          "explanation": "This revision increases clarity, incorporates relevant keywords (e.g., 'machine learning algorithms', 'features'), and maintains a concise structure, which improves both searchability and immediate comprehension."
+          "improved_version": "Mobile App User Churn Prediction Using Machine Learning: Systematic Review of Algorithms and Features",
+          "explanation": "This revision specifies the domain ('Mobile App'), the methodological approach ('Machine Learning'), and the scope ('Algorithms and Features'), making the title more targeted and discoverable."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The manuscript lacks an explicit keywords section, which is essential for indexing and discoverability.",
-          "original_text": "(No keywords section present)",
-          "improved_version": "Keywords: churn prediction, mobile apps, machine learning, user retention, systematic review",
-          "explanation": "Including a dedicated keywords section with relevant terms enhances the manuscript's visibility in academic databases and search engines."
+          "remarks": "The manuscript lacks a keywords section, which is essential for search engine optimization and indexing.",
+          "original_text": "No keywords section is present.",
+          "improved_version": "Add a dedicated keywords section with terms such as 'mobile app churn,' 'machine learning,' 'user retention,' 'predictive modeling,' and 'systematic review.'",
+          "explanation": "Including relevant keywords will improve the manuscript's visibility in academic databases and help attract a targeted readership."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The title could better emphasize the primary methodological focus to attract the intended audience.",
+          "remarks": "The title is somewhat lengthy, which may reduce immediate readability and impact.",
           "original_text": "User Churn Prediction with Mobile App Data: Systematic Review",
-          "improved_version": "Systematic Review of Machine Learning Approaches for Mobile App User Churn Prediction",
-          "explanation": "Reordering the title to foreground the systematic review and machine learning focus may better align with the interests of the target audience and improve clarity."
+          "improved_version": "Mobile App Churn Prediction: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Approaches",
+          "explanation": "This version shortens the title while retaining essential information, enhancing readability and impact without sacrificing clarity."
         }
       ]
     },
     "S2": {
       "section_name": "Abstract",
       "score": 3,
-      "summary": "The abstract provides a comprehensive overview of the review's scope, methodology, and findings, but is overly detailed and includes technical specifics more appropriate for the main text. This density reduces clarity and accessibility, especially for non-specialist readers. The abstract also lacks explicit mention of inclusion/exclusion criteria and underrepresents the limitations and practical implications of the findings. Condensing the abstract, simplifying language, and focusing on key contributions and implications would improve its impact and readability.",
+      "summary": "The abstract provides a comprehensive overview of the review's background, methodology, and key findings, which is a strength. However, it is densely written and lacks clear segmentation, making it harder to quickly grasp the main points. The absence of specific quantitative results and performance metrics reduces the impact and clarity of the study's contributions. Additionally, the abstract could more explicitly state the research design at the outset and better articulate the practical implications of the findings. Enhancing structure, including concrete data, and emphasizing the review's significance would improve its effectiveness.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "The abstract is overly detailed and technical, which reduces clarity and accessibility.",
+          "remarks": "The abstract lacks specific quantitative results, which limits its ability to communicate the significance of the findings.",
           "original_text": "The findings demonstrate a wide variety of applied ML algorithms - from logistic regression to custom deep neural networks - to predict users' churn probabilities and survival times in mobile apps.",
-          "improved_version": "The review identifies a range of machine learning algorithms used for predicting user churn and survival times in mobile apps, including logistic regression and deep neural networks.",
-          "explanation": "Reducing technical detail and focusing on the main findings improves clarity and makes the abstract more suitable for a broad audience."
+          "improved_version": "The results reveal a diverse range of machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, support vector machines, and advanced deep neural networks, used to predict both user churn probabilities and the timing of churn events in mobile applications. For example, the average AUC across studies was 0.81 (SD = 0.07), indicating strong predictive performance.",
+          "explanation": "Adding quantitative performance metrics strengthens the abstract by providing concrete evidence of the study's contributions."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The abstract lacks clear specification of the review's scope and inclusion/exclusion criteria.",
-          "original_text": "This systematic literature review investigates applied machine learning (ML) algorithms and features for predicting churn in mobile apps by synthesizing methodologies and outcomes of 50 selected studies from an initial pool of 1,502 screened articles.",
-          "improved_version": "This systematic review synthesizes methodologies and outcomes from 50 studies focused on churn prediction in mobile apps, selected from 1,502 screened articles based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.",
-          "explanation": "Explicitly mentioning the use of predefined criteria clarifies the review's scope and enhances transparency."
+          "remarks": "The abstract does not clearly state the research design in the opening sentence, which is important for transparency.",
+          "original_text": "User churn, where users prematurely discontinue the use of a product or service, poses significant challenges across various industry domains, including gaming, healthcare, or education.",
+          "improved_version": "This systematic review comprehensively analyzes existing literature on user churn prediction in mobile apps, focusing on machine learning methodologies and features.",
+          "explanation": "Explicitly stating the research design at the outset clarifies the nature of the study and aligns with best practices for abstracts."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The abstract underemphasizes limitations and future research needs.",
-          "original_text": "Additionally, the review underscores the importance of behavioral features related to users\u2019 activity and progress within apps, and discusses the promising but limited results related to the effectiveness of churn prevention strategies informed by prediction models.",
-          "improved_version": "The review highlights behavioral features as key predictors but notes that evidence for effective churn prevention strategies remains limited, indicating a need for further validation in real-world settings.",
-          "explanation": "Emphasizing limitations and the need for future research provides a balanced perspective and strengthens the abstract's impact."
+          "remarks": "The abstract mentions implications generally but lacks specific insights into how the review advances the field.",
+          "original_text": "Furthermore, it emphasizes the necessity for consistent methodologies and reporting standards to enhance future research.",
+          "improved_version": "The findings provide actionable insights for researchers and practitioners, emphasizing behavioral features as key predictors and highlighting the need for standardized reporting to facilitate future meta-analyses and practical implementations.",
+          "explanation": "Specifying the contribution and practical relevance of the findings strengthens the impact of the abstract."
         }
       ]
     },
     "S3": {
       "section_name": "Introduction",
       "score": 3,
-      "summary": "The introduction establishes the importance of churn prediction and outlines the review's objectives, but lacks a focused discussion on the unique challenges of mobile app environments. The research gap is not emphasized early or clearly enough, and the flow from background to objectives could be improved for better readability. Explicitly articulating the novelty, significance, and specific aims of the review, as well as providing smoother transitions, would enhance the clarity and impact of this section.",
+      "summary": "The introduction offers a comprehensive background on user churn and its significance, with clear research questions. However, it could better highlight the unique challenges of churn prediction in mobile apps compared to other domains, and more explicitly articulate the specific gaps in the literature that this review addresses. The practical significance and broader implications for fields such as health and education could be emphasized further. Improved organization and clearer linkage between background, problem statement, and objectives would enhance readability and focus.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "The introduction does not clearly articulate the research gap or the unique challenges in mobile app churn prediction.",
-          "original_text": "However, despite the progress and high accuracies achieved in churn prediction studies, no review has yet been undertaken to summarize them in the context of mobile apps.",
-          "improved_version": "Despite significant advances and high predictive accuracies reported in individual churn prediction studies, there remains a notable gap: no comprehensive systematic review has synthesized these efforts specifically within the mobile app domain. Addressing this gap is essential to understand current methodologies, identify best practices, and guide future research tailored to mobile environments.",
-          "explanation": "Explicitly stating the research gap and its importance strengthens the justification for the review."
+          "remarks": "The introduction does not sufficiently highlight the unique challenges of mobile app churn prediction.",
+          "original_text": "User churn, also referred to as user attrition, loss, abandonment, or dropout, is a well-recognized phenomenon characterized by users' discontinuation of a product or service.",
+          "improved_version": "User churn, or attrition, refers to users discontinuing a product or service prematurely. This phenomenon presents critical challenges across various industries\u2014such as gaming, healthcare, and education\u2014necessitating effective prediction and intervention strategies to improve user retention and engagement.",
+          "explanation": "This revision clarifies the scope and importance of churn in specific domains, better justifying the focus on mobile apps."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The objectives and significance of the review are not clearly and explicitly stated.",
+          "remarks": "The problem statement lacks explicit articulation of the gaps in existing literature.",
+          "original_text": "While the progress in churn prediction research is acknowledged, no review has yet been undertaken to summarize them in the context of mobile apps.",
+          "improved_version": "Despite extensive research on churn prediction in domains like telecommunications and finance, there is a notable gap: no comprehensive review has synthesized studies specifically focused on mobile app contexts, which differ in data types, features, and user behaviors.",
+          "explanation": "Explicitly stating the gap emphasizes the novelty and necessity of the review."
+        },
+        {
+          "remarks": "The objectives are clear but could be more explicitly linked to the identified gaps.",
           "original_text": "The review also explores additional factors and methods influencing churn prediction outcomes highlighted in relevant studies, as well as the outcomes of churn prevention strategies employed alongside churn prediction models.",
-          "improved_version": "This review aims to systematically analyze the methodologies, features, algorithms, and performance metrics used in mobile app churn prediction studies, while also examining the effectiveness of strategies employed to prevent churn based on these models. By doing so, it provides a comprehensive understanding of both predictive performance and practical applications.",
-          "explanation": "Clarifying the dual focus on methodology and practical outcomes enhances the reader's understanding of the review's aims."
-        },
-        {
-          "remarks": "The flow from background to objectives is somewhat disjointed, affecting readability.",
-          "original_text": "The flow from background to problem statement, then to objectives and significance, is somewhat disjointed, with some repetition and lack of clear transitions.",
-          "improved_version": "Reorganize the introduction to follow a logical progression: start with the broad importance of user retention, narrow down to the specific challenges in mobile apps, identify the research gap of lacking a systematic review, and then clearly state the study's objectives and significance. Use transition sentences to connect these sections smoothly.",
-          "explanation": "Improving the structure and transitions enhances readability and logical coherence."
+          "improved_version": "This review aims to analyze not only the machine learning algorithms and features used but also to evaluate the effectiveness of various churn prevention strategies integrated with prediction models, addressing a key gap in understanding their practical impact.",
+          "explanation": "Clarifies the dual focus on methodological synthesis and practical outcomes, making the objectives more explicit."
         }
       ]
     },
     "S4": {
       "section_name": "Literature Review",
       "score": 3,
-      "summary": "The literature review covers a broad range of app domains and machine learning algorithms, providing a solid foundation. However, it lacks depth in critical analysis, particularly regarding why certain models perform better in specific contexts and the limitations of existing studies. Recent advances in explainable AI and model interpretability are underrepresented, and the review could benefit from more recent references and stronger integration with practical and theoretical frameworks. Improving the analytical depth, updating references, and clarifying the structure would enhance the comprehensiveness and utility of this section.",
+      "summary": "The literature review covers a broad range of app domains and machine learning algorithms, providing a solid synthesis of features and methodologies. However, it underrepresents emerging areas such as wearable health devices and social media, and lacks critical analysis of why certain models perform better in specific contexts. The organization could be improved to avoid overlapping content, and the references should be updated to include more recent high-impact publications. Better integration with theoretical frameworks and practical implications would further enhance the depth and utility of the review.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "The review lacks critical analysis of why certain algorithms perform better in specific contexts.",
+          "remarks": "Emerging areas and recent advances are underrepresented, limiting the review's comprehensiveness.",
           "original_text": "The findings demonstrate a wide variety of applied ML algorithms - from logistic regression to custom deep neural networks - to predict users' churn probabilities and survival times in mobile apps.",
-          "improved_version": "Expand this statement by explicitly comparing the contexts in which different ML algorithms excel or underperform, and discuss the implications for model selection based on data size, interpretability needs, and computational resources.",
-          "explanation": "Providing nuanced guidance on algorithm selection enhances the review's practical value."
+          "improved_version": "Expand this statement to include recent developments such as transformer-based models or explainable AI techniques, emphasizing their potential relevance.",
+          "explanation": "Including emerging models and methods ensures the review is current and comprehensive."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Recent developments in explainable AI and model interpretability are not sufficiently discussed.",
-          "original_text": "The review identified a wide range of algorithms that have been applied to predict users\u2019 churn probability in mobile apps across multiple app domains.",
-          "improved_version": "Add a discussion on the emerging trends, such as the use of explainable AI, transfer learning, or multi-task learning, and how these could shape future research directions.",
-          "explanation": "Including recent advances ensures the review remains current and comprehensive."
-        },
-        {
-          "remarks": "The review does not sufficiently connect findings to practical implications or broader theoretical frameworks.",
+          "remarks": "The review lacks critical discussion of the limitations of relying solely on behavioral features.",
           "original_text": "The review underscores the importance of behavioral features related to users\u2019 activity and progress within apps.",
-          "improved_version": "Include a critical discussion on the limitations of behavioral features, such as potential biases, data sparsity, or temporal relevance, and suggest strategies to mitigate these issues.",
-          "explanation": "Addressing limitations and mitigation strategies deepens the analytical quality and practical relevance."
+          "improved_version": "Add a critical discussion on the limitations of relying solely on behavioral features, such as potential biases or data sparsity issues, and suggest avenues for integrating contextual or psychological factors.",
+          "explanation": "Acknowledging limitations and proposing future research directions deepens the analysis."
+        },
+        {
+          "remarks": "The references are somewhat outdated, missing recent high-impact publications.",
+          "original_text": "Many references are somewhat outdated or lack recent high-impact publications.",
+          "improved_version": "Update the bibliography to include recent studies from 2021-2023, especially those published in top-tier venues or with high citation counts, to reflect the latest advancements.",
+          "explanation": "Ensuring the review is up-to-date increases its relevance and authority."
         }
       ]
     },
     "S5": {
       "section_name": "Methodology",
       "score": 3,
-      "summary": "The methodology section outlines a systematic approach, including protocol registration and adherence to PRISMA guidelines. However, it lacks detailed justification for inclusion/exclusion criteria, insufficiently describes search term validation, and does not apply standardized quality assessment or bias evaluation tools. The analysis is mostly descriptive, with limited statistical synthesis. Addressing these gaps by providing more transparency, applying formal quality assessments, and incorporating meta-analytic techniques would improve methodological rigor and reproducibility.",
+      "summary": "The methodology section demonstrates strengths such as adherence to PRISMA guidelines and comprehensive database searches. However, it lacks detailed discussion of the theoretical framework, search string validation, and strategies for including gray literature, which limits transparency and reproducibility. The absence of formal quality assessment and minimal discussion of ethical considerations further weaken the methodological rigor. Addressing these issues would enhance the validity, reliability, and ethical standards of the review.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "The review protocol lacks detailed justification for inclusion/exclusion criteria and search strategy validation.",
+          "remarks": "The rationale behind inclusion/exclusion criteria and theoretical framework is insufficiently detailed.",
           "original_text": "The review protocol was submitted to OSF Registries on May 5, 2023.",
-          "improved_version": "The review protocol was registered with detailed inclusion/exclusion criteria, search strategies, and quality assessment procedures on OSF Registries prior to data extraction.",
-          "explanation": "Comprehensive pre-registration enhances transparency and reproducibility."
+          "improved_version": "Include a detailed description of the theoretical framework and rationale behind the inclusion/exclusion criteria, clarifying how these choices align with the research questions and scope.",
+          "explanation": "This enhances transparency and justifies methodological decisions, improving reproducibility."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The synthesis of performance metrics is primarily descriptive, lacking statistical pooling or heterogeneity assessment.",
-          "original_text": "The synthesis of findings was conducted with a primary focus on features, algorithms, and performance metrics.",
-          "improved_version": "A meta-analytic approach was considered to statistically synthesize performance metrics across studies, accounting for heterogeneity using random-effects models where applicable.",
-          "explanation": "Applying meta-analytic techniques increases rigor and enables quantitative comparison."
+          "remarks": "Search strategy validation and inclusion of gray literature are not adequately addressed.",
+          "original_text": "The electronic databases were searched using predefined search terms.",
+          "improved_version": "Conduct a validation or pilot test of the search strategy, possibly including a search for known key studies, and document any adjustments made to ensure comprehensive coverage, including gray literature and preprints.",
+          "explanation": "This reduces publication bias and ensures the search strategy captures all relevant literature."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "No standardized quality assessment or bias evaluation tools were applied to included studies.",
-          "original_text": "The review notes the heterogeneity and inconsistent reporting but does not specify quality assessment tools.",
-          "improved_version": "A standardized quality assessment tool, such as QUADAS-2 or PROBAST, was applied to evaluate the risk of bias and methodological quality of each included study, with findings reported in supplementary materials.",
-          "explanation": "Systematic quality assessment enhances validity and interpretability of evidence."
+          "remarks": "No formal quality assessment tool was applied to included studies.",
+          "original_text": "The review highlights the inconsistency in reporting standards across studies.",
+          "improved_version": "Apply a standardized quality assessment tool, such as QUADAS-2 or PROBAST, to evaluate the risk of bias and reporting quality of each included study, and include these assessments in the synthesis.",
+          "explanation": "This enhances the rigor and helps interpret the reliability of the evidence base."
         }
       ]
     },
     "S6": {
       "section_name": "Results",
       "score": 3,
-      "summary": "The results section provides comprehensive coverage of features, algorithms, and performance metrics across studies. However, the presentation is dense and heavily text-based, making it difficult to quickly interpret key findings. Reporting of performance metrics is inconsistent, and the interpretation of feature importance lacks nuance regarding context and potential confounders. Limited reporting on the effectiveness of prevention strategies weakens the evidence base for practical application. Incorporating visual summaries, standardizing performance metrics, and deepening interpretation would improve clarity and robustness.",
+      "summary": "The results section provides a thorough synthesis of algorithms, features, and performance metrics, which is a strength. However, the presentation is dense and lacks visual aids such as tables or figures, making it difficult to quickly grasp key findings. The analysis relies on descriptive statistics without inferential testing, limiting the robustness of conclusions. Interpretation of results, especially regarding feature importance, could be more nuanced and supported by quantitative evidence. Including visual summaries and more rigorous statistical analysis would improve clarity and scientific rigor.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "The presentation is dense and lacks visual aids, making it difficult to quickly interpret key findings.",
+          "remarks": "Dense narrative presentation hinders quick comprehension of key findings.",
           "original_text": "The findings demonstrate a wide variety of applied ML algorithms - from logistic regression to custom deep neural networks - to predict users' churn probabilities and survival times in mobile apps.",
-          "improved_version": "The section could benefit from a summarized table or figure illustrating the distribution of ML algorithms used, their relative performance, and contexts, enhancing clarity and quick reference.",
-          "explanation": "Visual summaries facilitate comprehension and allow readers to grasp complex data efficiently."
+          "improved_version": "Present a comparative table summarizing the performance metrics (e.g., accuracy, AUC) for each ML algorithm, highlighting the best performers and their contexts.",
+          "explanation": "A table enhances clarity, allows quick comparison, and makes the data more accessible for readers."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Performance metrics are reported inconsistently, limiting comparability across studies.",
-          "original_text": "Performance metrics are reported inconsistently across studies, with some studies only reporting one metric.",
-          "improved_version": "Standardize reporting by advocating for a core set of performance metrics (e.g., AUC, accuracy, F1-score, precision, recall) to be reported in all studies, and include a summary table highlighting these metrics across studies.",
-          "explanation": "Consistent metrics facilitate comparison and meta-analysis, strengthening the validity of conclusions."
+          "remarks": "Lack of inferential statistics limits the robustness of conclusions about model performance.",
+          "original_text": "The performance metrics are summarized with means and ranges but lack statistical testing or confidence intervals to support claims of equivalence or differences across models.",
+          "improved_version": "Incorporate statistical tests or confidence intervals to assess the significance of differences in model performance across studies.",
+          "explanation": "Statistical analysis strengthens the scientific rigor and supports more reliable conclusions."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Interpretation of feature importance lacks discussion of context-specific relevance and potential confounders.",
-          "original_text": "The most important features are identified without discussing their context-specific relevance or potential confounders.",
-          "improved_version": "Add a discussion on how the importance of features may vary across different app domains and user populations, including potential confounders or biases influencing feature relevance.",
-          "explanation": "Deepening interpretation enhances understanding of model generalizability and practical applicability."
+          "remarks": "Interpretation of feature importance is somewhat superficial and lacks quantitative backing.",
+          "original_text": "The predictive performance of effective models is primarily driven by behavioral app engagement features, particularly those related to user activity and progress within apps.",
+          "improved_version": "Conduct a multivariate analysis or meta-regression (if data permits) to statistically assess the contribution of different feature categories to model performance, reporting effect sizes and confidence intervals.",
+          "explanation": "Quantitative assessment provides stronger evidence for the relative importance of feature types."
         }
       ]
     },
     "S7": {
       "section_name": "Discussion",
       "score": 3,
-      "summary": "The discussion section effectively summarizes key findings and methodological diversity but lacks depth in analyzing the mechanisms behind model performance and feature importance. It does not sufficiently address the generalizability of findings, ethical considerations, or practical implementation challenges. The narrative could be more cohesive, with clearer synthesis and linkage of insights. Addressing these issues would provide a more balanced, insightful, and actionable discussion for both researchers and practitioners.",
+      "summary": "The discussion synthesizes findings on algorithms, features, and prevention strategies, and acknowledges methodological limitations. However, it relies on limited evidence for the effectiveness of interventions and does not sufficiently analyze how dataset characteristics or operational definitions influence results. The discussion of reporting standards and standardization is somewhat superficial, lacking concrete recommendations. More critical evaluation, explicit guidance, and integration of practical and theoretical implications would strengthen the discussion.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "The discussion of prevention strategies is superficial, lacking analysis of why certain strategies succeed or fail.",
-          "original_text": "Few studies have tested churn prevention strategies in controlled trials.",
-          "improved_version": "The limited number of studies evaluating intervention effectiveness underscores the need for rigorous, controlled trials to establish causal impacts of churn prediction-informed strategies, and to assess their scalability and user acceptance.",
-          "explanation": "Clarifying the research gap and guiding future work strengthens the discussion's practical relevance."
+          "remarks": "The discussion of intervention effectiveness is based on limited, non-controlled studies, weakening the validity of practical claims.",
+          "original_text": "The review underscores the importance of behavioral features related to users\u2019 activity and progress within apps, and discusses the promising but limited results related to the effectiveness of churn prevention strategies.",
+          "improved_version": "The discussion should include a critical analysis of the methodological limitations of existing prevention studies, such as small sample sizes, lack of control groups, or short follow-up periods, to contextualize the promising results.",
+          "explanation": "Acknowledging evidence limitations provides a balanced view and guides future research toward more rigorous designs."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The discussion does not sufficiently address the impact of dataset bias (e.g., dominance of mobile games) on generalizability.",
-          "original_text": "Most studies focused on mobile games, with fewer on health or social media apps.",
-          "improved_version": "While the majority of studies concentrate on mobile games, the review should explicitly analyze how the unique features of health and social media apps influence churn prediction performance, and discuss the potential for cross-domain model transferability.",
-          "explanation": "Analyzing domain-specific factors enhances the context and generalizability of findings."
+          "remarks": "Insufficient analysis of how dataset characteristics and definitions influence model performance.",
+          "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users.",
+          "improved_version": "The review should analyze how dataset size and diversity impact model performance and generalizability, possibly including a discussion of overfitting risks in small datasets.",
+          "explanation": "This deepens understanding of methodological robustness and informs best practices."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The discussion lacks emphasis on ethical, privacy, and user experience considerations.",
-          "original_text": "The review does not sufficiently discuss ethical considerations of deploying churn models.",
-          "improved_version": "The discussion should include potential ethical issues, such as user privacy, data security, and the risk of manipulative interventions, which are critical for responsible deployment of churn prediction systems.",
-          "explanation": "Addressing ethical considerations broadens the review's societal relevance and responsibility."
+          "remarks": "Recommendations for standardization are not specific or actionable.",
+          "original_text": "The review highlights the need for standardized reporting items for churn prediction studies.",
+          "improved_version": "It should specify concrete items or a checklist for reporting, such as dataset characteristics, feature engineering details, evaluation protocols, and statistical significance testing, to facilitate reproducibility.",
+          "explanation": "Providing clear steps for reporting improves research quality and comparability."
         }
       ]
     },
     "S8": {
       "section_name": "Conclusion",
-      "score": 3,
-      "summary": "The conclusion summarizes the main findings and emphasizes the potential of churn prediction models and behavioral features. However, it lacks specific references to quantitative results, does not clearly state how well the research questions were answered, and provides only broad implications. The section would benefit from more explicit evidence, concise language, and actionable recommendations for future research and practice. Enhancing clarity and specificity would strengthen the conclusion's impact.",
+      "score": 4,
+      "summary": "The conclusion is well-structured, summarizing key findings and emphasizing the potential of churn prediction models and behavioral features. However, it could more explicitly link claims to specific results, clarify how all research questions were addressed, and elaborate on practical and theoretical implications. The language could be more concise and impactful. Including concrete recommendations for future research and standardization would further strengthen the conclusion.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "The conclusion lacks specific quantitative evidence to support key claims.",
-          "original_text": "The findings demonstrate a wide variety of applied ML algorithms - from logistic regression to custom deep neural networks - to predict users' churn probabilities and survival times in mobile apps.",
-          "improved_version": "The results show a broad spectrum of ML algorithms used for churn prediction, including logistic regression, Random Forest, and deep neural networks, with performance metrics such as AUC averaging around 0.83, supporting their effectiveness.",
-          "explanation": "Including specific performance metrics strengthens the support for the claims and enhances credibility."
+          "remarks": "The conclusion lacks explicit linkage to specific results or data points.",
+          "original_text": "This synthesis demonstrates the potential of churn prediction models, identifying a range of machine learning algorithms such as logistic regression, random forest, boosting models, or recurrent neural networks that generally achieve robust prediction results across different mobile app domains.",
+          "improved_version": "The review demonstrates that various machine learning algorithms\u2014including logistic regression, random forest, boosting models, and recurrent neural networks\u2014consistently achieve strong predictive performance across diverse mobile app domains, with average AUC values ranging from 0.78 to 0.85.",
+          "explanation": "Including quantitative data strengthens the evidentiary support for the claims."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The conclusion does not clearly specify the extent to which research questions were answered.",
-          "original_text": "While the review mentions the potential of churn prediction models, it does not specify the extent to which research questions were answered.",
-          "improved_version": "The review demonstrates that most research questions were addressed comprehensively, such as the variety of algorithms used and the importance of behavioral features, though some areas like real-world deployment remain underexplored.",
-          "explanation": "Explicitly stating how well the questions were answered clarifies the fulfillment of objectives."
+          "remarks": "The conclusion could better specify how all research questions were addressed.",
+          "original_text": "The conclusion claims to synthesize key methodologies and findings but does not clearly articulate how all research questions (e.g., about features, algorithms, and prevention strategies) are comprehensively addressed.",
+          "improved_version": "This review systematically addresses all research questions by analyzing the algorithms used, the most predictive features, their relative importance, and the current state of prevention strategies, providing a comprehensive overview of mobile app churn prediction.",
+          "explanation": "Clarifies the scope and completeness of the synthesis, aligning the conclusion with the research objectives."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The implications are broad and lack actionable recommendations.",
-          "original_text": "Implications are discussed broadly without specific, actionable insights.",
-          "improved_version": "The implications suggest prioritizing behavioral features in model development and recommend standardizing reporting practices to improve comparability across studies.",
-          "explanation": "Providing specific recommendations enhances practical and theoretical impact."
+          "remarks": "The conclusion could be more concise and impactful.",
+          "original_text": "The conclusion is somewhat lengthy and contains complex sentences that could be condensed for clarity and impact.",
+          "improved_version": "The conclusion could be streamlined by consolidating lengthy sentences and emphasizing key takeaways for clarity and stronger impact.",
+          "explanation": "Concise writing improves readability and the strength of the final statement."
         }
       ]
     },
     "S9": {
       "section_name": "References",
       "score": 3,
-      "summary": "The reference list includes relevant and foundational sources but suffers from inconsistent formatting, incomplete citation details, and a lack of recent peer-reviewed articles. These issues reduce the credibility, professionalism, and traceability of the manuscript. Standardizing citation style, ensuring complete bibliographic information, and updating the references with recent literature would significantly improve the quality and authority of this section.",
+      "summary": "The reference list includes relevant and foundational sources but suffers from inconsistencies in completeness, formatting, and organization. Many references lack full publication details, and formatting styles are inconsistent, reducing professionalism and making it harder for readers to locate sources. Some references are from preprints or less formal sources without clear indication of peer review status. Standardizing formatting, ensuring completeness, and clarifying publication types will enhance the scholarly quality and credibility of the manuscript.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "References lack complete citation details and consistent formatting.",
-          "original_text": "[1] Ammara Ahmed and D. Maheswari Linen. 2017. A review and analysis of churn prediction methods for customer retention in telecom industries. In 2017 4th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), January 2017. 1\u20137. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCS.2017.8014605",
-          "improved_version": "[1] Ahmed, M., & Linen, D. M. (2017). A review and analysis of churn prediction methods for customer retention in telecom industries. In *Proceedings of the 2017 4th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS)* (pp. 1-7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCS.2017.8014605",
-          "explanation": "Standardizing citation format with complete details improves clarity, traceability, and adherence to academic standards."
+          "remarks": "Many references lack complete publication details, hindering source verification.",
+          "original_text": "[3] Dmitry Alexandrovsky, Maximilian Achim Friehs, Jendrik Grittner, Susanne Putze, Max V. Birk, Rainer Malaka, and Regan L Mandryk. 2021.",
+          "improved_version": "[3] Alexandrovsky, D., Friehs, M. A., Grittner, J., Putze, S., Birk, M. V., Malaka, R., & Mandryk, R. L. (2021). Serious Snacking: A Survival Analysis of How Snacking Mechanics Affect Attrition in a Mobile Serious Game. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1\u201312. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445689",
+          "explanation": "Adding complete publication details, including conference name, pages, and DOI, ensures traceability and scholarly rigor."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The references are not consistently formatted, with variations in author names, journal titles, and DOI inclusion.",
-          "original_text": "[2] Mehreen Ahmed, Hammad Afzal, Awais Majeed, and Behram Khan. 2017. A Survey of Evolution in Predictive Models and Impacting Factors in Customer Churn. Adv. Data Sci. Adapt. Data Anal. 09, 03 (July 2017), 1750007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424922X17500073",
-          "improved_version": "[2] Ahmed, M., Afzal, H., Majeed, A., & Khan, B. (2017). A survey of evolution in predictive models and impacting factors in customer churn. *Advances in Data Science and Adaptive Data Analytics*, 9(3), 1750007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424922X17500073",
-          "explanation": "Consistent formatting with full journal name, volume, issue, and DOI improves professionalism and ease of source identification."
+          "remarks": "Formatting styles are inconsistent, reducing professionalism and readability.",
+          "original_text": "[50] Xi Liu, Muhe Xie, Xidao Wen, Rui Chen, Yong Ge, Nick Duffield, and Na Wang. 2018.",
+          "improved_version": "[50] Liu, X., Xie, M., Wen, X., Chen, R., Ge, Y., Duffield, N., & Wang, N. (2018). A Semi-Supervised and Inductive Embedding Model for Churn Prediction of Large-Scale Mobile Games. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.06573.",
+          "explanation": "Consistent formatting according to a recognized style (e.g., APA, IEEE) improves professionalism and ease of use."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The reference list lacks recent peer-reviewed journal articles, affecting the currency and robustness of the review.",
-          "original_text": "(Multiple references from 2017-2021, few from 2022-2023)",
-          "improved_version": "Update the reference list to include more recent peer-reviewed journal articles from 2022-2024, particularly in areas such as deep learning, explainable AI, and mobile health.",
-          "explanation": "Including recent literature ensures the review reflects the latest advancements and maintains scholarly relevance."
+          "remarks": "Some references are from preprints or less formal sources without clear indication of peer review status.",
+          "original_text": "[4] Saki Amagai, Sarah Pila, Aaron J. Kaat, Cindy J. Nowinski, and Richard C. Gershon. 2022.",
+          "improved_version": "[4] Amagai, S., Pila, S., Kaat, A. J., Nowinski, C. J., & Gershon, R. C. (2022). Challenges in Participant Engagement and Retention Using Mobile Health Apps: Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(4), e35120. https://doi.org/10.2196/35120",
+          "explanation": "Clarifying publication type and ensuring peer-reviewed sources are prioritized strengthens the reference list's credibility."
         }
       ]
     },
     "S10": {
       "section_name": "Supplementary Materials",
-      "score": 3,
-      "summary": "The supplementary materials provide comprehensive methodological details and data synthesis, effectively supporting the main text. However, some sections, such as those on prevention strategies and standardization guidance, are less detailed, limiting practical relevance. The presentation can be dense, and clarity would benefit from additional visual aids and clearer subheadings. Enhancing the completeness, clarity, and practical guidance in these materials will improve their utility for researchers and practitioners.",
+      "score": 4,
+      "summary": "The supplementary materials are thorough and relevant, providing detailed methodological descriptions and supporting data. However, some referenced appendices and visual elements (tables, figures) are missing, which affects transparency and reproducibility. The presentation is dense and could benefit from clearer organization, visual summaries, and inclusion of all referenced materials. Addressing these issues would enhance clarity, accessibility, and the overall utility of the supplementary materials.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "The section on prevention strategies lacks practical implementation details.",
-          "original_text": "Limited discussion on how prevention strategies are practically implemented or evaluated beyond a few studies, reducing the relevance of this section to the main aim of understanding effective prevention.",
-          "improved_version": "Expand the discussion to include specific examples of how prevention strategies are implemented and evaluated in practice, and provide recommendations for future research on intervention effectiveness.",
-          "explanation": "Adding practical details and recommendations enhances the section's relevance and utility."
+          "remarks": "Referenced appendices and visual elements are missing, reducing transparency and reproducibility.",
+          "original_text": "Appendix 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 are mentioned but not provided.",
+          "improved_version": "Include all appendices with detailed search strategies, data extraction sheets, and reporting standards to enable reproducibility.",
+          "explanation": "Providing all referenced materials ensures transparency and allows for independent verification."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The presentation of model comparisons and performance metrics is dense and complex.",
-          "original_text": "The paragraph discussing the comparison of models and performance metrics is dense and contains complex sentences, which may hinder comprehension.",
-          "improved_version": "Simplify the presentation of model comparisons and performance metrics by using summary tables or visual aids, and break down complex sentences for better readability.",
-          "explanation": "Visual summaries and clearer language improve accessibility and comprehension."
+          "remarks": "The presentation is dense and could be improved with visual summaries.",
+          "original_text": "Feature importance analyses are summarized but could benefit from clearer visualization.",
+          "improved_version": "Add a visual summary (e.g., bar chart or heatmap) of the top five most important features across studies, highlighting their categories.",
+          "explanation": "Visual summaries improve accessibility and facilitate quick understanding of key predictors."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The materials do not sufficiently elaborate on standardization for future research.",
-          "original_text": "While it discusses dataset heterogeneity, it does not sufficiently elaborate on how future research can standardize or improve reporting practices.",
-          "improved_version": "Provide detailed recommendations for standardizing reporting practices, including dataset descriptions, performance metrics, and feature definitions, to facilitate comparability and reproducibility in future studies.",
-          "explanation": "Offering concrete guidance on standardization supports methodological rigor and future research quality."
+          "remarks": "Some referenced figures and tables are not included, hampering usability.",
+          "original_text": "Figures and tables are referenced but not included.",
+          "improved_version": "Ensure that all referenced figures and tables (e.g., Figure 1, Table 1, Figure 2) are included in the supplementary materials or appendices.",
+          "explanation": "Complete visual data supports transparency and allows independent verification of findings."
         }
       ]
     }
@@ -255,175 +255,175 @@
     "R1": {
       "section_name": "Originality and Contribution",
       "score": 4,
-      "summary": "The review provides a comprehensive synthesis of mobile app churn prediction research, offering a valuable taxonomy of algorithms and features. Its main strength lies in organizing and clarifying the current state of the field, identifying research gaps, and providing practical recommendations. However, the review's originality is somewhat limited, as it does not introduce new theoretical frameworks or operational models. The contribution could be further strengthened by proposing standardized frameworks, operational guidelines, or experimental protocols for future research. Overall, the work is impactful in its breadth and organization, but future iterations should aim for greater methodological innovation and practical advancement.",
+      "summary": "The review provides a comprehensive synthesis of machine learning approaches for churn prediction in mobile apps, highlighting the importance of behavioral features and summarizing current methodologies. While the manuscript excels in breadth and practical recommendations, it is somewhat limited in introducing novel frameworks or empirical innovations specific to mobile app churn prediction. The contribution is primarily incremental, focusing on consolidation rather than transformative advancement. To further elevate originality and impact, the manuscript should propose new frameworks, benchmarking protocols, or empirical validation strategies, and more explicitly compare findings to related domains. Nonetheless, the review is a valuable resource for the field and lays a strong foundation for future methodological innovation.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "The review lacks a novel methodological or theoretical framework, which limits its perceived originality.",
-          "original_text": "The review claims to be the first to systematically synthesize mobile app churn prediction studies, but it primarily aggregates existing algorithms and features without proposing a new theoretical or methodological framework.",
-          "improved_version": "While pioneering in its comprehensive synthesis, this review uniquely integrates a taxonomy of features, algorithms, and performance metrics, offering a structured framework to guide future research and model development.",
-          "explanation": "Reframing the contribution as a structured framework elevates the originality beyond aggregation, positioning the review as a methodological resource."
+          "remarks": "The manuscript's originality is constrained by its focus on synthesis rather than the introduction of new frameworks or models.",
+          "original_text": "This systematic literature review investigates applied machine learning (ML) algorithms and features for predicting churn in mobile apps by synthesizing methodologies and outcomes of 50 selected studies.",
+          "improved_version": "This review introduces a novel framework for categorizing ML algorithms and features tailored specifically to mobile app contexts, aiming to identify gaps and propose new hybrid models for improved churn prediction.",
+          "explanation": "Shifting from a purely descriptive synthesis to proposing a new framework or hybrid model increases the manuscript's originality and contribution."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "There is insufficient discussion of how dataset variability impacts model performance and generalizability.",
-          "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users.",
-          "improved_version": "The review highlights the wide variability in dataset sizes and discusses how this heterogeneity impacts model performance and generalizability, emphasizing the need for benchmarking standards.",
-          "explanation": "Explicitly addressing dataset heterogeneity and its impact adds depth to the review's contribution and guides future research toward standardization."
+          "remarks": "The review lacks critical analysis of why certain models outperform others and how insights can guide future research.",
+          "original_text": "The findings demonstrate a wide variety of applied ML algorithms - from logistic regression to custom deep neural networks - to predict users' churn probabilities and survival times in mobile apps.",
+          "improved_version": "The review critically analyzes the performance trade-offs between simple and complex ML models, proposing a new hybrid approach that combines interpretability with high accuracy for mobile app churn prediction.",
+          "explanation": "Providing actionable, theory-driven insights or proposing hybrid approaches enhances the manuscript's contribution and practical value."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The review does not propose new operational frameworks or practical deployment strategies.",
-          "original_text": "The paper emphasizes behavioral features as most predictive but does not propose new models or frameworks for integrating these features into practical systems.",
-          "improved_version": "Building on the identified importance of behavioral features, the review proposes a conceptual framework for integrating these features into adaptive, real-time churn prediction and intervention systems.",
-          "explanation": "Suggesting a conceptual operational framework advances the contribution from theoretical insight to practical application."
+          "remarks": "Claims about feature importance and model performance are not sufficiently verified through meta-analytical techniques.",
+          "original_text": "The review underscores the importance of behavioral features related to users\u2019 activity and progress within apps.",
+          "improved_version": "The review identifies behavioral features as most predictive but also develops a new feature importance ranking methodology tailored for mobile app data, providing more robust insights.",
+          "explanation": "Developing and applying a new methodology for feature importance ranking would strengthen the originality and empirical contribution of the review."
         }
       ]
     },
     "R2": {
       "section_name": "Impact and Significance",
       "score": 4,
-      "summary": "This review makes a significant contribution by synthesizing the state of churn prediction in mobile apps, highlighting the importance of behavioral features and the diversity of machine learning approaches. Its impact is evident in the potential to inform future research, practical applications, and policy development. However, the review's influence is somewhat constrained by its focus on gaming and health apps, limited discussion of real-world deployment challenges (such as privacy and ethics), and lack of specific recommendations for standardization. Addressing these gaps would further enhance the societal and scientific significance of the work.",
+      "summary": "The manuscript effectively synthesizes the landscape of churn prediction in mobile apps, emphasizing the practical relevance of behavioral features and the diversity of machine learning approaches. Its impact is notable in guiding practitioners and researchers toward best practices and highlighting the need for standardization. However, the discussion could be strengthened by more explicitly addressing the broader societal, economic, and policy implications of deploying churn prediction models, especially in sensitive domains like health. Recommendations for standardizing datasets, metrics, and reporting would further enhance the field's progression and facilitate meta-analyses. Overall, the review is significant, but deeper engagement with policy, ethical, and cross-domain benchmarking issues would maximize its influence.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "The review does not sufficiently address the challenges of real-world deployment, such as privacy and ethical considerations.",
-          "original_text": "The discussion highlights the potential of behavioral features but underemphasizes the challenges in deploying models in real-world settings, such as data privacy and ethical considerations.",
-          "improved_version": "The discussion should include considerations of ethical implications related to deploying churn prediction models, including risks of user manipulation, privacy breaches, and informed user awareness.",
-          "explanation": "Explicitly addressing deployment challenges ensures the review's insights are applicable and impactful in real-world and policy contexts."
+          "remarks": "The review underemphasizes the potential for standardization and benchmarking, which are crucial for field-wide impact.",
+          "original_text": "The findings demonstrate a wide variety of applied ML algorithms - from logistic regression to custom deep neural networks - to predict users' churn probabilities and survival times in mobile apps.",
+          "improved_version": "The abstract should explicitly state the potential for standardizing ML methodologies to enable cross-study comparability, thereby accelerating field-wide progress.",
+          "explanation": "Highlighting standardization and benchmarking would enhance the review's impact by promoting methodological consistency and facilitating cumulative knowledge."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "There is a lack of specific proposals for standardized frameworks or protocols for future research.",
-          "original_text": "The review notes heterogeneity in datasets and inconsistent reporting but does not propose specific standardized frameworks or protocols for future research.",
-          "improved_version": "Establishing and promoting standardized reporting protocols for datasets, features, and performance metrics will enhance transparency, comparability, and policy adoption.",
-          "explanation": "Proposing standardization directly addresses a key barrier to scientific progress and increases the review's impact."
+          "remarks": "Societal and policy implications of deploying churn prediction models are not sufficiently explored.",
+          "original_text": "The review highlights the potential of churn prediction models to enable targeted churn prevention strategies but notes limited evidence from controlled trials.",
+          "improved_version": "It should emphasize the need for policy frameworks and ethical guidelines to govern the deployment of predictive models, especially in sensitive domains like health.",
+          "explanation": "Addressing policy and ethical considerations ensures responsible innovation and increases the societal relevance of the research."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The review emphasizes the potential of churn prevention strategies despite limited empirical evidence.",
-          "original_text": "Limited empirical evidence exists on the effectiveness of churn prevention strategies in controlled trials, yet the review emphasizes their potential.",
-          "improved_version": "Future research should prioritize controlled trials assessing the real-world effectiveness of churn prevention strategies informed by predictive models, to validate their practical utility.",
-          "explanation": "Encouraging rigorous validation of interventions strengthens the practical significance and credibility of the review's recommendations."
+          "remarks": "The review calls for more controlled trials but lacks specific guidance on standardizing datasets and metrics.",
+          "original_text": "Most studies evaluated and compared multiple different ML algorithms with mixed results, and no particular model emerged as a single best-performing model across a broad range of studies.",
+          "improved_version": "The discussion should include recommendations for developing benchmarking frameworks and shared datasets to identify truly generalizable models across domains.",
+          "explanation": "Providing concrete recommendations for standardization and benchmarking will facilitate future research and meta-analyses, amplifying the manuscript's significance."
         }
       ]
     },
     "R3": {
       "section_name": "Ethics and Compliance",
       "score": 3,
-      "summary": "The review demonstrates a reasonable foundation in ethical considerations, including disclosure of affiliations and funding. However, it falls short in explicitly addressing key ethical issues such as data privacy, informed consent, conflicts of interest, and adherence to established guidelines (e.g., GDPR, IRB approval). There is also limited discussion of model fairness, bias, and the potential harms of deploying predictive models. Addressing these gaps would enhance the ethical rigor and compliance of the work, moving it toward best practices in responsible research.",
+      "summary": "The review demonstrates a generally sound methodological approach but exhibits moderate gaps in addressing key ethical considerations. While author affiliations and funding sources are disclosed, explicit discussion of potential conflicts of interest, data privacy safeguards, informed consent, and adherence to ethical guidelines in the primary studies is lacking. These omissions limit the ethical transparency and robustness of the research. To improve, the manuscript should include explicit statements on conflict management, privacy standards, consent procedures, and ethical approvals in the included studies. Addressing these areas will strengthen the ethical foundation and credibility of the review.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "There is insufficient detail on data privacy and anonymization procedures in the original studies.",
-          "original_text": "The review mentions the use of datasets with user engagement data but does not specify how data privacy and anonymization procedures were handled in the original studies.",
-          "improved_version": "The review should detail whether the original studies reported procedures for data anonymization, privacy safeguards, and compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR or HIPAA.",
-          "explanation": "Explicitly addressing privacy measures ensures adherence to data protection standards and reassures readers of ethical compliance."
+          "remarks": "Potential conflicts of interest and bias mitigation are not explicitly addressed.",
+          "original_text": "The authors disclose affiliations and funding sources, including industry ties (e.g., CSS, Uniqa, Pathmate Technologies), but do not explicitly discuss potential conflicts of interest or measures taken to mitigate bias.",
+          "improved_version": "The authors should explicitly discuss potential conflicts of interest related to industry affiliations and describe measures taken to mitigate bias, such as independent data validation or transparency in funding influence.",
+          "explanation": "Explicit conflict of interest statements and mitigation strategies enhance transparency and research integrity."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The review does not discuss whether informed consent was obtained in the original studies.",
-          "original_text": "There is no discussion on whether the original studies obtained informed consent from users for data collection and analysis, particularly in health-related or behavioral datasets.",
-          "improved_version": "The review should include an assessment of whether the primary studies reported obtaining informed consent from participants, especially in sensitive health or behavioral data contexts.",
-          "explanation": "Acknowledging consent procedures aligns with ethical standards for participant autonomy and rights."
+          "remarks": "Data privacy and anonymization procedures are not detailed.",
+          "original_text": "The review synthesizes data from multiple studies, many of which involve user data, but there is no explicit mention of how data privacy and anonymization are handled or whether data sharing complies with privacy standards.",
+          "improved_version": "The review should specify whether the original studies adhered to data privacy standards, including anonymization and compliance with regulations such as GDPR or HIPAA, and describe how privacy considerations were managed.",
+          "explanation": "Clarifying privacy safeguards ensures ethical handling of user data and compliance with data protection standards."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The review lacks explicit statements about adherence to ethical guidelines or IRB approvals.",
-          "original_text": "The review does not explicitly state adherence to established ethical guidelines such as the Declaration of Helsinki, GDPR, or IRB approvals for the included studies.",
-          "improved_version": "The authors should explicitly state whether the included studies reported adherence to ethical guidelines such as the Declaration of Helsinki, GDPR compliance, or IRB approval, and discuss how ethical standards were maintained.",
-          "explanation": "Explicit acknowledgment of ethical guideline adherence demonstrates commitment to research standards and ethical compliance."
+          "remarks": "Informed consent procedures in the original studies are not discussed.",
+          "original_text": "The review does not specify whether the original studies obtained informed consent from users for data collection and analysis, nor does it address how consent procedures were handled in the included studies.",
+          "improved_version": "The authors should include an assessment of whether the original studies reported obtaining informed consent from participants and describe the consent procedures followed, ensuring adherence to ethical standards.",
+          "explanation": "Addressing consent procedures confirms respect for participant autonomy and ethical compliance."
         }
       ]
     },
     "R4": {
       "section_name": "Data and Code Availability",
       "score": 2,
-      "summary": "The review makes moderate efforts toward transparency by referencing data extraction sheets and appendices, but it does not provide open access to raw data, analysis scripts, or code repositories. This lack of accessible resources limits reproducibility, independent validation, and the potential for other researchers to build upon the work. To improve, the authors should host all relevant materials in open repositories, provide explicit access links, and include detailed documentation and licensing information.",
+      "summary": "The review identifies significant gaps in data and code availability, with most datasets remaining proprietary and little evidence of shared code repositories or detailed protocols. This lack of transparency and openness severely limits reproducibility and the ability for others to validate or build upon the work. The manuscript should explicitly state the availability of datasets and code, justify access restrictions, and advocate for standardized reporting and open science practices. Encouraging the use of anonymized or synthetic data and recommending the deposition of code and protocols in public repositories will greatly enhance scientific rigor and progress in the field.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "The review does not provide open access to data extraction sheets or analysis scripts.",
-          "original_text": "The full data extraction sheet is provided in Appendix 4.2.",
-          "improved_version": "The full data extraction sheet and analysis scripts are publicly hosted on a repository such as GitHub or OSF, with clear instructions for access and reuse.",
-          "explanation": "Open access to data and scripts enhances transparency, reproducibility, and future research replication."
+          "remarks": "The availability of datasets and access conditions are not clearly stated.",
+          "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users.",
+          "improved_version": "The review should explicitly state whether the datasets from the included studies are publicly available, available upon request, or proprietary, and provide links or access conditions where applicable.",
+          "explanation": "Clear data access information enhances transparency and enables reproducibility."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "There is no mention of code sharing or repositories.",
-          "original_text": "There is no mention of code sharing or repositories.",
-          "improved_version": "Publish all analysis code, data processing scripts, and review workflows in a version-controlled repository such as GitHub, GitLab, or OSF, with detailed README files and documentation.",
-          "explanation": "Sharing code repositories supports reproducibility, transparency, and community engagement."
+          "remarks": "There is no mention of code availability or sharing of analysis scripts.",
+          "original_text": "There is no mention of whether the original code implementations, models, or analysis scripts from the included studies are publicly shared or accessible.",
+          "improved_version": "The review should include a statement on the availability of code repositories, such as links to GitHub or other platforms, and specify whether code is shared under open licenses.",
+          "explanation": "Providing access to code repositories significantly improves reproducibility and allows others to verify and extend the models."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The review lacks explicit statements about the availability and licensing of data and code.",
-          "original_text": "The review does not specify whether datasets or code are shared publicly.",
-          "improved_version": "Explicitly state the availability status of all datasets and code, including links to repositories, and specify licensing terms to clarify reuse permissions.",
-          "explanation": "Clear statements about data and code availability improve transparency and set expectations for reuse and validation."
+          "remarks": "Documentation of methodologies and reporting standards is inconsistent.",
+          "original_text": "The review notes that many studies do not report detailed feature sets, sampling methods, or performance metrics consistently.",
+          "improved_version": "Authors should recommend or enforce standardized reporting guidelines for methodology, including detailed descriptions of feature engineering, sampling techniques, and performance metrics, and suggest depositing such details in supplementary materials or repositories.",
+          "explanation": "Standardized documentation ensures that other researchers can accurately reproduce the models and compare results across studies."
         }
       ]
     },
     "R5": {
       "section_name": "Statistical Rigor",
       "score": 3,
-      "summary": "The review covers a wide range of machine learning algorithms and performance metrics but exhibits notable gaps in statistical rigor. Key issues include insufficient discussion of assumption checks, lack of multiple comparison corrections, absence of effect size and confidence interval reporting, and limited details on sample size justification and power analysis. Addressing these concerns would significantly enhance the credibility, reproducibility, and interpretability of the findings.",
+      "summary": "The review demonstrates a solid understanding of machine learning applications for churn prediction but reveals notable gaps in statistical rigor. Key issues include insufficient discussion of validation procedures, lack of assumption verification, inadequate sample size justification, and inconsistent reporting of confidence intervals and effect sizes. Addressing these shortcomings through explicit validation strategies, assumption checks, and comprehensive reporting of statistical measures will significantly improve the reliability and interpretability of future research in this area.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "There is minimal mention of assumption checks for statistical models.",
-          "original_text": "There is minimal mention of assumption checks for statistical models, such as verifying the proportional hazards assumption in Cox models or the distributional assumptions for parametric tests.",
-          "improved_version": "Include explicit statements about assumption verification steps, such as testing proportional hazards in Cox models or normality and homoscedasticity in regression analyses.",
-          "explanation": "Verifying assumptions ensures the validity of model inferences and prevents misinterpretation of results."
+          "remarks": "Validation procedures and appropriateness of statistical tests are not clearly specified.",
+          "original_text": "The findings demonstrate a wide variety of applied ML algorithms - from logistic regression to custom deep neural networks - to predict users' churn probabilities and survival times in mobile apps.",
+          "improved_version": "Explicitly specify the validation procedures used for each ML algorithm, such as cross-validation or train-test splits, and justify their appropriateness for the dataset sizes and model complexity.",
+          "explanation": "Clear validation strategies ensure the robustness of performance estimates and facilitate comparison across studies."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Few studies report confidence intervals for key performance metrics.",
-          "original_text": "Few studies report confidence intervals for performance metrics like AUC, accuracy, or F1 scores, which are essential for assessing estimate precision.",
-          "improved_version": "Recommend including 95% confidence intervals for all key performance metrics to quantify estimate uncertainty.",
-          "explanation": "Confidence intervals improve transparency and help assess the stability of the results across samples."
+          "remarks": "Assumptions underlying statistical models are not verified or discussed.",
+          "original_text": "There is no mention of whether models were tested for overfitting or whether validation techniques were employed to prevent it.",
+          "improved_version": "Recommend that studies explicitly verify assumptions such as proportional hazards for Cox models or distributional assumptions for regression analyses, and report these checks.",
+          "explanation": "Assumption verification is critical for the validity of inferential models and their conclusions."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "There is no mention of statistical power analyses or sample size calculations.",
-          "original_text": "No mention of statistical power analyses or sample size calculations to ensure sufficient power for detecting differences or effects.",
-          "improved_version": "Recommend conducting and reporting power analyses during study design to justify sample sizes and interpret non-significant results appropriately.",
-          "explanation": "Ensures studies are adequately powered, reducing the risk of Type II errors."
+          "remarks": "Confidence intervals and effect sizes are not consistently reported.",
+          "original_text": "Minimal mention is made of confidence intervals around reported metrics.",
+          "improved_version": "Include confidence intervals for all key performance metrics, such as AUC, accuracy, and F1-score, to indicate the precision of estimates.",
+          "explanation": "Confidence intervals enhance interpretability and help assess the reliability of the reported performance measures."
         }
       ]
     },
     "R6": {
       "section_name": "Technical Accuracy",
       "score": 3,
-      "summary": "The review provides a solid overview of churn prediction methodologies and categorizes algorithms and features comprehensively. However, it lacks explicit mathematical derivations, core equations for survival analysis models, and standardized reporting of validation procedures. There is also inconsistent use of technical terminology and insufficient detail on model training and evaluation protocols. Addressing these gaps would improve transparency, reproducibility, and technical rigor.",
+      "summary": "The manuscript provides a solid high-level overview of churn prediction methodologies but exhibits moderate gaps in technical accuracy. Notably, it lacks explicit mathematical derivations, detailed implementation specifics, and comprehensive validation procedures. Improving the clarity and completeness of mathematical formulations, providing detailed descriptions of algorithm implementations, and including statistical validation details would significantly enhance the technical rigor and reproducibility of the work. The current level is acceptable but leaves room for improvement in technical depth and clarity.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "The review does not include explicit mathematical formulas for key models.",
-          "original_text": "The review references various statistical and survival analysis models (e.g., Cox Regression, Kaplan-Meier) but does not provide explicit derivations or formulas.",
-          "improved_version": "Include the explicit mathematical formulas for Cox regression (e.g., hazard function, partial likelihood) and Kaplan-Meier estimator (e.g., survival function formula), with references to their derivations or standard texts.",
-          "explanation": "Providing these formulas enhances clarity, allows verification of correctness, and supports deeper understanding of the models discussed."
+          "remarks": "Mathematical models are referenced without explicit derivations or formulas.",
+          "original_text": "The review references various mathematical models (e.g., Cox Regression, survival ensembles, IBS) but does not provide explicit derivations or formulas, leading to ambiguity about the exact mathematical assumptions and derivations used in the models.",
+          "improved_version": "Include explicit mathematical formulations for key models such as Cox Regression, survival ensembles, and IBS, with clear assumptions, equations, and derivation steps where applicable.",
+          "explanation": "Providing detailed formulas and derivations enhances clarity, allows verification of correctness, and supports reproducibility."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "There is limited discussion on hyperparameter tuning, validation strategies, and convergence criteria.",
-          "original_text": "While the categorization of ML algorithms by complexity and their application is comprehensive, there is limited discussion on the specific hyperparameter tuning, model validation procedures, or convergence criteria used in the studies.",
-          "improved_version": "Add a subsection summarizing common hyperparameters, validation strategies (e.g., cross-validation, train-test splits), and convergence criteria reported across studies.",
-          "explanation": "This improves understanding of algorithm correctness, reproducibility, and efficiency."
+          "remarks": "Implementation details for algorithms are insufficient.",
+          "original_text": "While the review categorizes algorithms into low, medium, and high complexity, it lacks detailed descriptions of the specific implementations, hyperparameters, and training procedures used in the studies.",
+          "improved_version": "Add detailed descriptions of the implementation specifics for each algorithm category, including hyperparameters, training procedures, and validation strategies used in the referenced studies.",
+          "explanation": "This improves understanding of algorithm correctness, comparability, and practical applicability."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Some technical terms are used without precise definitions or context.",
-          "original_text": "Some technical terms such as 'survival ensemble', 'heterogeneous multi-source data', and 'recency of data' are used without precise definitions or context-specific clarifications.",
-          "improved_version": "Include brief definitions or references for specialized terms like 'survival ensemble' (e.g., ensemble methods applied to survival analysis), 'heterogeneous multi-source data' (e.g., combining data from different modalities), and 'recency of data' (e.g., temporal relevance of features).",
-          "explanation": "Clarifying terminology ensures accurate interpretation and reduces ambiguity for readers unfamiliar with these concepts."
+          "remarks": "Equations are presented without clear formatting or step-by-step derivations.",
+          "original_text": "Equations are presented in a descriptive manner without clear formatting, labels, or step-by-step derivations, making it difficult to interpret the mathematical logic.",
+          "improved_version": "Format all equations with proper LaTeX or mathematical notation, include labels, and provide step-by-step derivations or explanations for complex formulas.",
+          "explanation": "Enhanced formatting and explanations improve clarity, interpretability, and correctness verification."
         }
       ]
     },
     "R7": {
       "section_name": "Consistency",
-      "score": 3,
-      "summary": "The review is generally well-structured and consistent in its use of core terminology, but there are notable areas for improvement. The logical flow between methods and results could be strengthened with clearer linking statements. There are inconsistencies in the reporting of performance metrics, incomplete or missing figures and tables, and variable definitions for some feature categories. Supplementary materials are referenced but not provided, limiting transparency. Addressing these issues would enhance the manuscript's coherence, clarity, and academic rigor.",
+      "score": 4,
+      "summary": "The review is logically coherent and well-structured, with comprehensive coverage of the topic. Minor inconsistencies in terminology, citation formatting, and integration of figures and tables slightly detract from clarity. Addressing these issues\u2014such as ensuring consistent terminology, standardizing citation formats, and improving figure and table integration\u2014will further enhance the manuscript's clarity, coherence, and scholarly rigor.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "Transitions between sections lack explicit linking statements, affecting logical flow.",
-          "original_text": "Transitions between sections lack explicit linking statements.",
-          "improved_version": "Add transition sentences such as 'Building on the methodology outlined, the following results detail the algorithms evaluated and their performance,' to guide the reader smoothly from methods to results.",
-          "explanation": "Improves logical flow and coherence between sections."
+          "remarks": "Methods and results are not explicitly linked, reducing clarity on methodological impact.",
+          "original_text": "While the methods detail the data collection and sampling techniques, the results section does not explicitly link how these sampling strategies impacted model performance metrics reported later.",
+          "improved_version": "Explicitly discuss how data collection and sampling strategies influenced model performance metrics in the results section, providing clear examples or case studies.",
+          "explanation": "Linking methodological choices to outcomes clarifies the robustness of the results and strengthens the narrative."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Figure 2 is referenced but not included, impairing understanding.",
-          "original_text": "Figure 2 is referenced but not included.",
-          "improved_version": "Ensure that Figure 2 is embedded within the manuscript or provided as an appendix, with a detailed caption explaining the categorization of algorithms, to facilitate understanding.",
-          "explanation": "Enhances comprehension and visual support for the text."
+          "remarks": "Terminology is used inconsistently, potentially confusing readers.",
+          "original_text": "Inconsistent use of terminology, such as sometimes referring to 'performance metrics' collectively and other times specifying 'AUC, F1-Score, Accuracy' without clear definitions or distinctions.",
+          "improved_version": "Define all key terms (e.g., 'performance metrics', 'behavioral features', 'contextual features') early in the manuscript and use them consistently throughout.",
+          "explanation": "Consistent terminology improves clarity and reduces ambiguity for the reader."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Terminology for feature categories is variably defined, leading to potential confusion.",
-          "original_text": "Terms like 'behavioral features' and 'transactional features' are variably defined.",
-          "improved_version": "Include a clear, standardized glossary or definitions table early in the manuscript that explicitly defines each feature category and provides examples, ensuring consistent terminology use.",
-          "explanation": "Reduces confusion and enhances terminology consistency across the review."
+          "remarks": "Figure references lack sufficient detail and integration.",
+          "original_text": "Figure 2 is referenced but not included in the provided text, and its description lacks sufficient detail to understand the categorization of algorithms without visual aid.",
+          "improved_version": "Ensure all figures are included with comprehensive captions and referenced in the text with sufficient detail to be understood independently.",
+          "explanation": "Integrating figures with clear descriptions enhances comprehension and supports the logical flow of the manuscript."
         }
       ]
     }
@@ -432,200 +432,175 @@
     "W1": {
       "section_name": "Language and Style",
       "score": 4,
-      "summary": "The manuscript demonstrates strong academic writing with a clear structure and detailed content. Most sentences are grammatically correct, and the tone is appropriate for a scholarly audience. However, there are occasional issues with verb tense consistency, sentence complexity, and minor typographical errors. Addressing these, particularly by simplifying overly long sentences and ensuring consistent punctuation and article usage, will further enhance clarity and professionalism. Overall, the writing is effective, but targeted refinements will improve readability and adherence to academic standards.",
+      "summary": "The manuscript demonstrates a strong command of academic language and style, with generally clear and professional writing. Most sentences are well-constructed, and the tone is appropriate for a scholarly audience. However, there are areas for improvement, including occasional grammatical inconsistencies (such as subject-verb agreement and tense), overly complex sentence structures, and minor issues with punctuation and citation style. Addressing these will enhance readability, flow, and overall professionalism. The manuscript\u2019s strengths include precise vocabulary and a formal tone, but targeted revisions will further elevate its clarity and polish.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "Inconsistent verb tense usage reduces clarity and can confuse readers about the timeline of events.",
-          "original_text": "The research field of churn prediction developed to detect...",
-          "improved_version": "The research field of churn prediction has developed to detect...",
-          "explanation": "Using the present perfect tense aligns with the rest of the manuscript and clarifies the ongoing relevance of the research field."
+          "remarks": "Complex sentence structure and inconsistent use of list punctuation reduce clarity.",
+          "original_text": "Logistic Regression (n = 28), Decision Tree (n = 21), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN, n = 7), Naive Bayes (n = 6), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO, n = 2), homogeneous and inhomogeneous Poisson process (n = 1), and Regularized Discriminant Analysis (RDA, n = 1)",
+          "improved_version": "Logistic Regression (n = 28), Decision Tree (n = 21), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN, n = 7), Naive Bayes (n = 6), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO, n = 2), homogeneous and inhomogeneous Poisson processes (n = 1), and Regularized Discriminant Analysis (RDA, n = 1).",
+          "explanation": "Adds the Oxford comma for consistency and pluralizes 'process' to match the context, improving readability and list clarity."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Some sentences are overly long and complex, which impairs readability.",
-          "original_text": "Mean performance metrics of reported best-performing models, including AUC, F1-Score, and Accuracy, were calculated across all included studies, and the results showed a range of 82%-86% for AUC and 75%-80% for F1-Score.",
-          "improved_version": "Mean performance metrics for the best-performing models\u2014including AUC, F1-Score, and Accuracy\u2014were calculated across all included studies. The results showed an AUC range of 82%\u201386% and an F1-Score range of 75%\u201380%.",
-          "explanation": "Splitting the sentence and using en dashes for ranges improves clarity and aligns with academic style."
+          "remarks": "Overly long and complex sentences in the discussion reduce clarity and make it difficult for readers to follow the argument.",
+          "original_text": "Mean performance metrics of reported best-performing models in included mobile app studies (Accuracy = 86%, AUC = 0.83, F1-Score = 0.81) are comparable to reported mean accuracies between 82%-86% in telecommunication services [58], indicating that churn prediction in mobile apps is likewise feasible.",
+          "improved_version": "The mean performance metrics of the best-performing models in the included mobile app studies\u2014such as Accuracy (86%), AUC (0.83), and F1-Score (0.81)\u2014are comparable to the mean accuracies reported in telecommunication services (82%\u201386%) [58]. This indicates that churn prediction in mobile apps is similarly feasible.",
+          "explanation": "Splits a lengthy sentence into two for improved clarity and digestibility, making the comparison and conclusion more accessible."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Minor typographical and punctuation errors affect professionalism.",
-          "original_text": "tranforming",
-          "improved_version": "transforming",
-          "explanation": "Correcting typographical errors ensures accuracy and maintains a professional tone."
+          "remarks": "Inconsistent tense usage in the methodology section can disrupt narrative flow and temporal clarity.",
+          "original_text": "A review protocol was submitted... search terms related to churn prediction, mobile app data, and ML methodologies: ...",
+          "improved_version": "A review protocol was submitted, and the search terms related to churn prediction, mobile app data, and ML methodologies were developed accordingly.",
+          "explanation": "Ensures consistent use of past tense for methodological descriptions, improving narrative coherence and professionalism."
         }
       ]
     },
     "W2": {
       "section_name": "Narrative and Structure",
-      "score": 3,
-      "summary": "The manuscript presents a logical and comprehensive structure, moving from introduction to methods, results, and discussion. However, the narrative flow is occasionally disrupted by abrupt transitions, weak topic sentences, and insufficient explicit linking of findings to research questions. Paragraphs sometimes contain multiple ideas without clear organization, and visual elements are not well integrated into the text. Addressing these issues by improving transitions, strengthening topic sentences, and explicitly referencing research questions and visuals will enhance coherence and reader engagement.",
+      "score": 4,
+      "summary": "The manuscript exhibits a well-organized narrative structure, with logical progression from introduction to conclusion. Sections are clearly delineated, and the overall flow supports reader comprehension. However, some transitions between topics within sections (especially in the literature review and results) could be smoother, and visual elements (figures/tables) should be better integrated into the text. Improving signposting, adding explicit references to visuals, and synthesizing key points at section ends would further enhance coherence and engagement. The manuscript\u2019s strengths include comprehensive coverage and logical sequencing, but targeted improvements will make the narrative more cohesive and accessible.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "Transitions between major sections are minimal, leading to a choppy reading experience.",
-          "original_text": "The screening process for the selection of articles was conducted in several steps. After applying the outlined search strategies, the resulting database reference lists were imported into the web-based systematic review program Covidence.",
-          "improved_version": "The article screening process involved multiple steps: first, applying the search strategies and importing results into Covidence, a systematic review tool, to manage duplicates and facilitate independent review.",
-          "explanation": "Providing a clearer, more logical sequence of steps improves narrative flow and understanding of methodology."
+          "remarks": "The abstract does not clearly state the unique contribution of the review or the research gap addressed.",
+          "original_text": "This systematic literature review investigates applied machine learning (ML) algorithms and features for predicting churn in mobile apps by synthesizing methodologies and outcomes of 50 selected studies from an initial pool of 1,502 screened articles.",
+          "improved_version": "This systematic review synthesizes methodologies and outcomes from 50 studies on machine learning-based churn prediction in mobile apps, filling a notable gap in the literature.",
+          "explanation": "Clarifies the review\u2019s contribution and novelty, helping readers quickly grasp its significance."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Results and discussion sections lack explicit linking of findings to research questions, weakening the argument.",
-          "original_text": "The results section presents a wealth of data and statistics, but the logical connection between findings and their implications in the discussion is sometimes weak, with limited explicit linking of results to research questions.",
-          "improved_version": "While the results provide detailed data, explicitly linking each key finding back to the corresponding research questions in the discussion would clarify how the evidence supports or refutes each hypothesis.",
-          "explanation": "Encourages clearer hypothesis tracking and strengthens the logical flow between results and discussion."
+          "remarks": "Figures and tables are informative but not well-integrated into the narrative.",
+          "original_text": "Figures and tables are informative but could be better integrated into the text with explicit references and explanations of their relevance.",
+          "improved_version": "Figures and tables are well-constructed; however, explicitly referencing and discussing them within the text would enhance their integration, guiding readers to interpret visual data in context.",
+          "explanation": "Encourages active integration of visuals into the narrative, improving comprehension and engagement."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Figures and tables are not always explicitly referenced or integrated into the narrative.",
-          "original_text": "Figures and tables are used effectively but are not always explicitly referenced or integrated into the narrative, reducing their impact.",
-          "improved_version": "Explicitly referencing and discussing each figure and table within the text would enhance their integration, helping readers connect visual data with the narrative points.",
-          "explanation": "Improves visual element integration, making visual data more accessible and impactful."
+          "remarks": "Transitions between topics within sections (e.g., from algorithms to features) are sometimes abrupt, affecting coherence.",
+          "original_text": "The review also explores additional factors and methods influencing churn prediction outcomes highlighted in relevant studies, as well as the outcomes of churn prevention strategies employed alongside churn prediction models.",
+          "improved_version": "Additionally, the review examines factors influencing churn prediction outcomes and evaluates the effectiveness of prevention strategies integrated with prediction models.",
+          "explanation": "Streamlines the sentence and clarifies the thematic link, improving flow and cohesion."
         }
       ]
     },
     "W3": {
       "section_name": "Clarity and Conciseness",
       "score": 3,
-      "summary": "The manuscript is comprehensive and detailed but would benefit from greater clarity and conciseness. Complex language, lengthy sentences, and dense paragraphs can hinder quick understanding, especially for non-specialist readers. Reducing jargon, breaking up long sentences and paragraphs, and summarizing key findings will improve readability and accessibility without sacrificing scientific rigor.",
+      "summary": "The manuscript provides thorough coverage of the topic but is sometimes hampered by dense language, lengthy sentences, and technical jargon. These factors can impede quick comprehension, especially for readers less familiar with the domain. Simplifying language, breaking up long sentences and paragraphs, and providing brief explanations for technical terms would significantly improve clarity and conciseness. The work\u2019s strengths include detailed analysis and precise reporting, but targeted editing is needed to enhance accessibility and reader engagement.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "Complex phrases and technical jargon may hinder understanding for non-specialist readers.",
+          "remarks": "The abstract uses unnecessarily complex language, reducing immediate clarity.",
+          "original_text": "User churn, where users prematurely discontinue the use of a product or service, poses significant challenges across various industry domains, including gaming, healthcare, or education.",
+          "improved_version": "User churn, the early discontinuation of a product or service, presents major challenges in industries like gaming, healthcare, and education.",
+          "explanation": "Simplifies the sentence structure and vocabulary for broader accessibility."
+        },
+        {
+          "remarks": "Long sentences in the results section make statistical information harder to interpret.",
+          "original_text": "The datasets used for training and evaluating churn prediction models varied widely in sample size, ranging from as few as 61 users to as many as 37 million users (Median = 25,000, IQR = 79,436 - 4,089).",
+          "improved_version": "Dataset sizes ranged from 61 to 37 million users, with a median of 25,000 and an IQR of 4,089 to 79,436.",
+          "explanation": "Rearranges and condenses the information for easier and faster understanding."
+        },
+        {
+          "remarks": "Technical terms are used without explanation, limiting accessibility.",
           "original_text": "The findings demonstrate a wide variety of applied ML algorithms - from logistic regression to custom deep neural networks - to predict users' churn probabilities and survival times in mobile apps.",
-          "improved_version": "The findings show many ML algorithms used for predicting user churn and survival times, from logistic regression to deep neural networks.",
-          "explanation": "Simplifies language and reduces complexity, making the sentence clearer and more concise."
-        },
-        {
-          "remarks": "Long sentences, especially those describing algorithms and performance metrics, impair readability.",
-          "original_text": "Many sentences, especially those describing algorithms and performance metrics, are lengthy and contain multiple clauses.",
-          "improved_version": "Break long sentences into shorter ones, especially when describing algorithms and metrics. For example, separate the description of algorithms from performance results.",
-          "explanation": "Improves readability by reducing sentence length and complexity."
-        },
-        {
-          "remarks": "Dense technical language and lack of transition sentences hinder smooth reading.",
-          "original_text": "The dense technical language and lack of transition sentences in the discussion hinder smooth reading.",
-          "improved_version": "Add transition sentences and simplify technical language where possible to improve flow and accessibility.",
-          "explanation": "Enhances overall readability and comprehension."
+          "improved_version": "The results show many ML algorithms used for predicting user churn and survival times, from logistic regression to deep neural networks.",
+          "explanation": "Reduces jargon and clarifies the range of algorithms, making the content more accessible."
         }
       ]
     },
     "W4": {
       "section_name": "Terminology Consistency",
       "score": 3,
-      "summary": "Terminology is generally consistent, but there are notable areas for improvement. The manuscript sometimes uses synonyms (e.g., 'user churn', 'user attrition', 'dropout') interchangeably without clear definitions, and acronyms are not always introduced or used consistently. Standardizing definitions, acronym usage, and formatting of technical terms and metrics will improve clarity and reduce ambiguity.",
+      "summary": "Terminology is generally consistent, but there are notable lapses, such as inconsistent use and definition of acronyms, variable formatting of technical terms, and ambiguity in key definitions (e.g., 'user churn'). Standardizing terminology, defining acronyms and abbreviations at first use, and ensuring consistent formatting of variables and metrics will improve clarity and professionalism. The manuscript\u2019s strength lies in its comprehensive coverage of technical terms, but greater attention to consistency is needed for optimal scholarly communication.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "Key terms are used interchangeably without clear definitions, which can cause confusion.",
-          "original_text": "The term 'user attrition' is used interchangeably with 'user churn' and 'dropout' in different sections.",
-          "improved_version": "For consistency, define all these terms at the outset, e.g., 'User attrition, user churn, and dropout are used interchangeably to refer to users discontinuing app use.'",
-          "explanation": "Provides clear, consistent terminology and reduces ambiguity."
+          "remarks": "The acronym 'ML' is used without definition at first mention, which may confuse some readers.",
+          "original_text": "The acronym 'ML' is used throughout the paper without prior definition.",
+          "improved_version": "Machine Learning (ML) is used throughout the paper; ensure to define 'ML' at first mention.",
+          "explanation": "Defining acronyms at first use improves clarity and ensures all readers understand the terminology."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Acronyms are used without initial definitions, which may confuse readers unfamiliar with the terms.",
-          "original_text": "Acronyms like ML, SVM, RNN, LSTM are used without initial definitions in some instances.",
-          "improved_version": "Introduce each acronym with its full form upon first use, e.g., 'Support Vector Machine (SVM)', 'Recurrent Neural Network (RNN)', 'Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)'.",
-          "explanation": "Enhances clarity for readers unfamiliar with abbreviations."
+          "remarks": "Terms such as 'user churn', 'attrition', 'loss', 'abandonment', and 'dropout' are used interchangeably, causing ambiguity.",
+          "original_text": "Terms such as 'user churn', 'attrition', 'loss', 'abandonment', and 'dropout' are used interchangeably.",
+          "improved_version": "Use 'user churn' consistently throughout the manuscript, and define it explicitly as the discontinuation of app usage within the context of this review.",
+          "explanation": "Standardizing terminology and providing a clear definition reduces ambiguity and aids reader understanding."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Performance metrics are reported with inconsistent formatting.",
-          "original_text": "The performance metrics such as AUC, F1-Score, Accuracy are reported with inconsistent formatting.",
-          "improved_version": "Performance metrics such as AUC, F1-Score, and Accuracy should be consistently formatted, e.g., always capitalized and hyphenated as 'F1-Score' and 'AUC'.",
-          "explanation": "Ensures uniform presentation of metrics, improving professionalism."
+          "remarks": "Performance metrics are reported with inconsistent units and formats, hindering comparison.",
+          "original_text": "Performance metrics like accuracy, F1-Score, and AUC are reported inconsistently.",
+          "improved_version": "Standardize reporting as percentages (e.g., Accuracy = 86%) or decimal fractions (e.g., AUC = 0.83), and specify units clearly in the text and tables.",
+          "explanation": "Consistent reporting of metrics facilitates comparison and improves clarity."
         }
       ]
     },
     "W5": {
       "section_name": "Inclusive Language",
       "score": 3,
-      "summary": "The manuscript generally uses inclusive language, with gender-neutral terms like 'users' and 'their.' However, there are opportunities to further enhance inclusivity by explicitly acknowledging diversity in gender, culture, ability, and socioeconomic status. Addressing the exclusion of non-English studies and avoiding overgeneralizations about user behavior will improve fairness and applicability across diverse populations.",
+      "summary": "The manuscript generally uses neutral and inclusive language, referring to 'users' and 'participants' appropriately. However, there are missed opportunities to address diversity, accessibility, and global representation\u2014such as not considering disability, socioeconomic, or geographic diversity in the analysis and language. Occasional use of labels like 'churners' could be replaced with person-first language. More explicit acknowledgment of inclusivity and diversity would enhance the manuscript\u2019s fairness and relevance for a global audience.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "Explicitly acknowledging diversity and gender neutrality can further promote inclusivity.",
-          "original_text": "User churn, where users prematurely discontinue the use of a product or service, poses significant challenges across various industry domains, including gaming, healthcare, or education.",
-          "improved_version": "User churn, referring to the discontinuation of a product or service by individuals of all genders and backgrounds, poses significant challenges across various industry domains, including gaming, healthcare, and education.",
-          "explanation": "Specifies that the language is inclusive of all genders and backgrounds, promoting gender neutrality and broad applicability."
+          "remarks": "Labels such as 'churners' or 'disengaged users' can be depersonalizing.",
+          "original_text": "The document predominantly uses 'users' and 'participants' with person-first language, but occasionally uses 'churners' or 'disengaged users.'",
+          "improved_version": "Consistently employing person-first language, such as 'users who disengage' or 'participants experiencing churn,' promotes respectful and inclusive terminology.",
+          "explanation": "Person-first language emphasizes individuals over labels, fostering inclusivity."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "The review does not address the exclusion of non-English studies, which limits geographic and cultural inclusivity.",
-          "original_text": "The review only includes articles published in English, which may exclude relevant research from non-English speaking regions.",
-          "improved_version": "The review primarily includes articles published in English; future research should incorporate multilingual sources to enhance geographic and cultural diversity.",
-          "explanation": "Acknowledges language limitations while encouraging broader inclusion to improve inclusivity."
+          "remarks": "The review does not explicitly address accessibility or disability considerations.",
+          "original_text": "The review discusses features like 'device type' and 'health features' but does not explicitly consider accessibility or disabilities of users.",
+          "improved_version": "While discussing features like 'device type' and 'health features,' future research should explicitly consider accessibility and accommodations for users with disabilities to promote inclusivity.",
+          "explanation": "Encourages the inclusion of accessibility considerations, supporting equitable research."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Discussion of behavioral features as universally applicable could reinforce stereotypes.",
-          "original_text": "The discussion emphasizes behavioral features as universally applicable, which could inadvertently reinforce stereotypes about user behavior.",
-          "improved_version": "The discussion highlights behavioral features as significant predictors, while recognizing the diversity of user behaviors influenced by cultural, socioeconomic, and individual differences, avoiding overgeneralizations.",
-          "explanation": "Promotes awareness of diversity and prevents stereotypes by emphasizing variability in user behavior."
+          "remarks": "The search strategy\u2019s focus on English-language articles limits geographic inclusivity.",
+          "original_text": "The search strategy focuses on English-language articles, potentially excluding research from non-English speaking regions.",
+          "improved_version": "The current search strategy emphasizes English-language publications, which may limit geographic diversity; future efforts should include multilingual sources to broaden global representation.",
+          "explanation": "Acknowledges language bias and promotes global inclusivity."
         }
       ]
     },
     "W6": {
       "section_name": "Citation Formatting",
       "score": 3,
-      "summary": "Citation formatting is moderately consistent but suffers from mixed styles, inconsistent use of brackets and parentheses, and occasional mismatches between in-text citations and the reference list. Adopting a uniform citation style (such as APA author-year), ensuring consistent formatting, and verifying cross-references will improve clarity and professionalism.",
+      "summary": "Citation formatting is generally acceptable but marred by inconsistent use of brackets and parentheses, variable placement of citations, and occasional mismatches between in-text citations and the reference list. Standardizing the use of parentheses for all in-text citations, ensuring consistent placement, and thoroughly cross-checking references will enhance the manuscript\u2019s professionalism and credibility. The reference list is comprehensive, but uniform formatting is needed for optimal scholarly presentation.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "Numeric in-text citations are used inconsistently and should be replaced with a standard author-year format.",
+          "remarks": "Inconsistent use of brackets and parentheses for in-text citations reduces professionalism.",
           "original_text": "[1, 23, 28, 68, 84]",
-          "improved_version": "(Ahmed & Linen, 2017; Mehreen Ahmed et al., 2017; Eysenbach, 2005; Sifa, 2021; Jakob et al., 2022)",
-          "explanation": "Switching to author-year format enhances clarity, aligns with APA style, and improves consistency."
+          "improved_version": "(1, 23, 28, 68, 84)",
+          "explanation": "Using parentheses uniformly for in-text citations aligns with common academic styles and improves clarity."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Unpublished or in-press works are cited in a non-standard way.",
-          "original_text": "(2025) (In preparation)",
-          "improved_version": "[Author, in press]",
-          "explanation": "Using '[Author, in press]' clearly indicates unpublished work per style guidelines and maintains consistency."
-        },
-        {
-          "remarks": "References to numeric citations should be replaced with author-year format for consistency.",
+          "remarks": "Some in-text citations do not clearly match the reference list, hampering source verification.",
           "original_text": "[12, 77, 80]",
-          "improved_version": "(Kwon et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2022; Li et al., 2021)",
-          "explanation": "Replacing numeric citations with author-year format improves readability and aligns with common academic standards."
+          "improved_version": "(12, 77, 80)",
+          "explanation": "Standardizing citation delimiters and ensuring all citations match the reference list enhances credibility and traceability."
+        },
+        {
+          "remarks": "Variable formatting of citation numbers and placement within sentences reduces readability.",
+          "original_text": "Most studies defining churn after a specific cutoff date [1, 23, 28, 68, 84]",
+          "improved_version": "Most studies defining churn after a specific cutoff date (1, 23, 28, 68, 84)",
+          "explanation": "Consistent citation formatting improves readability and professional appearance."
         }
       ]
     },
     "W7": {
       "section_name": "Target Audience Alignment",
       "score": 4,
-      "summary": "The manuscript is well-structured and demonstrates a high level of technical rigor suitable for an academic audience. It covers algorithms, features, and performance metrics comprehensively. However, dense technical language and the lack of visual summaries may limit accessibility for practitioners or interdisciplinary readers. Incorporating more visual aids, simplifying complex sentences, and explicitly highlighting practical implications will broaden the manuscript's impact.",
+      "summary": "The manuscript is well-aligned with its intended academic audience, offering technical depth, formal language, and comprehensive coverage of methodologies and findings. The structure and terminology are appropriate for researchers and advanced practitioners, though some sections could be made more accessible with clearer subheadings, summaries, and visual aids. Explicitly linking findings to practical implications and including more visual elements would further enhance engagement for both academic and industry readers. Overall, the manuscript\u2019s strengths are its rigor and depth, with minor improvements needed for broader accessibility.",
       "suggestions": [
         {
-          "remarks": "Dense methodology and technical terminology may overwhelm non-expert readers.",
-          "original_text": "The methodology section is densely packed with procedural details and extensive technical terminology, which may overwhelm non-expert readers or practitioners seeking a high-level overview.",
-          "improved_version": "Summarize key methodological steps in a flowchart or checklist and provide brief explanations of technical terms to make the methodology more accessible to non-experts.",
-          "explanation": "Visual summaries and simplified explanations improve accessibility and comprehension for a broader audience."
+          "remarks": "Dense methodology sections may challenge practitioners seeking procedural clarity.",
+          "original_text": "While detailed, the methodology section is dense and could benefit from clearer subheadings or bullet points to improve readability for practitioners and researchers seeking specific procedural insights.",
+          "improved_version": "Add subheadings or bullet points to the methodology section to clearly delineate each step, making it easier for practitioners and researchers to follow and replicate the review process.",
+          "explanation": "Improves navigability and supports practical application by clearly organizing procedural details."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Results lack visual summaries, making it harder for readers to grasp key findings efficiently.",
-          "original_text": "Results are presented with numerous statistical metrics and dataset specifics, but lack visual summaries like tables or figures that could facilitate quick understanding.",
-          "improved_version": "Include summary tables or figures to present key performance metrics and dataset characteristics, enabling readers to quickly grasp main findings.",
-          "explanation": "Visual aids facilitate efficient understanding and comparison of results."
+          "remarks": "Extensive listing of features and rankings in results may overwhelm non-expert readers.",
+          "original_text": "The extensive listing of features and their importance rankings, while thorough, may overwhelm readers unfamiliar with the domain-specific features, potentially hindering quick comprehension.",
+          "improved_version": "Summarize key features and their importance rankings in a table or visual, and provide a brief narrative overview to aid comprehension for readers less familiar with the domain.",
+          "explanation": "Visual summaries and concise overviews improve accessibility for interdisciplinary and practitioner audiences."
         },
         {
-          "remarks": "Discussion could better highlight practical implications for practitioners and broader audiences.",
-          "original_text": "The discussion emphasizes technical comparisons and nuanced insights but could benefit from clearer implications for practitioners and broader audiences.",
-          "improved_version": "Add a subsection in the discussion that outlines practical recommendations and implications for practitioners and policymakers.",
-          "explanation": "Explicitly addressing practical implications increases relevance and engagement for a wider audience."
-        }
-      ]
-    },
-    "W8": {
-      "section_name": "Visual Presentation",
-      "score": 1,
-      "summary": "The manuscript currently lacks visual presentation elements such as figures and tables, which significantly diminishes clarity, accessibility, and overall effectiveness. The absence of visual aids makes it difficult for readers to quickly interpret complex data and understand the study selection process. Incorporating well-designed figures, tables, and visual summaries, along with clear captions and consistent styling, will greatly enhance comprehension, engagement, and the professional quality of the paper.",
-      "suggestions": [
-        {
-          "remarks": "The PRISMA flowchart is referenced but not included, severely limiting understanding of the study selection process.",
-          "original_text": "Figure 1: PRISMA flowchart illustrating the study selection process and app domains of included studies.",
-          "improved_version": "Insert a high-resolution PRISMA flowchart illustrating the study selection process, including stages of screening, eligibility, and inclusion, with clear labels for reasons for exclusion. Ensure the diagram is visually distinct, with consistent style and color contrast.",
-          "explanation": "A visual flowchart enhances transparency, allows quick understanding of the study selection process, and improves overall clarity."
-        },
-        {
-          "remarks": "Tables summarizing performance metrics and feature prevalence are referenced but not included.",
-          "original_text": "Tables 1 and 2 are referenced but not included.",
-          "improved_version": "Include well-formatted tables summarizing performance metrics (Table 1) and feature prevalence (Table 2). Use clear headers, consistent font, and adequate spacing. Highlight key data points with shading or bolding where appropriate.",
-          "explanation": "Tables facilitate quick comparison and comprehension of complex quantitative data, supporting the narrative effectively."
-        },
-        {
-          "remarks": "No visual summaries (charts or diagrams) are provided for performance metrics or feature importance.",
-          "original_text": "Descriptive text about performance metrics and features.",
-          "improved_version": "Complement textual descriptions with visual summaries such as bar charts or box plots showing performance metric distributions and feature importance rankings. Use color coding for different algorithms or feature categories.",
-          "explanation": "Visual summaries improve data interpretation speed and highlight key differences or trends more effectively than text alone."
+          "remarks": "Discussion could more explicitly link findings to practical implications for industry stakeholders.",
+          "original_text": "The discussion, though comprehensive, occasionally lacks explicit linkages between findings and practical implications, which could diminish relevance for industry practitioners.",
+          "improved_version": "Strengthen the discussion by explicitly connecting research findings to practical implications and recommendations for industry stakeholders.",
+          "explanation": "Enhances the manuscript\u2019s utility for applied audiences by making actionable insights more apparent."
         }
       ]
     }

Agent1_Peer_Review/results/review_report.pdf

@@ -0,0 +1,677 @@
+%PDF-1.4
+%<25><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD> ReportLab Generated PDF document http://www.reportlab.com
+1 0 obj
+<<
+/F1 2 0 R /F2 5 0 R /F3 6 0 R
+>>
+endobj
+2 0 obj
+<<
+/BaseFont /Helvetica /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Name /F1 /Subtype /Type1 /Type /Font
+>>
+endobj
+3 0 obj
+<<
+/BitsPerComponent 8 /ColorSpace /DeviceRGB /Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Height 76 /Length 2561 /SMask 4 0 R 
+  /Subtype /Image /Type /XObject /Width 261
+>>
+stream
+Gb"/ll[#T]&;KuuA(5\([Q.SjRnMK0^,LbcD.!PK#:7Xh5!Jq-(l#qU0H@Gl!<<*"z!!!!q*S5f?rA<-XmJ<>Xc6lh/(4[T64jT2%^7Yl'>KBhGF9-h(JjSt1XU>A!/4G6m;1Jm\*?gBn'qt\.&jIdlh)tMuq6U#&_ZY3tApr=7TVcnpf84mJ#k/DL$:,r5JKdAXXQcSIkRN,*2X.B^MC<!LJ2#`40&2*]M?)rUQohJeZ!\UR.\W#s)2\E`;j@T*5"L6;VF(#%k7O(LJ/,"tBG_m-JH5fdV+rTjAnmA-!YhJ+/QfFgiVNO/%!S';UpO"'3RnTK,C[_@_>rQ<@2R:dNIoES>RQDqR7[u$OM_aKmCR5+0:2>:#fts2GmGuM7^b`;64Qf4-?@1cF&n<fG.V89SXlgO3NtO0GIc</03m4A64KNAQ'_,kod+bLrm-dKgN>R2q3YDWqg$XqFLU0%qDoW,Vo^UKn*g:ds44%8HQ,nOe1NdJV;?)s^,S^/AbJpO*Gr/qP<']U:c6#3RpJQ%]4;e7@3G#SgUl3`4*Jj8\i60g*M_oDgV9Tka8N`nMDr*/>JcI7g/(ud00+(Sj0$PSZhq;9E<#pQgnATBorl#t0=D%DQ':g)DJ1dSr=`\-9^Q<(&hKfB?'Bm?.oLR]09_'-GMNLlPA/j1DZffU-kqXGcAf#n@Gb(PVEaNm-i\Wj%`Yp?UrMQjD]n.LRQ-P]G]>l]C)Nl7WWY>pq"<\&iTli6>KPRR3^\PX1DGF]i4NX&i>=QX>V:F"Eo;7UjuS]tOBP+&]1Pg.r^aVh,*p:ndLX7ai`Mf2pd?P)VH]S*hj6]j(48-<qS;S6^pq4+C)Nl7.PWq'8V\CQ87j;5Vi)gI=XefB86-+uU`:`Qa.C'G:(F'8FHbt"BA7m]5jd'><XsFjali&%j*'tt5KlYJUS(m=,R<_hI\#s%5BXqFWQ5(%]hfC,OQ'GGP%VbDMQL*0_r5R+[c"5,W-5^.c/7bKLP%[0o]<mLlHY`bjq!gYlnSq%APu0e"')18,$d-f+EjGm90#B]l6r?[lo\Jh[q&Pf_K'>EGHt/,[QDXjbo^Map3e*^#.\<0[&\l@5Qu(=Zeg%AcE&B8]p'<V.u1*f(XbWnSh2[6)SU\N#Lam`[o8_B,R8'!<"C^j8BK4/YDfc1Q'`Nml`2p;3Ysh,PO2P)QV"3on"l/<464T$C_+LB.k$1+FF7X[@=3G?AaPXl,ip_-'2".K_d-=9YB1o0AN5`ef*]/"M%`4d2crQK<d&RUH8m;qLEp#bG,JXY?Ue21A/Rs!FBo]c2a*Xj?b=m5$LU_Dl+N9eEA+`3=81niO9<*(7l>]S=/!,M^5T@@'eKZb6HfaqRG.cnEhjnLR70"AK:,8!#jue-Do78iQEY.emD:4cO@)>qA5^nTjnLURg5W9I4U$kfU%\!N]lG@Af0JIC=ainO<Y;X85*hut4$#bfX.guts2uR3H,jO=?d>*G=lM?%-1.]83=o,6cE@#spHK+.]Dp*^4UmMue"u48,7BR-qlUPqX#UtI&c8JC92+cpjpTKU\4ImT*0aMo=hBREi21662TR^Z2Xch<pUVob`MKr5/WtfXVFT3_)\P/PO8h6%.cCKaiAuIJl0-?"f8ptOF@Y.DJ#RO%7Ya5H"mmdS&<,JY*cHD9mAul!YK6YGEW_OVAeJ!Zr)Hi,^'TYD@>PuV'+ss)Zk3@d+t1)SIC&T-\VKA`FU"A]5>_o"G1BBqmoRJRf&Go89g_<:N2Ar5HN0d2r3j#k,A*RYru3IPr?W,,EB36C/+5Hu,DZ5h4a1XebL<ScSB4QA)$TCWo;E.EVhr5bh!lc4iAksh'PAU<U6D"rBBga^MH%5fRY?le.Neu(l%rI'iJY&u9%dKJ)cJaBXX8$jP*JC(a1DDr1Kd$SMHQ$bIMLLZ84i!iKuh7,e1sYL[7h(^"]B;T_qUGO*clI/RaH'oCH`r2LWHc$+ZYo[WnHO@b;K:^jC;buYFb7e44BEDUQjSBV;3H'gUXcjfmsU8U?1VTE1n9:+!<tW7kO7b%_Y\e?,-u3iu,2nUmY!:B%m"-N_F*#Ig^q__qa6jC)Nl7:9flUqc.;.%a'^/Qpm]-ISFt/'"9E^cu:6f^Gil9WQ'7?hlO.K0e\Zn06]JAp>sSgMBc\6bL!&+Z?m@5%*_GCC&XK0Xsa)b&=k+'Xj0TlP%rkn:MQR93V<7e$3*,C_F,`S:,"6r^cNqF\%0.[Q>5!&@NRaS'p3SX!`Xd$]3b]?/O'`hUA`'4PCGf.W<Wh!SuqSok2G*6P=\1@rtmA,%h:tE"2QEqbs(sG5=W"`*[8^&K_R?.TIAc35>+qms*7Ba][H4!pYd.NO2t@37)3\o6c2ILdVk1d@\iN':>iA_^C$`hB*JF5b-`p7[i6,h^R*aKKN]nFH1MYn7)F!>P&o#R+ZtVt^oo-JC$=p%B?)-.!RsSta!UWLp%DM+Ck?fTS\^L'Y6`1pYN@%DRS@G\63G"9Y6^8+lf%t"%tjq56O=KlHbp\O'bF=FKE-H1OmAh\$c')'>tXt+?VS+@+92BAz!:X\"#I&haOo~>endstream
+endobj
+4 0 obj
+<<
+/BitsPerComponent 8 /ColorSpace /DeviceGray /Decode [ 0 1 ] /Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Height 76 /Length 2376 
+  /Subtype /Image /Type /XObject /Width 261
+>>
+stream
+Gb"/jCMX_S'Z[,Te-ZI5#RtI`&jTn`#+C'5E!%O3dL_j*&0X<'+pk-@5^5-N"@30UQ\m@C(,\9"OSAi"&6VuL,>f&0";;MZOAZ[Pntre[h)RR/41fS-mTsu/k4[[3L\As9RFsC2S]C0T>sct3/$62,8h6PK8l\mA,#VE5BqiL:J/$R]5q5TN:n^KJ+OrHE#af;"_[Aig#Z:al<!9ds6q8+rM8MTTMP@?Aa@;:IK0caC:_dUd<E"I#FgbQY>TP`G^d=9X*a7"oj-8>nr_Baf+e5c'PtqV&g-F@6"`mC;UAIj'\<9R;c>G_?^q1?.?&<2f@4Q;pe98>Q"<ZK8],M)6p_6f`h,"Bc+FpE:U$uTU/>4d,"MuNSe=cjR2T6M:G`$@Q;u@)Y,_;W,\EWl0$:t;M`].`K?Rn^25k$cF'VqHb?dO5EF\RfH[*[n&K^-mRW$BXOd[1H;I_)8p::_XMfr]0\`Inq*^\`%_/g28.FPj^Tnq+/9F\AWU,,>Ssa>"(j.XuWlL?D$Lo4SO'1YTu1;EaY?DdM#pnRn0>YF%CsOB;H]+0u!Y1m6+=%=2&JAfWC:)WFj4$?ne,X0:Y:@)`2ATX<[XEOGAh/@7"QO"=a#01)DNFZj^K'#XEV>fUUIL]Tk.b:Nq>I#pX=*@eGh&L!*M1.++pM@DnlinKou4hZud0L$.9(LY2J3mFh`GutTNg^aK'.27Bb"r4icGDEI^bp`i?A%S+RH&TBfbR]E3^i?`bJj9nDAMTq(Wj9llKDhIL"UJ8O>RUVLHtVl8HtcfP*sSFV2.j:g50<%R->+IS*5nBJBAa6Xht,R(!Wg.h-oa<[_;Qp>Ygss[F:7H-<n;(J&*=,&[ST0s67&tHoo(H,'@/F\LDL)%aV28J_*GRp(kFW3AS5!+;;!'K1@s+(\ioV]"lXlA[CqkHZ0sgUq-t[eTmdg]=E^RHgi?,)hZ(l#^CZ(ABJ0Qr&16nR"ecK"WW^'BKMGU9oo[XUIotuGG?_R!"p(UIV6qQ?NHf\fL7Ec1"P.Ec"s+<oZeQ*5A_'EtPTgdX6tT[W1+LLZaeS:4E'FcJ0HU2S?+$Lg!bk/(Zf=oS_rGOLFu*u$R)Z4u]\juh0TR+KGs9TcRH&#ipCe_2Rh0VDBpP2+7cG,t7EFI&pj_W[!f+!L!b!Oa)L0(q%UhLV[da2g==m-MD;fpJKU8@).nd+)V92i`Y2/;AUBH2?#C;&S#D=B9#]GP2^?6&.1S`g.!UFuuX"E,QJ7&N._]/u9</VH.NsG_OUjt2h\6,bn5Zl)YF-AZ*+i"BZK]hO6mb,Y2(@Gg#=9\rJ2@*i$rAf4+:3ZEh'7g5-!5Ea)XQt0?_B``a0_2hi*5ZN(*9J"4Z".p1X"E,QJFFm"%(8MG,^]1[UXk^q'4)5TGEF3US:U;Z*!1Un!auAEO+R:0-A6B_BItqg/8*',m^@(!j77FN'N>AM](_-\.@@@5%ldmt='+1ddV:TCnsaS(I"hbjB=Rt'aR3LY^2?9Y]>Q71gZSekHC_Z"glK[4QC4<:2+p=Q`\+Y@*knT/.#.*E/Gj:[03Dl;-k,/qi=Pd+#mBfW*9kM;3JDPLk%.gQC1$2r[1pp=NVb#=Tmid=8uChG)]FK."KTP/:jX9W/<!\r(NljDoL8=MKt?0p&HkUFA9pKh[bh>E+:Muc]4pU-]uJUp@Tcp6+6a<8k&lrI%r*Eonemf6960Vr@"[#+'DZ-6Cd(7Nr/m3K"L:l7_70oZl%a(h>F6KU^UkE8+UiNks2Gq>#U0!'ApH6e#eAhri>apj5p0CM:eqLa[tXVinrt`8OgWCK`^qakKg,r"#^cpea8l#Vc3j^<p`9rY8,"7p^[Z8VqB[Z?f%#%:>F8bc%;,>(5$L_eUseD/BnmaKLVsq^:d?M4AD*0kFLcY7U%QHq>>B#S:WUk`TW=44Zh=MYG[^&[Zn9Kt=#J3X/"?,:K4%rFFII!jPU#;\O:8,ZPNjS8I/)KbBhuS9SnhmG(fNS9I$(au>DQY+O=Be%7sB(:BAW5Neamk%Qaf[V`UGs9/3i.neoGfgQDHA[d?uRiIg;qpB;n2/'_(c:OKj.ldr"-5l-<sb659,e*E>pcVDV37b`[j`q1lehM-_\p"ak#U%6f7c)QPmk92>+_+Y(Q;H02a.5nC9T$,PY):I:lRV@_h%:Jk8e$4*)-L`t(=9(PWjs80PDNV`PSYC:e#5n"4@=k:V'eB:M`57AaYl<QGolAUTt]je#`DqR<uTSSNnb8AGLl"00)PnYaWDh)B[m6pY$SK&U`<OEPk#mi71M;NZbc[uu+\ZhHnkV2$Ja(K<gd6n3WImp+t'-1I?o"ra;^]0H(R1q,u/"/LsS/bF?$jb9?#-)SR8u`>O[*hPs<V7FZi)XC~>endstream
+endobj
+5 0 obj
+<<
+/BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Name /F2 /Subtype /Type1 /Type /Font
+>>
+endobj
+6 0 obj
+<<
+/BaseFont /ZapfDingbats /Name /F3 /Subtype /Type1 /Type /Font
+>>
+endobj
+7 0 obj
+<<
+/A <<
+/S /URI /Type /Action /URI (https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1EhQvw-HdGRqfL01jZaayoaiTWLSydZTI4V0lJSvNpds/edit)
+>> /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /Rect [ 161.138 284.4 238.16 297.6 ] /Subtype /Link /Type /Annot
+>>
+endobj
+8 0 obj
+<<
+/Annots [ 7 0 R ] /Contents 39 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 
+  /Trans <<
+
+>> /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+9 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 40 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+10 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 41 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+11 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 42 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+12 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 43 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+13 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 44 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+14 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 45 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+15 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 46 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+16 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 47 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+17 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 48 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+18 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 49 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+19 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 50 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+20 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 51 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+21 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 52 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+22 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 53 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+23 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 54 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+24 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 55 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+25 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 56 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+26 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 57 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+27 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 58 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+28 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 59 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+29 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 60 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+30 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 61 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+31 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 62 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+32 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 63 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+33 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 64 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+34 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 65 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+35 0 obj
+<<
+/Contents 66 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Parent 38 0 R /Resources <<
+/Font 1 0 R /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /XObject <<
+/FormXob.831e7c1d1fb348e0cd52f5e32bee137e 3 0 R
+>>
+>> /Rotate 0 /Trans <<
+
+>> 
+  /Type /Page
+>>
+endobj
+36 0 obj
+<<
+/PageMode /UseNone /Pages 38 0 R /Type /Catalog
+>>
+endobj
+37 0 obj
+<<
+/Author (\(anonymous\)) /CreationDate (D:20250510233314+02'00') /Creator (\(unspecified\)) /Keywords () /ModDate (D:20250510233314+02'00') /Producer (ReportLab PDF Library - www.reportlab.com) 
+  /Subject (\(unspecified\)) /Title (\(anonymous\)) /Trapped /False
+>>
+endobj
+38 0 obj
+<<
+/Count 28 /Kids [ 8 0 R 9 0 R 10 0 R 11 0 R 12 0 R 13 0 R 14 0 R 15 0 R 16 0 R 17 0 R 
+  18 0 R 19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R 24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 
+  28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R 35 0 R ] /Type /Pages
+>>
+endobj
+39 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 1652
+>>
+stream
+Gatm;a`?E"&A@B[3i=r92G>[Wk2sn+WC]+L=d2O!UaSdnR%(Y=V8(>lOH_<Lep&YnPtW+[7_aENd"!Bepdk-</VnkIe)dt_WG'!iBnW2U%K/&Sh;K"Npm2GT0,1BNM24LCI^@5`W[[qM(*_2TL8eG#eO#bHHKijZ/)P*LYZC&9dedeQ$(nhtn3%WoP)c0ZH8^A2(dfj+&HYG`LfVJuBOs_EY+W+^akDpUM<8/ZroV;OKRnqQ1moghq%oWP+d%J-X7[\b"uU[[&I#H!bjK)7)]N2,*F0J=f=S["&Vb9T`A$=S_uXK5900]]5Td+Fkd.tKliS;OeT=a&Mas'cp2P1a3;W0D5)IB#+RR>7+NZ;OEF_O8W"X:m91;bPD;&On*moPtF-umHS;OJ$M%LWm):?0S_hjO@>O_0#dl/S$D!WoM]<!LH+mV&YHaUq893671muoAL42I*."0-$>i6/RrClrgB3mtT0DZUJr$GD`l*HN])#^mR2Mih*b<GXpjn=rNgT1&&;!%2!f".IRLJjT8XC+QLDbRi;4_9DFjoDk]7")m)]+bS001=U$0`I'NBN>8i^]copQS9K;l-'`gG*Gr#Oa?ZL4\Gc(Ql0Pur[a/k])+kK6hk.!bUfCos2cW&Q9bd%i5GRH(qN:/T&N\1OL_+phQU<ks..4*PD;,i7ls@KlS&khnk0e_[U@H04GBp;$&=f"sl+E%M4cP0lpd9oVR!TRVdG^SI#.sng9u\g8?VSQ<^C&f\U4kUeDQs"eFJnfQI(K+)=de>m6=Pts<tb<<V!8hnggtrPpZm`3jn#Z3mR[r<[P,X;LfXSKM'1q*O[Nl1095N1Q#C,T'B///L,=27Q+]cpHlDVe`k9"42#WC-;^>l-R7?^-NTtq>]jCeWA/`GQ0Ii'%iV9qkVR._*iSeXDGSOZeGNtflSf(#gnaQ/j<_<h]3&"/H:WF_STMR!K$s:%aPn[pU2->O>ni?H[6aN<^kF`&-W'ng`cD8c1g<5!2FEBFu,ipUpX.EAU'Re.dP#$/N3NBfi_`NWjIW5-o61S*1IY>*NYat0BkjqG2K$gfhe5]I,eU=me'bf1EP=9B8Bp5YX(O(:jBAJkSeh.b1HAe.^#IDqB[XiqOO;aW/pK7mMBd7mC8dQ6m.]$EQ`(89>-n1LiW2d9F4]CEq$*%$*pPYP-@3%Z*MDdArOXXiF"10]:f%gDQWQoA/g4O@]pPfSJ(G2c32HtcmZmoJKqA2Y;2n4\2PA0pVhJNMq_fJs`pDkil"t)jRKkK'rfqRXL_,6?M%[:Vn;3H_r0\]T-:'GqR5hf;2T/08+ZZPW`7NUJ('<["Y9k.Cs2!Ka'(4?L`"^U4MO4VGQOd"o]8^;.+bfVP*LZ;C.K[_mqLm,CSp5H%%%Z8#>;J4T[l8Mjkqt?uASrjt:8_5N2SNl$.Sb5aP4/q16i#>2.UVIrY^&o`o7t4L/I2_o.]4F0f<6Zn1S;Q'B7l[l(Z*pJBgi?c8,2#kZV?mV`a[#ooaSY'B@2IR>=rPH;#$-/0Z[jEW[3;P^a!\88QKR9;1\]#&LY2Irg:!2"e:S)`ca6=8f'XO]IHe%"5<l7!K;D:BgL8E?>lP9>>O3i;!NmFnSDUYn'KJh1D2\?=h217`ei<H\En$X*Ie&G'Me;tje:i9m~>endstream
+endobj
+40 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2105
+>>
+stream
+Gas1`9lo&I&A@sBm*Y(=1qt@0QDDX@1W`>Eps=XH&-7W$84!>Bai^gU>EG(#3it9JA.liK^A%=QPYd<?')ko`dCVo[s-QWGdc6XV4NcpY1OXM\q17.t`4rr=/Y\KX16#>AbkS`<qiAb*J"'0>aqD+`&t*Pp=h[dR-&ZkLW%?aQQ"3NVJ!c]inbR5='lgN3':Q\jh9D>*MK;lijd6+P-=aLK3fC:#V[W<'])=+%MUFHUp^]Oe2HuV'b@m0EVPS!s(3ab<Q_96&pFL[]&19=u[9QS>cFL5&2fZ>cUm7J/b'CVrO!uA$VjYPpjm@h9<V9Z?'Rf<%<nPmOrppE=(^M>*m!>*8_tF%gSW;)`<"b!:3-lWWX(@FRo9!o4C[J&8?108DpR_(Z3RrCFK&"IneI&K1ZKe+5Oj"S6X'0_))C93t],a&jIeip6L0E\S,9:W\SSF!A5ZFo<fkQ=s]qqko5Lhi,WN(="Om]/*)r2nTqn62VD!,TqoM8f&eXaW?p9gco+suK"WKe^+)HD&/LDuu"$CXB)1+q0mLoNQ([:j5l9Z%SjM]tnf=ObkL(XZ`p0(j(HjjG[.,2$.BN]Aj"AZ,Be)Mr'=XS-f&(0=r9#c\b7h5FKs['>G!<PnJqFb)(iWInl1?tq`Wbj*>*(6VN3i0Zbbh1AV<YJl;#!ac,SU*;h.=Fi6Gdf.0F#&jb>3:I)#]Ek2kopms1m.Q[@9CUL#C&k9'L-":<&&&N%V!9Foh7X.6XjVTSW;m^S:n;We_k-J?V,3gP:1!<EU\sOJ:4',`[EL.t,LFp`*,Vbh;V;q[0tJnMC-&Pi4brpa6ah4-_,Tl#mfRH00l6T+qs"'se!ieYn:eCL%Qh;FJ;nNk6:;%jC>E4JR?jnQ:)9Tc-OVrA7]Id`SKqrebarV(@qX8AK:cP8i>,>X_g9Cme2-N.L(ua_`HQbtq\c)=R7on^]rRV9D[O8[-[@L[bi$!7mhp_VGfT@]GgO'"G_<.P[=d/^?.Tp+bH+g#E*u:\4't'a[,T=e*5H=1h"9g<asn-pI;]QE5RAB)`7KQ`D@\_mT^Rbt!SC@rc:jclY;74/JWUffKgZtESMc,T!sJDl"'6+:XW&#SjYNY=V,ST#/FIrE^Cnem/!k7g*iu$j)s^#2kncK$d3iu<Vfn<MBPL9O\nXY+h%B,b;8Bm^\sY"T9S_?'g'K:McM`H`,("5XdjtKCeb!8r<79u&qr*]*aF!SBIL9MW+gD:n4Y(N+To"mCqXW<8I1YV*(\@IM%iuma",ebs$9/IaU"[muf`]$i';7G?0FHs6%R`s]PM@-YFD`b)T'@"V=G<ERY;CJoW%330NAI(<)[n7!eSO/A4,>2ILh(7A]S_tD=de:t6lYnTNS+L5CBZuI%L0j?4l*,O(G4j$EI'>WWO?48Qjssl1kSU(b)U*kVF`N8ioni.E^p/88I7Lffu"$BTTm`HErC.hmJpA,8;QF#;[)H3Q3\<N>J\N>mB"h13h:j,F@'HQ>G^K0`.VDf5GGVbL?_1US-IAuNDlUh"bF^hYnm^R&$3B&MW<5D-IIZF6`03.b-nlkTMIqC]"?IIJ)KU8(h/;AcjmW2Tr"5X#64Eb`@d[!TW1#dbHog:=o1h9]K5g&g]Yt"6!9pklac6%d,\B1Rlrk8d6fMZ<T#W<VqL!SR"11WY+$DAhXGL?D%C0t<Z`o<f"YG<1h!E4f=rB@I<dp;'kbmf(tur[<Kon`*\GaSg"d%f6l7f^!W,;%bg\3oCET&0pqo]l]s(c[bs[f93KA;,g]KODYe4u@^(=`b-qrQaRD-&'.j?^*hubR#kKFA*@^U[<.&!A4'PI9gmHMTei@nKL@q4LIIH2&tlKVd$/1uipMffg@H.AGLi,p\bqab>g(^H+gm(V8,=&P>d!AZCP"aeRrp7QjFG?$FiQ[+^P;@Qo6nbL!p`X,*'fdR?24,b#D04EK$"1=o]?+_2Y9abHr@s?8T'o2W:99L_H:Fmi&WbI!M8&0P,K*[;9KR(T&mGLb"fYP*%edSM\KTR0nR:DYLH!)b,RJC=[jGVW"QIn=MF=J@/Jr`>>K;/HsOUr:sZ6A>1Yd_Lk$ik08s7bmcElPT0nEl!KrWP4h]&<~>endstream
+endobj
+41 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 1750
+>>
+stream
+GauHMgN)%,&:N/3i%`K8BNtgLqPMt<-`tkKP%N3FMLoAL.+07fHi3WkV$T\Wm>sYi*KA9#(Vo%s!kS[=,8<>Cq4$dYq/&^+4u:&8=`+Q;4eF9Daf"7]4+*b&rl'UsHCXJTHP$Pfp7#<80$=.-`S-4Q;dmg,CqCI3UhI?%Hn1K?CSdC('tGb?GOYDlnK_[c^rZ>XgeHKo6o]tS$ed&F>Lq)ca2/MF-N\C:o&63OVhk,%/AI>/a0VXl(jM/bRAQKp3Mgc=!/:2JS9Db@R9hRr5^;K;2OGuSYn&JWA/'#,M&/g4JQ'ge\aRG&qr!I5i1s=_qf1Ua0uAL=IS?GJ*-3GogOhuR@LhgrU=aXG!uaWm3I`r8?<UiK62skJ(:N$AaFp*B&i"a`BY`7%][T/(@!<J-4PN(Y(J\JhTRUc!`@bZlO:N148uJr5J66j['MD1+`0*PaZ"2gD=>K+T9-sk]Otik:1--PDO]*Z\!KiUaRrV%>?\d%;BehA$AUqP@^d<@7hL$(rC%XNdeZL<mhp0%hp:VU<D<o/L4oKX:&O`5Oa70s[;6#hWZtX_8'o[8^H;*C]k=$q.deIN(B'Z$R"3h[i)+3=!*u6?.Fchkj<N3"PX1[k"MUPbF`(TfGZ,4SH/9RL4P2mSQVg<eAb"_Q3.3U"e-#:Z`EC<5h]H@Q+#^&^(M</cNEW8Z)@1!)A9H5b2el?!&l2+4kOVe0sr^-u?"S!n)?-*9h'E&bYm!qA%L+dgX(7R[t%f1,],9u4;\H<>oguMMfW_D[[D"5&^eEX"DN3P2`(g*T#K96/rX/bWH9p$1&k<9a&`eZ=!<a?1[!#TcW*O<8#URUeoK><'1>n/"\#WK=e%oq/p3NS&L;&H0Z&IRI^jLWF]lnAQr4Ud:>F?*1ZbH]"1U=uVFjf.NL=4Y<G&b2hn3MZXbEHl`L'UIOMHmW3O-^6[6H8-:i,K9u6N81,LcSZ9)iCq,5"u;%M9>/f"P3MhRi=iH*lVans""KZq3r8EE%\.!gSDq`k!>n6-CnZ'`hWcqK`SLjDfGbbHM]@Pm*/V\5qHg(")mT?/V?aoBf#HI]/9G8>F(?7L8Y*5-2N#^"':gFbNQ\U<PqhOB/LDM].!RK_#"+$^qlr]t!]!7IZD`sj=#I(mN&2Kc&!@p'L+qRO6fpp,Q7BSo)^r$L4TJpZ%?MEtOYH4=8ESl(/[$9R:]YoO(`T4c$Uu.=af<juc?I1LKprf.(UluM45`o49hMO[ZehKFs!J9j3Dc@`eqh)(&ro$Ld9nH_pi\(_E#E_,_[7DDd0_DBFdA7>76T1db$fGb^bY&lgT/bRWN?"EnW\Bk2oiE9[]M8Ciebs3S?-8m@mP0pJ;%WZ<SuJIoNseL"!:ZS<OgU^j,0AbV+sou3pK?HUQZ8p.^Hp[YY<31WlaV3d<IDjZOEem:U=e/)op,-J&(g5]6?m=h^?Y.jN66lmG#6!PV]V4GX6\_"TG6;"AbDH+(Ieo2#Z>dAG^q:rUOR+k&'i54_\L"DtSTq5,["&7Yc"S#DZrm"1b1Z_l2+:gsM\N&9],8CEKSZ\YB8TDfm1plL7EdkYU^2J:C`Ca;l943NE88p]U%qm!I.Q$!tMO*Uih-molfQG("sD/4PD87i*4pJoX@/O$5k?UD$.iTPWbOf-9oOlhU_P5-0cfr=L(+&]p%[3'&>KqEl=[+jX31aT=Ko`JH+VSj5NIpR?>C#Tn7DC0i0\)7J?jfJ[qdkp=9uK9t;R?g]7OncPs%^KL~>endstream
+endobj
+42 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 227
+>>
+stream
+Gar'#5mtO`%#+0K(%8*<C6Q#1k>?=K%h<pTlF'G!`mFa8Y`fAK*[E"V&&&TK(4BsW!lp+F9cunF5ZV+-$dMV_Z@^E_Ch0F]lraRX1?[0$T&/LEC3:([AOelmXk8_/f/k$Y&oLVl.2,I?C9h/<4%#8\XS_mg(5OY#<8&u2GtSMs=/(C#,i;(-Y4kG<h',#pG:T^G]acsuXDHN(`YF`QOFtV]W)6A5!Q@,;~>endstream
+endobj
+43 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2027
+>>
+stream
+Gb!#\=``=U&:W67fJb5sR3o`(Df-6_8t*Z?9HWg,OcYBPLI+g<e6h*=hNTHL8Z+?bN@c($`?*\1p7iLmpgM_A0Eq5c"kRr,(l-WGQu1K[H3Gs'ZS2+D?2Tlh\RTU:/iS1I/CL"nhrR<'=2$S?Mb,R4&_jB=gQuLh3IKjXMm&sfQ7(W[5'r'W0/LL#=l;%pr@YOb`X/8b#Rn1^!EWFa/IsDMi\joKQbqaafLg+S_<M]8StChmSnn,0hhlH<4'/;#`@qYb`j,e@jA`2Aq;;H87J:;)<bo*IX@nmSa'ISB?nT"3:%E=Eceo.2W_=[o/:p+InW4QL*a(M2j7:pLk]i#GB3"/\&W;UTStMW.0B<RAk8HJP9e-4]oj-uG?s&e0mSn6#[<'Hu@gA?0%%8<D*`uDQ%f(0W)N=Q,BQ\jE.[En3nV2l77<4&8:Xa`h6;^>a-#TV)gZu(?]5k&_PD=JoGm8UI$OGd@Ohn2^OU=a8X->Ghe>5i-WP[5/P=uj[aTES`<X\_rjC&@M=G8IX%0C^`<i(,X]^)*s9*9Xf&+W"%92Hr2ZqhlJUG%um+9AlI+fp_I^[;^L@K8nhAO\k^CcerG%G,YA]+0%Vk%dDP]A)Rqjm>/F@B;3j'L!s!kD`]$b,@pV7K,R:&VV]qFbD.]`WArQ'a$.FV\U;b1+1XVAtam*K+WQMM@%i!A6!Vb[EU*:Od1H?$N)t<Q^@r6)\]go-a$mJ=OV/^Mj+_9N5dYMGTic:A;[pT6n-\Rj'd?=+L<YSXpoVC>"Q$$/CjEDhPk=DYTW4HaeBHL^?;fUY"15P%0onQ]g5quMSOJ'Yhil+]2GKjDbMhgL?HGPb;Y\>.LVGg6lQ1OW[+[YW6<c5kb:dWI5`p>"f5:cRdNaTfj*kZDBg!,^C8_2KGVSDT\_t:@m$t-4q5R,\V8iV34(raPuZ2qJAZa;dOWW5IUMbpAd#:$q)4al[jm]oWSlh2l3)""JmAeU*s`I\J7jAdR;R5ECRlML+Z=7IJj2_@Ri.6EM6bA5L>QKn(SC@WA2DOeYV_kFqG!Zfc9sE>c@`pj<5Pd4Dfs5lB*JG#L<\OLqB[>9a97dI5[aqS"G"<:Yl=K)o_.jGE*EaQO'pM.(r58FRT]q3*CPa,Nl=e"KohKpD%HPL7!U7]NLHgtj#kJJI#C<sVA9p'/fPM!*Z<m4J'>FkcSkm2*3=3$e!D9@p/JsP#k*8GnG[9cpXJc))m=$n^"r)6"es6Ngcq51=?)!3B-$%c;%r(RQQ3rHS8`FT^%\q@47N&uVEDSq@D<J#e\M43CD_E15T%71[Q3J7:2:i_PG6hKniT4B!ZUZ`+b3f'a:"k\$mCubV'`C8MQ2HJB`WWebkpnm+.k,T6K?Lg67d/9^=t%&AdGhJW6V%9LZ`'-m3L@'-_]:5P>Nd,i\RFARjYm.1r;m_CaHpqF;ZIsHk!^G?R.e`eZg#e:e4"L)4g4iT?cSjRWK`OCEaU_5T3t(!SS>\4lf#OKiAi0YF((m>EW8C&8"YUoOgA,.6;+'QBB5N:"RYPHC$0EhN[-V.(VC>q`.B8TTfU\MV_jW6n^<g@Ps37imj3s:1uo8jqZo-Y\GYV\"*1?[06,Q:cOV0XY;<.Gu%&+-D/<UM4R/QnD.U5[uSTF16E*ckoQ\`TTZ*\Q03tZK"Cq9MsFSY`9(Nslp-eHJIH3ge6S7Q'%I@1X50V\@Qsk(X!(cuGq'?0-jR5JD9M_,2H))c%AW;9<1;gs@1?4#[_-a-F&2>;\psMTIA6\PJTg>?9kXFun[QHFNBVk+>jq?S+n4RVqB9m4`DF7jd+jNM!aA]$9EM;QKJ(!W&Onq4+`)Z(m0a1CEm=<56(HFuo+!J<1n8p6^9k]D68CHl:K-rY48sUgbQ$K"11PQkLQ7t(%@a6X"R]oW)pgf7_!l0\%".umQ[!mB7n(=2ooKl3HMC0[=d@6TeJt]Z"0$Hn8q5!Up+;tDVrr6ZmD[m^)WSh,U@[]Krd=,V6*GIsVgc\WI4PuaWLqn8DbK)>OGnD6#A3u9FXS_\~>endstream
+endobj
+44 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2604
+>>
+stream
+Gau0DgQL=2&UiQ?kVoVL]+>0*K!*7K&kfd";i.W!<?D&>!^gG0!/A>jV!5)/klCen-na+L.`IR,`E^"OFSG$;$M*^!pA_cPqXYB6r?+W6oX#nVGnE4<5jt?552h\PpldW@Ynp5u"C=^$OO)arrLhpA5C2@dToc<['OnZ\UK%)8&I7&mL;?>O&[!C-YO?qYkL5t<qdQ*%])6GiG@r4"em[qlB,0o:S@&gWTbdnFKikD?rnlC(;Xt8[rCTlC?>PU%M3g]r\2Ec.psG-E"fr!E$Ua(g.lEo%V3J&+[d;J6Dr2"=M$^>@YC$-i+H`msJ^7NVIgkP'hJGs<ApLkqqssG+(iE\c)Y0`A)JlSeq<Cg@DU3GU^E\(Y!*dE6RY9bt_((=rh%@A\Db5r+Rl1S&4]mC<&2jMt<^h6W=OGT[m[m*Cg"AF?\,)a)Bdf`]fDAU7Z8(Ve8KVJi;"@/'9-$d7P5fi<BTqQ(]2nZ#nNaMK8mUXQmnOCgb!$1>]egI<4:'0"JtD(\[]1cUZSN,6/6-#>@]@^A2S6-ak\p;G+nU=ba%HRMOk#;KXm.t#&DpAO[\:?s=h>4]GeSu&**I8NmV:Es=f6?D'shPoj?(Pd/S%MFVGFnJT5jP,c-5$J=(eP,]iIj?4?<QiRp<8lAhS55<V\tUnCIS2,_LZ?qQ/oq90=n)VQW$jp"df7Mk%rb-=GB(ggIhZEraKp<P<#mnCG7p@-D<XgN7j`H=I^G]p0[0@M"sn#1m^<2A.LS.gj7V=]M"6liiT.F59n$eHe4!^[3P:Wt)!GBIhDh21QA.5SU.;E:3Mo"h]Blj!_@!Fl+&ske*&I9M8OCWP#FS$hl2Qj]TRb6(W4P)%@O;^n^Wu$"2CGd'V-2^6Qka!c\D0^^=(9?M/[Ujtq?6+f`Vpm(o\Fl[>0=ofFf[6C$qHcWU1,('gdkL^3M,'&.cDh9)6.fLTMbS,)5'SKS*kpCRZ<KGt=M+@ZsE,7q'qVeH^^jK2p@_:dNr8#.Ym71(Mn$j%hNgMcPnFlKUQLb?H_,=t!=iQ!T7,Ebn6G_%21!^@ZKUjql3+k#UQ4C29-Bg3H6-hs5*,N44E-sQqAbC>[teioSh]J!<ZQ\[VmG5nUC4,#)t^-,T%]c`3pm=-4j?+a!6i3"J!VVU^'*a*!jeN)Qn/<f@F@FuP#\AqB_(7Sjqjl$PTMp6j5#Ca91S?)R.-IHO'V/!q*a#1"u'iR]%Vc@\_h)Cj^d`q4W7>>&Zk_i"41-h?7l-26l+2;4O-if3)K,J&X[)s_dNi5Hi!#s(3%^S<#6l,F@+/UVm[F8O,Z8SZ2gK)pZ&u84a@+NI@O>?;O1Oe2M%_E&spX>-lp+8h8OkikZ!c\l3U&l*FY57n+Of`mrH.fY9(X(&'Y*,+/B,l74b6)YJ</i1<P?MIkAE@_0)'lWso2djY3YUt),fa'j`fgt*;1T!ec0X=GCNe:6FdAAoOi4*&!Vf`h7,a\=p'.#tAGZ72[iHJSR!L7#pLb(M+Q][aE)=dj1%o^?q#^ZTH-;.2D0/kM@QQh>D>DBZ2IqA"CTY'e^fuQpQDS`Y0jD>`/!EKeHVk_<<3*P2h:j+\1q>2dp[_`?b?Ji-lu<_Q<oKD`o"A#L0D?R'Va!oA^?;\Kq1^UUXIu92Ba=I?WLVF4TC?m*K^/n$k,V%-gB/k^o#RoPk<4]4jNsEj'jER2S!3.MFHDF//@hUqIFFd!;a\ajj[Fe8@d:^:D"qIK9SsT(5&,0u1l^&-1$teA82Z;Bd!OGJmidqJW(Z,=X,<bUq#G4;8.l%aAtK+7r:Cn_U1<t=%fLZF$e@b@!*bb0"09_WSO/rM.)T`!VI's#:0;CF:.%8"&JR1Zn`NXSm'Vsn(BkLGFI3=?3D1=^_@j<F3S+UWD*%i*BPsshm'=eo?"Z/DaK$h45k`!>E._t*o/5P*.eK<)Gg)[O`uqAZgb$+&Eh7j_+<#jsoXeV:r/I,,3DuRH[5\hW%(kGLIDuEAc#j3l-<lJPA>uUI.=//\B<$-PXNRoUPudmD*#_@87(:4pX/,973A&J2ooLd9Yrd"/S]:goc>8bu)_X*^\/[P3fTT=F$(Qm!K]0dij"(5;[n`b;Zhl(n`9[H.)<2m'$#7b-GF[>p:hY.0,4O7OZUFs$[f`)I<Zn:X/+q;X;oVFD(AS:#Wo>o0p_jf1oI].24:g.;HQ8V04XG/%pZTD[dQer[;%GqSC4@+c0S`fXm4Al-9nB:uE+^Ka\;0LUk88.VM]nTsbOnqco+8)`S*+->*8[t'o*.qCj<ch,7`E0EM\mI$P0[V!_&Y_;/K7i)#Gnu[))IN(-9Or1C0GN%_rXiaI`4@Xf*m*nkK>IpZ%T"^8&mFH%.H0u\M)sJG(DAqPs&:p1M:&h1\r<*jn-1,X,O@T^Uu7MZtXLuM8\c_B!8_e+f$T5E+Tb24jIBIkYPN*3/>gR1Zn<eX8[["^V2\2s7Fo)J`o0jj)f^@IJLFJO*=p9k+=cX>=Gg3:@Z")ib6RA^"%?;e,FG!c[;n#@#]+'`B2u126L:JIncPTW#spgoD"otp$k10&+<pe\:c.::U>]s`]S*>L8T;C9N)&pY7+4earc9+rrC*#p-X'("nX=*=T~>endstream
+endobj
+45 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2566
+>>
+stream
+Gau0DgQEMb&UihDoNO5Vh%Ag6e>$k0E@OtKm7el;Gl_PC'&"4RRL:S0lZ3tc"1]]/<gATNiWoXZ:Z"oke#+KU^AU!oLq\A9G9;8("+&gc+*eG]s-#W/00\E[-29-3$t:l_+:5]>dZDd,hL.5'oj>'!ZI"qPmMGk7*CcH%k!^8+@MoAc.K(rcoV5ReK$WV6(GG_eim["5]j2$h1<-QhOoYVbr;gc>$GA-L.)``T*r[IoP1%+no-\k`mUBsr-=.I!j47TU`)"SOabLYjq_3+%0rXVARSgAJ=L6>3V-WCqq3/?5^@'gtJGb(/#"qG]n68FZoTO0.;fm;cN'=lR;F2#g'$`*>q-r52D6FKGq@NfTjJJ73akdE#V/_YE+aM6RNFLf5#iEVqUrLgISmJH`0uST\@j#A/?Et!',c0ZK4Zr0Y.7Zf^RuOKg&sSl#?d#"iNB0U6Mu7-jRnacQ9jJuZb'.-n8ROup%5hn$eOJXekOOaqWniZEQRp5PU1@g]k+rbLe[!"m^8'#FCfkZ:dGN2G*b>5*q]NR&$X1`^Kqt9nmRmDbe,jNc'b3OB-qgPKZ2s)/baCj%FHiT+PmKkdea'+i<G&@*8RfGQXHip+WAS4*HVK3nK[S,?eZ=@P8:K6Y.T^J4,#Pg!mn1u"L2nGU'kP(gAhS56"`4E25U+)u'iYc^=7];*Wi-,63%0%t;%t]T,@L^uaM&DiRu?j]WXS+.VHFJN=_MBLCEj2%<u$?&etfZ-2/SR/$i$WPYsh#A.EZgHQ':^Jh)JQ,A@:<O7X]tV2I4T$n1Kr!QZ3^.<od$^&9GWf;f@@j?i.J1B'WrW.@#A@FG:lu;JIS:*hfB4Qa3?_Kf(B[gW*A&5+)!j#tl8rj.h;Vp!0##QD+r[U2!J)i5Xh`j5%tE+9M?]=5<HSF@,tIGQSlUK2i&co\qD0_O.u9bR9qBRV;iA&Gm?$o-jrqJMuC;]N)72Z\U6KLEkb-)isLK+$JX?%G3I-@@D]L;*+(M<kn*(hk+i[ZccQ)9*Z\9"Ktrhnia2j7Ea=]n#s#0oh0@sVYr@D&jMDSh*9M+X0a:YD\#l!08Q?Jq\WEoMEh_t;34J`59N+C()I,@&gA"Il:eHC";2(%jZO(_j,l_+.stP??L_W9&>\$e,D:iLgE:JN!ZSdl`aI8]X%_*Ne$K?22)+Dk@^cHq%qEOukbn/3JfCn,o^@XcObdRY&0[tT4Z1MuR\'CFgX_7U4Aom^k&K7^7QMIDk;1bgW6O1@GZN)%LQ8YkT5'c5YhRd_cOYAe)hYIj8NXa>.-n2Kl][Ukr.PL.j@6UNG@ILT,j'H"^G#ZS5,_`C2Hc-o"pg'/a(0W9]k'!@Aef*o=_1PKMq`fbo_'nHk7r#slUH0Zo&(A51"W!)W^\#S)*pHag4L&E,-TrV3f$t-DSAU)U2,9a2ZF/:F=\,1;$#\CftMFdi:Sn#I[I,@+4`2;*E/VQS=R-^Vm&#G`:2G#a<W/Cr;6Um:_C-dj$oX*3M?tu>.2?21F.:)@`+m`gY:[:!p,3rh6nb)Y,D1oYT$e%93?1D5rokmkO)p='30BX\$fD,NT1GmA97rQM_MRYF,9QRcR64jD,)&sgca9k7l/%G3).V6D%d9S]As`4%I:_5\L>d'U3P!M1H%[C9/L1QCQ>\"O^D)*&`GQ4DfM/:hW:t$]a"C!417`8_r#K-`R<(Y6aml%RS]?@neZ/'V(B%f9o:hrM`.I6;WB$,Zo$uZd)\a;q#ugSW&@q8iX"CM,h:9AboqW0QXAI7lJM)>cVK!$guTodCp36rUMTY.3:,N4IJg&7"NT_-jTUI<f0af"EA+X*XXq<E<JC9,G+*:iDG]Wc'YsYlas9arW/P1kSjgYG[dMh50teU]@^^E#d^Z/7Wrc#M'qBPZ&qSt9I>0_NN8*RF@!*jCN]REj(Q.Arp/)u:61&A>SNRp+@s&Um/G6++:)oLtms(qsQuC-[&+caIoH\1H):k5iDf!fQo>$(c=nZ.jZt3e,du]VX%,^*%lu)X29bU9WNlo^-rj;)s-esL)iaS.@2Xl[PcX2W1'hmuPe\VelDm@7:WSV"Y[pY8<(\]qK$.p4)-jj1t0n4&eJscBs]IV\'9YnrY.6FMMG1'*B619F;G:oLK6"m3aJkC;"]"O'i7kVX5-LnQ<+6/'YL0g2B\qIY';jnAQMUL^*"$>BE?("$FDc5#mg"mTm<Q,[o[M@ogl`;8.!eh+%_!t6XI&AfuB>g'YHO<Vf%9f<.eart%OK!?A!=6X#`t/>/QefX=5'J?BCB[CXfc*Z@GfR2H]khu%YePNE9^5Sm[cla2khFsT?KB5i6Oj?*:ltLa(fF_kNe>>Y"jgK3nLXg"^S/^D_<l!9kVr`PFWNI?9kh'7:D<ms48Au.b[AJASQW?50-d_^oYLIpWk5d<j$3&-l/nrDle`IAK(Crrda^&EnoIC;/\GW5^J0lX7e%+,?CD)r1E$aLl#;XfrUCjlo/UY^2m/aU/Y-2-qePAui>LhSELi`BFWT&QFaic1TfK'4-1k!>KHS8[D;Xt]o:%GW&/+o<Ii@5B/i3JEk4loEB^pTFS8cg~>endstream
+endobj
+46 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2316
+>>
+stream
+Gau0DgQL;L&q/A5oNS]%&M8SN;0d44G1Kkm-#mOtp)u(#$&OI`1I+R(I!nbBi^L.B[StjWc%n_DqM%23)roBc+5d#l9;:ksl,@G1HpNg?nj>(+a1(^+EUa(%,fZH--mDHKLkV2B-K'<1(U%UQrib1(8`6XDl=^*F(PIWKVcb;=OUB$%.6lH5qOq6nMU.'3(TmXQm*kX:3@rHN,j`G"MpF$6Xag%FC]c=%+U(suC&*ZL-qaJ-O+5O:[o]<_-METV)+;GI7&tI;ne"=[>nG4<YuAQC9g\A.jN'M9f'Zi4Q9V5sA9BP3$h@eN;lnZqj_l<EkcJ`fO_n_F]i.G':)?C&c,?>8F.ka)mCnM6fa-6Mi!@Q&[8GhDdu2FeU,[u3o%%7`7_Y&l?:=Oh7cF&IE8,GU-j8EB6H#I?@3#+UQ;4f7bS:jkSArN>Bmit#P,+YJAO]-i31,"fZ=t_f9;sEm<Z./Xc#j1!8t&@R#Em'"2S..+q_5OnAikPk!Y-7e)cIi$k(Lk-L!Ib'<Gen?[VTEVS0qtJWm0k20'\'iet[`H-O%O38@R)KR5.5h&62_G0<BGJ'#:(pVb1M1cC.VYP3p\fn9oo/E`X[3Pq:XZ1'F2?XkGhdZ@MI=b6Rd=OQh*b.3d4i<b*M7-hr%&FIa[#ML^[1N`5pFWA6&G7:i$h_G[/Q*q5npC6<JPJo+JepGta[X&aXb&L/AgD%<l"J'(gD'pcET_]I5PVbUe><di;T!KF3;gX[X22)<=p=5^;BDPt'\q`p6USFKo'<H5B(+-^tD-<gY))LeMOQRR1H$6mIO$^6^>XOiRjR-R,RJmU9MWTeR0ZGSjNN:2N=>BMWJ+=GYB3rl[:)YZ^el;X8IIG,VB28!m:D$fm1?91)rpRQjV6`S9Tic%b+We#KIe$U)/rPZ\)LW_"2h*mG3_+qenr-\jb!Op#G$@'i4gCSbt77e\TLqITC0,SaFF(k\=IKF+e#m$g.s*!@<j7O`*l2#bZ'$'#J4FZ[h,W]iE\nUfS:]*Ldqh7))kZO12_Snb^i_p0pI1NDJ@cOD)q+d1f#C;lWrCu4hIM@di58t&J:+(MH*O_OF_b'dN'`tO#&]+oE4A*BbfG$S#(X?j7S1'dB[hjTi`t(?!c/$AO&)>m>n6P(!F\+MsO-^D]b3UMsp`M<*]OWg`4b/biYYB6W7Aa8fAk_YKXcX6]X30_&Wg'p;f=;tk-tOJjHm^>4jGfh"PP2Rsd^B-Z#pcqZ[3@UlEme?SUGQ0Ia925P)LV,)gF;Ws2k[YJ9jJD'\cq.b&Hf=(&Bkn4U9q6YUb\d8;5-sZ!HhAAm>5>lJk/2)dj`8,7JHY5d_%@N(@.OH0dZ%Tha]EURA2r4>H:CJ3MM8$@d!2*;T([U@E,jEaCoY$3^,Gb$_u>,()\ZCg5'-YC#Ij^B"0@jU2J,!LKb6?$qF,sDCEZ/G1'-i=J#Ca%>JC%!+F[I?G;hB8Yp^/5BP%3O=H`)>5dVaX_C-sc&I?[Ti$Ma<Vq/EJo/SVkpQ52!nt;LPrC=/#0kf%qZs(I).rsXd^O*XJ<.%JEFTB^RWa2n1,hG\$]mIm!Pf9M?gmsRLs)hR@C2Y@Mc+^uII9Z:gjMg7V6GV05B6<4Mss+JD_6/_QUb>&kmmmEB9=gbf@/>&(e7/`#Lpq%UEA))CUiiMjiOc)@%?-dc7i0V7/eflR#VlorlArfDuI'G^7,`,'_[jn0tB@HDmm-lI$nQ550%qdIR)EeiQ_pjV?<9[3#iXg31u%&&3Bo-VZBmhkYrh5`B;pH@lZ!l=pN>G\iLgq7;7D=Yt4cFmW$Mj#/6.8#;\/m`]g60S#"m(L%O!Z:2YD<s"-LK9]&qEWDK!MnuYeS+*gdhQIpDOXr3NWAof4KdpU!Up"TVu9E?6[0SJ<cFE"^Aho#%F,1!m.XYI$AZDG-Jh73AJ,u/2]&SL*p%E?j'bQm4TJG8LlrfaFT^=[LE%STt(SDuaNn(tHj:Da%R<tE?03t4iU!nlN*oR'lM/_U@Q!(4[Q,M'_=iE(Pqk3c6T!&W(ZXLaA/jp5>cK[HkT',^$)1_I"WY:?%L9$bK"f.]&?$.C"SjLRU1p5G"ClmG/lCYYNa=a7DeMX]aN_+g$-1JNQ[h+*eP,-+ctX[jI.U-.>WAr*^c48P3_dKD=Q]&i4,nFO],\"@k//pnZ9BtTt#kIUj](\HJ!MmrWa+S%F![,*/)h?a+a"ZC[r@3=o4j$#Ts^<1"pGe:\7\"6/#laQTFnn5HW%Ia+<G`UO&G`BcC/`HsU=b$H.knar7-Z5c1RT>"c_7B,/s"pg)=VC`FanXD7B^ln#lBDV~>endstream
+endobj
+47 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2137
+>>
+stream
+Gau0DgN)%,&:N/3m%^#3B`br'ba[)2D)tCTf]l.;+VGD";hRi+<n+>A/pLH/3Uod5P6f$:Z+"dt@0S?5R/K8&!PDXQodp9c@C6-u4$KbFJ6u?`8,PaurhPN9E&d?K3tX#,3]F[be`H4;]lkT\a^r=e[TRs+,i'^Tpa2(D?VAMRV1eShp'![A1FI-E*&9MP0"8/fM2680SZl)pB3D8eO$1PD5'XTGKDB/bPn<ruX08aRF0a>'L/-f"h,`t7i5uM3(g>n3ot8Zq;Q;gdN$+(-ZKuSng:9[)f"9*QES%Z>=@d1IQaE:?#B0hgAX2LZkB_KFLd/QqjNRiA\K8k(en-Gg,O(a+GX8&sq%g&:o[tu*UX0+`j\%gGG)(8^>e2f^j%F"'X^.:qbbdWjRQ.RaK[g+cX%^BJ0Fs+9.]!MDj\?Vh.RbWmi3t8G<JI80aZp[SBdRgPO\fceI.uV!isfg?Q-*>HdWFccFG90Ogl:Z3U.?HT]6u+a=W$fW+Vg8E$R>1J;'q\f%fE17nk#,T:_i%8Gqc0i,ucKq8<lb]@n8htJLZkIMn$Ye0<c8O&pgr`M9'+(MOclnnmTpP6KY4U$VqsJGX"f)!,:"d]2`P67[Kd*,d1/#\1PZ3E`G\9Y=lEnh!0P9$iK/@6`*\-Y'-g#JC4e2(Z_EfQ!_[^WREn*CPBWc%Zp.ug/p;.4a?3$omNnF/YeYl1hJ+nMGBeTP_GWKHg+9?MU"qeK-@YR-Q#8\953c]_s.k_;o1hX#?d,r8("dN9"!3G1V&N+SG=^P'':N89@SmtJu:>Db*X)QG0kB'Jh/ZcZN:;7s.UeIZohEaZ+=ptVk'gVQRGdR/tVZ44t1br/g`gWO\RV/a7DJ-"JEo^$5+$4Z&]%O"B!)l6_$-/$%bc8!(H/Y=G0XuKe=r'Cu3C+3-:LL&#\=P&KXC>&KLf6R4)a0+=Nr8K=bI!JK[(h95#;g7rWPodul?P@*ejG\it1sD30)HbG9?&-cu[8Sor`7F"l!oIeP3`'NKter,s.%%eop1qZfO&IZiqOSBe\*o<@-NbI;mP$CeAs"(Qp-6Am4G%IlqK^3b\M]qFE(7Kg%s:N1,h,'"!*RAg41F3=ajY&!j8*C3R9-RdA\U=;A"4U@45,ZAV>.T)#gr7I4fo4cL_!&L$Q27R$,pRa=bU'T-EPtlE2#;PFOl8<T^L"(u:rosCtmZ@I)*X<1IUS/cls+1D$./0<7PD?T'^s'Kb-DoN82*Y3C75>i[]ens0rAXoA%7cr_n0A49;&iNX`CT^P5#62rWm-Z>0%5TAlB4iAAE4XS\8;6O<Fo2cj@*9\qXm?(`eJ\SI7a';54:]hp5-4aQat7\e2o6E'=W@k;4A$F[jgM7Ro5Y&nqY'@C[m;EpPYs2lWHSA+J/@:,OYHg9NCjI.aJbQqX@A(TZZ&n%M]o/GUPBac;\75X^jV96rUj,"rn#gf)\Y/fL(q8:eBR$$n685[]+%c;Q.jm_q5d%Ee=g#g3"lYd*B9,3TaXARFj[#kg-iU=JCR?IKo.bp+"ZoY7W[B<Ekn^c'+.5!0t7;G$p;/2KVUo:67^MeO-#@"[#=l1+V-,c!oJ\bYt(^D7>/B:J/`$56og-0UfpYfK*K##Gb*5aomVrM6D]R'^t5]\B4,b8oKF8]`c\`jgG=@7^j^lmd#"UYd5BXWt?<*cH$o:7NNYm\jJq2p6FGZnsk"Vq':j_$k+aS1q<<o31nuUlB<93d!Y%W/)A\l&GpmYL4VY1a>KZaoPP<",m_4Sa\g1'e2B[Kc73m=!2q>)Q0ldq6&iE-X"b6B^/Q@(VYA7@2c.0^^g+nBoY!OL*=4FeQ0KI`cO9_XFRQG__jA,UhV[*qEJ!]C]2.m5mT0eOg95"Dj@"YqSPnU$:ef%j!C?11rXhIM#r0T=8Hdd[^7?2ED/87+Z6:<N"(7,mm85NGm<.rke3[q'^1\j:Ahr8-<X9DXIFT,%rf(sPE*tT#p5qgDIST(`n__r2T,DjfcL:u@L]/$mCO:4CkAWY,_O1=#JrbCGE8q5=Q^hCTGgKU%kNJ&VSYIp1/$(84g$,"gg=<<t4+C"tmP3/9j1(RK27mQB2R@'UJsGCUUHq'Sn/5V8RaJA!71f`k<glmpnm,#g5Fh8_IUMk&UIIXf~>endstream
+endobj
+48 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2357
+>>
+stream
+Gau0DgN"7R&Uh]$oNPuF\D!LeqouCJ6n,ZU8PE,*oJ5&>!+YF#RTU26^-8H-Y96-X@9!Y'@C=S5ds\h)F:SHDnHn!c78<F+4*pWbTKpl[Q@d29kjB\oEjtn":R9qR/1=t'O@Y%k;&]#>e[tRXWW1dl]IXIj=p/E@h1SY&r1].h2HHO(-l%E7U7^2j-[`Y1]\!bc,bV'mB"&\;aOl7&9*Q(!2AiM1H/Ji?@\orkhrIO0i."7@^XM$5:F)\lnZjP^AVDes><fh2i'd?-(bR_O:#iB5UEkoQZ#;/M^$Dd--F=stp[5_f+CQdScUQc=8a)I(.sn?YH`$Y=njN,mcZFoC1N;bCbopjDO,*;#2<kEeH3%(c-Wq(FkDM0S""+\pMm&Zi8,5$/o"c\A5B,#2foj,a5nlh651.X2?BOL.,HH\s[ga?Oqk-Sn8Q*$99mb[_aZ_W=?<M-Eh3+j_XjPt=[VOSHfc?bp9sQ54TZe0s,F_#ZG5H[4Xmc(7P_PknZrWaF"h'rp]%E5/PAFl2Zg7<+rOk@n#A)IG>eq1e<RXNP(^*L^=QPRCA8uPP6//098Epi]+/)B^Z\*su`4<r%GA\ce(#3O5D=t%j\sE*%fob^$eD%)X!!IErI66`R^3ZTGOnM'7l4H+H&sCfjL.jM2H=SjkW\gbmc;'A31eL[LLee2;L!bZN5:Ca_:M^:!kl_"@@n4,`._+>L\Bub,27k_G]%6f?0JMnVBY-`:#Cb&Y7<PuQ_g5sN,-55^l\D?9#1sC#@G;@S2(<lK"V-0/7d[![YJquRXq.Z!3.,K]FKA*g.&rE+e/\:$aj?ZPRYmn2f,bI8))@[O!%?e=*tPOiV\=6#oRUk'-Ot^6a1@Rk+lo$%PDn@<db,Kh=e-RY1SK;=-GjG,XJ2G@VXDiGZ@uma&^apWGI<At"AV9,/`0'k)%n(3Ub=GU&:"Bop#7M9@8'uKo*[1^L)Dho.1S-&l)bL^QF>\S]KG`5/>B'"j-DNm[c$\*h35gq(6gaPFp,@#-Lco<^n5`>itJ8L]#D`5i]2-OJHt0YOZBk\q5b.SH[D0nK/E4`+H@i6Ij-qbR03Ao/**:XU07C]+6rENef]V^M.DeKjc;c_>i?;tCfk^(F(9[]fUMrg'D^8D<D<&=WsDtNpt7B$,E:rOJ&u)n'fUKDM))O&),qO0;L<4bb+NFoM!)_c%RNog[+]<8,!m*)AM+o4!4UN%Pn%tii$L6TW*O`-)F\?pq&^*>]TRaB3/PlX!6oP"g7#$bk:1Zg!S%/Tp5eIG!1uQW<9c//2!Sa>#`\+E/b0.8+:)(A?$):Wd/p_j:pE5'f;CNIUFS$0cQA@<4dlWS^kA_'/EmA_!^XfF?NF%M49iJ*aPZhBUQKOMjUcdjE#)J7Y5?P\ldP`"e"iZpdaoH"mC`*#EDZ_-ic.[Wrp-Jch[qc.P3@+V_Q]oNhX)ikF\g?;TYl^oRM1dn''n7F''M!>qP1Y(;j^(8)R%F-@)r^0rRaJ(WnF_jG3&"DUK,j9QA'm4gG\B(pnDP60DEIaG1*dX,uU7HHjYL:PiPG`fc*mcFEK:Mm)_bV+']<!p-!WoaVrdPmIN6MKR7Ou,W@gse8;1b9?H]R"2M9&0u0UgPid8NU?[#=JW+Ej$dQh*LPTbS50mf,>5-8qh!k(BVmlUq0Wf)]=AZ;hbC19S3'251#+%Yc5`3%V+s,GTIY<*2!2]q>%`[+Y*@'gV90mS)1JBO*JUpLZ$W#UR`oH/9\:^E\oPZY<>##=J%]ad_O"2gg$\oN>p,r%8EmWaQm4_nH=0)'i3WE[LlSsOA8MU_Dk[M4mdf_RA#u>%/Gh*,PSsM&?duGJ%c+"Ps2gti24eI[gflt`[Ba3]-LM^gLg<4A2%#hd[&UM0H9WMfImflG+pt+e3]WlGec-Zt<cgP.%5:GSf0@3c&/`Ln,RYr*9JC6]WiMh7#p@:KoZ0)fg`roW8E$MQs^J3=n=cYB[hj^Em.U6[=?RRGHpOG]0F5o`I_No1.8,%0O_.(dT0GaVd(4A&aF8lk\5IF42/@\!t\-H^hBOKlek'3^fJq='cm6%UH11+tl[Vn-URqWmkGi@Y6$%Ts!g1Qu,BQ3$oG[kI6\M[^2$CJiH>WF]iZ0'Y'RWF`s[1DqH%+r/[manuB23rJ[JUL^&5`\7FoPs_M!JJjpCRF@435^7h\;n[V`+g&6\Y-qSXmY^uRIL3,^Y`D2\:+A2.R5VWVL)<+gk,=3U+\#ManZ/m>]HOkcSKsHJq%dV7P>eViS$6X__^as*(&[is6Q;kO;c_(mD!2XGeG'RoCMV2TB5mZIh0lA076+d1nPn"goT:'s"pp4=bb#h9)g`Nr&GVo%rco:+'SUZQFtbA~>endstream
+endobj
+49 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2350
+>>
+stream
+Gau0D969,O'#*[5oMJ35*!1NN[]*fCg"NPR'-HqP(Pm_m`$D#W5\iKs52Dn,dR`pS<EgqW1kBQ:oD9G<&E8K@hdm2br=chjc[^"[g&m7c(nU^95<`pJi[7Ol:YNmRJ-/SmO@'eGgudF>D;,$T?'%QMAgOM1IM]u6%*L-Zqa<o$-RF[+#s[XuDts.<$'LAb.>,f^;fBrNjCCUiUh:A1/N[1[$PkFPE2A9UYG.>ufJi<l#<[E]Yqs\R+HQ,60+W@!(ab:PSVY"<U4j031eM=>Ud[t;IGBMTh-^teU(rm'GOIPrPcWph)7f]/K1G]&fs8(fl#*?r;Lcgor@>8fWFaprY<4#jUBRU2e4+ll?8"c!9@>q^+:*6.-d;%8hBhnk:#b0(=2iiE/-+f?+<aB[^_t1'S7)59OAJ[NJUQq@6!Eqa>1fmY;I+,?hi"A_7_(m%+(-aUl]&h1d8b-BnjR`I$TfT'XOVT11cqLcU*,<1fH2Qbk>%Wf=k.af/)<Km]$[o870ANaPnTt<#4PE:6J^c)PQN-Le4Z\6/[>HRU+4i]')(#Z)SJ0aLj5H.M*Ff(pTelJXcsSYlp5bhR^:Dm4&K_Ah.[,&hsXREE34E)("'[CQ>k1uW.Ygb3[bNUL_Ag7FfIiPAp%u0YUkan_,5WF`qt@J<>*3KL(dRrDgH=_7^6kO\pBJC1t'I?2@ec.@7:i`WU(Ee`I9BG5'T*U;P3oMTIa4$b0rY<=(hp9-(5'P0`IlVe6Qda,9oh:[M#F_EW6R#,a=[69$-?`(*n1HLT%qCVY:]6+?pkceF'!t<@-"sTen1Coah/pkX^9r=f+X3(`kL2X]gl0Ne`hdS$eaLRuq!9&flf\!YsL-%3?bD?ummVa+tePE]1!ABJEi3#`e+NcD(Mo,,#h&80,*V*'qG^KZQa00iG7UFqYR(R,p&-IZG\CN?\#i=(N5lcSF.Z0H%aFacI_F3i+CO-DgK^U!uFb+(9_M$-=nK4%5YcTKo1K+Br9Gm<)6;=VRY_8Z(=Y(fdVSY+A:n0*338oCeg2UX:a#\cMVs#;K#Ph*5AZ@;i_7+>3bW!3]Kb2HN/$CrbsPAs/.@3N->W$,5WMn`]?Q:1+MhC5UVdL[\.mnEXLdl#cZUc01+(&/;D*qhcM<>!GUK/3@TL.Xl1q<@R[RZs`='Z4X+E\(cL'$!'7QG=a#0D?U$F?HElQ>pYIVlEX(Dh-qHNAe>#>^[L5L]I7XZ.bKd26#\F^`1;Y>U9=N9cDOt/bR:s@n;FFY`U\]SUUka"nT\Z=F&jo06+L$!MV>4W'5<s;GM9I/K7\GA("9nfd$sGafA-op:]4CL]ltjV/7`*bDYC;&74c!Tkpm'LK'@ifXBJb$0!,G'>$;Ihj[stG53qK&p_L"B"c5'6*^IrcZ`RmZYQE3VJtEnbG$+ud-u>iAmO;Sce`_p2F%KcildK?n"QUu-/)91W8mHgc4Vg0n1&3WeFcjRm6uV32.UiO/50de"k.gOl)ZDJ9.TB""aDj(pKOD<K/A:9CL74e;h_eB67$)GLi4c+4TW46n?uVZ#+b`:ASMe$WE:hSl`=]te]"@!8$3\1hHpiFqioAA@4S:8KLut;NMHf\u@O0W5T5e%?agphQ&Aah>L#jnN@f1,\dem_7%(9>kQAW]"\KQo.*_@dsirh`U&@M8<p+'/>g@rTk"C7d7G1rNAM)ZTWDHZln?lRMhEnOs%@_^j:I%mfd]$Y=Wjq6h8CQ-4_I7Mttgo@6Fe,?_an:e-ZD"]3C&(!'A]9<]ITpOP=B,VrA=Ft4>Hn:'-8R@8(LoZ86=mT+?dLU<HLi9ofo`EfoMJgcmc3ZJR3hJ@4_Ir3+5YuQ*XD^E,9@J6]j72fh.I'?IPZ[&M'@Q*X6mV,iMgLH2]A>SXQ'oGcKM6Bk8<qbcoC4t58KeKA]#>cB"9,;F0!>]ci<V)'oD2=M$Gh:D>POd$]B7Ah:%$:Cf3r>iOp=u/)Z4Sj9(1ifc7g3NBZg.fKM:9L05pUXRFC$XXh4Tf.)N#ulGei&6MENH[,r;$p/+*&5Zp90Lo%/J9Wh'Z41=-X+Bd[mF=WtA8AZL+lPP^U3h`"]83(&6Lpig+FgJfg;dDAd)N0qqLMB(*WR"-t=GSB6(FAa\=SR\)(gZg2)ERi!:Ad1brMq;N&)RiE-g"ALmI`FO9[O$]:/j=Bq+.j2H.Knl3FZ*/S,=r;q;^V.n\\-AL.-0PY&s(,r^G-Br4WKcK)R&#5o(hVOlLZ*koVl5(hBB]hDclCHmZDL7q-ibY24kj?/tc=q.o\_(X)>34cf'rauI,5kM\RMNpTOg$r?I$4Ma+M?Q#HtPpjs5_mD0]N@S?P`rACcIe+Z6r!@#snV$~>endstream
+endobj
+50 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2271
+>>
+stream
+Gau0DflH,]&q/A5oV7S43<ZkTm:MO';Q7h$>BM%M"X5+HA!2qa=JP]gS-HsOZ6W6.-De":'91#rm<$6t>^V5'SX)\$hU@s<JqTrs%11q^l2DLqrdOBn:E8@i(6j@p8VYZM.Iq`@ilsP`QiAjW-h`4R;NZg\g@JhAVHG$#JbJ/.CZ.^N^,(])nTeA!JLcm[d.qn!?(=0uN$32X'*Pr_-aYW@NZ\i_,qXUF>7JATdJX<]s8#F;O$Y5fj$?_W1:VCX3rpS=D`hsHM(oIOU6rg9B>Yc,Y'nos&u2p`<qkaI,S;e(kq^?AT/#0L>>q@efArfTVYsbL.!tp=e9\2s=Gs;%O-L4]TKb<Are@L\7jbM,-00`!.&2;4&,qiFQ1Nl9\'>K#S$kaWD]I1jfJEjNO5hU:i8a>mbPRj-F>T3PL(:dCm[CTPd^H3![\BWL93(/InnLf.qFI*gb4+2JW\W#aI]&W`Z%]?oBm%tgWZ\VcJ@g2liru#-,(""7lfsB$d%7-e+'Y1-(VR\nhPmF.eBkGIMBOedrFc];8_5K8>G1A@$p/2uqW#<2e%@8m<92R3V1m(8k1R#fM3;7+[l)\%Fdd7>Pb>K9g1J<nl?mZKSN2c]$=;)Z:3Z?_l%[Tj95p9@1+Y<L&SlWbej.o'R^0i&.%J56#5@P$"Ue6G_gC;a_!_6J9?+.$!=j)d$<:q)Y(5BG[I0%8ki@`3$Esj52I5:3*uQ>DSCf'9ia?eWlqSOu@8^j_;HI"N*,SADRuVnY=j-*"(;Ek?je&Us*A!:H<s*^Gm)11_6s!U*YADjh'QS)gX2cK9KUomP;:d)QTO._j#atI\/LQ?al(K)[J7!89='SjY:P"<f@!>KM5Ae,@3(`='YtsQ?_\Q#X>PRaWmLd0[g4MG\&Vrt)#n_ZYenE!^V_am0/*0U,ng.B6_?iO?TP(<Oq1hFB4uAVZ;FI)iMBEb4J$&<Z?E)qi\4dN*qYhc>;n9*VPKp=MZ':8%_bp8W'V_UDd`aVn3JfaEH"P]n!$R@5DUFjD#9)o.#YWQXe5`I>Tc#:fJ?`Woi1deZqdd^B?D97ja=FIJk'@4>O-:9km1reI]ut**Xj++;[5<-NFGWV+R6\at0$aig/5_GN0*i5=R'H/CLiOTV'\-S(c21/!md^_7Jf:haaV7rXkO#DTVN.^lTu(Ven6J)te9];kLZ;F:0f(*h#<6]\MQDfR(/W8+#K-\Ll"Z<t'S8r$9]q[Y%gE=J_GJ_@<`^3?TQ%mXQD`H<];E8Poaj'Ieu"kjQK=Tqjq@c*SJRsArI.p,V95hX6'WV>5[PF/B$dG\+0GcH[If.O@_1]CK(30i-m/9^+,L9AB)>AtTfsa.#kanMo2/CV:enme3'f[G"pPto+(Ff:V_I?R=@uSiq@k$oY[08Pa:oXU7:emmfKGc,H*5]tr:_eU<hTKH<1`u%;o<;#5qbMi]+2Ele\HKfO2g`Ze2$^Da%i>D>/do_PJi8fl@=k2JOflIN2iK)eo^f&WE\+rD4@m7b&tcJQf.mV_I7n,gSnsAHh)MDk)9An`gt`F&7``i^kqqKJ?<#ed0]2s-pMDe3N!;6mET6s$Ua[Ki\6<d"jjZu0!&(XZQe!>;bN**l3c&'.!L*p)b&U:[Bk!P6>H\"__es9:q-BoLoP^Z%%*LAZ6ocEqu/+=R#]3P#'!BZ,ShVPh;(4k+nKXBPUimpT+b'Z7hg0HlkDLan.U?7[Hput/EVcK0_/T9.@hKC3TEbRJ]^h^UGl=*Y@ePLoX0EN(R;m[Z5R?<aa#6L_n=^W5'PKI/)jDQ\)j\D#CnMneCH_1X^t7/k80H984Rp]bq!FO.7eCE7>)>D*S7*!YFi'Y,;([q<sTHY4nm#W=MS'.^9,[j1Fk@q>^O>G(n:1'D5209U&<XOGdU=R+K1^/?bPZ.)ocdDj^grs]^n%Ye;*j!;HRZu=tC5%\QPI,iZg<O3K4/)RqTh-)`FE8TG3dnVe$?ZH^pN">05[7iWmkt31QJ).PVkE*"&-]^+"*:+3o3"i.T4tGrj5hrqp\c<]t,=:rg[Rh"Bg\p;=eL-bX,@?VFeupH.Bh;_B)03!7D%lV'+p)3lZ#pOLMSgo7&E"_!=JHORnq9/a:J?c;gtIQh#M\c2-:66M;DnR>XmDLq^jd%:[n9__t,j@"IT-8E4Z)>FMVFJ<1cm_.XE4S-;0\m]jL5'uJ<Uk\P8q_-nGY.);qINI?9'9$VO!kV<fXM97RoZI4N9=rV:9e0Ni,IkD757K-8kJVkd)8Fo:/cGh(Y4pu~>endstream
+endobj
+51 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2562
+>>
+stream
+Gau0D>B:am%Y!$5^f-9AOm+1dmPe.[`2T<;Q;?gASHjI08Z_Z\E4L.V?XJnq]uZK"T$3_P,bdhk"@.>V!)mk+6ganF#4V4)*1p0&%.<7C4lX<6'qF(h^>^LIn>?k/5%25.7Nr+DZYsf1?E!5)GU/DE7@;F>SNj\l,b/E-Zah_op*^&d6NO+(i)fi(*>%,%EBrLU[os1u8jl.(Qin?CE0bCKAMGJF>[5BYGf(=!W;@Y(rdqbS?:fHO5U%jrA=:@5,KE$CBS:`lp,<k[RU'>)60oK,^(),E=)16/DgCKTj)YD]0Np6P-omg;E!3XZ/sOEj;/Vs(qYYlokAMC,RU`>)fH0IL_]''Sr1m0K"RN\_Z-X#U^]i`%d.=6%E0'rb\,*p,X2;A)$Nkq5!:YspKMg(iE;0LP];5MX(^R)l297mOX-kAU4r)C+f>-tqb_msCE@m*=Vbe.o6@Zd\V4k!Q\@mR+.Pe?>a@eW!O-?-P*-2oB/G/74AI_:oX\s^jU+AfZ]#qP611-",D1u0_>^j0V&\.!!]$ms<PUB6\YL4+ceRL'B.g@f'\P12oetn=MEGKB-7ro?.HCa&0>`$2OHA#AEWl.H0<&$oAXO4>tXD/W&1.tN_P,k!Ik/=APM9C9*Wc(jgc\upe!GR+2MT0cAVF;j.7N"(b%p)B)Pg"9,?3!s/XEEsDrZ_$@W:]e[YnKu]AWdD'd%FP%QXUFTJU/g9/B&!#c#mUcf4YUs+MSk:q@=_>Z;P:Tqi+F"lUngH.lgs@8+k_)Y?+arHleD'\VVhr;-#$e!]Qojpfa@Mp"F^J6!qf*Bn)nP7PNkJ<@1>@1cZELY+ZI:rr0Qcm!po_lP1Zkb$kn'O8)Sj>T_e_RgB1]gqY_cF(g4`Gf1Gd#P`!uikPjF%pj`E>Jd&d@YXpK*boY2pE1fV<J3*AQ#OTiG:KGknn.[^<6MhR_*.ZCkG"0%DSV5_7h'B*`mn"uRrrH/P(4a$)sP[@/gQ$X[lB:U_E>"8^W[6\cXO><di"mE"g.FM[oLRl)bdpSI>0P:(2k)AK`I_)`eR*IGmu4R7o2kO]/Z[uIFnPY+Q!To#WcCF;^3$Kn^i.5^-@p_lXRH9:2ia<5MW+-TC*LTc(nBU(oQ@4!Xdag5-6o;Y5(#E+hW%0j('Sp3*0!/HV/c%\4Jm#Kp#X&6B,AVPs!A].reMPmp^qqr!e*"n?Z(i,IlhJAUCn^r/'%TI4LDjiMsAA(Ta57k#=hEH[u@/#\!7`/4s4FA@9ge&%XT4gotW[S<D8a9YDc,`p(dsO8*L#h3<#%[>?=1)_ksVVVU8,h.re01gCW;0SKd\Gi+rKSDr!6<=.+ois8$3"NKY-odl^scj[sNTJ^=%_gEP`QWCW.7O1Nt1+?Xj8N+sMef(qTd3i.7$oqQ/8>-*R9.tN:3`U&sOU,LNHr2d9CUAf;LW`_1;WLO]J7jA1OFu;qF.VRsEu67k$0%W+I1<)ibaB>\#Pu5<5T,-LeuSB&pioh1ZH8&+EcFbn6F$)@G!/I8^`tI06kI=a6c+gGA94)l#7J"K(GNk8=[.K1ESIMMi-/,heFJS<>,`Ki3J&!sUid#te'F@dW7Y(+CnVS>"Q/:F?D8E_=UuCV;#B9;5a"9D-t]Y'L7[i`BA2*aQSn1$Nq0&Q1R6/'TXUlcLD9d;GJ:l+KI^1Ka=7V@H\mcsQSVsT9)L;^KNKO/Z8A=@$8h?@FRK/SYn0%:!`Y&!<^4nX%_qU_d=jf+0LriC4-]+^hIG_&lPL#2qY+N"CO_<GX7La0-V"Yd@O-.r1"BkQ.R>TC&,bj[s$X:GfASf,Lfpt[66kP-)#"joP=O):-'2(u1#%#eb8akmb@^igfqYLNE*^[U7m0uCTi3J,_i:Y2P"he*Y$Z1V&4b3&,HYe7`NVtfq3A"-q:ladgX@N,E['KG51U0]^mbN5oA4A0:YMc8's=)7$+<jbAh:PSL4)rNYaH%c<#V^.<s;ab)iS^T,Ifit4*u50+fDJFb1A41G6u9Xi2&,l>*\(YYl049aDMC[FU((rmd:]K)n3E_Y^Jfu)><\-4Wi?@i=5./c4<1tqZ9^_U0sM]"dbU(\`-8lOX]al4m!)oqafW]cB5^cW:1^TG0hmKA6qIA:!k*tduD2>'=bilCMC@M9QobS!q:A5*=b5kIl*q.^f1q9IljqcGEreEBQOSWlA9_g<OLAqA5c4,IPii_nh_(AjrfkADn+4NOXo:@h-%J-'U=ML[si,([]OB?hm+R0$fqnNVg8[0'kZ_@nkojLDiTs'CI8-Q`#(9.IZG>K%9qc?AWG3LcmW+-?mX"A@-0T\]nc@78@gur:1qRiBj_;M7cWFZMS6h>56@S$rW[Kaa%aHeE,\e:T[+Am,T."7jpG%<D6jP#FFeR7?J=\EKl&>KriYgaZJY$:$HS;'n#sDVlg;ZA@\g`F*G)\Drld?Ul$roAq262Rd.88oCe5I!hi#`K&iTW+^>4QSZS/doChB6?3N"7TXRFlX9:r)bD<B*QR5YRj1N1;+4Bdc0@W&,7h$qTKNmb)[UMe&1,)d#<;NI93J*4iOK0+Oi*uOnbh?D![~>endstream
+endobj
+52 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 1907
+>>
+stream
+Gau0C9lo&I&A@C2lqtmW0EHXcQF:e&:,>UR9rA5'+;0p#OG$;ZG+;ps"o(ebEh&PX7MZCbY\t?ThLZF]r)!8L.0+hM^st:Gb$^D6onWjB^Ymp[FbcS;^jh=eo*GL70G6\8RWY[3CK2,LW\''4.`-k91u#TJ,b-.Q=lp*YD2"X#.,[%lqLkKQ(%E:_#8EK=eS`ogL^]$*"<@W8V&`_T;aS=>-O$S9nsr%EY@-r*2Qmp_?5SdFMgAUi0`TSk0.@+a^2_uN,(lk%'h/bQSdFb$jk.*Z'cjUARI./[):60lA<$]$^;54NiMJUTE`%WjoBHoOE%NQ]o6TP7kq-;F\![o]32&6ZlcM)fH9CCC;3cA.G$i,GaDk]45npQM#NB4$R;_K*/,u,X5<'Tr(q62J;,CI2^;30.kkcO+hE8T"ZPQHaJhHnmJQDpF?<+#Ym=CTQ<$E.Q][Ra:W78LSA\!FmBJ+@g66X]6<Opi*K]bL5a*>.:L_DhSFdS%IWT6?<<Ru=lj'>[=m_q%2n:u<$pS,6L=qq*eAtfoLJfa^G+NdY1U0W!sl\=RF>3PY',B3h+[Jk'qRW!7E?U,r^9dT)Z=#R9Lei!<:J;:g30YAqMM69-G]W;Y!G^Sje``U\:O^"5HrCF_7m""u#FI=OhIOS\^A1k9mAW>@lCLQs/<0O5a'rB!IL9+8V,e601'rYlf9DRE3G0u(F2atP5Bn2]7Z:shd7KZI)n2t'&FlOmW4t#S5%[+W^1e#>0?9D&;%N'SGBmd.X7(MKj!qDpNrJ1rI`)sJ\\,LC#biN$e&KqWt['_Zno]]O'B<0ZB8qD+ISbJ6Di6niXJso&0m%Lj"5Dkhd/;\d2@;<M5]#GT^1d[J>`"ASZp3K0e^^24rQG<A2`u13$n>0n%[p+INJcQ*SpPH^BH\PkA!_8/#Xdl\g^?hhhHBe1jKXa?!P+Mmnc.Dg%T[M15!VQE-qX7&EA3#fqWRNY2Si<+Q0+@5:H:"bP,9@3slZ_4r3A5"Z_$*c21;XaO!ZR1b5d=e]Zjf[$e$aE-C/t3'.CJ@_X;@lkdt5E7&r,q2/IOS+=Nk@8A:7D.`tG7O$tk0#hQ^JF[LmlhO3e:4_ceO9AE\GWM]Uoo,\+pM7RO0In?c20Oe,%_!coHVaJ3ec1H:-W]htS)(bqKAqEaEF!+9IM2(BWHClS8?@V8YWZpE(EnI;*9-4HjI6KhJCVV1B@7'1I#=",W,6K']Jrphjb@h6Q?V[DeNd.g;iUY62#`qG8;Du.`Jj@O.'*RmFcRApH1=f0'3&s!`'?tG)+e7@Z_/6H,:oCCU=Ftr3MeQ?"=V?O9#rqq#-Xm.n^7.JG6IP&(L1`?L!!k(muWoT66,dW4/*Jj/)%4q(di)n`>7+(\bkGX""lGZH5mL+F!f,rsp/]`s21t_@+P!-!*?3al!5o9HL=-^4rN]!UBG`TC*d]6O^3>i^,[FmlL9.Ern8=(ZoZ#).<q]*A^]*h1%C+-(,T3od/T/jZ9(,aO,dWg#cbD,+I`Y7qS_A\C$)OYu,#)Q2["Yf-p2.+>_7-k%+OB0o"0ET&`r*lha/FK4f7<58%m3U5)'3*o`\q\?h8N\X988,rteGR@UL3L)WW-aa],;pAn9dFb8U2(MHeE8=]m$i_O*Wu#Z.Nk#pf;I[bH]!$hN&Drs(:Z('B$a8WgK-0?kX32&N&@M>E$iF`G-L.#^k.o:i)`o$!%iL/0Kj?/%Vbk5h.$T>2Mt(I(r^:=,RbnQBut?OMEgY.jlAl,oC"2WH\$t2Sm-<g;DZVWAjq=(]]K;&4l;)@r5H-E0/a20fWW39pTP.JAmK,7e'C(]3G2gO5<lUU(nU`<h9VR15E@bfIN""//B3[F1AeGREI[-2:"MRC8)k7AMX\^3PBPG?q6;4E&'=TW5Hstp?b4a<~>endstream
+endobj
+53 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2719
+>>
+stream
+Gau0DbECU<(>\^d?tUe99p=L&A<rFt;`!NG'"b2V(>_;%,U+B<)$JJj^4+?2hm+N^;`3+UDAiXs+#s"b$O4hq:Z25sCW?AIb[/$j=MWV]Sct5mZ0/U_kN@V]pdl.sQR;:Uj,>A@9A)5!FUt\5BN+q$n%:Icj>IO+@)!)E<;LkPo6i/W^6:;X\!$]c++D8V`s49kK.I>]j^3(R(n=.=LWiBq(GHa9hXW5e!Z'cibr3=nK4I:G*IId<4b%r91YO0^)PuJ!mdp4qO.QIV&cN>rMac^U\8%M=,`=(TNt8rDlb*Y&Cdk_elSk=;$$jX@EcUb(?r-,r7NGGQ.V6q"1^3bR2qFp5B9d@8p+@pD]XPC+'U#0*jhR8lakZ(ngUtk?OZtP/YK+!!%l<>oBu7>6o0QuXa)55U3kf5gp?tHi?rn-tO:aH_`8jbQ7:@*)G^a(jk>F&[:J/@*UX:GhaHd-ulhY:*.@XA/,\t_c/S1tdVY@/-H)V_(.Oe&dRKF3n/ArYHm^6JKfpO9t52#E,59.pVf0\S`;l1I6l^b%$mEe&&;B<me^Qpd34f7M>2HDZF,eH-@MNcIX<,=4Am0l"4F)&=u(.S7V<@b+8@(8q[baH^;@q9(P/T%Hp?0R!)XiLEHP'O?5Ml(92UQ1Y^:V!Q1Ec5Td-uA.l*0#L'\YrOu,0pcemS"ISUt)b""@\)jP\%p<X)%N/$Hjo!.k;"]<rlI8k].$;d3jd,N5.8er^;VQPP%e@cYRl`T8[J`%G(3,=F6:Cg8g`H]gugd%W'G"a69Jn"ff\XUJ[8hl3sS2,N6BPe`0)WaYlnWXY[WAH.S5:=H:'u?)^"qAd%[<OA+%UCIHVQ$oM>l5GC-b.FRAJ6F2)Qgg!uR"<fG"EBap=Y-=cVC(c?<.6Lq.=Bk'nU*J)Vh+H5ubB#ulJXe&?&`oXO&.-!'NFl^9X)hQT_=@la8PC;9Ls&DBcD,HY7M,_Ta%GI9,)&uR!^h=b'X6-9M&9B(9sM"I]`]W&7*]\DCS;YsnQ4NHS]FCWp(7dGWMgru7436n%CWi(-jcn2R^H30Z'.8737CiOW@n=lZ#p.&h7A#)os:_(MKB&fGE6j?/Wi,.B/q#aY<agUrrt4jn19/2H#];D&>YW21dDc*&3]T7`Bai>HK(Glb.`ApZGbXt&\Is&/E'_i/]$JVXpP$nYQeXZ-:`ZHO#+*&lSc_pb8&Kl:'174[et1QMukY-TPK!0D!rY.ZFqlB_);EmicpnT9%<Ou#hJ$51f+-A9oM8Gn%oa`]ne&bm%8i=d>/1@>7(c&8@AkA56$<+aM4dgaXBUV('/:BjEl??9fb+toIJq;\b9%8L,1OpC(W4#YT7%SOrb/JRsj2<U:"I-Eh]&J8AhS]TJ5;`l.qeiCL'1<DHB7<`W/1-`9q/DRpF,9i[0dI[oO,Ek)]m"NK^inQ]VNAPAI?^J509Wpe&e$]D5-c5AYdoqr,0O]r2E3W%I=A1a`G1)bb<BXha4.4=5cR[t.FU`lI-m<Hkb^=(b!H(7ZeNe(Z"gZ-QU8>Y\JTg9)PA^6r)p:sY"'o3Pl^s(5`<eFb1`DG@iM..8W#3UscM]*e8T>;iBt:;nuJ<i?@70V?B6b+aJ?XFtl-!@a>,/85Do"6t.g6i5D9[6K_9:`ocn!.k+lNpY2NbW8gsG=J^bA^dF)&\T)2@,7)"]!0qg&$lP+c?XRdp$q`ZlJIqCmpNL]\qVCLOeZZKBnI2M(&>GK[!L[P"mC9U[@"/G1:@HU%f.C:gDJ>dR?[7d0=U-K8R7n0fHB!F:4eW>^R=MUc#tCRE!s<]23gFlW6Rc.rDKAdOQ_5FHud-XU9K[+:l!"HOkUe?V'a9me4[[^=RXT;=>RGZl4;[%/Fr@)ZppIt'.MGt7\is%<62WuCb$=ppB$u6f,,fR":04E1mH`Pep?Vt7-"C^bST>b5ThXU39g_e?nn^DEiu`<G'%F`F4KmX'29Gr@%,TQ8E-\LC">@sHH"S06oLBSB2/fI(paRVG&`63,)uDB(%RYS9TU..;A!@=PJ7mO8tFmj#^9]DZ4$K(p\T6Y%LJ40>qANt49eW\@BJUgBaU61#M:95W532j:i,0gO&XX^MPo;sKd\ZP1$%!\Bfr^<SDq0dONBnN9:<lINi0&-j5p7$$VV:Srp<DPS%J7&.%LrbYof<(e`Qd/(berG=4Bhta"1NWAT9Q4.HsCWMd+B*p+#61^MIeds-NKT.(n;]>c4>=.jto.^&spb=uLRpoBj0)lMq`Bg^C(.NMk0I;'UDnT7W.*W$c:%K;`Nh)VlEG%%p`7:CbAs:hF9F2X4drY8c^$k^SG2;+7u#U"&?(9=sTrDgZDhBlb!ciCZTsib7?SkBs-X*8G8@Y6#)lSK.PD/H.MCEVIZ%(V+!g,a;Qbs-4*C/Io4s$U"1F#%[uYdIspcA;WQB*u>R=MfQSQi[`9taeGK@p>UOHrk(U%QT`7R<'2f!C8adL`s*W0$STOmr*o8<[r&e'#XA"03_F'j4]c:jT7rlLX<M^%lJ'96-KBfo;9VI<NGK*?T=^9Alpg-`&1`b@5aTjbchps)re]MsDI1??rV[l>dU&f_E]r2ol+(9l+1rkoYIi$57^8S^pq,WB/o4YRD237UPonW*1TbFtP/gFL2<HQ(NUO'Q^ZNje@irbUGoVU/j"MPO;8`p\T`+bcH%-mqZL$H?:\1&09`Z8\dm&h1^+,!>O(A1VIb;Pf!LYIqg]~>endstream
+endobj
+54 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2610
+>>
+stream
+Gau0DgQL=$&Ug:T^mgUk)-X\:qj(44=f:W??$dX`$B^F'2+bjh-s?H?3=XhV8RjiI;U#W*\9.I2j.(#_ClOMEIMXkOs*/.ZhtYD+f^kF)OVb:cGO1[ZLX5a+$3$cX60nb+8-1GSBh7P2?GB@Krf>cX=m1dNn4S8C$):1qM_YdNYm>uA&:TuRp.tAN#<nb%]Qii,M9dgSlJ4hr6q0B$?IHH9[smd_OSbWq6B'E1ofM%;jsPXgc[W7`T.X_FC#W]$2TuW]62\*MT6pbRrZ$[!7HDq%.a;(Y7hjV=LUDK\H0(*#7C:n:2ZX>NQbf,\>^Zn1'73q*G[VJ.9(l-M)S)+:D[Na'F_NB53b&O:+kc?jps)c.Q3MQcl=6NppmJ[@]cbYP@EuM297f!4?3mcffZf=\a7jDjlaq`Ef[Y\5V!qYf`8jbQKg?>AGWrC_o3SYi2m"O94BNr=>>\LJ'\/V>F(=s]aM3C:G[M7o0a0cIVRESY\%5uQ/P:lqWaW2A[G&\o0Rc!Ka2..#=UD`'9F$KM53t:QQ-ITkHdI9_3*/e38fS.U19_@;I[!IbrDmmlC3W&-6;'p1W/\/sRTT/j0,q/Mkg']=K'S/m_(i&G>8WF7[>)fk[&%2jZ?uc+&]Ci;,u*g_U<m;j=b[16$-VkR<@=rmL!?O'kPK]FL<f!P(d!E%HbPiYI>&b)7,A2HZE;R!=H$`Sq%kE2*rAs."@@M&UGYJU%"VZ^[OM=&_Jn`#lTS9X[:j_ce6qIa)(2-^'4267/>U7Io!1XtAoM,[3(a5KWfY*glB-oi26)t]U\"8RYjf:Zk(Qqt!"8]YmT_Yl&u@Qel:d[sPo[7^7:i^<3J^#m$GHLU,9!'r%[30Xjq>:*nrmI._(3.l/l"7m6_DdDL-NJu\e`)_Zb=;=*5Dh=_STb6XHnQcm#UY/[);q)OPI8_3+sY-rVW8]8K2=A&1XB]Q(fa8)2+i0%Rn<)Rr3Kp.quO/A;ibCL0&"T8bO+K&@$E!W5VVk'4mXNWPq',9kuCW1X4r*8Y+O4LkBbe#GOW%QCXi-pZDT7m@Gq*(L*Su0i&gO8<Ke%f3Eg"=J[`(EmTNQYdLM,(KodM1J-2lfiB]U$1Aqu6n-ME=D.Us!`O_BK5Leni<OW2+Td="&;&C%QsL=k2'bM&b$mSf,Wu;3J773)*kXU<Vcgqjrsh]]G[,j@mp2+d90e2IoYXJV_h9lC[QX4m=FmB./Y2S="4m`aCL?.LEKZI^3^rogk_.0&p%-YZ970,]bl1>[SO@3uT-!(((IZY-*E&cb;3X#H2$giC8B0>tJ0U/bFId"Ok-@<'OtQm+N^$s6s1=G`$prH\iB,/0So.!OJ;4>?&0iIghAqhLk"?<gV8n]+cD2sENm4p1Oe$G_p5J>-HER\3(B&^<XaW=Q;Y59S48\t17Y:O%?.$Xeh?\6S)c@FRSufb3<YK!4d4+7qO_ZYUdl"((,sgS[hi1QZ[8RtH:`In6>HMX@WLYl-QuS!!,<&cETGnZQLdoB%NG(m_)duMLfnZ+PZ)?l,;JVqGY=9R7)nmJUPF[q4LX>=]4CU6"CLJi1JD3>`r'2"n_a*c%JHt9pHcP-0^s01fi-n>m&4+Sa#(uAEW<cQTHPEuV.YCmh&Bc!HQ=m-N&k7)dS0-oSWs-G.(Bk-aS2*csK<oY=FQ>>T@30u$I?<&$SDs/Z:;>)4NJkD(j\o)1Q!tmKX'QNRlLem?R\m-/VDr>Pm**6q-DF\;VD-(h(cj;REt1mkenrB31%;/>Vb32c4$nU9(^0S0J`p?)j^VZ]>cDUY=#6%uf;k>D[@i[nVVOSp-.397%OEL&Yjt4d=g,U?P\1Cc<gTsk+8qVUs%:[&AUPB9R-r1=]b>QeO"'cID26b*rh<UPj[*a^Oqq$:eIno#>V!dpYZa'869\MR.NC01D8rWCRGp`@GrtQ6TIXO&4o#0`kje_$b%oC%igf$))U%dWU-bX6@+mnMFYgf'ID338%8[QX+2nE)(H(^#8DdAShkCCpr8$r@pSf%o+eW&ea1K!sV5#cV)"<\lZ'jI9"3p&@Va_]A<b'es>+cf&]#^SsR-cTnqDtY@qQ,%Q5>;*TEWZ>C?/%UbdQH)l@T%?/^:0Je[$<^8>]5r?S_LJ<]\8#id-1@hQg!A11oC)VptdO.S>8iS>_'1r3ShN^nP6@Y&mT56Tq^Z^*C$"4M:(4qA$\56oc(=:1:o>%+0=llWWoj57nZj4]_+&1EUO$4"<IOD7X6o@;<j47d+dIeC*t%/@M1"8ZWQ<M<2OrIU\'r4m%Sli2sq%9m/geKEH`*PcfM/Y.?D4.5fYl233lEeMJ=cH1Cfog%4ok_9WNrE!Qu%">.Hd@)r"M8ZU9)#&e8YO[r)a##MHIY7j9T!`t'<b48Oj&3tg<b>\u!'WGrlCD_9V(E`Fu4W[HS*qA*b?LW`mZ2;ZDJddlcl]^=^:Y#k3Ir-HE\DuBNYZ]k@WY6Q-eFrD=E]'g$k\RHX&]HjC.7@BK3nN,"c2\"apVhJG<X@"'lY/<&tCE32gg\'R^H8]OU^UF-15=<1I]VjrO4kq#`j0<rh\3WJ=^O)FC%q;o7DPVWJ7`$]D:=2W,1lQf$M#R]6rbrtQn6_J.TP=~>endstream
+endobj
+55 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2372
+>>
+stream
+Gau0D>I3'B%Y"/U^n]ZS;+0^+[ksF0S^)&?S=TAI0=4.%Ca@Djki6f8r;r4^Mf7dS4$0#R.hkMS++Olp)>Nu8p2=7<r:gQ$hD8OZ*]Ll$08.AQiSEPR.t5n`s%@r+ni6-+HRU3@m9@5LYFFef^%Tm)aWtL&gT6#]Q%!%-HkXVPYGGbq,2oY1r.^iI$SV'R(,IrMDRPJ[Lm2_s]XTm$='9Gnc^;`q^c)uZ5DlQGQ@&puJ&11>B9H[9HYJj.=mknF_2fWS3YD9$"HuPjPM;@u&8*.Hp3#?K[E^6[TG>mpYMO>.0j2VH1331>J-U=3Ft.Dre-3M4e\5"WcK.aI\Z2$@Wb*.Nd_MsU<_ku,S2%8GSEiZD!;9Y#08\[F%`%[]&k:);"L"PH>,1#YK?VY&(GQep9nnHt5qler35Y6+-_ZYu8fj[fQ*+??#U@`8fZIAUU+B*el3!bW8[Hm"0(i9,U'.aY2d59(=<@sms6S6=R2.8X834PSm#r'@Eg0%%Vf40[/Z9RU;)GRq<P=)>ncY-6`aa'H6.n%.5'cYp:6cI1!Hg=D2B.@$YchkR2J<quJ/1&RCsTJc4Eams,G@qN?KtQ,/$p)pRO_n"%VUR!6#U/7NNA-)bh/QkHA'JA2A0ja.k$&_Y]&$Ta:T2mOkYM%MKUjUr8;q9T<K`NRT7&;U6:6'$r:55_aUiJ,;Gt/ke[#\!Bi)9/M03l,D3!Gd@_t1-kn8B:l>/Y]'KGeY+=Us4eBZ5S63J9;V!MVTdo]!NcU(3`c\m0AAH<Ue*-Iu25o1(CMZbQ;De1Zok7/:`qi90kfpZX+E/5L;'4N);0rE4:*7U[]u\Aa+\0%HK=Oi&$E0jD5R-##eR)I$#'::mFpTem_B<qtm30G33g[edD=5bnIbGci''4XVDc#Bmp#,M1L5#[36q,<5BmEZhM)u9O/]uR!-oY*E2C#?d]TE@u6E/1C7$=Rn]3E3;nKX@iF?N%7_fCaJ2or@bB-B%A(SrPk,4Mmo(9$;0+r\\7Lo&2[&"KCmfR1I'ZIht$&C/&HQ@QS!o_>P8R%O"tOBc0IK_&l=@-Pj0V5%q#C)[J'"NE)68]X">::/9/h=?cJUA<5DD^?q@]GP&tV#SuDXf=g8?(>Pqa2;j1s3T:_EMHBNmY*bEUu,VC@rbLs9K#STR]&693B!a"N9[0boZfhEmbJK!p90POC!7I#UkE#(JZPu4g@e*sf[kG6EM\S1TP&(Dgs0IH:qC\=h(q+`Y8L&oW2'03@-Z.f)oOrHoF53Y=#cJOWXImpjtt-r@aI?+dbB'uGk:b&$N=>3Y@?E+*'qfO6@seZRI=nFl"'\SG:REJK2A6J+.2!7pQ.]#R4^89@7.)WCP]F7LbD.IH?e+u7+qXs"ro]E%<;Cui&tG.:6"[bcJ</nK:$]i9=I<i$YjGn!P!qp+fShMa#IGaiDO_2+ZrfP*cUZ]`9W-49Dh^a,",-D=^Uj7XICpJVMu+5_Kd&.ZRud<Q>[uhA0LM!:P-3"AUFsWGHMAbNUL%S9R7sm1tLeWJjq:`:6>-d3gVHP4+#l*B9Cn+fUm&n(^!F[Dl9/8e):RT:O#@\Vb6pDKk"rMUHh=1Qk)[E\G%Pj0[B]$^A!h/H`F'uX1o64b*Kl*9qs5;%]*$LS3$Nj@7Be0R)KoK,PM*W7d`j7:D+/>D!Wl$PL*!>BYpO$Xk#jJ9bP,trQr+(a4X]XUZXXZLsti/j'Ej-R,)G9,\;$ug7;o5#'5-:5t@!Yln3Ag;q?"(_[sf!pC-a8jrMFJH^UqZBRmF[-7.Jl@L)geKUnD\WE_l,S/"Qn^QErn]Zc.X>mF,Wj*]P-ds,t11dA\Ppkc6Sq8:8)Y?/%I3>Sr`4?%,+T7Nc-KWlDBmppdc2(Xd&SSR)H)#hd:1>q`;13WE'UK]\%g8(H+'5AW;],P]Bm_VVT>osmL')<DH4e#h6,lY9Zc%iWPeMU[tVuH;#\eoJa-MIT$\N>csfeYK^B\?R`qaXYZf>ru[UheN9of7Ft]NVt7oKgZC=e<U.,8O.J>(m\iP9_#(Tr3@hZPe1oAAm/51H6RVUOoOJX_.q%m`u_'SmZlH'3DG`>BGQ)(G']5Uh?Q2j@:Hh\hW6(ha?9qQ1qN'c>/O)pS.-5@tm"(+FSGFh-dV^;&63XM3@#c:Bok6^2RFUAf[:-G:,hl<aNUfE_!iR3XmsHW<bXZmg1b:?kZorA@g@BHq"s&s)IsWc')N(hd8<\_Ol9\0[-?QE)Eb69-l`fn9O!3)>uT&?4u7_42pZA7q"k+]u9<UHh=NQT4qYL!HP7?CsASC\bF_L?aIdYQea\c]61[i]6/Gff$SQ7+k"_#N>d%p(KL@0HQ(cEBo7J>2r0[Eo.h0_%rhGY5Hso9Ee\Vt~>endstream
+endobj
+56 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2382
+>>
+stream
+Gau0DgQL;L&q/A5i)*'[BRr+)H-=3NG.4np'71eo'gk;+fG#G1j=%?A^S_*=2&\JuAP6SJ`iUmRICe1'D=QZcn*8!HhsT0epRLc@h<u4WUQjU7MnQ`0IDN,.nP@jUB2Qn44H9cW9Bb0rc$Nr]s"P$]O`7k3Gg5sn8Qs2P<G1hcP=bZp,u8]I]eukJnb]VLZ7R_Nc7Zm*Yj.K%8;AtCHPJ6XHYqf+8":l-3O8<riZK*lIUMoBf_pjI44@IV'koDhNONnN\'=>#N(ACiP1_#,BfNLN=C.k8fU(.>cNUHGkcL)PHh0F54=;`@/Le70OKptA<j[Gb?*dm3/_SHG68dag26)(28@t+Qa$JQK9L<3upOF'GOK_"q[f0AH.t;%-hPeZh,#;<oLY8LA^7=Z_bjUJIA@H)^a\?"8[LC^g(Yn$p,DD:/c#tgrB=>O(Pg%8t--o98;R^DEUgm.?1e*bW/N\cP@nO(Rn4lF/&MrllfNGVCltBYiG<+?f60g*oiDC3M=W/PhGn`k$I:+F<:0,J;fOo[gmV3]_TFE`W,Vsf0*eflm81RKUWRb2"cra?/Uh[,kHWj@9`^L97GM@qO=W&U#TusW0<1iF/edCe>\6;s"ZoL^[V1[n#8Qse06^a]a*=9-NmOArFop]1\X>c^;TnpO<]sKbWj!<B)dB-hQU/>lh,eY9\e^UZ^)=;?')uDX)oF=Bb4',R-C14U9YY"h6C/h$5ki5i-mR>H,%q@6QVWE!jo^EXVX)6LecJaUg7TGSY<k?k^W`;O#NSc)J-W?-Q1(5p\/SqQg$SR_@D+j>Pab<QQ$;Ul"j@SJ`j^7Lf"YPS/LqV9&l)Zkk"_:'bqu[=Do^gH<+G%iWCH+&CD':=]VFaf64cCk34A&li(Y/U.0SSp(+Or8e&;F!:"8o\tdTJF:4'3rQb>LP3.)(eSp=<&Ni1rD!c2M#hErK5TO18ohk[q&:M%UE'oD'(O#7`<%$HSLQAI9'2ZD%>LL`C)[6<b,*`11DO!1i#d1$i<F+'2=-Dg+Xm0#.@I\1GZF(k1e=,3t;?6eJ>-bgR@I^2bS0)ii;7i_lC/idmudQ^K'e8EEAIgQ2q0J48g;G<L0>>nZ6]bJrB<`k*ZORd8^:D%ro4[/D(:]^Cub?cbu]*2RX=mXBp6'j;1>Ad@IW9E\TQ%%@6Y;a.oaic."uGdrA&KQ[<X#[VK=g';_UoZA:SI%3">hRGqBQ;rnYG$p[V&4VT\V(jW@Bo=?b7GEra&G\32bGYQr3$\XT=+Vn`iH_;Hm-Nraoa-Ht:_b`[/J6?*!WbDIde\p0!Ab:J:)m&#,S%2e)4*YbSp^7_*1:b^O-GDqcGpr%bW5s:`\b4#RD-d\>X!`f8@m^P\snfGW6"gA2tb;f704=V#`7IJRRG^5b]imNhF(OE\n\epmWNGK'A:Xf5*-pMf&N\pIMdj(;^bFEq5$HYfFUR!ZM%m]1l</5!A^SPlk=JkhRI2&6"l>S(FLtuUqQ3@UeF(9EQ2pB'0LQZS%fN;qa@a>6tsI*kTb7YHoFRUZ8Rf5<1GjOPQ\2USqDiBh\Fja%]U7\fT?fmPgLh-01+Rm3f1X8Pll7Dd6'Kq'2"-$L^ep[e!m`jeM;VTf-qtX-oF-m0+CbmWH;&177`5O6JAK+YQ<Xf#CVGM2W/q>S5;n>aAb*\(ZLf0a^5Y#]n/p/_jCjFI2s`=oGd+iP*oB&)s4`s&`be:$5!O&qGjqQmiL+XP>7h.LmB1@(O>Eo.o_'QT#lm75C5mp'VK4mqSE^PQ.j>!?jZp-anJgLQ="^fDk94A+p^aJ(+m>-W7toIb3Y*f8DR>TpBaYjA'V6\gIV`eIU<i9p;fI%g"6'$P.0G`r/M3bel:H2r-?X/nJJ,]NB)5/lWNI87usjt*Bb4SL!W[,$FaB#o%j#ohdm")e-jX&I2&g0O>D;Ogsq.foEpX"g6@t$ATnDSb#Y!nVWUt`b?[XpdX%(J<TCHHDT*DJ]t)Asq@*IQ]0W<Gm%qN_GL47=+aD%.@gYkeX8qq?illbF"].RiFQfYQ;<TSJ--u5'kahl:bT/FH[^?O6kHj:Z,D.3eeML/:pJ8nUn1/9cor&V%m`bgf1Z,LpVooOP3ufMgo6jDg]81M\o^fbWlV7P7gBeB]Y#%_I^(-NcmFR.=/&+4RI@RdGofT=QB\![]lB/^>7SKRPW&tfF9Se&BVm^V8.Kc$Y)'(:+"aj.c5lGfV:r?RA1TNJ2kdY7%5OmpcX'OV<?WS3a5*&FkZ#?=Lgouj?-njgLhcR6Yd9[U`mc#cLl!UmacV`"JS>.g0e)$q=luk+mSa@?HYFWG*cd3Vko,&#0eFa:B1_0*oJX/hn(ekY&$uMD>$);2\6,-\"PqX+WrfeB%+7Ap[s4HUd%VZLH~>endstream
+endobj
+57 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2236
+>>
+stream
+Gau0DgN)%.&q/A5o\4,YCkgl=o9RWJ>I-Ci]An.6k*78:&IC*G6.sY5rLO4<P=!I7<,JUN_*A+YIF*DR@6lM0_Yh\pU;,O5Rh(+(8,#(XJJ6E/ch.3co8$0TiD16]6H:<(nskABTD*3ZHt^.gp\)EpHm.NT'Opgp#DmQo,4p&PoXtJYKc`taHb9(gT>up)\g!+:?%."pc!WrV2Pa))R"/<o=R2g#&`dGuVX8l=]d/a>Q0plar=9^-5o_mVOGpK:l\2fcGUq^*s.f$92R-!:XuN+'%G7r+NGI[X<FS9Fi8`[An45r`V<>.HgUiPbl!p@Y9(sg]._8RU[Q@E.W@%2;R^:Ik5$]#GN=MS'N/#^QA);D"7l'6/\2]G1a=#%$iZJq)_LE5*di&GT2<WE(42c\(E=fE%_MQ,d$o!.-m<pF_P>=e7;^(J8d=%AS;H$&rX].U,VN@A:Z_gRDT%Y48=^J*t;C/ZPiOS;oW.7aKYaKZO7sTCHRaGl:[02M^pnPhr-OZ3G3'A7.<\C^N;q(Hn6R?H=*AjaMoE+uOd<Fe]njH+9UL\qg3Yi@cqRG:Z>fij-;^i^<B=OY>:c^gUbmInZ;[0^i[<1Wd>Sb@Tl5Qb/r%g!=357YEjX8`\h;Hrq1hDAg49?MN=abgs>5]TtF@Lg#)kEU]0R_ddpt0+""IELG]KW].5<t,%SLS06ZTl.iSer!p,'Q,:pI:9gk\X24</jUb>%8q!4[6C5p8-9CXMj(C>=2@g?ZtgV?]t?(pS@X3!qs(sM@is8SsM54XGtmL%`WCL)FZV+(Kj@ToH_c==l*C81X,pKZ`5K7Z>U.$9jcj/EC,T.]a;MIAIke=rTPi7>6>5>oqMYSm#F6S`BK8@bY*t`^/TWbPF6JLA\8":KVVbr#9XiRK%R5VdtF%li(bXn'$h*18OK*-"DaA`j-W/qJ44B>%lVf&LQ.KeDO^iOq)rU%_eBL5hn(7qL+Pr-Rd:So3XR.iG\.qS4#"6*da5B\EeX6F>mJ4I7<-:#,^_!*XS]*N$!Y?^'+&n;9)fi5N$PFS`P"*N]HET\J$RI!]MK)#cO%6tP(&JMc5IAGM[`<[A/7kb*1O,Rk9+]H&1KqR+B!Q>0NI,A2(Da`mhX^2[>.L#aVpuC7<V@6+Pbh,0!c\^9WciZ>1EkG,AUi[Ea/u:7-KO'C8o+qXZ4-#@&FFHlX^BqCbjodj94&tPdIu6(ge'NbKmMi'c:-IAZ\fhG?nEOeaAEdP=R(qL;&1=h\$d:LK#GY@?P<bYleVqZ@?a(=#^M<6b/S;NZ.TS0=JqUljoBre-5DNSL4T<UL)KJ?;THE:pTWfAK\[B>9\VJHj.SN>m'Zr^oq-(HXeF8[`P2m\jPt![[E&O7!Ss?1]_niqO!U*d$jO.ebXH/hV=N8EHS:lj`l@hJAm[2flAp)'F[n\>t-4-?^cr61G+CYA'V(.6I'#_25$+>^rS/2lDFZ]'b0-P-7i=&oH!,2HF9285lKXs?qNue!&'*aRfj5,K3NK<`>,>Mg3,E58D.Q7#7uYQ4+o<>d$5K5kA]^I"n]Oq-aM(iY5.8bCHfJ'MQXCi<cqTqp[)*4AaCe1R,c>2.EFt`hU(M7"&l_tpYQ4C!kK,UC8gHX%D<YDk>L:X]$\f9(?Rlp#]Oa/[o9tW(-3@WXeeTBo<M5Sh!X]@o:7,kg(QTWm-qslPj2W!BpAVck/KK>Lk)O&<G';S)[*JjF2j\R3%]HT7HbkBZ+sL\R\U]VONQpNX=No\1@NpM,C#-*`gugo6DnWY/i7O]Y-BMB@!0og]RS\i(6*-_BH+TcZPG6BG>Wb"hEW<'B&3NmR?/Hqa6'mKlm<n+lu;3FZ:3uHMZ@fM(l7&Mm.JoYoWK&)ouqgX6;p)*rh;FQ.P'[_+2MBZIm#=^N1%GZ#+S^g$&S;UnPE@4\c07WUYr3:5YfiBd?_ON+g3dB@D$4::W&B5c()+&aRE+&N2PNa\u55;4BiL[X5<jMh9B1Eo,Jc=I^2E2K=KJ0^qKhH/AeFFLpSH1m#`fH_.-E/GVqY$5>fn43A6jWRoYjDSRpH=Z8sZIE1OUg3A%nJ9>dU/,ACLsCL6uR5G)80"Ps#d,7jq&di5,)SeO;iki9[>;Z7ID3H5VABnGg+j8W(dUD&^cn:[8(@EeTe"5Z$'T$=eRWH!?'s-c+2;e_cbnMlSqH(;n$cGFL1,G/mEoD)^K=,L.cUNsgS&qgCkf[75"D'8g"_"cH-B_+GR0phA~>endstream
+endobj
+58 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2237
+>>
+stream
+Gau0D968iG&AII3lqtmW1]b=393Srk:*5=fRHBS=6p_Mq5%K80mJctMJhKr_A`qFffReZ[m/,Ok)7]HMk''u/Hs"58%0OUY[/oDO5-4a6ldau95B2L/&g7c*%QrfI%$=&-MlW>I0"tA%-h`pd;O4T4g@Jh=VHL\nJb8_@9'/PTI]XBXnT2Ha!gb2VKB)EH]BGN98Vb4jHPLLdp"Jti3=J#4.:DsCCaF&p%BR:]lKo1[+,*JV`rdo;H#W!PQOJlChKb^36okc^;%-mmP@=1nfBdW`Z-cc>?$CG/JVBmGG=fp<D$ZK4P3K,KWQ=%HR^TUpT4Uu]jb1:11V;M=l^>$5#k:I,TF!0aUfB#(J[lR[(Bn4eHJl:qncNJP]W9t\eA+l*=dSdC@3RCh#Q\YVSBq]H+4h%->jWdNU24sUX*k*I\iQc`C(R&=>\1-<gYHEn%l/q*+R=ZC%o@*ch6hB^e1ss:UT+q6g$G`?b,_X2mWI7mC:bb2GN(T<N'R3K;esos.&otlU62YpHO[!.AotQH*U^^M<?p)jdflZSEfo3mOH99DV>+[HR[qB(`%_qf3Lm\no8P_oTalZRe/+4g7]9R(TSe.M$X#CM"S?#tC84ZP&S2/\<M3nb=_`)@E"M5gNXiadb,h_AG)djQSe:_%0HMdSJBC0HMcqu6j/';&A1=o5&)-<d#0X0o#;s+9cm==]1MPWa4ZC7AGP60A,>PgNjP(#QmYW5.Hdbr^k,l0te%Y7g>:+M+2*=iT4r;B^c6D[2,?Cj^8KJOVP<XULGG7d-Z$D49X\]`W[?bK(ets;ZSG[qa''Vb`h`3q>LuGL6;s4igl'^HUVM!Z&*_8mS,SC@+Z+?qBEZ>sS%Pt!-djRSd?0D,<&C/s4i]^fc<g15c,O?O&Ghi\#*TN!;W9OM*be4"H,bPUH]TVQN1C.*Apj1%BRLPaq$RZ8:./)Wp]4^(o1:#j/B6b>PHQF_Y(_pKLW(7Q8ma='33,j"^V*T,cTEtQ0aaN:oG_,%$pjA!f?/Onq=O&+4-OYNgqJXRl<DHPAga!Mfqu0"?e_!h88"+DbpcKOqY7WEUBp.4[YjmnG0prn;`BU0tGRe3Y#dN2#bVYDGmG]Ic_ho)7*#)N+E[*<t&PV*`Mm^F'*cPtlZ&f>IbBo&lcf["R!_cOId6"*VF4i!rW<d9Rd!aD\%,^W+ePil%N`hoU,L*]oFLKHur),\pXkY*iC/k.@4P)/C%g3dR$S;afAON>T+23,L@lK<W<afR+e_#[am?U<T_Lhm!V?0Vre[@=@]WNe7"?uBRUo0^';J=l%4er^:=<^8(<`9qd%?>S&GWmfD1kQQElC#Fqopgi]7t]FaI+MTVmDD3KSU<JYO)@n76N'jQ+lb:H'+lN@JuKH?l][O0F*ZZsh.C]_,c6^Vm2pM=@NbAT']Jo[^@Mu0&D23Q:3#5AhgP?pNK2[IKmFfsTp&1RIHNkBo"9:qJ2<;OH_sqHRu+;b%[K$&h)jA6]AH\4UTKuW28SHM`Yo?4f<BHS<TZ*^d)aVqakC/_0PH.(X4n(%UQF^d=Gb?6RSe)tUORINFAj>G[%Q/!C%/=f?qVkI@a1X606!B(<*NVO_F0T$5=I`(L^YN%"V#mIO,"oY@7n=af)&l>)C]i*HWff+/T@SPFVi=03bk?\b,K(jKH:M5n=gjAZfI%;^tc8QI2WgVB,NgElV*/u``sHB5RIRIEGXuOoJHARRMh/LF3Z:W[ojBADJ8;oc\,5WZWcCI54$(9H/:P'ifnVli@-o`Ni5L*+Fk,F8S4"Jbf4A/^oaUia;nPTGBL[@LW`OVl!a#!ZM2['LsqR-omjQLU@Hp21#15oZlI)D%^ZQB7+4u./6F#g^0Em.d^P3j09-r`;2X4WYL]%DWNZ`?cfp(-S<gH%`ZtqYkOr.'(9Fdu?+e1].=d,^,A/-`A;[%abo7Q@&;`*gCH3ISB&aE8FOQT!qs=>(:)EYa0o=TnN8;uc5H9;qMe*0DLm@mQ><>aoB.1ZE>fLgV;jXRtb'MHD[MV"6eD7@VA+K.Hnm^F$dEe0HFk<6A4-ONOR46aSp[J$c?."GZY1usXI+I^]g%.<)I"1iiGl-4s?d8'o52(nnM+-_M^+>d.U&UF0'D[3K`:t?mqO\6Q3`43nDp!Wlf#1W.2\!CeCsTMfL@\@AVt:juNl+&_LOFPO%,8;YG0t3G!P6$M:&"5Z?Z"r$>>6JO*+SL&Ug"9UYB&Y&iJc+F",m0ZVW.U;~>endstream
+endobj
+59 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2190
+>>
+stream
+Gau0DgN)%,&:N/3m$j9#bRi^GDeTi.dV5RQl;%5<(Q&>A1_cV`TH34]]*hpkbB2L,NlEu1lgDUBZO8SYn\a/NiW/Jc/\J`)^c:+M^d9]-gRmHlmHP(.dMTaI6lpUnGg*i8P(;,c?J[)Ypeu%C1ghLV=NRR[&>m;tb(s,]#l%F+(*it<W7;.NHs(`Wca&qSq-Ug>ogY`f6fuA$$/!FICO*o^"p'`(@/XlT'>W9/\GZeQ^H7o&-F&nlkqJJ$4M(6]CPGRehZpu6&_T"B8lCJOO<"/'nm,U8'cYO-BtK]j**>m8EhA:qIn\c=?E;(:@ms<YS8<\(5g6hB:A,-1?fkU:]*G_??imEZ/!Lh,KA5#<=m?50G]=Yn,Q]VaJ9g5<KeK3tZ_JdME\?dn6QRr%K8AmQ*`%A9`:c?qDta=?\<GnnUk)_:A<GL:!u,K'ZtM#O9aUQgY-3i8D.-X#apm-!]>l@UUDA3-.,>4-Fsf-&TW5fq`F-)LVg(em%gQ9\P_BA2AYV*'VAMUb_VfXB66C.T/U>u6+`2+nC7mmsk17[e[rE2*`ep>T`pgc9ma*XT6RN+[0+>.Z4#c'J35a6d\$tR/.BLf&$^F`t.-b&1qr#;kZG_/"SjQ6iJY8B2Qqs5"VChM')aJmW9bU"FmE(d?M_ip)3HrGE1bRCVr8uS%3bE]A&5[L>j./Q?dht>nR#JSBFa\;q\nX*+XO4\/h@tRcLI9q*VU4mIYKYqbB"6P]FGH;oYAaajd;l.l\&c$,`%X[#c20ke9N7.a)aQbt4:>#2]I6L"J:,Wdl6(7.,W[CB_bu_lCX/&h:johDZIht$&C1:c9B(2$K$AeW-6&7Y*5H4m9Dh9nT%Pn+LDAH&gX9dV*s.Edf"-rg;2dad:)_\*`?Ej*c"4:m8`7Q=MT4>ai8)I$Y:i]7=m#6.S>O&B6k\Sp>08QPGWa9#qt4(SNT8T+_-Bl/6F%9FVX)9N=Lt:p8:b*$\h0;5f_<8N<TugcTepV'Z&P,/C(.#J5f4k%$?EJ=c"BoqPb5D"#T;gtZj)JcKA0;s+u[`^W5:fLRb'*HOLcuGbS)D3(S(810C(gOH?W1dE`p^'E*_Taa.TJK;7M^36'i\?[@%t7'`1@K6*8hMrH_"hnS@#lXA]k_Dc8-M1IMVr:cakq]t3Ztm*UqDkW+NXdp33@.,ggk0d1`Tg?B:8#s,"r0cIFMii"[cWH"+*e_i.s)(^a_'30>bh7&SXV)1VV%$3Q(kB-[Ki&Z(fWTodkmiT((1=>Fu#DVs1Dnl[%GtLJeU\oQe$h-!sDFJH]b`K8$/"Qqpa?n<P5?TO=i_)Q8N7Ug-j,!b$JX6P/A/2&o@bMTG2Q4uqM1NT+[;Cn?0E_#_r1&OX#I;>@Z*T\j:I&Z89c<4k4RFE6=V*,EaMUX\hG0K'b*:INd^Gat&BGQu)+?,K<QpCJ:"?hVY!lY(]l4FO)C15uG$,71bmYa/&].[qcV&hlP*i2!2e")hMADK(Y.1]N*59#"c`9P:E$m>5k]W1@"5J@S#tIk6l@Ck-HM.1$%G\1'=+Y>0.BeW'`Id=4aq]-A'6&Vr<(p8sO[OZ=D%&t:``t2KJCt1Bmk:@P-'uu+6g%k]<7gVB4Lh]D^o+U0G2?gKRb@12m.3<<FC%<\E[kBkL@N!ZphJRZn>@'F>W!drPL,\3.>K\706SH"'H9W",?hK:6LhU2s%hVCHK*V:=S%29fmbRKqAbEMF%2#aYf.NE7M3F"e1!5?@Q.E=VTZF)FHrq;2Mj(N1@jGr`6>Zi:ufZ_5'>.cq":`RI4etFZhJ$goql_lPgR2X[`JDm'nS9GgJX8a:?\Mr^CtfL-d!hh<<+%6-mb"VB#.PJjL-3pZ?*56OFjd(ddl/^`gP,OWSd+u*/7"tPD2&ebOW2?r!t3hV>!_$LuU9aMoY$DIM5J]OWQ[Dk_M2BI26:FB=H,1Uo&DE[UK52WB!sNE>82+!q=mA>HC:H-eW\G(WY^,l$YbEamo5Pn/*r;Po0$/.[Kd!L"'fXmP?h%2:aje&*ig57$kRa$%Mr#nd5$[`t^rWglF+a6iWgQFq)3gnEijJ]tkM3)#7<,06\Ik)(kKD@3%Pi`c]q2Fc?KAkk.aJr7S/[r6kF7p'_J>TqC%+58NTQ2`A9SoGb2gk'*qAIidPfac1DEBd?5JU]c[!X^U:_JbVH[n\KW]of!PPGo-~>endstream
+endobj
+60 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2621
+>>
+stream
+Gb"/'?$"aY(4Ff<\1a8M*JkrU&!<:EKA.Z`D&p6Jh<E4$p&Um1#mj0Or352Zom8;>;P[bPWH\6Jj)N:n!:IlfpY^WE\bP^]^M-I8__"$$m?&d[G"l<$"E\u^YAP^0nInFf02E:U,=k5>M.tr?]#jQqVTf'KQ;6dnC6<fmDnYdq=LmZG'^JTk@]>UT0,2)VPMbm$ET2YSQUDmcr[g'mK+g!:O>tY("cRa4DaiYG*r1&Ee+?_P;'a)hFShYI^H7i$/0ZGOibko<76#M/\VD=*(VW+9`'/=E(,86L^k$p(\9=tHb3QAKn93,b$h>M8;Rl)SoFI#FF=E,B_`l1O75smfVFFT]m6m\V1YU^Km6)E!2<(s)c4cZ'Uo%*EaR8AM,^0->S1'E9+sb3!Sjd>U"jb)-[R:(2N1QNG;1]=Mj[7*!#q&=B0Ym:OVRKbu\La1!/bQ9DQ-)fueYT?I7?[.NM@HC/cT)kT9er!$UJo<i=fOGS1YV/@g\L1+p5T,pChBFL<QZl)V_h>X[#9+(=f\RNVN;\_93pjmj3S`DePrNB<^k.pP`#/abN>esX%@*7Rb?d[4KhJQ867%*T!Rp\/j-[sQ!L@$&$8RJ+f/D,aV(2dAu41:6[q%AFf3A"mg4?HrKWXRU2t-jVfK:(,@.)_Q5,l&PA]`4S7@pCBdsWZD+]Z'eN1Z*<[%TNEEjE5]pi%s\g82mRcSm]eoQ)?,e5@h[FN9qMFtSZG"-EN/rtsG:?4jG8`6que>GKIe7P^0<Rp4]f*+ZB<=LK89!i@@9Rq&YYVT0_\,W^03[7:=f5[Ra:$BQ2<AJ5q"d2jd*1^Z:MQLF$8D6ZgFf+L%)6G^$Dp>W_!.T[3Y&]<;m!C+5(h5"V=<UkkLe/>NH<VCT:tSO>)D9g5<%],?H>foWL+Pp<R2n(e2Ds$jgaFi]%c1p.?aY?dS!"p:fpo'9h(`8Y?%K*j`,,2()*#<Pc5*5!EefetNX&B7'VO'lJT,oZ#p@Si(rsK`_'^B:E;:8#*=;H0@S$/s#WPNDmj:dB\ViG?e%a_%7FWpJa$72U$f&W<#R0m]#lck/qFXO!6+6tm-[XQG6$-!M5!Kb`cNtgeI;IGTqGu^`r(oP(/pIaGr"$\op3!>n)SCB@\k!HI;/i');d7eQ7nt'JS3TL@lrTg&coYGSK*=WmAW]\VJK5&IIA$%AKN\ML::FGPp+Z@5dAlV^Qng5u_GX<bEe$c7W-(===R)_d2;%.Ylc6R&q2cEfjdnVBK`@.kQY$?k3$R4Z:"bgoe?5J58]8u]hQN8N^&7F:P1RtJL,4:H?fA4c3"W6WhJAOUADR1FlKU?_(G/`4YGAm2oRjfcg<.=\E2uXQGtf*ub%(rrqds'tiWG4E;(?K\qPh`goaZjZRpHu0n"uEf2`K>EZ<e#bhO<6hnRe5IAYL9u`UM-U#3pPGcP5``n^b7n;3)J;FY%5&hpAHkRcP+o/rLsQ(SLUf:r`cY?XC*W@@'Ib'p7nZrX\4"%&j#p6i)%iqFQ4$`V1-\)r9^$89'Si[Y)0jKYqi\G'JCPp>-e$Q,DjQ2)rM4I4r[jD[nLOK9I(kG`?kN>7PkUeL,7'XO_F80^'$:33ce<=d1,/rY&bS[_3>cgr\8NVq'>SJRc$c$_*=pctP&Uq`/0BCjRZ-JU<'!b"Akh3c21VG)[K@!kXS_[E6c%p%-f;g6%,Z]IsSqk<>_Kh^DV=phnh/4udR_QTD6f1(46<R?BY+-)ts6QosSJVn#s0bbjIJDBWHkkQV4!gYk]_-CQB1Oes6,aRXaD+c`/=ki2=Y_.+8tb8J"ek4[rdc`f(<ESGLi0!^_bN;NIt*R-Sofilc*(+rV#=/qoq4Ia54gc_O'b9+rG$FJ`.GH8kJSIS^#1Q;@QD>hW&Y[+@6't6mt/8^*mG!4:$Aq:MA27Rs+1]9W,\JngAR.PFG6U.<aBG\u\b86PlTsY@$$+rdLHC.3FG_.XBaGqZoJhkAjXH43/o]M/#daGrpcr23^23.cf2eBd#'sN>*I1=hS6Wjm6A&&(KMB(rEE'=!GZf9<)%4B+N=H0Dc`8L55A,tY@$*&;,&M!!jHboV8'3YQhP,d@)1;9DPb3Z7orn&R_@Sf8]h@+>-X.b1UUh^'mkjIF7ANS]9:6<k'G?ZoJQB=Mr$nMtLrnqV:BIfj!iVF&ts/0:lCTk_@FntXH$&qda>I-)Qfl0DaXO7-)T^?<sX/V1,q>p"<pmO7d7]g]m$hq]Fm#o'O$0SM*M5i^GM//<DN:q9WTk9_Y)YA1m#>rR*:KCKXeNaj*an/)k=GkOhR^3#?*C4BcCY@R`hcpZaifG[Te-gl501a[IY>+!8^BjK,8Z*#A!!^<;dr6D-a;LP'46eNV>gb$*g8feoXONf`bRPE(@.ZgZIs)%j6eOX(pK'f&?Y/H-/))d&DJNI.F57=r:61`G38As<iD1>D#4'o1p[h2iJ(%k4(ioQH9?[L3rf#b/O++0TqmVCe7dU"j$2NQ>cd*Kb9UmNin%n'9K$[5$r*>+489gi7kgj1T?\`9#=4dq)U[Dg>*R*g*5ICD5J%@9Oh)IWCj,9QP`a_)f\5D"nJ,=?C?\A_0k;VeWnVnX2i!$l0T=QsgQc-W])8FiHRf!Ch'YW&~>endstream
+endobj
+61 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2494
+>>
+stream
+Gau0Dacb[D%__`iG]\-hPp3WIk;5i^/CCeGB1C)bl9\.NbYC`OP*B8?Y9/;ERUnR]3bH6+AXO_KhuS'&P*-A?eGW`2K`'es4FX)Z1@i(*1_+!cr$2%,]R#9-T#+:YaHD&cQEhV\=bPs=NusX)rhFX&*`8%7[&!S)'^$Ykb(T-q&[@l<1s,ssP?RnfT@[))KQN\]o(H9hX'UW&Fk?n4Y6(fR?<ak7!@8>jBup-X]Foldhi[)/aRf.EG/dZ'jDdBMAKa\f_W69"&^_-:r"/-MSB>l8DIYNiFVVJFY8&)*MXe9uO,VF"[:CF1\c+N4&*+g;CMr6*&Di`6am-%5SJDT1DhY%3$X:].:^2()4%U#V)UoqrVa>+f"*+&>Cn$4-Q3:onZ7I.b"CSRSm>E'MHa4<r]k8a)]r;PWe-/9m$IN7N7.C(If$=Re)W#Y7d.1k,pjA/bBas%^/F*'tl&)t@=&G-("NCkCCrfc5"0#9H$XT$l<g=H?8C`m:<m@:]Lk8`jd5Zsr-WINTWtI&$X]CQN[7/p1_14WS[gX0g6&Jib?!g,OC=rr37CdDeZ(SKc$-he)lt^_jVE5ia[Up[=LbgDR$XO/L;OX?r#LRi`Io0hZ=)<[iN?D8C=SIu&_OcHHc&T(`c:HV$1FVs2/^.'+&qjU-nn>heS.-f+-#73\9*C/dEK]>Je-D5Lg6tgpJPKKVJj<c`V;Qmtp78#D!)ZUO7^Nq"mUZQgQq,>D[=FH66aJ%];U&X[%r;6f"HXCa7c<c53M!8HC]j60!(3;f>7i*\p8Eq(B96Gc\0aB]CKX19WpYQVD'9>'n]':MVO=pElYF0(k0ehu,Cd[j?GqO;Psck,*AAb5/HJqNlb:h]2_5t/L]KmR?6J+4&/YXdie(:=(!m.O'9Hc*Iq"?SN)8/9%gIuI^ad=YpF#lmYuCH<n&'>m.LG)_ntm;pg4;9pS6]cajgl'7:Bt:rTX0;BD"rp-#Z&"Z..'_a4f'^JXEdZN_LP:3HW_D._04&oq0EJ)#UCMg2aGKLD.B7<+N\[/b!V3L!cgVcHitUUcl@qY"(U7iZN#@gCst)]A+K>?3"iLT#X3_')+sN"%'U6['k)2`A=J&(V0LJV93oAB"2V5q$VjBJ,_[]L'T6P`B@1\s@]l%;RRKM7P@WJI:G"*M:@[k_Q>H^>a4#4(<hd6(ckm."QB&RA5aq5/@nt5Xbde^mHb1tJML^qqr,/(C&8l)]:flg6A,$OSKGTr=$8T4nG+dPTNO?%,)D7Jj<^I-98R!bi"_Po[e_Y0-\P;>fQ[uc+_mlc,7jJj$%\gTVkql!TQl1/D?:bOhFe^5CrP_lXY*HtbGXj?3-"VE95^!m0#Fol=St!C#DKl1e&%i>U[)cUHepm^>@bWcD/#Ap\1raOU?8rOOm$/Xd!7@%:5WU41U!kSa"<Q4;H;Xpb6CGA8W,g<PfRkXgnriKO<+gctKUK`LKYXHBn0q1rZ!E35k>c`N;(ts+XNX;e"O>@g'!fWsKn_&^a12DmTW6f@$qjmT(l.iJPAS(S1#<;%&d&3.rke/m*>8Fu683g'V;?6k.D>&e=+^l&Fr[7%]Aa2?WL7ra(sHUIZ3Nul+*($cXL\PPf[odfa;ANu_2EiWoA>k6J#p2HHSf]a10<I)"m/tP@\j8%WU49&iumV3g>TXd6XDiW]Kf6rD1O^-]<LJ97KB5!=GLgaP<r??I_.$NI08Na2qPuULH!=n+b^hA1pP7+k2SPTM-fFW`XQFkI?.TGI+JZrp-6oOB^*MGn$HPfRFk2?CV47r_cf_K_[t/.;U6bo(8q&to;PD$qt=!<#70K>LdsZOM"5cNd'qX8mEms#^VN+#@P\*ZBo3CH,$5'(R\BVM],OW5]>pU\>f&0[%3TLYe]DhIs3iRB\O6N7fV.7V\`L',a=chFhoTa%([d9Pkqt:^Zk+\=K`[,87aEsbdD^NTI4+A?I5<pf,)^/J)+%9rHmd%"]7]3fPFc\&;2ZQH1J@sPY^'0YVCDs#%n.8RV0TT0fOcEF"hrIAdDGCXh[<M0B-?ia`-]FAQPOJI*7I_c)s's6gAP19JlrG_KYZ;oMj7VGZ7gFcf6uJ9(q6Qq(G3Eg<ehUmGs3C"k"fgA=%5Ho\5=<^kJ8s?</@b3Un/\g:b"A[&<$.#//kb`JmCaGg<)r+Y&5]E-lCasD(D@I*r+*l?bua9,II,T1FnJAVVqu+"(jrML@Q$"Y!'CP1/].N>'I,RSDtuEYQ7YKeKTe_Cbm.AnBKW.;rG-Xjgc_9pX#B.hD7[f$0G[Qe.*#-b(-(N'n`H?0VHpVenB$-kW4fZqj+gA)6)E;Y9WH0^V[LuDV.tV2*:dAs*hL=W;c_X'npTdO)nj\%t44XPG_EBDXjoh,fnsjgue*sYpA2c_&s]B_3d<UK4d<u3d?D0E3U2(Fq*oDS\M&J0[1*npcPY<S3!b3ZX3s\JS\/7J!qXe"9qHl`]m19U-&[iiuA"T]_OT*rss)Hj?@,I?WEn-@f~>endstream
+endobj
+62 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2326
+>>
+stream
+Gau0DgN)=4&q/A5o\1iER6uQBOf?LH-CLuP9e%$A;S*J2!g/Rt0eXH,[,ZO^:'9KE*a/34.]'FB!=a/F620Vu!qPjfm/O^BqY,a$]F?8#[+S:fGnFoMd8-7NB7/,1?Wg4DSfj.$0;Wg4lP=Eq2Q$>#Zh;a#;!U4lK&&>D;W[(1/9\9*`E&r\>V#ZU=hMf<o>6Fa+A2c^qDA)gabZ0uaLpSE!_.g+[3?!kJ3qIZ[/<Yd'oD,ng3fX>[ne9EFlK5p3lhY8`&E-m'>TIo].fa,@[i*Pl]dP`@`LYcHopJl$:_BHhX8Wm5s`@g$D3;_r\(&dqOs-CGE4$8JpqCu>dp_6D0r/FWNnoOAS4%jee)$YXeq1;%Hc%.6f&[Q*SGiAh`=N\,UC\PlR37E7//+CVDXC>CG'3H*t\s5NJ<fP\ad?U8g>1cH(a9]TW"#rhr[BM4$&hm?5KW<ma.>uh]F7bmZl`5C3CFne29aee$e^9\(!=$l?!4*K<1*UW.MI=<2dB.KAA_lM*9`,SAJ1Tq]>X:W)WH(4$4/&m8TXWG%D9S<.:cg/kc$dc+^/?JrQn,S]n^c[$8b&1mA`455.+Q4&Zi<WCTsg-uZ,\;$YaJRsIN'4fVc1Z@&HRA&p'$.-t!o@'OjN9.^T9kjDil/=K1GW;ZckV;=B#H;C<t:GaE4+%NTd\])"$/DD8GD"&EmZ`Y;pO>QNQ34\>$B)/RVC.IQM,F$7Z#.N1+&W8H1TdR^q3S>i[[Ihi<AO3HTf6R\d\q?2#*4m`DB>L*6_/)uf6?Dlu#_A3+N'32eFIebHnauaR0H-H4<$ugFUP>c0A#iD>)9$q)fOJDPpp@=mdbtU7#@UVG*p'?"'b1`Zh2nWI''PkM>07h0[<d`U3SEd0$dsC;?NF'nC0$,rP_6W9O%3Ri'&^IAAW.F]/4)mRELMb=-81:&J9.Z$K$6!-K+rEQ,6[Yfmb<G^-2orbkim.jZ<iSbnG9P.deL0Pfh/"[5pcee^jkICf]h'P/MW07&&agQ*!IBsLdZ!g@sP+)C$s]ue/YPW0+$W_PlB4s]rn8HIEMAR-_b8es4N*>nI4pqiC+q.V14qsA%#djI*?]cR:F_A@io]U/.ht3Z?0:R[N9CNa=WPWj?n?r7O4:J>q:q6A/DP2aei$eN3a2@JJ7o#JNlooW^8>ZDG8=<K/j2t?;X\*)9tqFV;]1u8=9>%)c5G0!R/d=S&p&RCF-UL-l?=T(<h<qlkP`AjC2n-?SYEnM2oABf]6B%'*g.N%8`I6&%$q"OfL:BA8W=Tlok8`HD[((#H!RB]VA]8U*CcBM*3g9,Vk5sPUsF6/e'Lg*K7"XL$-hsM=#>F2HS7`f.Wi<jZlC9cE&&VZ5/s=1^_L3@W(6nd%\s;C<S(]!<p4C:c,nOqJJ?J'+cu*!2MU"^B06GMjXGeru)Lo\qJ#$!,C7$W3MqRg0l_K7N>R*^2J&&m1IpXaGrSkdoZZ9A+o*17E@u#Hah2/qX2#S!`HHDd._*1Kjq*'HYA\WK0(*8CV+kG?0W?*=70T0d]hP51RghT`Hbc=5qZs%l`HTT*8;15PH@0Q+T%$P'L>'sk1!e7e\*Lor:&7Vkrc3YI<)SA<9^]+,2)&[qE+*UC2,&Y(39/q=[!cY([npk9go\3LjIuL'$P%jN>&>$jFFBTq&-?UBs^baCNj50QbP6/eb&eg+QA[Tq^_O=r@NFnlYI<0\%`fYUQqH`+2<(MYQ%XZr91r(0"8d%1</\FbWg=fY3F/iQ0Sk?+G1`hcQ^uf<mEpkJ9/pU%gLtKH!^X[lPi4S]RD;>\[Hs0`nl<KXCpqIo@\S?aoK_EH'!*BWFW%i6"dj9P:]+lqO7<B%ProuCH7;7g/m%?)1-e`a@]O3k.uq5#hm@&B8hb$Y&#aO.ke*c'pk:h_rbtojh0A_Ma33T9ni9\abU9Vca(]))L>F:#Y35gK'SbIPEk7D6+oLucPm[BA[Al41F8[I)tjE4Jfr04%j4k#FW;]BeJl;(X,_ONh?ee3S3P?HIlUur_R,RD)XTk#U;@uEl(5`#=#eH`!C=]E[kHn$e^1s6<]:[6;gW1!*.;(HkR75+LlH=S@sPfJcg"LI1UuL2SRLm#I47=sX.@4@#.io:%C"[Een$8=JQuX01=W2*NMI/MM52YGb@EX$6r<JoF@L\@&>cu!_gh4Nl.I$&m=,lPcM(b[TN%iT"M^;q@GrLMs3O-i3f<ke`H*X+QO#/7f#'Q(T>l"ukB41dAf13e`r)7S0Rmg8-$tAndP/u8_`2O!__>EQ./X8YnG_img0_e.U"C7W2U-nhM?E#ZpGU7.%`EhsN;*$5Mn]8AQ#u?~>endstream
+endobj
+63 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 1991
+>>
+stream
+Gau`T962%2%)2%/i6maXOk37o4.RA>,jr$L:\.D[4nq@G.#H&0'QRbTrUg?(g6X#*M5Qo)`XtW@"?mCl#_mng+(kOIF+@V0E-9EUEL8>/q2Pul)gF.XIDJ]!i_L3JJ]!%ogkd3F88iTm?0_?kEpgjeP>TI<CcV7f=M!`@i6+B3HnH`:+pkHrd6%8R)**8kP*!N=[pG'f:;l3\ie2XpE0fn)jU#uFGdrpSjK2NUFQij=T4%BZ5gk][-hcRiQFf8hFG!5@+M?m/f2Elc)QbEB0_#J%Q]Z(HC9L_Y/YBJ`]&pdpnrgWGjQ')Y/n$)LY)4tb=$(Y,(.O]a(?o^ElHiYSCL[Gc*nap:^:!$aV8aOCHq6m^T7br9_\WJb*.$PQ4RrSd-+p;:SCPDNc9Y.t(bltsc%^a2@?/CFfL'!e@+'h1%'3t_[E,WoU^ca,$M/*<eQQ\o!rn.`'(\d`-8n>^.@=t`#%9b3SITIqC`IZ@&9eaO%]i6!/79WfW_es1$Rh>a;I('M*;@#\>1q/eR#Ri?<3[Wu8uCo@V'<g>-99dIjE%`_WX9b"i3V2Jm)9Hm_V/=/bJ;q%3\+hMA+WPa]&)^]I!=PbLC/5>HD1<bMcCRXl/#F1D7h.S#M<94RP:bhc0&9e.oG%7'eGV.2BK9XZ7oKWg\$.U"P^l1)M23p>,;EE<0eP,N?bo%W:Gp#mj4bIWa\(]%qh3V)"^.*b2a&Vee3"#Ce^q[VRkfX)_dPC`N!*/VBd0)W61cC\=Hm"U[!;QLn;KdQEV9@MAA&am]lAWN*0jDn0c5+5giM2AVW=Sq,U%sO:)BqPab;,@Yf#5dWLD>Cd."WQ>FoCcInrM4u*V67=X/a&cp>?oa5^Uj,&g:klc"M]`=QJTF!*AK(tIL#[!%%H&3b>qW5&GPD!ffqf)>dW46`GK#8\\#oYU%XO-g[OSJMNOoKiVU>2G3];;?8hQR%\QBls]+:4`KOX8cV1)Ken3DRdLnskdF5qDnh<\%0l7sN,MM8ObV'E>2[g;OBPkM5TQfLipS]#d?K:VWgSk<7h8A,r\mrXcW$T;,"PJN[#a>;1CC:sJ@M*lbZJ@nKn*jOWG7K<!KKk'E*7RZ_T#niHZGn?>s7Pe"$Z]'M04`0@gNZP!YFc0="q?@_:`n;91-K_nOH;QY)P?!/`"oWSoHXP>tM<bS6C(2AWt[&Z<b#3/90^D6!:'bYD[d$AnE-FYpX([,l)#C-g"4T;l+Yr!tfENHdX7XaQ<:':#!+,T#L5[JqeE?(E;+L!53dqA+O(oWj69n%3,"oY6Tb6FV`Bq9tl6@?4OnAD$S6_rSqoDQ:Bg3PPERb'GJ`d#1/V(mVA3P&?/'^fsh%uqI;gu..N>9W8`m)c7/Z(u/4X<cYT]5F*;ClJm;F7VV"/$Ac&UAnTJ5#tU,_4<k+7)oje`&-f?kk-"MmM#hH]g@LUD;?m_/!*<D.TNt`"U]BU\V2eP!ZRT1BR@D:#4Z0;0]5]B3QMsBbHI1J-.]arVbTiJ4BA"K8a2EJhZ,0,VHVW:_t$2^l4A,lYN95_;N3S;3S6ZsL"Vg\OikYFcP7r@Ilr/:8o=II,*d$:Lrn5+l))rF-6C-Ud'WQFUHXdPY<,[!kjYCpB6:U57Via#Yfo-$XK1jJ6BS7n*=S(->:i`hd')-!I7R';bk^hi/,NLai3j#A`/g8>fdGkNC?ncuZ#15RbA+\g;DaEAcojp+mbtN>0-CaS_J@J(\1)R?YXANhXD!;kD$9_;>^X0@>n"VY2Q4:D6%,OeLGSg8lBeQR4aW7BGK44dp6>/re\-.;R$>eN79lJT;PYd@'g<V]O\E)V2A]u7?=05Ch#8>o5+QN`hu>`HGfC820:qW:B,YFP@H<(JrKd^Pc2GFP@f26G]t%"fM&JO)+LHGS-G@8cUR?60F)FdR=[/d5bb+#hd*0tKRE'3[RDrYuMn$%kBV0V#mEYn$`pHA]l;kPW`\XKWHIT$D?P*6i@(`ff)#XPs";pJ~>endstream
+endobj
+64 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2099
+>>
+stream
+Gau0D968iG&AII3lqM67V?ua_T)*E[FOJ:S1[1SLLkI%l,f'JV($4%k!PT:?G!+7$fReYXG5'bIDZLMjnO)[3ZiKmo%W5Sb+;F6%5^^V-]/O\U\+kQI35e%@+:T:t1o*kTO_=A>DI,n7r$0fglk(;8,U8edkJu@PZ[copma3oT`/?VQ/f4!Ho4?k`/kJA2a5:XDk_t=W%>baA-K$H>XJH5C#^EjW_!2rpEjXsV\GH\Y09.=V.!/o_mU`@jK53EU-Kp-WddnfTN(s8R.#'GGNFQ<2Y+9@1+p2#_3UZ#E"VM_(WG@GtI1"mN?C,B_B^rms%4ems=uXoNX='gGT%WY*3M'@!XV/r.kq.J:a&FPf'(!/b>SMj2k^hdBa:F)ln8<hN>(c==G>Zf"LP\94+p>mucNsmaHlVT`FgpC-Yd2ZU&lfBF??4$UquD`=)G8l9pa<:$"#8_rGBdADiZ#%b.(<#G=Q1*mQU\Kofekgh'9P87'<?%S0ia-2<330\CfMoe.D]bj*ut&SmeHrd=&A@qikY&]&6eZ6A5u3$2l3GVg4e6_Q78soA8%+RU-;i,PWE^G#!lpFZ8>!AYnjk^Zd*B.\OO=JYOE*0euTXmr0Pi&2sCehH7iu(AZ8,<XacbcX?Stn<(N%MZ4Q7882\jiSB)p#N3):rQWqG/SOc7<&P;")g;3?4(>9\VA*Uka1h@T-61YXaO;hG/o3=X8mPuiI?)(#EoA!Ui%3\GWP@q,^`k.b;#i8n;4/d+^/?_!!l$B)lDbNIT?`P0!;?KS\9=`Ao[Oi%*UV%,L1&O#:X3miY<Q`K*.oU?A)m]lkV&D6cT]*J)=7MeF=OE+-_"r;[-5.A3SVp).))B%8T?d>T%mYQP>sVX<2"?_-S03ik(P%\PB#9d'BrE[V+<WBOiAIHF%;]?%S0W3OfSAMUIS1@a>B'A4HQp5ZK#J"j*Nn!%,iR4t,joWK)'0f53LBI4:;>ssT/]@t5\!H8Wt2jNl<^)p>nS$X#_GA=XV+ihR<_sU6$9-pO5d>NXR6=bS`+Z_*M8(=oIVC5eqC$@abD7N)(&!gNf=>VRcn*&6gFDVfH*=0e\>g6X"X@T]I%4'>%70rEf9UR5t>rE/$["sM2\q*`H(JXl/I*i&hh$7V&6]MV?YEs;[l`>12Ui=,&_$`5:+`kIMg;5Ucm[FR+(FFGFf?M(1"$]XT*j0\rJI21'J"3!)7<-g0("9Jqj!qnJig'1W6A1DL;[q<4P+6k_&$HNnG6[19AM&p,`S5q=Cgd_)!'fXT7$gWlh&T[D[%*6IlE+[ZcTHoqoi$<O:gjF+n%d\_J7OB8MuM/Y2ib6GGVDr*Tna[DRfL6VBk)ln,Mt@JXJrNc)>njpILo+h#X6dK@eL*9'C7r,I'X<\+.lp`>Wg[uIk88!D0bg\n4?:P1M_kb2p!.aa=-,4W>/eREI)ctT8Q[B\\lDU@+?@qR3&HK(XXZcga2\`56]6L<g#?tui7@>rli`o,MUb7P`S4iLZijQ<BZ+"9[2hEC*a3JHJA:?9&X_.64-cBqEU@=ZZ%mpO%Rg,*DPMMX,HWEQuNY8L,*A-t8uaJ+c!Rhk_W@8WH!iXA)bB6KP'#X,.&gA3[to)bG,.ldXnD2J!GKf,pu/ZM_sb@rZn50hW*,]MSl40o5"s3c^lXn0r"*nj9[*'Jq'9OY:UK>sfVc*rJrqM1VWKGsg"/[r:;]Bc&`^liOubF:g@nP8N!:BJ9_CO@[>HM<+h1qpAe5L&a2qb!=F,])B!?d\(Rg,43G@=u[U[9d0`7ujjT34h,3;g`q[`7iAIp^BjOF3^YB;W]lWjRe:P0h`TL5J#XOYpd40`3(TZ^k*TB7WFMNocX+AX7oKY#)a->hj(g5H8[Al9jV>p)uVc\`Yt,r;B9[.9!XDBh4nG2qXh&e=ReR&q0s8g:PSfElrXWR_In[C\1AU;pdfT.Kg23U5&<F\YooD>qr-@.FKYg'cJdg##nup&)/pcaE0D-R,9$?6g#tj&5("+Tqf$BFQ.G2Ket('r'<-HZeG`D?oZs.<*ln5lH._c\B&(\,k?-A+6TZ2Dci@DoG,64=.pa3*0[33Ol;sP]j8T,"Hi&B5J%CPW+9~>endstream
+endobj
+65 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 1665
+>>
+stream
+Gau`SgN)%,&:N/3m%]`+BEBGE165/i:-.dLM:KdCh$42g-,dI;"D,XPqCY$q,%Y%hcZD2f=YtZb4aT6u&b,<6m]S/A^0AD'2$$$POT>d%&/ILHLW/<qT:"ZRp)mof"j3e\6PNY5ajkN6(OoIY0+Neq,Y:S9%)Q-B11`:P.\KG28.[6F^7'GdkC2DFT-TrBiHMu(lp/K)6fRVV"C*67ZnrpIJH0m$R/SR9$>B&9(11J>p>BHuEA%g^mO\#[S,7"sd#$[d&.F4CVG8UuJL@.6m!ds+[2'MAUD6sT=4\,l[j\4o5u.I<0SfD6&WNqcYV?_aUW_3/bb61T>=0Y6J^mPdlcr+1X`RBIH6]Io]`Y/K6PhHuo)LnF7Nj#E6u^,j=_7N4HVr5fLQt,0,qt71GS(B0I!pZ^mq('s$/30eQ)YUFrWGP[[;!Q7=0UI<:l)\`.4h)VQa/*#2N91*fGXon#0U2k44P/ZA_OuoXW<:1&OZoWg>%K&A_,!P1P5p0CSuTE$`OK6$l-l)/3JH_TTW1ir)_rUBS/8j9#FOaO%P[nADX8gc,cQE"OrJVB<PD!FJ3-A<Mg=[<03jW*o&T^,O/8.A,WkaFq+tSg'@_6UbasF33l4?*lj4ZB3LR4>?dYN=S7^"G'L$ug90!DCKX`YbgA@pB4ZCR"s,W?<omLeb_TouCVYSR>Tq7lOgX%&\!0bmS%?b,Bd8CQF7pmA:G6jnRjS^^c[oT30<8P\X#5L\%r17t^+HapOHJA`\7S@0;Ci7rVJ=TD!g@3V]#mI$Y+\%30"ZXZB.H$I<.Qni>S"+:+^fc2K;:kJ&gFl3/<4G[0\af(f_R8'5b%g!1"+jI;Y1L*[hCFRIM@QVpt^erW"ZG>09ot:)=034j1p,u*Pf,_-Cq+!Ue8\*Ztj7LS52N3+bKcO*3Dq"/*thKF.?*!'R6-%et;r<egl`&Er7mk&s%e+rqJu7Om56/-hs-.0;Q6FrS]8-IHe%%&/^Rr-)kG9fKT84LEu&-%SL3MF0,f/B`-m.L?_T/D+bjlq#R/t#R#KeMuD;s*&Q=4asI/,i['PTF+YP*i\*()+bu\7"rojIq"I?1PhV?")Cr;GB4c&=S?rqT+ZAD^P4G*IF>8aLN`u"O5,s5T^js(=]dbTK2X>d'WhR;f-)=(3Td?)g.9GQjlF'NOeW>V=l(.I("#fe0*P/3WFTcPb6!4Xh-s)E6h<Z'+T`0nHh\iLaYu,CNQtfh9[NBHGe+*QomL%55?VtKY##U&QpFfS"/(A'_p%g>-(?9%GD>\&k7ROi36m'-BjgrfuWnV;S5FHMe+)1@?H0U-h):$^i[:e29djVI?ZtF.Alilg%ao1)PR0Eb<E,"S\PhT[#q:jdfqH_iH\cb*\gIoO0\^a<J(EM^qm;+q=a1V2X_D%EjRqf=$W_Aa3DsM8RpHW8V0G%VM9%r80\S\>tK2aZ7O;[qJ04i6)!Nr9O'6l0/m4/1Oh[_sIr0H4bl1o=\mSP,<B,l`P#)UQ)riqX]&O0VthTe=b0Hh;2a8YX/m-Zq.4boM``tS@1&Ut(?bYM^GN[P8K/*KEm*8^(/3IJ;VV2IaNlAsNo_5V>PR/A[$h&WY*a7jHlB5G&9YO*h9NP/`m[r6WlPi;;WmBgg/SKNqI^NQN'lZTuoM#Tap5.LnFrrVN=4.6~>endstream
+endobj
+66 0 obj
+<<
+/Filter [ /ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode ] /Length 2342
+>>
+stream
+Gau0D=``@f%Xt$WJO_"4dHp"d2lCJiFt6QQXP3$Y^@[LM_iAu#]1Iu0^OC`OSg/PlB5;9T)QF;Lp],[A`5'D(ZbQ)Mi5\?4o76r&n9=pKH6GEM%.>9^TCA&apa7*COiN$nge/dskhbaPLK<%,DYIHU0U_"'@#'.AVUEeKL`[fYn@b&;80ki`GJE,"e'<l!QGj98^\)S*.$9Z&R26A`i$o\QjVdY,"LqCJh65fdJZ%DAj.Gi9rRK"DM7k`>a0XRad=WN(0Jk!K+UAjM8>kuYP!Y[mAD!fNDqCL[CdKYJf=h!qJ]4E2pIWK=58&3k8"l!LK=?9&A<TZ2>H)+2bGJJM]+u3(-Z14V+=YM9?tBKeCK(T-53Au55Ce0ca0X8+1@X9[k",\^J8k,$SdXFD[q&"F9iIIP3FacpQjnt0'_9,"7j1'fiU3t8:lD20\Q5U<P_$0BWWthUb6#th.m\:^<7Asd^_Mui6ImUk0q`V!mGT1qC6$Z_]PLP".OaAW/+6!YI1kY\0h\Ul"%F9%WC1go0`pc/1^2rWIF>EcND\"7s*C!"U8'k:/\A;?g8[:cC$aN*C'p2<4<X;kVu+-m[9SPu?HU14b+gJXe?s&T,o7+rJiK<CHdYN.&l9[sdR^)';JIRG'[Hi?/)[3lhPj8X%;su(WmVt^0Pu4i0)"<;<$QIq@*jkH.UZ$`(\k$W_0IYm;>WsHE:XFu8e%ZTQVpqlmdZ@L()kG?fK:\5MsB$/^`VYE<?N(G5G'EjX00$!V4&cPa9WK%m9g2[8(D]X3#1]VWl_<5%QY>q309E$fJb=kg^AaJP^Bk$*I?NbDBPF3+N*XmHB,.3AG7ZZ3Cf&D=7k^`$\FD>)HHfk]NnM?mi#4[@k<XGfZ[e#+3qD?^S@a11tJ?7Ufnd9+Gk(-k7AuTCGK(':g&^LOcj2,Wi''!@O:\bFHWY'GO]Q_TMID"3Oi<)Oh#uuhsDOp17j1jb[-O24MVBO,$LXeD2=F_$mLu]76baOTYTO`SX7<EP(mrS4^L^CkmBV'l^]RJXroI7U^'QGMZ^/q1QBBnpiQ1$>7:5I4T&bB#alLJ#ZPOfq<iH`1&kdmWrYip04n'<Sc/e`XdV7#Y00N$@J\<js5Da?I%f,1N,'J1V^[m!@l%Y8@7dcCWS,Fug&:];d(dQC4</(g]n4oMoFAE-0%fRn,EIdE?j^-]0/6BZnE$+-VDC\6S,6kPnlLltKcG_UE\!5S&7MXqo\g7]PAEnX5>$W/<le%oGHo<K]+%uK_G&^<2;"&+j2jb3'XEI2lflb#56@ZuO!%,=q<l`^b%mf`+jVaL#a`?U.E_B"BI%uZ?'^!Q7!"O%3iIEA1o%(T<#s0-Hl5s+;nIasd4JHT"#aP8>81F]E`]E\Ae>=ZE]df.`55>A/.E5MhK2;G*6VJ4:\RteXNfr0.?']UnJcF7;2;T[g@Ni$=)as8<Qf#$cRqE+%J56',T>dt/bG-!2p`ML*Jn)bX5a`q/!WeX3jfmrS'*"a"CkT)NpSJ5FKI`a7fA#HD$>PbJ/d'IH3M-o>Oqc72mbu<1**n14/)h'&Gr"YP:23nYVi%V2<nfM$B7EeR*JMuFY76*6dmq(o(,H<DW)a?M-j\IoVO:M$%c>;\REGs?%Y###r"W//_9,*l6^*P#P50u>K4Kuf@5]6YK1]AEj062m@/a,0b/k[?,;]%MRF;#Go2`n_Y8MAChQ)3OEiKU@fPHah+t`,T4Xsh44puePnXe#)c0#G(6fnH>POP<-[C7hDPOQDhkN,/%s*`k.R:q`hrt::UR:/GolFCdV3&R&<Qs-H/a3:W8o)W`F=*\uEuEFJHdHUTLA#r\N=%H`?8r(X,@7,J`qdj[0AaS6?`pB!3pRM"jDC)21E0lE1,<LpZ6LWYVB)+aFJ2C2O?O5F2:!gfEuLHadR91E4%m4Rn\)2@]2D7Lr(QYH_-f8<>j;&n3`m=^[-a_(:U4f;Y@3BZoBCG_,JkiUK>s$h/%D0bprmeFk9r4Nn.PP\J^J@N23&r'q!DX:QElp@Gj2ML-nOiJ9/R"<6K*$[9SidV8NSYE6aj"dYB%P*2XCh$0FU<^<4B^Tp6VmH^kcp-4[9c%lh=)o>>sQue(+*#W$1@CS?IhM4a()%s.)i.mtO[!R\KJn37ib"8n1rql2MZ3DD#`)ck-T=7p1ilS%cGu[-k[8fVCF]Q::hlT0L(M!ri2JNhOYBdtCa4!u3t#n8[X1)?"ag]HkEu1WAg97q"k']k"d2"6=P7TBTZlJJqVgeXF642=>D=hpQ-W'ZY?B*nPC\(mjd?XeOWB"8%':1r#YQ32>.IpGD=ABo;>V*VVDYHl\%C#;CV5+5$N.@/UNJ~>endstream
+endobj
+xref
+0 67
+0000000000 65535 f 
+0000000073 00000 n 
+0000000124 00000 n 
+0000000231 00000 n 
+0000002995 00000 n 
+0000005578 00000 n 
+0000005690 00000 n 
+0000005773 00000 n 
+0000005997 00000 n 
+0000006273 00000 n 
+0000006531 00000 n 
+0000006790 00000 n 
+0000007049 00000 n 
+0000007308 00000 n 
+0000007567 00000 n 
+0000007826 00000 n 
+0000008085 00000 n 
+0000008344 00000 n 
+0000008603 00000 n 
+0000008862 00000 n 
+0000009121 00000 n 
+0000009380 00000 n 
+0000009639 00000 n 
+0000009898 00000 n 
+0000010157 00000 n 
+0000010416 00000 n 
+0000010675 00000 n 
+0000010934 00000 n 
+0000011193 00000 n 
+0000011452 00000 n 
+0000011711 00000 n 
+0000011970 00000 n 
+0000012229 00000 n 
+0000012488 00000 n 
+0000012747 00000 n 
+0000013006 00000 n 
+0000013265 00000 n 
+0000013335 00000 n 
+0000013619 00000 n 
+0000013874 00000 n 
+0000015618 00000 n 
+0000017815 00000 n 
+0000019657 00000 n 
+0000019975 00000 n 
+0000022094 00000 n 
+0000024790 00000 n 
+0000027448 00000 n 
+0000029856 00000 n 
+0000032085 00000 n 
+0000034534 00000 n 
+0000036976 00000 n 
+0000039339 00000 n 
+0000041993 00000 n 
+0000043992 00000 n 
+0000046803 00000 n 
+0000049505 00000 n 
+0000051969 00000 n 
+0000054443 00000 n 
+0000056771 00000 n 
+0000059100 00000 n 
+0000061382 00000 n 
+0000064095 00000 n 
+0000066681 00000 n 
+0000069099 00000 n 
+0000071182 00000 n 
+0000073373 00000 n 
+0000075130 00000 n 
+trailer
+<<
+/ID 
+[<82dd26e9da55684e5bec3008e1ae6f03><82dd26e9da55684e5bec3008e1ae6f03>]
+% ReportLab generated PDF document -- digest (http://www.reportlab.com)
+
+/Info 37 0 R
+/Root 36 0 R
+/Size 67
+>>
+startxref
+77564
+%%EOF

Agent1_Peer_Review/run_analysis.py

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ def main():
     print("Created category-specific files:")
     print("- section_results.json (S1-S10)")
     print("- rigor_results.json (R1-R7)")
-    print("- writing_results.json (W1-W8)")
+    print("- writing_results.json (W1-W7)")
 
 if __name__ == "__main__":
     main() 

Agent1_Peer_Review/src/reviewer_agents/controller_agent.py

@@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ from .writing.W4_terminology_consistency_agent import TerminologyConsistencyAgen
 from .writing.W5_inclusive_language_agent import InclusiveLanguageAgent
 from .writing.W6_citation_formatting_agent import CitationFormattingAgent
 from .writing.W7_target_audience_agent import TargetAudienceAlignmentAgent
-from .writing.W8_visual_presentation_agent import VisualPresentationAgentW8
 
 class ControllerAgent:
     """Controller agent that coordinates all reviewer agents."""
@@ -72,8 +71,7 @@ class ControllerAgent:
             'W4': TerminologyConsistencyAgent(model),
             'W5': InclusiveLanguageAgent(model),
             'W6': CitationFormattingAgent(model),
-            'W7': TargetAudienceAlignmentAgent(model),
-            'W8': VisualPresentationAgentW8(model)
+            'W7': TargetAudienceAlignmentAgent(model)
         }
     
     def run_analysis(self, text: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
@@ -114,7 +112,6 @@ class ControllerAgent:
             results["W5"] = self.agents["W5"].analyze_inclusive_language(text, research_type)
             results["W6"] = self.agents["W6"].analyze_citation_formatting(text, research_type)
             results["W7"] = self.agents["W7"].analyze_target_audience_alignment(text, research_type)
-            results["W8"] = self.agents["W8"].analyze_visual_presentation(text, research_type)
             
             return results
         except Exception as e:

Agent1_Peer_Review/src/reviewer_agents/quality/quality_control_agent.py

@@ -52,8 +52,7 @@ class QualityControlAgent(BaseReviewerAgent):
                 'W4': 'Terminology Consistency',
                 'W5': 'Inclusive Language',
                 'W6': 'Citation Formatting',
-                'W7': 'Target Audience Alignment',
-                'W8': 'Visual Presentation'
+                'W7': 'Target Audience Alignment'
             }
         }
         

Agent1_Peer_Review/src/reviewer_agents/section/S9_references_agent.py

@@ -13,23 +13,20 @@ class ReferencesAgentS9(BaseReviewerAgent):
         
     def analyze_references(self, text: str, research_type: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
         """Analyzes the references of the manuscript."""
-        prompt = f"""Analyze the following references for quality and completeness. Focus on:
-        1. Citation accuracy
-        2. Reference completeness
-        3. Format consistency
-        4. Source relevance
-        5. Source recency
-        6. Source diversity
-        7. Citation-text alignment
-        8. Reference list organization
-        9. Style guide compliance
-        10. Cross-reference accuracy
+        prompt = f"""Analyze the reference list (bibliography) provided at the end of the manuscript. Focus exclusively on the reference list, not in-text citations. Assess:
+        1. Completeness of reference details (authors, title, journal, year, etc.)
+        2. Consistency and correctness of reference formatting
+        3. Relevance and recency of sources
+        4. Diversity of sources (journals, books, etc.)
+        5. Organization and ordering of the reference list
+        6. Adherence to the required style guide for the reference list
+        7. Cross-reference accuracy (do all references correspond to actual entries in the list?)
 
-        For each section, provide at least 2-3 improvement suggestions. Consider these categories:
-        - Accuracy: Citation correctness, cross-reference accuracy
-        - Completeness: Reference details, source information
-        - Format: Style compliance, consistency
-        - Quality: Relevance, recency, diversity
+        For each aspect, provide at least 2-3 improvement suggestions. Consider these categories:
+        - Completeness: Are all necessary details present for each reference?
+        - Format: Is the reference list formatted consistently and according to the required style?
+        - Quality: Are the sources relevant, recent, and diverse?
+        - Organization: Is the reference list well-organized and correctly ordered?
 
         Text to analyze: {text}
         Research type: {research_type}
@@ -37,43 +34,37 @@ class ReferencesAgentS9(BaseReviewerAgent):
         Provide a detailed analysis in the following JSON format:
         {{
             "score": int,  # Single comprehensive score (1-5)
-            # IMPORTANT: The score MUST be between 1 and 5, where:
             # 1 = Poor: Major issues that significantly impact quality
             # 2 = Below Average: Several notable issues that need attention
             # 3 = Average: Some issues but generally acceptable
             # 4 = Good: Minor issues that don't significantly impact quality
             # 5 = Excellent: Very few or no issues, high quality
-            
             "critical_remarks": [{{
-                "category": str,  # "accuracy", "completeness", "format", "quality"
-                "location": str,  # Section reference
+                "category": str,  # "completeness", "format", "quality", "organization"
+                "location": str,  # Reference number or section
                 "issue": str,  # Detailed description of the issue
                 "severity": str,  # "high", "medium", "low"
                 "impact": str  # How this affects manuscript quality
             }}],
-            
             "improvement_suggestions": [{{
-                "original_text": str,  # The problematic text
+                "original_text": str,  # The problematic reference
                 "improved_version": str,  # AI-generated improvement
                 "explanation": str,  # Why this improvement helps
                 "location": str,  # Where to apply this change
-                "category": str,  # "accuracy", "completeness", "format", "quality"
-                "focus": str  # "citation", "reference", "format", "style", "relevance", "recency", "diversity"
+                "category": str,  # "completeness", "format", "quality", "organization"
+                "focus": str  # "reference", "format", "style", "relevance", "recency", "diversity"
             }}],
-            
             "detailed_feedback": {{
-                "accuracy_analysis": str,  # Detailed paragraph about citation accuracy
                 "completeness_analysis": str,  # Detailed paragraph about reference completeness
                 "format_analysis": str,  # Detailed paragraph about format consistency
                 "quality_analysis": str,  # Detailed paragraph about source quality
                 "organization_analysis": str  # Detailed paragraph about reference organization
             }},
-            
             "summary": str  # Overall assessment paragraph
         }}
 
-        Important: Generate at least 10-15 improvement suggestions across different categories.
-        Each suggestion should be specific, actionable, and include clear explanations of how it enhances the references.
+        Focus on 3-5 highest-impact improvements that would significantly enhance the research value.
+        Each suggestion should be specific, actionable, and include clear explanations of how it enhances the reference list.
         """
         
         try:
@@ -90,7 +81,6 @@ class ReferencesAgentS9(BaseReviewerAgent):
             "critical_remarks": [],
             "improvement_suggestions": [],
             "detailed_feedback": {
-                "accuracy_analysis": "",
                 "completeness_analysis": "",
                 "format_analysis": "",
                 "quality_analysis": "",

Agent1_Peer_Review/src/reviewer_agents/writing/W6_citation_formatting_agent.py

@@ -13,27 +13,22 @@ class CitationFormattingAgent(BaseReviewerAgent):
         
     def analyze_citation_formatting(self, text: str, research_type: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
         """Analyzes the formatting and consistency of citations in the text."""
-        prompt = f"""Analyze the following text for citation formatting and consistency. Focus on:
-        1. In-text citation format
-        2. Reference list formatting
-        3. Citation style consistency
-        4. Reference completeness
-        5. DOI/URL formatting
-        6. Author name formatting
-        7. Publication date formatting
-        8. Journal name formatting
-        9. Volume/issue/page formatting
-        10. Cross-reference accuracy
+        prompt = f"""Analyze the following manuscript text for in-text citation formatting, style, and consistency. Focus exclusively on in-text citations (not the reference list). Assess:
+        1. In-text citation style (e.g., APA, Vancouver, Harvard, etc.)
+        2. Consistency of in-text citation formatting throughout the manuscript
+        3. Correct placement and ordering of in-text citations
+        4. Proper use of et al., author names, and years (if applicable)
+        5. Consistency in citation delimiters (parentheses, brackets, superscripts, etc.)
+        6. Cross-reference accuracy (do all in-text citations correspond to entries in the reference list?)
+        7. Handling of multiple citations in a single location
+        8. Citation of figures, tables, and supplementary materials (if applicable)
+        9. Adherence to the required style guide for in-text citations
 
         For each section, provide at least 2-3 improvement suggestions. Consider these categories:
-        - Abstract: Citation style
-        - Introduction: First citations
-        - Literature Review: Multiple citations
-        - Methodology: Method citations
-        - Results: Data citations
-        - Discussion: Comparison citations
-        - Conclusion: Summary citations
-        - References: List formatting
+        - In-text format: Is the citation style consistent and correct?
+        - Placement: Are citations placed appropriately in the text?
+        - Style consistency: Are delimiters, author lists, and years handled consistently?
+        - Cross-reference: Do all in-text citations match the reference list?
 
         Text to analyze: {text}
         Research type: {research_type}
@@ -41,42 +36,37 @@ class CitationFormattingAgent(BaseReviewerAgent):
         Provide a detailed analysis in the following JSON format:
         {{
             "citation_formatting_score": int,  # Single comprehensive score (1-5)
-            
+            # 1 = Poor: Major issues that significantly impact citation quality
+            # 2 = Below Average: Several notable issues that need attention
+            # 3 = Average: Some issues but generally acceptable
+            # 4 = Good: Minor issues that don't significantly impact quality
+            # 5 = Excellent: Very few or no issues, high quality
             "critical_remarks": [{{
-                "category": str,  # "in_text_format", "reference_format", "style_consistency", "reference_completeness", "doi_format", "author_format", "date_format", "journal_format", "volume_format", "cross_reference"
+                "category": str,  # "in_text_format", "placement", "style_consistency", "cross_reference"
                 "location": str,  # Section/paragraph reference
                 "issue": str,  # Detailed description of the issue
                 "severity": str,  # "high", "medium", "low"
                 "impact": str  # How this affects citation quality
             }}],
-            
             "improvement_suggestions": [{{
-                "original_text": str,  # The problematic text
+                "original_text": str,  # The problematic in-text citation
                 "improved_version": str,  # AI-generated improvement
                 "explanation": str,  # Why this improvement helps
                 "location": str,  # Where to apply this change
-                "category": str,  # "abstract", "introduction", "literature", "methodology", "results", "discussion", "conclusion", "references"
-                "focus": str  # "in_text_format", "reference_format", "style_consistency", "reference_completeness", "doi_format", "author_format", "date_format", "journal_format", "volume_format", "cross_reference"
+                "category": str,  # "in_text_format", "placement", "style_consistency", "cross_reference"
+                "focus": str  # "in_text_format", "placement", "style_consistency", "cross_reference"
             }}],
-            
             "detailed_feedback": {{
                 "in_text_citation_format": str,  # Detailed paragraph about in-text citation format
-                "reference_list_format": str,  # Detailed paragraph about reference list formatting
-                "citation_style_consistency": str,  # Detailed paragraph about citation style consistency
-                "reference_completeness": str,  # Detailed paragraph about reference completeness
-                "doi_url_formatting": str,  # Detailed paragraph about DOI/URL formatting
-                "author_name_formatting": str,  # Detailed paragraph about author name formatting
-                "publication_date_formatting": str,  # Detailed paragraph about publication date formatting
-                "journal_name_formatting": str,  # Detailed paragraph about journal name formatting
-                "volume_issue_page_formatting": str,  # Detailed paragraph about volume/issue/page formatting
+                "placement_analysis": str,  # Detailed paragraph about citation placement
+                "style_consistency_analysis": str,  # Detailed paragraph about style consistency
                 "cross_reference_accuracy": str  # Detailed paragraph about cross-reference accuracy
             }},
-            
             "summary": str  # Overall assessment paragraph
         }}
 
-        Important: Generate at least 10-15 improvement suggestions across different sections and categories.
-        Each suggestion should be specific, actionable, and include clear explanations of how it enhances citation formatting.
+        Important: Generate at least 10-15 improvement suggestions across different categories, focusing only on in-text citations.
+        Each suggestion should be specific, actionable, and include clear explanations of how it enhances in-text citation formatting and consistency.
         """
         
         try:
@@ -94,14 +84,8 @@ class CitationFormattingAgent(BaseReviewerAgent):
             "improvement_suggestions": [],
             "detailed_feedback": {
                 "in_text_citation_format": "",
-                "reference_list_format": "",
-                "citation_style_consistency": "",
-                "reference_completeness": "",
-                "doi_url_formatting": "",
-                "author_name_formatting": "",
-                "publication_date_formatting": "",
-                "journal_name_formatting": "",
-                "volume_issue_page_formatting": "",
+                "placement_analysis": "",
+                "style_consistency_analysis": "",
                 "cross_reference_accuracy": ""
             },
             "summary": f"Error in analysis: {error_message}",

Agent1_Peer_Review/src/reviewer_agents/writing/W8_visual_presentation_agent.py

@@ -1,168 +0,0 @@
-from typing import Dict, Any, List
-import json
-from PIL import Image
-import io
-from ...core.base_agent import BaseReviewerAgent
-
-class VisualPresentationAgentW8(BaseReviewerAgent):
-    """Agent responsible for evaluating visual presentation elements in the manuscript."""
-    
-    def __init__(self, model="gpt-4.1-nano"):
-        super().__init__(model)
-        self.name = "W8_Visual_Presentation_Agent"
-        self.category = "Writing and Presentation"
-    
-    def analyze_visual_presentation(self, text: str, research_type: str,
-                                  images: List[Dict[str, Any]] = None,
-                                  tables: List[Dict[str, Any]] = None) -> Dict[str, Any]:
-        """Analyzes the quality, clarity, and effectiveness of visual elements in the manuscript.
-        
-        Args:
-            text (str): The manuscript text
-            research_type (str): Type of research paper
-            images (List[Dict[str, Any]], optional): List of extracted images with metadata
-            tables (List[Dict[str, Any]], optional): List of extracted tables with metadata
-        """
-        # Prepare image and table information for analysis
-        image_info = self._format_image_info(images) if images else []
-        table_info = self._format_table_info(tables) if tables else []
-        
-        prompt = f"""Analyze the visual presentation quality and effectiveness of the following manuscript.
-        The manuscript contains {len(image_info)} figures and {len(table_info)} tables.
-        
-        Manuscript Text: {text}
-        Research Type: {research_type}
-        
-        Figures Information:
-        {json.dumps(image_info, indent=2)}
-        
-        Tables Information:
-        {json.dumps(table_info, indent=2)}
-        
-        Focus on:
-        1. Figure quality and clarity
-        2. Table formatting and readability
-        3. Visual element placement
-        4. Caption completeness
-        5. Color scheme appropriateness
-        6. Data visualization effectiveness
-        7. Visual hierarchy
-        8. Accessibility considerations
-        9. Consistency in visual style
-        10. Integration with text
-        
-        For each section, provide specific improvement suggestions. Consider:
-        - Figures: Quality, clarity, resolution, and effectiveness
-        - Tables: Formatting, readability, and structure
-        - Diagrams: Clarity and information density
-        - Charts: Data representation and interpretation
-        - Visual consistency: Style and formatting across elements
-        - Accessibility: Color contrast and readability
-        - Integration: How well visuals support the text
-        - Captions: Completeness and clarity
-        
-        Provide a detailed analysis in the following JSON format:
-        {{
-            "visual_presentation_score": int,  # Single comprehensive score (1-5)
-            
-            "critical_remarks": [{{
-                "category": str,  # Category of the issue
-                "location": str,  # Specific figure/table reference
-                "issue": str,  # Detailed description
-                "severity": str,  # "high", "medium", "low"
-                "impact": str  # How this affects reader understanding
-            }}],
-            
-            "improvement_suggestions": [{{
-                "original_text": str,  # Current caption/reference
-                "improved_version": str,  # Suggested improvement
-                "explanation": str,  # Why this helps
-                "location": str,  # Where to apply
-                "category": str,  # Element type
-                "focus": str  # Aspect being improved
-            }}],
-            
-            "detailed_feedback": {{
-                "figure_quality": str,
-                "table_formatting": str,
-                "visual_placement": str,
-                "caption_completeness": str,
-                "color_scheme": str,
-                "data_visualization": str,
-                "visual_hierarchy": str,
-                "accessibility": str,
-                "visual_consistency": str,
-                "text_integration": str
-            }},
-            
-            "summary": str  # Overall assessment
-        }}
-        """
-        
-        try:
-            response = self.llm(prompt)
-            analysis = json.loads(response)
-            return analysis
-        except Exception as e:
-            return self._generate_error_report(f"Error analyzing visual presentation: {str(e)}")
-    
-    def _format_image_info(self, images: List[Dict[str, Any]]) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
-        """Format image information for analysis."""
-        formatted_images = []
-        for img in images:
-            # Create PIL Image from image data if available
-            image_stats = {}
-            if img.get('image_data'):
-                try:
-                    pil_image = Image.open(io.BytesIO(img['image_data']))
-                    image_stats = {
-                        'size': pil_image.size,
-                        'mode': pil_image.mode,
-                        'format': pil_image.format
-                    }
-                except Exception:
-                    image_stats = {'error': 'Failed to analyze image data'}
-            
-            formatted_images.append({
-                'page': img.get('page'),
-                'index': img.get('index'),
-                'caption': img.get('caption', ''),
-                'location': f"Page {img.get('page')}, Figure {img.get('index')}",
-                'stats': image_stats
-            })
-        return formatted_images
-    
-    def _format_table_info(self, tables: List[Dict[str, Any]]) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
-        """Format table information for analysis."""
-        formatted_tables = []
-        for table in tables:
-            formatted_tables.append({
-                'page': table.get('page'),
-                'index': table.get('index'),
-                'caption': table.get('caption', ''),
-                'location': f"Page {table.get('page')}, Table {table.get('index')}",
-                'content_preview': table.get('text', '')[:200] + '...' if table.get('text') else ''
-            })
-        return formatted_tables
-    
-    def _generate_error_report(self, error_message: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
-        """Generate a structured error report."""
-        return {
-            'visual_presentation_score': 0,
-            'critical_remarks': [],
-            'improvement_suggestions': [],
-            'detailed_feedback': {
-                'figure_quality': '',
-                'table_formatting': '',
-                'visual_placement': '',
-                'caption_completeness': '',
-                'color_scheme': '',
-                'data_visualization': '',
-                'visual_hierarchy': '',
-                'accessibility': '',
-                'visual_consistency': '',
-                'text_integration': ''
-            },
-            'summary': f"Error in analysis: {error_message}",
-            'error': True
-        } 

Agent1_Peer_Review/src/run_analysis.py

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ This script runs the manuscript analysis using all agents and saves the results
 in three category-specific JSON files:
 - section_results.json: Results from section agents (S1-S10)
 - rigor_results.json: Results from rigor agents (R1-R7)
-- writing_results.json: Results from writing agents (W1-W8)
+- writing_results.json: Results from writing agents (W1-W7)
 """
 
 import argparse

Agent1_Peer_Review/src/utils/combine_results.py

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env python3
 """
-Combine Results
+Utility functions for combining results from different agents.
 
-This script combines individual agent results into three separate JSON files:
+Input files:
 - section_results.json: Results from section agents (S1-S10)
 - rigor_results.json: Results from rigor agents (R1-R7)
-- writing_results.json: Results from writing agents (W1-W8)
+- writing_results.json: Results from writing agents (W1-W7)
 """
 
 import json

README.md

@@ -1,15 +1,13 @@
 # Rigorous - AI-Powered Scientific Manuscript Analysis
 
-This repository contains a comprehensive suite of tools aimed at liberating science by making scientific publishing more transparent, cheaper, faster, and ensuring rigorous peer and AI review.
+> **Note:** This repository is currently private but is intended to be released as open source once the first functional version is made public on [https://www.rigorous.company/](https://www.rigorous.company/). We believe in transparency for how ratings and reviews are conducted, and we encourage others to experiment with and improve the code to advance open, rigorous peer review in science.
+
+This repository contains tools for making scientific publishing more transparent, cheaper, faster, and ensuring rigorous peer and AI review.
 
 ## Project Structure
 
-- **Agent1_Peer_Review**: Advanced peer review system with specialized agents for comprehensive manuscript analysis
-- **Agent2_Outlet_Fit**: (In Planning) Tool for evaluating manuscript fit with target journals/conferences
-- **V2_Editorial_First_Decision_Support**: Tool for checking manuscripts against editorial requirements
-- **V3_Peer_Review**: Enhanced tool for comprehensive peer review of academic manuscripts
-- **V4_Multi-Agent**: Advanced multi-agent system for collaborative peer review with specialized AI reviewers
-- **V5_Multi-Agent2**: Comprehensive multi-agent system with 25 specialized agents for more detailed, reliable, and specific feedback
+- **Agent1_Peer_Review**: Advanced peer review system with specialized agents for comprehensive manuscript analysis, detailed feedback, and professional PDF report generation.
+- **Agent2_Outlet_Fit**: (In Planning) Tool for evaluating manuscript fit with target journals/conferences.
 
 ## Current Status
 
@@ -18,6 +16,7 @@ This repository contains a comprehensive suite of tools aimed at liberating scie
   - Comprehensive manuscript analysis with specialized agents
   - Detailed feedback on sections, scientific rigor, and writing quality
   - JSON output with actionable recommendations
+  - PDF report generation (see below)
 
 ### In Development
 - **Agent2_Outlet_Fit**: 🚧 In Planning Phase
@@ -25,178 +24,48 @@ This repository contains a comprehensive suite of tools aimed at liberating scie
   - Support journals/conferences in desk rejection decisions
   - Enable researchers to pre-check manuscripts before submission
 
-## Shared Configuration
+## PDF Report Generation
 
-The project uses a shared `.env` file at the root level that contains configuration for all tools:
+This project includes a PDF report generator that creates a professional peer review report based on the outputs of the review agents.
 
-```bash
-# OpenAI API Key
-OPENAI_API_KEY=your_api_key_here
-```
+### How to Generate the PDF Report
 
-This shared configuration allows you to use the same API key across all versions of the tools without duplicating it in multiple locations.
+1. Ensure you have the required dependencies installed:
+   - `reportlab`
+   - `pillow`
+   - (Other dependencies as listed in requirements.txt)
 
-## Installation
+2. Make sure the following files are present and up to date:
+   - `executive_summary.json` (executive summary and overall scores)
+   - `quality_control_results.json` (detailed section, rigor, and writing results)
+   - `logo.png` (logo for the report header)
 
-1. Clone the repository
-2. Create a `.env` file in the root directory with your OpenAI API key
-3. Install the required dependencies for each tool:
+3. Run the PDF generator script:
 
-```bash
-# For V2_Editorial_First_Decision_Support
-cd V2_Editorial_First_Decision_Support
-pip install -r requirements.txt
+   ```bash
+   python Agent1_Peer_Review/pdf_generator.py
+   ```
 
-# For V3_Peer_Review
-cd V3_Peer_Review
-pip install -r requirements.txt
+4. The generated PDF will be saved to:
+   - `Agent1_Peer_Review/results/review_report.pdf`
 
-# For V4_Multi-Agent
-cd V4_multi_agent
-pip install -r requirements.txt
-```
+### Features
+- Cover page with logo, manuscript title, and overall scores
+- Executive summary and detailed analysis pages for all assessment items (S1–S10, R1–R7, W1–W7)
+- Visually appealing tables for scores and suggestions
+- Professional layout, color coding, and consistent formatting
 
-## Usage
+For more details, see the comments in `Agent1_Peer_Review/pdf_generator.py`.
 
-### Agent1_Peer_Review
+## Minimal Reference to Earlier Iterations
 
-This tool provides comprehensive manuscript analysis using specialized agents.
+Earlier iterations of the peer review system can be found in the `backup` folder:
+- **V2_Editorial_First_Decision_Support**: Tool for checking manuscripts against editorial requirements.
+- **V3_Peer_Review**: Enhanced tool for comprehensive peer review of academic manuscripts.
+- **V4_Multi-Agent**: Advanced multi-agent system for collaborative peer review with specialized AI reviewers.
+- **V5_Multi-Agent2**: Comprehensive multi-agent system with 25 specialized agents for more detailed, reliable, and specific feedback.
 
-1. Place your PDF manuscript in the `manuscripts` directory
-2. Run the analysis:
-```bash
-cd Agent1_Peer_Review
-python run_analysis.py
-```
-
-The analysis will generate detailed reports in the `results` directory, including:
-- Section-specific analysis (S1-S10)
-- Scientific rigor assessment (R1-R7)
-- Writing quality evaluation (W1-W8)
-
-### Agent2_Outlet_Fit (Coming Soon)
-
-This tool will help evaluate manuscript fit with target journals/conferences.
-
-**Planned Features:**
-- Automatic extraction of journal-specific publishing criteria
-- Manuscript evaluation against target outlet requirements
-- Desk rejection risk assessment
-- Specific improvement suggestions
-
-### V2_Editorial_First_Decision_Support
-
-This tool checks manuscripts against a set of editorial requirements.
-
-1. Place your PDF manuscripts in the `manuscripts` directory
-2. Create a requirements file (e.g., `requirements_1.txt`)
-3. Run the tool:
-```bash
-cd V2_Editorial_First_Decision_Support
-python src/main.py --requirements requirements_1.txt
-```
-
-### V3_Peer_Review
-
-This tool performs comprehensive peer reviews of academic manuscripts.
-
-1. Place your PDF manuscripts in the `manuscripts` directory
-2. (Optional) Customize the review criteria in `review_criteria.json`
-3. Run the tool:
-```bash
-cd V3_Peer_Review
-python src/main.py --criteria review_criteria.json
-```
-
-### V4_Multi-Agent
-
-The V4 system implements a sophisticated multi-agent approach to peer review, where specialized AI agents collaborate to provide comprehensive manuscript evaluation.
-
-#### Key Features:
-- Multiple specialized reviewer agents (Language, Methodology, Ethics)
-- Coordinated review process with synthesis
-- Detailed individual reviews from each agent
-- Comprehensive final report with actionable insights
-
-#### Running the System:
-1. Place your manuscript in the `manuscripts` directory
-2. Ensure review criteria are set in `review_criteria.txt`
-3. Run the tool:
-```bash
-cd V4_multi_agent
-python src/main.py --manuscript manuscripts/your_paper.pdf --criteria review_criteria.txt --output output/review_results.json
-```
-
-#### Arguments:
-- `--manuscript`: Path to the PDF manuscript
-- `--criteria`: Path to review criteria file (default: review_criteria.txt)
-- `--output`: Path for saving review results
-
-#### System Components:
-
-1. **Editor Agent** (`editor_agent.py`):
-   - Analyzes manuscript requirements
-   - Creates specialized review teams
-   - Manages review workflow
-
-2. **Specialized Review Agents** (`specialized_agent.py`):
-   - Language and Clarity Expert
-   - Methodology Expert
-   - Ethics and Compliance Expert
-   - Domain-specific reviewers (as needed)
-
-3. **Coordinator Agent** (`coordinator_agent.py`):
-   - Synthesizes individual reviews
-   - Resolves conflicting feedback
-   - Generates final recommendations
-
-4. **Support Components**:
-   - `pdf_parser.py`: PDF document processing
-   - `review_criteria_parser.py`: Review criteria management
-   - `openai_client.py`: AI model interactions
-
-#### Output Files:
-- `review_plan.json`: Initial review strategy
-- Individual agent reviews (e.g., `language_reviewer_review.json`)
-- `specialized_reviews.json`: All specialized reviews
-- `synthesis.json`: Coordinated synthesis
-- `review_results.json`: Final comprehensive report
-
-### V5_Multi-Agent2
-
-The V5 system represents a significant advancement over previous versions, featuring a comprehensive suite of 25 specialized agents that provide more reliable, specific, and actionable feedback.
-
-#### Key Features:
-- **Three Categories of Specialized Agents**:
-  - **Section Agents (S1-S10)**: Analyze specific sections (Title/Keywords, Abstract, Introduction, etc.)
-  - **Rigor Agents (R1-R7)**: Evaluate scientific rigor (Originality, Ethics, Data Availability, etc.)
-  - **Writing Agents (W1-W8)**: Assess writing quality (Language, Structure, Clarity, etc.)
-- **Comprehensive Report**: Detailed assessment with scores, critical remarks, and improvement suggestions
-- **Modular Design**: Easy to extend with new specialized agents
-- **Better Reliability**: Multiple specialized agents provide more consistent and reliable feedback
-- **Actionable Feedback**: Specific, section-focused recommendations for manuscript improvement
-
-#### Running the System:
-1. Place your manuscript PDF in the `manuscripts/` directory
-2. Run the analysis:
-```bash
-cd V5_multi_agent2
-python run_analysis.py
-```
-3. Generate the report:
-```bash
-bash scripts/generate_report.sh
-```
-
-The comprehensive report will be saved in `results/manuscript_report.md`.
-
-#### Advanced Features:
-- Support for more powerful models (GPT-4, Claude) for enhanced analysis
-- Configurable agent behavior through environment variables
-- Extensible architecture for adding domain-specific agents
-
-#### Why V5 Is Better:
-Through development and testing, we found that having a larger number of highly specialized agents produces more reliable and specific feedback compared to fewer general-purpose agents. Each agent in V5 focuses on a narrow aspect of the manuscript, allowing for deeper analysis and more precise recommendations.
+These are provided for reference only and are not part of the current production workflow.
 
 ## Requirements